| |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Browse |
|
|
|
|
|
Live |
|
|
|
|
Join |
|
Collarspace |
|
|
|
|
Dating |
|
|
|
|
News |
|
|
|
|
Glossary |
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
|
|
Alt |
|
|
|
|
Safety |
|
|
|
|
Toys |
|
|
|
|
Live BDSM |
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Welcome |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Login |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Male Dominant, 23, Altamonte Springs, Florida
|
Male Dominant, 54, Florida Panhandle, Florida
|
Male Dominant, 41
| | |
|
| Back |
| KPM |
| Directory |
| Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
About MasterDarkSadist
Hi, welcome to my profile....maybe.
I am a sadistic bastard looking for a pain-slut submissive female to enjoy tormenting on a regular basis. Im very much looking for a girl who likes pain and submission quite a lot. Casual play is fine, as long as you like being marked up.
Ideally, Id like to find a self-sufficient girl who has her stuff together and loves to please.
If you want to know more, message me. Im not looking for an internet thing. I do have snapchat and if we get off to a good start, I would prefer to move the conversation there.
|
|
|
|
|
If you noticed that the last journal entry was way back in 2009, you are right. Up until recently, I haven't really been in a position to look for other submissive girls.
I met my slave that year, and have spent the last 5 years training her. Now that she's at a mental place that allows me more freedom to expand my horizons, I am doing so.
My reasons are two fold.
1) Philosophically, no Master should only have one girl. This is due to the "expectations" that being the sole recipient of one's ministrations tends to create. A slave cannot own their Master, therefore they cannot dictate who, what, where, or when their Master decides to play, fuck, or flirt with another. The only expectation a slave has, is that they will be cared for by their owner. I intend to do that, but I also intend to make sure my slave knows she is a slave, in every way. One piece of that is understanding fully that she has no control over me whatsoever. This is just as important as my total control of her. If she can expect anything besides that she is required to be at my side whenever I beckon, I have failed. So far, that does not seem to be true.
2) I want to play with other girls. That's enough. See above.
I've also purchased a house, gutted and remodeled the entire thing, and created a nice play space in my bedroom that serves as a dungeon when I need it to. (see pictures).
So, now that I have my ducks lining up, I have time and energy to bring another submissive into my life. Depending on how things go, that might lead to a place at my side, or it might only lead to being play partners. Those details will be figured out on an individual basis.
If you are intrigued by what I have written so far, send me a message. The worst that can happen is we don't have any chemistry and we stop talking. Nothing lost, nothing gained. Can't gain if you don't try though. |
| |
| |
|
|
I am going to concede that there are no longer any actual submissives on this site that are: 1. Not fake bullshit ads 2. Not so jaded that they think all dom's are evil bastards that want to steal their souls 3. Feel that a dom must write a novel to someone who he doesn't know, about useless crap in order to even manage a reply.
Don't take this as me being upset, it's just frustrating as finding someone shouldn't be made more difficult than it is already, considering what a small community we are part of. |
| |
| |
|
|
To:? All submissives From:? Me
I am through playing this game of writing e-mails that are boringly specific to what you have said about yourself in your profile.? I don't go around e-mailing the entirety of collarme for the simple reason that there are many on here that do not interest me.? Furthermore, I don't do one night stands.? I don't enjoy them.? I don't enjoy the risk of them.? I just don't enjoy the bullshit of it.? With that in mind, if you recieve an e-mail from me, it means that I have already done the following: 1.? Read your profile. 2.? Looked at your pictures 3.? Looked at your profile again to make sure that it is possible that you have what it takes to have a relationship with me.
Given that I have done my research on each and every person who I have e-mailed, feel special that I sent you something at all.? It is me trying to see if you are going to respond.? I'm not going to spend 30 minutes typing something to someone who is just going to delete it, or not even open it (which most of you do).? Hell, you could fairly easily spend one minute and reply with a "not interested."? I'd be ok with that.? I like upfront people.
MDS
P.s.? Honestly...how do you expect to be any more special than just someone who MIGHT be compatible with me?? I don't know you.? Until I know you, how can I find you to be any different than anyone else in the entire world?? That's really demanding the impossible.? Talk to me, and let's see where it goes.? Or not.?
|
| |
| |
|
|
Categories were developed to define something in order to easily
recognize or understand its inherent nature without the need for
lengthy definitions. They were never expected to be a pinpoint
definition of something, more as a general way of distinguishing the
differences between things at a glance.
I have noticed that many in this lifestyle, which at its core is
hierarchal in nature, abhors categorization. This does not make sense
to me. Without categories, nothing can be classified. I could not
easily distinguish myself as someone who lives it 24/7 from someone who
just play in the bedroom. I could not easily distinguish myself from a
submissive. Maybe this is the goal, I don't know. I prefer to have a
general knowledge about what particular role someone gravitates
towards, so that I may understand their line of thinking, and if I am
looking at a potential partner, be able to understand what it is I am
dealing with. I don't want a bottom, nor a submissive. Without those
labels, I would not be able to distinguish those who just like to play
a bit, those who enjoy submissive type relationships from those who are
looking to be a slave. Submissives and bottoms would not enjoy a
relationship with me. They would find it too confining. In the end,
categorization helps them, and it helps me. What is the problem with
this?
Just because a submissive is capable of going from submissive to
slave (or the other way), does not mean that categorization has failed.
It only means that things change, people evolve in their mindsets, and
people learn about themselves. They mature. They grow. It is not the
end-all of definitions. This is why we have profiles, likes/dislikes
charts/lists, etc. This is why we have scene negotiations. The problem
is that sometimes it is not necessary to know the intimate details of
one's particular personality. When going to a local club, and talking
with people and getting to know them, it is helpful to understand that
one is submissive/dominant/master/mistress in order to understand where
their particular point of view comes from, however it is superfluous to
have to spend 30 minutes discussing what everyone is by unique traits
when "I am a sub/dom/master/mistress/slave" would be completely
adequate.
Categories do not limit a person in who they are. They are truly
only a simple way to expedite communication of mindset in order to get
on with a discussion without having to re-define yourself each time you
talk to someone. When someone tells you that they are submissive, you
immediately understand some inherent general traits about them. You
understand that trying to talk about dominant specific topics/ideas
might be lost on them. You also understand that they are not dominant.
You understand that their thoughts are coming from a person who
understands the submissive mindset, but most likely not the mindset of
a Master. Conversely, a Master is not going to understand the mindset
of a bottom, nor is a top going to understand the mindset of a slave.
These people are basically incompatible with each other outside of
friendship. A top is not going to be happy dealing with a slave
personality on a long term, daily basis. This is not a good fit. A
slave is not going to have their needs met by a top. Sure, they might
be able to play together, and enjoy each other's company, but the basis
of the relationship is imbalanced. Think of it as a see saw. Each party
should be spaced at a distance that keeps the thing balanced. Should
one side be too far out, they will have more pull and they will lift
the other out of their place. An imbalanced relationship is an unhappy
relationship. It doesn't matter how extreme the individuals are, if as
a couple they balance each other out and in that harmony, they are
happy.
Categories speed up the process by which we understand some inherent
qualities about something. The smart ones among us will realize that
they are not 100% accurate, however they are a good starting point from
which to gage the compatibility of a potential mate, to set the tone
for a conversation, or to set the tone during scene negotiations.
Categories are needed, useful, and necessary no matter how someone
hates to be tossed into one. Embrace your category, and realize that it
does not define you, only helps to situate you within a general space
within the lifestyle.
|
| |
| |
|
|
Honesty about one's self is paramount to having a working relationship within this lifestyle.? I have met many "submissives" who are not actually submissive.? They are bottoms.? They play at being a submissive because somehow they view being a bottom as some sort of horrific existence, when in reality if they were honest about who they are and what they want to get out of their time spent.? If you are wanting to find yourself, that is one thing.......and here is the key.....be honest about not knowing what it is you are....instead of trying to dodge some imaginary stigma.? Maybe what you need, and what you want are two different things.? Needs and wants can cohabitate, however not fufilling needs will be detrimental to your being, while not fufilling a want can make one sad, it cannot, nor ever will be, a true impediment to life.? Decide what you need, and what you want...and that might just lead you to who you actually are.? The sooner you figure that out, the sooner you will find contentment.
|
| |
| |
|
|
"I'm a submissive, not a doormat." Obviously, or you would have some clever slogan or a "wipe paws" thingy written on you. Good thing too, as it might be a painful endevour.
While I agree that no submissive/slave/bottom/what-have-you should be required to submit to everyone, all the time, for no reason except another says that they are Dominant.....haven't we taken this a bit too far? I mean to say that "i'm not a doormat" being said to another can be taken (and used a few different ways). It can mean, "please don't assume i will submit to just anyone." It can also mean "leave me alone, you trolling perv." The problem with catchy sayings such as "i'm not a doormat" is that they stick (such is the point of catchy phrases). However, using a catchy phrase such as this removes the necessity to really say what you are trying to say. Instead of telling someone that they have found that they can only truly submit to someone that they respect, and that they believe respect is something that is earned, not demanded, they just say "i'm not a doormat." If you have an IQ above 50, then I am sure you see where I am going with this. 99.99999% of Dominants who are worth their salt will tell you that they prefer direct, concise, clear communication. Catchy phrases that can be (and are) used in many different ways to convey many different meanings, mean nothing when they are analyzed. So the bottom line is this: say what you mean, in your own words. I swear, the next sub that I hear "i'm not a doormat" from, (if I had my way, which I don't...or things would be different) would be made to be a doormat for a day and realize that 1. they aren't a doormat, and 2. comparing themselves to an inanimate object who's sole purpose is to wipe grime off the bottom of shoes, means completely nothing. The English language is vast, and having at least a minor grasp of it is somewhat useful. |
| |
| |
|
|
Submission as a gift eh??
Websters dictionary defines a gift as the following:
1.? Something given voluntarily without payment in return, as to show favor towards someone, honor an occasion, or make a gesture of assistance; present.
2.? The act of giving.
3.? Something bestowed or acquired without any particular effort by the recipient or without its being earned.
4.? A special ability or capacity.?
So, when someone says that their submission is a gift to the Dominant, they are saying that they expect nothing in return, which is a bald faced lie.? They expect to be dominated, which is what they desire (or they would not be submissive in the first place).? They expect certain things from the Dominant (don't kill me, don't send me to the hospital, don't give me an STD, etc).? So, when a submissive submits to a Dominant, they are not giving the Dominant a gift, they are merely fulfilling their inborn wants, needs, and desires.?
The phrase "my submission is a gift" (to be given to a Dominant whom I respect) is actually trying to accomplish two things.? 1.? To make their submission somehow special, or different from a normal relationship.? or 2.? Make the Dominant feel indebted to the submissive for "giving" themselves.?
First off, if you are submissive, it is in your nature to submit, so you are not giving freely without expectation of anything given in return.? Second, if you feel like you have to make your Dominant feel a debt to you for giving yourself, maybe you should reevaluate yourself.? If you have to compel anyone to stay with you for any reason besides they enjoy your company (for whatever reason), then you are probably not right for each other.?
|
| |
| |
|
|
On the topic of submissives.? I honestly believe that there are people who enjoy being submissive, because they like giving up control SOME OF THE TIME.? When this situation occurs, it is all about what they want to experience, even if they don't wish to be in control of it.? This is a selfish act, because it is about what they want, not what they need.? However, just because it is a purely selfish act, does not mean that it is wrong of them to want it.? All I want is this whole "submission is a gift" crap to end.? Submission is not a gift, if it is truely in one's nature to submit, then it is not about "giving" anything to the Dom........it is about experiencing what they as the submissive wants (or there would be no scene negotiation, etc). ?
|
| |
| |
|
|
So what does it mean to be a slave, or conversely, what does it mean to be a Master?? This question makes me wonder if there are many people out there who actually understand what they are saying when they are a Master or a slave.? Are you in the life for the pure kink of it?? Then I don't think you qualify as a Master or a slave.? Are you in it for the subspace, what you get out of it?? Then I don't think you qualify as a Master/slave.?
Here is what I think makes one a Master or a slave, and it has nothing to do with experience, age, etc.? It has to do with one question;? Is this who you naturally are, who you need to be?? If you are not naturally submissive or dominant, then you cannot be a Master or a slave.? It is as simple as that.?
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Male Dominant, 61, Las Vegas, Nevada
|
Male Dominant, 36
|
Male Dominant, 58, Columbia, Maryland
|
Male Submissive, 41, Dorset
| | |
Male Dominant, 42, winchester, Virginia
|
Male Dominant, 50, harrisburg, Pennsylvania
|
Male Submissive, 48, San Francisco, California
|
Male Dominant, 43
| | |
Dominant Couple, 45
|
Male Dominant, 49, Dundee
|
Male Dominant, 34
|
Male Dominant, 60, Quebec
| | |
|
|
|
|