| |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Browse |
|
|
|
|
|
Live |
|
|
|
|
Dating |
|
|
|
|
News |
|
|
|
|
Alt |
|
|
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
|
|
Safety |
|
|
|
|
Toys |
|
|
|
|
Forums |
|
|
|
|
Friends |
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Welcome |
|
|
|
|
Join |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Login |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|  | |  | |  | |  | |  | | | |  | |  | |  | |
|
|
|
|
|
The text below is mostly for nostalgia purposes at this point. :) Not that it isn't still applicable for the most part, but I'm quite content as is. Heck, save for the shared humor with friends from reinvigorating this profile, I'm likely to still mostly be a ghost.
Cheers!
---------------------
Photographer, existential nihilist, misanthrope. My life revolves mainly around the appreciation of artistry and intellect, and I relish connecting with people who are immersed in both.
Dynamic relationships, for me, are about the expression of innate qualities. I gravitate towards M/s interactions because I have a natural tendency to lean towards a pretty comprehensive system of control and guardianship (and doting) in relationships. I'm not really into the dynamic issue for its allure as much as because it happens to be what I feel most at home with. I've found myself particularly content in poly-family (polyfidelitous) relationships before and would enjoy approaching that again under the right circumstances.
I'm a heavy critical thinker. It's one of the primary motivations that fuels my leaning towards the guidance/guardianship aspect of M/s and, while I've discovered some people don't have specific interest in that aspect of the relationship, skill at decision-making is a paramount prerequisite to me. The fact that I'd be making the decisions should mean I'm competent in that department.
I am most in tune with dynamics that are validated by the quiet moments of compatibility, rather than by conflict/correction dynamics. This means that I'm not really interested in having to woo you daily with my superior dominant talents nor am I interested in needing to "put you in your place" in order for you to "feel" submissive. The relationship would best be validated in something as innocuous as a mutual look across a room that speaks to the comfortable contentment of the dynamic being what it is. I decree, after concerted thought as to what the best decision for the relationship is, and you follow knowing that I've done so. It should be a group effort. I wield because it's who I am; you yield because it's who you are.
I'm a creative (photography), intellectual sort. I have a living situation that is comfortable with select luxuries and indulgences. Essentially, it's just missing a well-jigsawed partner to complement it.
And, speaking of intellectually motivated, I'm completely dismissive of the nonsensical idea that a slave-leaning s-type has to be "strong-willed" in order to actually have intellectual skill. Any s-type who feels the need to adopt some aggressive/assertive demeanor because they cannot differentiate bravado from intellect is missing the very sort of intellect I'd adore and appreciate.
I think that may cover it for now till I decide I want to babble in greater detail. If there's anything you think I may have missed, ask. :)
I'm also open to meeting potential artistic muses here, so meander through my website (nihiluszero.com) if you think that might be up your alley.
Cheers,
~Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
