TheLG

Ladies ... if you take the time to read this book I call a journal / profile and you are interested, don't assume I'll get in touch with you.  I don't assume that just because you read it you are interested.  So you'll need to write me a note if you're interested or I will assume you're not.

... while in the process of saving my profile and journal updates to the appropriate folder I noticed the the total length of both documents was 5 pages on a Word.doc ... and while I have been complimented numerous times concerning the content of my profile / journal, not once has anyone mentioned their length, or that they had read them in their entirety ... and yet I see many women complain about how little effort men put into their profile / journal.  I encourage everyone to be more proactive in their search ... I realize how overwhelming it can be to have to wade through the tide of messages.  but, if you search the database yourself for those qualities you seek, you can make note of those that interest you ... and, even if you don't want to initiate contact yourself, you will have a list already made of those you are interested in.

This is just me not understanding something and hoping somebody can explain it to me ... Here goes ... If a sub/slave does not respond in a timely manner or at all .... who loses? ...
IMO it is her ... it is her who seeks guidance and control ... it is her who fights the slave/sub's natural impatience ... who wants and grows more frustrated ... I don't envy her wading through the flood .... hoping to spot her one floating comfortably on his raft of strength and confidence ... but I don't understand a Dominant being impatient ... what is the hurry?  If a girl doesn't respond at all is it really a personal loss to the dominant?  How can you care so much about that which you do not own?   Haven't even spoken to? Why give her a second thought?

I'm adding another recent conversation ... hope it helps ...

      Everything we say or do tells an observant person something about us. You asked two questions that you should have at the Forefront of your profile.

      The thing that I find most attractive is that you have a brain and apparently know how to use it.  I always equate ownership of property whether living or not as the ancients did ... how can owning this benefit me ? make my life better ... and no, I don't mean put her to work so I can sit around ... I mean (in regards to human female property)  at the very least, can she hold an intelligent conversation.  If she has a degree, is she using it wisely or at all? If she has other skills or abilities, are they being used by her?  I will put her to work if I feel she is capable of it and it will benefit her as well as me. How else will she acquire the means to care for herself if her owner dies?  It is in an owner?s best interest to see that his property learns and grows.

     Although it is the right of an owner to do as he pleases with his property, how he uses it is highly indicative of him as a person.

Does the use indicate a wise, intelligent owner who sees value in his possessions? Or, is he by his actions proving himself unworthy of ownership of even the most trivial possession?

     As to the questions you asked in your profile:

1.  Ownership - Is really two parts ... Does he know the difference between thinking of himself as an owner and Being an owner; (an owner doesn't Think about owning ? he simply owns). I was once tested by a woman who believed me to be a prospective owner ...the first time I went to her home, she invited me inside and asked if I would care for a drink. When I indicated my choice, she said "have a seat in the living room and I'll bring it in"(with her back to me) ... she turned around and saw my arched eyebrow and admitted that it had been a test. She also indicated that I was the first man to ever not move at all when being so tested ... My response was "that was your first and only freebie ... any more tests will have consequences".

     And second, does he know how to use it in such a way as to get the most out of it? (Again, using the human female example)... Is her mind being put to best use as well as her body, sexually and otherwise? If one is in possession of property, but knows not how to use it best, that is not ownership.

2.   Violence - Random or otherwise is also indicative ... Perhaps it seems so (random) to the property. Perhaps it is punishment.  Need the owner explain himself to property? But for myself, I value property. To me, random destruction is not indicative of an owner but a user. Punishment has value in its ability to wipe the slate clean.  And Sadism is fine; it can be enjoyable to all involved.  But, pointless destruction is simply Waste. 

     For me, the choice of whether or not to accept ownership of (human female) property is based on what she brings to the table.  Is she is intelligent enough to know her value to an owner?  Is she able to make the commitment to fully submit once she begs the collar?  Is she capable of accepting her commitment?  Is she capable of accepting her slave heart and ALL that this means?

this slave promises to always remember that their relationship is based on the foundation of a deep friendship, where respect, trust and honesty is always foremost.

Always will she PROMISE to be respectful of Master.

she remembers that she is slave, her place is at His feet, and to serve and to be pleasing. If she is grumpy she needs to remember her place, and perhaps warn Master of her mood *winks* An unhappy slave is not a pleasing slave, and she will mend her attitude swiftly to be more pleasing.

 trust>noun 
1 firm belief in the reliability, truth, ability, or strength of someone or something. 
2 acceptance of the truth of a statement without evidence or investigation. 
3 the state of being responsible for someone or something. 
4 Law:  an arrangement whereby a person (a trustee) is made the nominal owner of property to be held or used for the benefit of one or more others. 
5 a body of trustees, or an organization or company managed by trustees.

>verb 
1 have trust in. 
2 (trust with) have the confidence to allow (someone) to have, use, or look after. 
3 (trust to) commit (someone or something) to the safekeeping of. 
4 (trust to) place reliance on (luck, fate, etc.).  5 have confidence; hope: