MasterTone

I was happy to met seraphimm over the weekend. Delightful girl

I have decided to re visit taking a girl for a REAL M/s D/s relationship. I enjoy that training and creating a slave so someone who is into TPE is a must. Also if you are looking for love I am not for you, just need to make that clear. D/s relationship is what I seek

I was walking down the street yesterday and saw a young woman with a tat of the words Daddys Girl and a slave number under it, was very hard not to stop here and chat

Is being able to control some ones orgasm that rare? The more people I speak to never seem to think it is possible.

Maybe why it never works for them is they are so closed minded

Yes I have train many girls to cum at my command without touching. It is not a ??miracle just a skill. I have not seen Mars, but I still believe it exists.

Open your mind to the possibilities..

Is it this site or is it a trend in the lifestyle?

Over the last year I have noticed a increasing arrogance and defensive attitude in people. It seems respect is not common place in the world today, surely as people we all the right respect. At least when meeting someone. Of course if they prove worthy of not having respect then certainly do not give it.

It just seems to me that people are so defensive here. That they will look to be confrontational at the very first word.

Every should treat the other in how they deserve to be treated. If you meet someone down the street are you naturally defensive?

Lift your act people

FUCKING FAKES

A slave does NOT give up thinking and reasoning and become mindless.  This is the biggest misconception of slavery.  It is a false charge that has been leveled at slaves mostly by cyber-subs and part time players as self-justification for their lack of total commitment.   If a cyber-sub can make a slave look mindless then she can justify why she is better than a totally committed slave and supplies a reason why she calls herself a submissive.  She reasons that "Naturally a good Master would not want a mindless slave, they surely would want a thinking cyber-sub instead."  It’s a late addition to lifestyle thinking and only stated by some submissives.  Generally, well informed submissives that feel secure in the lifestyle don’t try to blast slaves.  It’s usually "wannabes."

How many times have we have the discussion about Slaves v submissive and what constitutes the difference. Personally I have heard people label themselves a "slave" and yet and miles apart in values and beliefs from the next "slave" that is why I find it pointless to label it as one of submissive or slave. But I recently came across this saying while searching for the history of TPE and I find it to be IN MY VIEW a great way to define a slave and submissive

"One definition of a slave vs. a submissive is based upon the focus of the submissive.  If the focus is on self then you are a submissive, if the focus is on your Master, then you are a slave.   I am not sure that this is a complete definition for each one, however it is one dividing line between the two."

Dunno, can a sub be focused on herself? Is she even submissive or is her want a kink or fetish

I am constantly amazed at the uneducated

I loved this text about cuckolds

A cuckold fetishist is aware of the spouse's activity and derives sexual pleasure from it.^[4] This knowledge and tolerance of the spouse's activities makes the person in such relationships a wittol, properly speaking. But among fetishists the pose of reluctance—the victimization of the cuckold—is a major element of the kink so the more familiar word is used. In the fetish cuckolding subculture, the female is typically sexually dominant, while the man takes on a submissive role, only becoming involved with her or her lover when she permits it—sometimes remaining altogether celibate. Other arrangements are certainly possible, however, as wives can have husbands who take female lovers with their full knowledge.

The wife who enjoys cuckolding her husband is sometimes referred to as a hotwife or cuckoldress.^[5]

 Theories in evolutionary psychology

In his book Sperm Wars, biologist Robin Baker speculated that the excitement and stimulation of the cuckolding fetish emerges from the biology of sexuality and the effects of sexual arousal on the brain. According to his theory, when a man believes that his female mate may have been sexual with another man, the man mate is prompted by biological urges to copulate with the female, in an effort to "compete" with the other man's sperm. The effects of sperm competition are well documented.^[6] Further, when initiating sex, the man mate thrusts harder, deeper and longer, in efforts to remove the sperm of the other man and is biologically driven to have sex multiple times. While he may be unable to have sex more than once under usual circumstances, the cuckolded man is prone to repeated sexual efforts. Meanwhile, the wife enjoys greater sexual stimulation, first by her other lover and second by her cuckolded husband. In addition, the wife enjoys the neurochemical "highs" triggered by entering into a romantic or physical relationship with another lover. These highs include the effects of oxytocin other neurochemicals which trigger excitement, euphoria and other feelings common to the beginnings of romantic relationships. These neurochemicals change over time and as a relationship persists, with neurochemicals changing to ones that promote bonding, planning and nurturing. When a new lover is taken, it triggers the neurochemicals of a new relationship, bringing home excitement to her husband.^[7]

The above exposition is contradicated by the hypothesized foundations for jealousy in evolutionary psychology, which is rooted in the idea that men specifically will react jealously to sexual infidelity on the parts of their mates.^[8] suggesting that differential responses to jealousy are possible and perhaps even adaptive.