PsychoticSanity

I can guarantee that most women who read this won't see the highest of value this article places on them. That's sad, but it's the truth.

Why "Hell Has No Wrath Like A Woman Scorned"
by: Henry Makow PH.D.

'And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.' Genesis 1-2

Ideally, man represents G-d's Will ("form.") Women represent His Creation. Despite gender confusion, women are still looking for leaders, protectors and providers, so they can raise their children themselves. Traditional gender roles give our lives meaning. That's why they are under attack. 

In a deceptive article, "Infantriarchy," currently lauded as "brilliant" on the anti-feminist website 'A Voice For Men,' Gordon Wadsworth argues that 'equality and self actualization' will result from overcoming two basic "defects." He seems ignorant that these "defects" in fact define gender and are at the heart of heterosexuality. 

"The female defect is her desire to infantilize herself; to project a facade of weakness and victimhood. The female does this because part of her identity is contingent on compelling males to act on her behalf. This is a mechanism which allows the female to feel desirable, important, and powerful. ...Thus, the female defect keeps her from assuming personal responsibility, which presents a barrier to her self-actualization.

The male defect is his desire to compensate for the infantilized female. He does this because part of his identity is contingent on earning female validation. He thus demonstrates his ability to protect, provision and inform. This is a mechanism for feeling useful, powerful, knowledgeable, and important. The male defect leads him to compete with other males to demonstrate his primacy to females... This becomes his own barrier to self-actualization.

These defects mean that the female path of self-actualization is one of taking responsibility, and the male path of self-actualization is one of relinquishing responsibility."

Wadsworth thinks he is anti-feminist; but this is pure feminism - neutering the sexes by empowering women and enfeebling men. 

Wadsworth is providing a recipe for more gender neutering and confusion not "self actualization." Gender is based on an imbalance of worldly (physical, material) power between male and female. Just look at how much stronger males usually are. As I have said, heterosexuality requires the surrender of female material power to a select male (husband) in exchange for his power, expressed as his love. This exclusive contract is consecrated by exclusive sex, marriage and family. 

Men want power; women want love. Marriage is the exchange of the two; i.e. Male love in exchange for Female power. 

With "strong and independent" women, there is more temptation for men to evade their role, i.e. providing leadership. Instead, men need to return to the traditional model, where the male is the Captain of the ship, and the woman is the First Mate. This is what women still want: a man strong and worthy enough to earn her allegiance. No amount of feminist social engineering can overcome natural instincts, as long as Captains don't abandon ship. 

MARRIAGE IS MYSTICAL

Marriage and family is a G-d-given path that allows us to find love and grow inwardly. Today, millions of people are in a state of arrested development because they cannot form a permanent relationship. 

Man represents the G-d Principle. Woman represents the Creation Principle. There is no war. Man and woman are in love. G-d is in love with Creation and vice-versa.

"Making love" is a physical expression of this mystical alchemy. It illustrates how each Principle works. The Male Principle penetrates, possesses and plants the seed. The seed is the spirit, code and spark of creation. 

The female yields, opens and accepts the spirit. But, by being possessed, she also possesses. Look at the imagery. The penis is totally engulfed by the vagina. The man belongs to the woman who belongs to him.

Another metaphor is the relationship between a farmer and his land. The farmer cultivates the soil and plants the seed. The verb "husband" means to cultivate and manage prudently. The land gives birth to new life and nurtures it.

Femininity is by nature passive and instrumental. Woman is a bridge to the future. She is a medium. When she is fertilized, grows large, and gives birth, she transforms herself and her mate into their child. Through the child, they are recreating themselves and producing the future. Creation is in a constant process of transformation.

If a woman isn't chosen and used for a higher purpose, she never realizes herself and remains unfulfilled. If she is discarded after having sex, the sting is all the sharper. In her soul, the sex act is a living metaphor for the love of G-d. This may explain the elemental wrath of the scorned woman.

Love in a woman is synonymous with trust, openness and acceptance. Indeed, this is exactly what a man most craves from a woman. He needs someone to believe in him. Her belief makes anything possible for him. Her faith provides the space that the male expands into. She is Creation.

A woman wants to be nurtured, used and shaped by a man's love, which is a surrogate for the divine spirit. I'm not saying all or most men are surrogates for G-d, but this is the ideal. When a woman loves a man, she accepts his leadership. She is content to be consulted and considered.

Men forget that the position of wife is a status to which all women aspire. Dating is an interview. Courtship is probation. Marriage is a Sacred Covenant. Women find their bliss in being intensely needed by her husband. 

FIND A WOMAN WILLING TO BE YOUR FIRST MATE 

A single man should approach marriage with a clear sense of how he wants to live, where a woman fits, and what her job description is. This is what women actually want and what they respond to. They do not respond to men who are starved for sex and love, and don't have a plan for her. Nor are they satisfied with men who want them to remain independent, two parallel rails that never meet.

In conclusion, Marxists, having failed to create a class war between capital and labor, created one between men and women. The aim is the same: power. They are creating conflict where none exists. They are trying to portray as a disease something that is in fact mystical and divine. They are presenting sick behavior as healthy. They are standing between millions of people and G-d.

Men represent the G-d-principle. Women the Creation-principle. Man and woman, G-d and Creation are in love with each other. They need each other for completion and self-transformation. The way to stop the spread of Marxist feminism is for men to start acting like men, so that once again women may trust and yield to them.

Better to starve and be free than be a content slave. Thank you, Aesop.

People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.