| |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Browse |
|
|
|
|
|
Dating |
|
|
|
|
Live |
|
|
|
|
News |
|
|
|
|
Alt |
|
|
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
|
|
Safety |
|
|
|
|
Toys |
|
|
|
|
Forums |
|
|
|
|
Friends |
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Welcome |
|
|
|
|
Join |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Login |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello.
A few basics about me you wont glean from the checklist inside: I'm employed, I work out almost daily, I drink very little, I dont smoke and I don't do recreational drugs. I can be sarcastic but not biting, I'm resourceful, and would probably be considered a little geeky, but not in a pocket-protector way. I'm a veteran, a romantic, and musically-inclined. I love to teach, guide, protect and nurture. I value my privacy, I'm always on time, and I love variety in every part of my life.
I am not married, nor in a relationship, and live with no one. I look and act years younger than my chornological age.
I am highly competent.
I have more than two decades experience as a dominant in real-time ownership relationships. I'm a control freak. I'm a dedicated voyeur. I'm not a heavy sadist, but it's not going to hurt my feelings to be the instrument of your tears, either.
Kink is great, but I am primarily here for a power-exchange relationship.
A rough sketch of the woman I want to meet:
Your age is less than mine. You are employed or retired. You value and exhibit humility. You love to learn. You love music (if you sing or play something, even better). Youre not a girlie-girl. I particularly like natural (no makeup) women, comfortable just being their unadorned selves. You work at being fit and healthy. You are not in a relationship and are over the last one. No smoking, heavy drinking or recreational drugs.
What kind of relationship do I want? I am not even sure how its described anymore the last time I spent any significant time on BDSM websites, submissivewomenspeak was still a thing. I would call my role a benevolent authority figure (and yes, I have some DD in me), in something approaching a long-term 24-7 TPE with a good bit of kink mixed in, involving two mature adults.
I have no interest in an online-only relationship. If we are a significant distance apart, I will visit you as time permits, and expect the same from you, until we decide we commit to something more permanent. I may be open to relocating, but have some specific requirements for the
Im not looking for a slave who is chained to the bed all day or forgets how to hit the shift key a nice phrase Ive read recently, youd have a voice, but not a vote. I would value your input. I do understand there isnt a simple plug-in model for every person. We would be building us as partners, and how we fit together is ultimately up to us.
There would be a constant sexual current through our relationship. We would have an intense connection, in every aspect mental, emotional and physical. I would define well understood rules, though heavy ritual would be very sparse. Id apply no contrived punishments, and actual punishment would be rare, as it should be (besides, youre a very good girl, right?). You submit because its who you are, not a role you are playing.
You would maintain a job and outside interests, but they would be shaped by "the system". The system is that third entity created when two people come together (like the joined area of two overlapping circles - Venn much?). The system requires its own care and feeding. Both people in the relationship need to monitor its condition, tend to it, and make sacrifices for it.
I see profiles stating the desire for a relationship based in both worlds, D/s and vanilla. While I understand why people describe it that way, I think it misses the mark. What I'm looking for is something seamless, where its simply understood certain behaviors are appropriate (or not) in a given situation.
I want to dig inside your head. I want to help you grow. I want to take care of you. I want to provide that place where you can feel free to fly.
I want to consume you.
My profile pic was taken during an early morning March bike ride, near my home up North several years ago.
If you think it's inappropriate for a submissive woman to initiate contact with a dominant, you will have to give me a sign. I dont read minds until the second chat.
Still here? Please say hello!
|
|
|
|
|
Despite multiple attempts to get my profile corrected, it still reflects the wrong mileage from you. I am, indeed, in NW Alabama. |
|
|
|
|
I first read Atlas Shrugged when I was 18, and have revisited it many times. It played a significant role in shaping my character.
"“A man's sexual choice is the result and the sum of his fundamental convictions.... He will always be attracted to the woman who reflects his deepest vision of himself, the woman whose surrender permits him to experience a sense of self-esteem. The man who is proudly certain of his own value, will want the highest type of woman he can find, the woman he admires, the strongest, the hardest to conquer--because only the possession of a heroine will give him the sense of an achievement.” ― Ayn Rand
, Atlas Shrugged
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think Nigerian princes are reading your profile? |
|
|
|
|
For as many people as I see using the term "TPE" to describe the kind of relationship they are pursuing, I would be surprised to learn that most of them are aware of all that entails, from both partners. |
|
|
|
|
Says it better than I ever could: http://www.everydayhealth.com/columns/steve-maraboli-the-healthy-empowered-life/the-essence-of-beauty/ |
|
|
|
|
I so enjoy reading a well-written profile. I'm a big proponent of making use of them to communicate clearly and I'll usually bypass the empty or cryptic ones; doesn't mean I might not be interested, but no one has the time to blindly contact every profile on CS to find out if even basic criteria match up. If you're truly interested in finding someone (or something) here, the best thing you can do is put some content in your profile, even if it's filling out the checklist.
Imagine a world where everyone's profile said "Ask me!". |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|