Mistresssamy3220

Can a kept woman be truly dominate?

I ponder this often and want to hear what others think. Often in conversation I will run across a woman who claims she is the dominant  party in the household, yet she is unemployed and her male supposed "sub" salary either far exceeds hers or he is the only source of income for the family. Now I am not saying anything is wrong with this if both parties are happy but is their not a big difference between legitimate power and someone being "humored"? Can anyone argue that someone that lives off anothers salary is anything other than "kept"? And if you are the one being kept" how can you claim to be the superior person? Surely no one would argue that an educated professionally employed person has obvious advantages in society and as far as the rest of the world is concerned superior in social standing regardless of what games are played at home. 

So my question to the site is this:

Can you be uneducated and unemployed and still be truly dominate to someone who is educated and employed? To me it just seems that if you are unemployed and uneducated and are bossing someone around that is, are you dominate or just a disrespectful spoiled brat?  IF it is possible that what quality separates the difference? 

Your thoughts?

Too many older divorced Dommes are giving out sex to young would be sub males...

sub males belong in chastity and serving not satisfied. When you older divorce Dommes give sex to a young male you turn off their servitude..... Respect yourself and keep slaves hungry... THINK!