Home
Home
Browse Profiles
Browse
Collarspace Video
Live
Join Collarspace
Join
Collarspace
Dating
Dating
Collarspace News
News
Collarspace Glossary
Glossary
Collarspace Mobile
Mobile
Alt
Alt
Safety
Safety
Extreme Restraints
Toys
Friends
Live BDSM
Resources
Resources
Welcome to Collarspace
Welcome
Login
Login
Vertical Line
Crown

mistressarletta

MistressTalisa
Female Dominant, 33, bronx, New York
mistressem65608
Dominant Couple, 47, Ava, Missouri
Female Dominant, 35, ny/nj, New Jersey
More Dominant Women in Arizona
Back
Back
Kinky People Meet
KPM
Collarspace Directory
Directory
Interests
 Interests

mistressarletta - Female Dominant, Tucson Arizona | BDSM Profile on Collarspace

Friends:
SlaveToyBobCheyenneWolf50x
pinker14

About mistressarletta

I have changed profiles, even ID's on here, more than once, but, I have been on this site for over 1-1/2 years trying to come to know people in order to form a good, full time, TPE sort of relationship with a slave, or a few slaves.

Now, there are two exceptional slaves I have met that are so very much exactly what I need in a slave, but, unfortunately, neither one of them are relocatable.

So far, all the rest have been, to the best of my knowledge, a great big waste of time. Though, to be sure, some of them I have only recently met, and some of them the jury is still out on.

I am interested in people who WANT to GIVE - not just money, certainly not sex, but, giving from the heart. The sort of people who could enter into my goals to help other people and be happy in their roles as workers to accomplish these goals, as well as other aspects of slavery.

What I have encountered, mostly, is exactly the description of what people will be like in the end times :self assuming, haughty, puffed up with pride. Hardly fit attributes for a slave.

Now, if this is your big fetish, that you WANT to GIVE, to be made use of, to be useful, I might want to hear from you at mistressarletta@yahoo.com.

If you cannot serve a person without them using you sexually, if you think you are worthless, if you think you deserve to be hurt, or if you think that "true slavery" is anything other than selfless giving and hard work, if you are not happy being the sex you were born to be, I don't need you in my life.

At any rate, that address is all you got, boys and girls. It's the same as my ID here on the messenger. I suggest you read my journal entries before you contact me, though. I will not enjoy another time-wasting bout of answering questions that I have already answered!

And, yes, those of you who read my journal entries may feel free to quote them or adapt them to suit your needs. Unless, of course, there is some specific poems, short stories, that sort of thing. Those, you can share with people, I guess, but, you better not change them and call them your own!

Goodbye.

Look, what I want is NOT complicated. See, there is this language, called English, which has many dialects and slang words, yes, but, it also has a basic set of words and phrases that really mean what they say, or close enough, so that when someone says "slave" the people listening know that they mean "unpaid worker that is going to work it's pretty arse off for me, make money for me, be a part of my life, follow orders, be polite and respectful to all, and generally not be an uppity bitch with delusions of godhood and way to many demands about what I should put up it's arse."

 

Get a frigging dictionary and a thesaurus! There are some online. Now, look up the definitions and use the smallest modicum of common sense:

 

I want a slave, or a few slaves, who will serve me in every aspect of however  I NEED them to serve, with the exception of those ways which would break their spirit, mind or body.

 

They don't have to be pretty, old, young, tall, short, fat, thin, male, female - but, they do have to be fully male or fully female, without dressing to pretend to be the other sex.

 

They don't have to be rich, poor, atheist, religious, introverted, extroverted, or anything else  EXCEPT ....  LOYAL  OBEDIENT  HARD WORKING THOUGHTFUL  CAPABLE   LISTENING  ACCEPTING OF PUNISHMENT but never seeking it and their fetish, their primary fetish must be to do things for other people out of a sincere and deep, driving need.


BONUS POINTS if they write real stories or novels, not technical books and not pornography or gore/horror schlock.

 

They must not be "toilets", and they must not expect sex with me.

 

Now, stop asking frigging stupid questions, sort your shite out, and if you really want to be owned by a truly dominant woman, rather than just to have your arse diddled by another fetishist, get in touch with me.

 

And, yes, dearhearts, I WILL test you! If you refuse to participate, then I know you are a fake. So, bye!

 

 

 

You know, when I was a slave, what I wanted to know, primarily, about anyone I served is 1) Are they going to respect the things that I cannot do (physically) or that I just will not do (social, spiritual, law abiding vs law breaking stuff)?  2) Are they any good at giving orders?

You can tell a lot about how serious someone is, not by how much they threaten you with pain (which anyone can do), but, by if their orders are clear, and, their willingness to clear up reasonable misunderstandings without resorting to insane bouts of screeching.

If they take being your owner seriously, in the positive aspects, they are almost certainly going to take the rest seriously, too.

Because I do not go around telling people that I am going to grind their face into the dirt, after spitting in their mouth, right before shoving a broomstick up their arse, because they failed to hang the toilet paper right, they assume it means I am incapable of grabbing them by their hair, pulling them down to their knees and standing on their head with one foot, while I whip them, for getting far too lippy and free with their speech.

 

Now, would I do that?  For that, probably not. For insulting my mother, almost certainly.

 

Example? Fair enough. When my ex was still my husband and it had already been established that I could kick his ass, when he tried to beat me down one day, we came to a sort of truce.  Allegedly. See, it was time for a family gathering. We decided to go to where mine was, as his didn't like him and no one liked them. But, I demanded a promise from him that he would not start insulting my nephew or acting  rude to my mother, etc.  We had a good, long talk about it and he promised. We get there, and, within minutes, not only is he acting rude, but, he is walking toward my nephew, saying horrible things and with his fist raised. So, I grabbed both his wrists  while reaching up to secure a finger of each hand and bend them back as far as they would go without breaking. And, I put my knee in his back and pull his arms backward until he loses his balance and goes down gently to his knees. Then, I told him "You promised me. Now, you can't stay." and marched him out, put him in the vehicle and made him stay there. I had the keys.  Yes, he could have left, but, I also had his wallet and all the money, and our children and the keys to the apartment.

 

Tried to beat me down one day? Yes. He told his friends, right in front of me, that he was going to bitch slap him a bitch. And, I told him we are not having that sort of relationship, so if he raises his hand to bitch slap me, he's going to find himself being the bitch that was bitch slapped with his own bitchy little bitch hand for trying to bitch slap a bitch. He did not believe me. Until he was down on the ground and I was slapping him in the face with his own arm.

 

I am strong, fast, intelligent, and resourceful. Not as strong and fast as I used to be, but, you know, more than enough to deal with the average man who is not insane, but, who does not want to be a slave; so, surely, for those who are going to be obedient, there should be no problem at all.

 

Of course, the more you doubt me, the more I don't want you.

"The practice of S/M is the creation of pleasure. … And that’s why S/M is really a subculture. It’s a process of invention. S/M is the use of a strategic relationship as a source of pleasure."Michel Foucault


Do you agree?


Before you go further, here are two very important, time saving questions.Be honest with yourself and answer them to yourself.:

1. Are any of your fetishes related to bodily fluids, emissions, or other releases (blood, urine, feces, scat), animals, children, extreme abuse up to the removal of body parts or the drawing of blood, burning with cigarettes, or anything of a similar nature?

2. Do you love, like, or live for any of the things which are on my hard limits list, over to the left - as in you are unwilling or unable to do without them in your life?

If the answer to either, or both, questions is yes, goodbye. If the answers are both no, proceed. 

 

I am not a fetishist. I do not seek fetishists. Some milder slave fetishes may be accommodated. The questions below will help to determine if we are of similar mindset. Answer them and I will tel you if it seems we should proceed, thereby saving us a lot of time, one way or another.

There is another saying , I enjoy: "Start as you intend to finish." I am not here to converse randomly with slaves. I am here to create a strategic relationship as a source of pleasure - mutual pleasure. You want to be trained to the will of another, I want to train another to my will. There is our common ground. Now, let us see if there is further compatibility.

If  there is, we will discuss contracts, and, if all goes well, begin to serve and be served, in short order.  I am, however, taking the advice of both sayings, and I am not compromising on those things most important to my lifestyle. I would have a better life with slaves that fit into it, yes; but, I would have a worse life with slaves who did not, whatever their earning capacity or other charms. Money is not everything, either is kink. Compatibility of personality and a working toward common goals are what brings people together.


There are rules for the reading and use of this profile. Read it through and follow the rules.If you send me messages without doing so, I will probably delete them and block you.


 Rule # 1: If you are a slave or submissive, do not contact me without reading this profile in full, regardless of whether or no you wish to apply for the position of being my slave. However, if you do not wish to apply for the position, state so in your first message, after reading it, and feel free not to answer the questions, etc.

Rule # 2: Do not expect me to initiate contact. It may happen, but, I doubt it. Even if I do, Rule # 1 applies.

Rule # 3: I need serious slaves who are ready to begin the process of becoming real, in-person, full time, 24/7, 365 owned slaves-actual (as in workers, companions, entertainment; not lovers, not friends). By the reading of this profile and taking action, you will be showing me that you are one of them. Do not begin answering the questions, unless you are sure you want to be owned, and you want to be considered as a potential slave for me. There is plenty of information in my journal entries, to help you decide.

Rule #4: I am not here to be judged by slaves. My ways are what they are. True slaves will reorient themselves to my methods. Do not ask my interests, or what I will or will not do to, for, against, or with you. When I have reason to believe you are acceptable to me, you will be told what you need to know.

Rule # 5: This is not so much of a rule as a statement of fact: I love God; I believe that Jesus is his Son, who died for our sins. I tell you this, here and now, because so many "slaves" claim that I never mentioned this to them (even though it is mentioned several times in journal entries, and usually mentioned on my profile, and definitely mentioned during conversation). If this is going to be a problem for you: goodbye! You may give excellent service, but, no one does enough to make me think I would choose them over God.

Rule # 6: Answer the questions below, cutting and pasting them into a message and giving your answer below each question, in a neat and orderly manner. Do not ask, or try to guess, what answer I want. What I want is honesty. If the answers are acceptable to me, we will have a more informal discussion by email.

1. Are you looking for a domme (woman who is a sexually dominant play or romantic partner) or a dominant owner (someone who sets the rules and punishments, guides, teaches discipline, in a non-sexual, non-romantic capacity)?

2. Are you seeking sexual play, physical pain, emotional pain, or acceptance? What is your primary motivation in being a slave? What do you think makes someone a true slave?

3. Are you truly relocatable? How long would it take you to relocate, and, why?

4. Is your entering into service contingent upon living conditions? How so, and, why?

5. Would you rather give or have it taken by force? (Regardless of what "it" is)

6. Does who you choose to accept as your owner is hinge upon them fulfilling your fetishistic or sexual needs - must your owner utilize them to motivate you to service? Or, are they something that you could forgo, altogether (or, do part time with someone else) for the greater pleasure of being allowed to be in full time service?

7. What are your religious and political beliefs, or lack thereof, and how important is this stance to you? Does whom you choose as an owner hinge upon their religious or political beliefs being the same as your own?

8. Do you want a Mistress who is a goddess, claiming to have powers over you, controlling your will and forcing you to perform vile acts? Or, would you prefer a kinder, gentler Mistress who is only harsh when you have displeased her, who can be put on a pedestal, but, never wishes to be worshiped as a deity?

9. If someone sets you the task of cleaning the kitchen, does your head fill with ideas related to sponges, scrubbers, how to operate their dishwasher? Or, does it fill with thoughts of you in stockings, face ground into the linoleum by the booted foot of your owner, feeling your butt plug jiggle in fear, as you are growled at and told that you did it all wrong and must do it again? Which of these two scenarios, above, comes closer to your thought processes?

10. Can you serve a woman who is/will be married to another man? What if the man was made your Master? What if he was just her husband, no one's Master? What if he was a slave? What if she were his slave?

11. Are you prepared for the possibility of signing a contract, a letter of intent, and/or whatever else is necessary for a fully legal, binding agreement, complete with exchange of address and other contact information, notarization of documents, and etc?

12. When someone says "service" to you, what thoughts pop into your head? Is it more about oral worship, or vacuuming? 

13. Which sounds better to you: quiet but stern or vicious and bitchy?

14. Which sounds better to you: weird and wild or sedate and classy?

15. Which sounds better to you: sexual domination only or total domination without sex?

16. Which sounds better to you: waiting for your Mistress to return home or traveling?

 

I will read and consider your answers, your profile, and decide if we shall continue past this point. As I will read your answers, your profile, and judge if you seem to be compatible, on top of answering the questions, you would be wise to go and rethink your profile as most of the "slaves" I have encountered on here, thus far, have done a rather bad job of representing themselves.

Rule # 7:  Rethink your profile and make appropriate corrections. Your profile should reflect
 a) (live for) those things that must be a part of your life, because without them you would break, and (hard limits) those things you cannot live with, because living with them, you would break.
b) (hate) those things which would be suitable for punishment, or which you hope not to have to engage in, but, which you will engage in if ordered.
c)(love) those things which, if an Owner wished to reward you or see you smile, they could give to you, do to you, or allow you to be a part of.

Rule # 8: You will also change your profile, ceasing to seek other dominants or anyone besides friends. At the top of the section where typing can be done, you will announce that you are being considered by me.

Rule # 9: You will write to me and ask me, specifically, to consider you.

Rule # 10: You will send a photo or video that has you (I need to see your face, your eyes) holding a sign that says "Please consider me, Mistress Arletta?" or something of a similar nature, to prove your existence. Or, you may write it upon your body.

Rule #11: If you want to know what I seek, think, feel, what interests me, then, learn to read. I will not reply to you if you ask, for now, as I have provided much by way of journal entry, and you may also look up my yahoo blog. In fact, Googling my name should provide you with much information, since very few people on the planet have this name, and, even less of them are 42 years of age, Caucasian looking, and in Tucson, Arizona.

Obviously, the rules, above, are for the sake of slaves who are in the beginning stage of getting to know each other. We will discuss things in more detail, after the rules are followed, and they may ask questions after I have proof that they have read at least some of my journal entries.

Since it has been asked: Yes - slaves, submissives, Masters, Dommes, Mistresses, or any other persons who feel the urge, may freely use these questions as a means of screening, or as an enhancement to their profile or journal entries.

Well, there is one "slave" proven an absolute liar. Yesterday, he was telling me he would sign any agreement I sent him and begging to be my slave (probably while he was jerking off). So, I went ahead and I sent him the same basic contract that I also sent to someone I believed, more, and, I just got it back with a note that he will not sign this contract.

So, that's it for him. As I said before, the best way to get rid of a fantasist is to interject reality into their life.

 

 

Movies that I have watched over and over again, and am likely to watch many, many more times if the chance comes up:

Camelot (musical, Richard Harris)

Stranger than Fiction (Do not like Will Ferrel, in general, but, love this movie)

Sound of Music

The King and I

Anna and the King

The Outlaw Josey Wales

 North To Alaska

Life of Brian

Star Wars (the real one)

Braveheart

Rooster Cogburn

The Quiet Man (always frustratingly in need of more)

 

That is not all of them, by any means, but, it is a good selection. Should tell you something, maybe, if you are the thinking kind.

 

In fact, Camelot and the two other King movies could teach you a lot about more organic forms of servitude. Do you see the Queen prancing with the other ladies? Do you think it in any way means she could not have ordered them jailed or beheaded, if they overstepped their bounds? Do you see the King dancing with the school teacher, who is his hired labor? Do you think he could not have had her beheaded, regardless of if she overstepped her bounds or no?

Yet, there is laughter, friendliness - everyone is not nude, endlessly shackled and full of wounds, are they? Do you think it means these people do not know their place, either the rulers or the ruled? If they have forgotten, on either side, will they not be quickly reminded?

I want this, more than all other forms. Yes, shackles and chains and whips and corner time and all that are perfectly fine extensions of lifestyle, reminders, tools - but, without that organic certitude of place, it all means nothing.

Is this stupidity or just taking the piss?

 

(slave who claimed to have read my profile and have become ready to proceed, which, if he had read my profile and even tried to understand it, he would not have messaged me to say, on being told goodbye):


am sorry please give me another chance

 

Me:

Then do it right, this time.


(slave):

yes Maam

 

Me:

Don't message me, again, not even to say yes Ma'am, until you have read my profile well enough to understand what needs to be done and have the time by which to do it.

 

(slave):

yes Maam


Me:

Goodbye

 

Newsflash "slaves": If you are too lazy to follow simple instructions or even to read them and decide you don't want to follow them, you are worth NOTHING as a slave; and, if you still can't follow them, or won't, lazy or not, you aren't worth anything as a slave, then, either.

 

If you spend your time thinking with your cock then go to a site for people who want cocks and nothing but cocks. If you want a genuine, serious relationship based on ownership, maybe we should talk. Maybe!



The easiest way to dissuade fantasists from continuing on is to interrupt them with reality. Hence my profile. There is a local man who keeps asking if he can come spend time with me, yet, he will not read my profile and answer those few questions.

 

This is not a man who wants to spend time with me; he just wants someone easy to get close to, who has feet.

 

There is another man who shows up, asks me odd questions and insists he wants to be my slave, begs me to send him contracts. Then, he disappears for indeterminate amounts of time. So, today, while he was telling me how much he needs to serve, I told him to order pizza from Domino's - that way, with no risk of giving out credit card numbers or anything silly - he will learn that I am telling the truth of my address and I will learn that he is telling the truth about wanting to serve.


It has certainly been more than a half hour, and there has been no delivery.

 

Why do I keep him around, do you ask? Because, when he shows up and annoys me, his questions help me think, and, in this thinking, my contracts improve.Usually.

 

What I have learned, this time, is that there is a site where I can send documents to have them electronically signed (actually learned that a wee while ago), but, to do so the contract would need to be written in a "The undersigned" kind of way, instead of giving specific mention of a person throughout.  Or, I would have to fix the area where the names go to allow for room for a field so that it could be filled out electronically, also, as the need came up. Something to think about, then!

More on strategy:

 

Where are you today, slave? What is it you are doing? Who are you doing it with?

 

Would you like to, ever, do it again? Is it important to you? Would your heart break, your insides break, if you never saw those people again?

 

Now, that is the sort of thing that should be negotiated in a contract!

 

Don't assume. Plan.

"The practice of S/M is the creation of pleasure. … And that’s why S/M is really a subculture. It’s a process of invention. S/M is the use of a strategic relationship as a source of pleasure."Michel Foucault

 

The key word, kiddies is: strategic.

 

What does it mean, to say that S/M (which for our purposes encompasses sadism, masochism, slave, master and the whole shebang) is the use of a strategic relationship? What is a strategic relationship?

 

Well, first off, we look at the last word: relationship, which means "connection" So, this is not just people coming together for a good time, who do not care about each other, personally. This is about people who are seeking some form of actual connection with at least one other person. It doesn't have to be romantic, or sexual, but, it does have to be a true connection.

 

Therefore, if you are here, looking for a good time, you are not looking for anything connected to S/M, or bdsm, but, are looking for just kink or slutty fun, and you are cordially invited to leave. Yes, I have the right, means, guts, and balls by which to say that, just as if I belonged here and you don't. That is because I am, in fact, seeking strategic relationships as a source of pleasure, and I know that there are many others on this site who agree with me.

 

I don't expect that you will leave, but, I wish you would, since, obviously, you are clogging up the works, wasting your time and the time of those of us who are seeking an actual connection with someone(s). So, why not go to a site for persons who are looking for fetish fun? This is not it. Or, it shouldn't be. This is meant to be a nice, sweet little "dating" site, not a meat rack, and is for people who are looking for people who want to be connected , emotionally, with people like them.

 

Now, on to strategy, which means "an elaborate and systematic plan of action designed to achieve a particular goal"

 

Strategy is exactly why I just suggested those other people go off to some other site. They are not strategically placed to get the most, or best, results for what they are seeking; and, due to their lack of strategic maneuvering, what I am seeking is much more hidden, on this site, than it should be. Therefore, it is part of my strategy, to get what I want, to help them to see that they would be happier somewhere more geared toward giving them what they want.

 

I am thinking of the quote, above (which is, also, currently on my profile), relationships, and strategy, this morning, particularly because of a man who wishes to be a slave. He lives in Cardiff, and his profile says that he is willing to relocate.

 

He approached me, a wee while ago, him having no knowledge of where I was located, what I looked like, my age, height, weight or anything; answered my questions, and we had a great discussion of things, finding ourselves to be very suited in some fundamental fashions. There were two that we found we were possibly going to be a bother, which is religion and romance; but, he assured me he could do without the sex and romance stuff, at least for a while, and, while I am religious, I have no intention of forcing that onto others as it would be rude to God to do any such thing.

 

Suddenly, however, he tells me that he does not think we'll suit because he does not want to relocate to the United States of America (although, without being polite enough to use the proper name, in any fashion), not even for a little while, and, that his home is too small to share.

 

Now, the sort of relocating we were speaking of, was only him being here for 6 months, or less, out of the year, and, me being there, in the U.K., maybe, sometimes at his place, for 6 months, or less, out of the year. This is because I have reasons I want to be in Musselburgh, which is nearish Edinburgh, in Scotland, in the United Kingdom, at least sometimes, and I would like to travel at other times. This was nothing where anyone needed to change residences. He knew that. We had discussed it.

 

So, today, I, thinking strategically, suggested to him that he change his profile to indicate where he is, or is not, willing to relocate to, as it would save him and the people who might otherwise be interested in him a whole lot of time. Now, I will share with you the emails, omitting his ID, etc.:

 

Me:

I was thinking about you, this morning, and your not wanting to relocate to the U.S. of A. Nothing bad, really; just, that's the sort of thing that should be on your profile. Because, you do say you are willing to relocate, and you do want to be a slave, so, anyone who took you as their slave would assume you are "willing to relocate" to wherever it is they get off to. Since that is not the case, you should specify where you are willing to relocate to, and make sure that when you have a contract, it also specifies such things. Otherwise, you could end up over here, anyway.

 

Him:

That's a fair point about relocation, but moving to the US isn't easy without a green card, as I think everyone knows. I always thought that 'willing to relocate' mean something like 'within one's own country.'

 

Me:

No. Willing to relocate means "willing to relocate" , and, you do not need a green card, if you are only visiting.

So, if you are "willing to relocate" , but, only to a certain degree, you should say so. It doesn't matter what you think - it matters what the people who are looking for slaves think, when they see it. More specificity means less wasted time.

 

Him:

This may be nitpicking, but relocating means "not just visiting" therefore a green card would be needed to relocate, therefore I think it would be usually understood not to be possible. I really don't believe that one has to say "I'm only free to do possible things" because that is kind of obvious.

 

Me:

Right. If you were only going to do the things that are easiest for you, then, you would not be a slave, at all. Do you want to be a slave, or do you not want to be a slave?


If you want to be a slave, then, you must accept the viewpoint of others, not expect them to reorient themselves to yours. And, since 1) It is not at all impossible for you to relocate to the U.S.A., generally, it would be thought to be a  big lot of bother, but, something that you, the slave, has said you will do (relocate, in general with no specific criteria listed as to where or where not and why), so, it would be no impediment were everything else right. and 2) it is not your province to dictate what other people believe relocation means, for their needs,  or how they would view what "willing to relocate" means, your alternative to wasting a good lot of time for yourself and others is to be very specific as to what relocation means to you.

And, I already told you that relocation, for you, would mean, to me, that you would not need a green card, as I wanted to spend a good lot of time in the U.K. and the weather here in the summer time is evil, so I only want to be here, in Tucson, half the year or less. Since persons from the U.K. and the U.S.A. are allowed to visit 6 months out of the year, without having to resort to changing citizenship or getting specific visas, it is not even remotely impossible for someone from the U.K. to serve me, based on my needs, unless they are excessively poor and I have no other slaves.


Which is why you should make your profile as informative, in brief, as possible. Because, obviously, it is not about the green card - since the green card is not something required to serve me. I don't care what it is - I am not asking you to justify yourself to me - I am giving you good advice on how to prevent this particular b.s. from happening again. Being "willing to relocate" has no boundaries attached to it. And, many fine slaves do add a little something to their profile, such as how their company has branch offices in these three cities, so those are the places they are willing to relocate to, or how they do not want to leave their family so they are only willing to relocate within this limited area, or they absolutely would only relocate to other places in America or in Europe, or etc.


I was giving you that advice for your benefit. I don't know why that makes you angry or argumentative, but, I do know how much I have to put up with it. I'm blocking you for the rest of the day.

Yes, blocking him may have been a trifle harsh, but, then, maybe not; if he was my slave, and insisted on getting lippy, telling me I had to accept his interpretation rather than for him to accept mine, I might gag him. Might even do more than that. So …

 

Strategy is important. Which means, yes, nitpicking is important. It is how one gets rid of pests, after all.

 

So, if you are someone who knows what you want, lay it out on your profile and in your journal entries. Even if you only know a few things, let those particular kitties out of the bag, so that when people pass by your profile, they will see what it is you know you want and they can quickly determine if there is a reason for them to message you and find out more.

 

Also, read other people's profiles, as the ones who are most serious and knowledgeable as to what they want, have usually developed a profile that is more strategically apt. Yes, sure, it seems like a waste of time, but, how much waste is it to read 1-10 minutes of writing, versus reading hours of writing, for the next few weeks, before it is determined that at least one of you is wasting time? Read the profiles, as part of your strategy, to help you save time and energy, and keep you moving along in your search, without too many pit stops or too much disappointment.

 

And, if you don't know what you want, figure it out. If you don't know yourself, enough to be able to say what you want, at least for now, then you have no business even being in a relationship. No one can connect to you, until you are all there.

 


 

Here's the basic facts of life:

If you have to be forced to do something, and you want to enter into a relationship where you are being forced to perform tasks, give money, or whatever, then you are not acting as a slave or as a submissive. You are acting as a Top, who enjoys being forced to do things, and who will mete out rewards to those who kowtow to him by beating him just as he wants to be beaten, etc.

If I have to force you to submit, it means nothing. It is a lie.

If you want to give, if you want to be accepted and tempered, kept safe, so you have a focus for that giving and someone to tell you that they are pleased, that this is enough, if you are looking for that home for body, mind, and soul, and you willingly give to me, then, it means everything.

If you cannot understand this .. I don't even know what to say to you, anymore. I know the pain of wanting to "do for" other people, the thrill  of helping them with their groceries or cleaning their home, and the pain of being laughed at for doing these things, or being accused of doing it because you have some ulterior motive.

For people who feel like that, having an owner, someone they can trust to accept their gifts  and help them to know what to do, is a blessing. It is not being used, being taken advantage of. It is being understood.

If you even might be interested in being my slave, you should write "kumquat techtonics" at me, in a message, so I know you are reading my journal entries.
I am not cruel!  I am pragmatic

Cruel: Disposed to inflict pain or suffering. Yes, "able" is also part of some definitions, but, when they say "able" they still mean "disposed to".

I am not disposed to inflict pain or suffering. I do not wake up in the morning and say "My, oh my, how fun my day will be, because I have small children to kick, grown men to make bleed, and if I can I shall make that puppy cry." I am not that person.

Pragmatic: Dealing or concerned with facts or actual occurrences; practical.

I am practical. If you need to be beaten, you will be. If you need to be put in the corner, tied up, forced to make recompense, tossed out on your ear you will be. If there is a practical solution that is less violent, less disruptive that will produce a desired result, it will be utilized.

It is pragmatism that leads me to a search for slaves. I like slaves, slaves are useful, I need useful people in my life; I can lead, teach, train, and love slaves; slaves need someone who can do these things. All of which add up to: my life and the life of whatever slave I own will be better, since we will be giving each other things we need in life.

If I just wanted someone to beat, tie up, kick, have sex with, or any of that .. pfft .. that's easy to get!
I will tell you something about slaves, slavery, and husbandry, slave:

See, too many of you think that if a woman owns a slave that means she has to provide for his sexual service with her own body. Well, honey, that is just not how it usually went, per the history books, and that is not how it goes here.

If I fall in love with a man, and he is in love with me, we will be married and I'll do things to him that will make his toes curl, because, yes, I do love sex, very, very much.

But, slaves are not lovers, friends, or husbands. They are also not animals. They are something else, altogether.

Because they are workers, like the animals, they must be taken care of, and that includes taking care of their sexual needs, if those needs are getting in the way of their being able to work, or getting the owner down with all the mopey behavior.

Because they are human, like the owner, they will not simply be castrated like an animal might be. They might be left out in the field to rut, if the owner feels it is appropriate, though.

I do not feel that is appropriate. I do, however, feel that the long standing traditions of marrying slaves to other slaves, or the slave having a free born spouse who knows that the slave will be serving and only has time to give them when the work is done, is perfectly reasonable as a solution to the dilemma of slaves who cannot control their sexual appetites.

It was common practice, in 19th century slavery, for an owner to pair two slaves who were already on the same plantation, for the sake of the slaves breeding. Or, the owner might have gone to buy a slave for the slave he already owned to marry and breed with. Or, sometimes, they would simply seek out other owners who had slaves, and make agreements that the male and female slaves would be married to each other, with the owners of the female slaves keeping the babies.

Now, I don't want to go that far! I have no interest in enslaving children or anyone who is not capable of making a firm decision that they wish to serve me. So, don't even start asking questions about that.

It was less common, but, still, a perfectly acceptable practice, to allow slaves, either on the same plantation as each other or on different ones, to marry for love. Often, their owners provided them with a home separate from other slaves for the purpose of having the comfort of family, hearth and home, such as there could be comfort in their situation. If the slaves were on different plantations and fell in love, sometimes their owners would arrange to buy the other slave, because, they wanted their slaves to be happy and productive people.

So, don't come at me with a lot of gobblety-gook as to how I must milk you, sit on your face, allow you to lick or suck anything, or etc. and try to rationalize that it is what makes consensual slavery into true slavery.

Uh uh, honey! If you are truly a slave, you will jump when I say jump; you will dance when I say dance; you will work when I tell you to work; and, you will be allowed to marry (or ordered to marry) whom I choose to allow you to marry. But, my body is my own and I am no one's slave, so I don't have to do you!

So, keep that in mind. No, I am not going to force you to marry a slave girl or anyone else that doesn't strike your fancy, slave boy. That's not what I mean, because I am not that sort of person. Just saying, if you need sex, romance, etc. I may help you get it, but, I don't have to provide it from my own body.

IF you want to be this sort of slave, write "gerbil frumpkin" into a message and send it to me.

If you do not want pain, then do not seek an owner who will want to give it to you. That is my advice to you.

Me, personally, yes, I can give pain, but, I do not get turned on by the idea of torturing people. If I was going to whip someone, they would have earned it by their own bad behavior and it would have been seriously bad behavior. Or, perhaps, at first, I might give them a whipping, just to put them in mind of the fact that I can and will do so, so that when I tell them what not to do if they do not wish to experience it, they will have a clear understandng. Perhaps.

In truth, I would just as soon have slaves who did their work well, were polite and never needed correction at all. Some I have known have come darned close to that, so I know it is possible. Unfortunately, most of them WANT to be treated badly.

"For sure, I could work and bring home the cash, but then there are even better slaves than me out there. My qualities comes from the need of serve, the need to please. I will turn myself inside out to know that I have brought pleasure to my Owner with no thoughts of myself. "

Absolutely beautiful! I keep trying to explain this to potential slaves, that the most important thing for a slave to have is the willingness to serve. Mind you, I haven't the resources to accept slaves who do not work  for wages BUT they seem to think that if they can offer some exhorbitant sum per week that means they are the better slave and they can play tradesies, getting me to change my hard limits for hard cash.

Whereas they look down on slaves who, yes, make significantly less money, but, who think of the person they are hoping to serve, listen to them, help them do things, etc. 

The best slave I've come across on this site is not relocatable, has no money to spare,and is making me no offers to serve me, because we both know that we do not have enough nickles to rub together to make a bus ticket appear or anything. However, he knew I was tired, one night, and swamped with work, and, instead of demanding my attention as the other "slaves" were doing, he asked me to allow him to help with the typing.

He did help, too, quite a bit, even though I had to take time to train him.  And, that is why he is the best slave - he's proven he is polite, thoughtful, trainable to task, with no need to be "broken" into slavery. He wants to be that way, and so he is.

Thank you for the inspirational words.

Persons who want to be considered as a slave (for me) should send me a message, now, that says "Pooter-based twinkie dogs" at the beginning of it.
Conversation with a slave/sub type, posted for the sake of those who are reading my journal to learn, either to know more about me or to know more about themselves. If you are not one of these people, feel free to ignore it. I don't demand your attention, but, I do give advice to those who want it.

Mistress Arletta:
You sound very interesting. Pity about the occultism and not being relocatable. I like your attitude, as expressed. I hope you find someone who fulfills your need to be a slave.

Slave/sub:
Thank You for Your kind words. Indeed, I'm only interested in local dommes, but I love getting to know people no matter where they are :). Now, I must look at my profile again when I have a moment. I have an interest in the occult, but it's "just one of those things". I should make sure I haven't expresses more of an interest than is there :). Thank You again for Your kind note. I hope You, too, find what You seek. I also hope we can still converse, and that our paths might cross in the future. Nice people, like You, are rare enough in the BDSM world, I regret to say.

Mistress Arletta:

Well, thank you. I don't know how intense your interest is in the occult - I just know how intensely I would like to avoid having it be a part of my life lol Yes, you are right: nice people are rare. Not sure I qualify, but, I'll take it and thank you, again.

Slave/sub:

Nice Dominant women in the BDSM world are very rare. At least, around here! Maybe it's the lousy weather we get around here?

Mistress Arletta:

Maybe it's the fact that I keep being turned down by potential slaves because they think I am not dominant, since I am not screaming at them, calling them filthy demands, or otherwise acting like a spoiled bitch in heat? Most men expect, and demand, abuse and sex, and they do not believe a woman can really just have a dominant personality, otherwise. Most men are twonks. So are women. Yet, some, of both sexes, can give one hope.

Slave/sub:

"Twonks"? That's my new favorite word of the day! I think that the BDSM world becomes a giant echo chamber. Women can be unpleasant and get away with it. Men start expecting that. Men get nowhere and stop really trying, becoming jerks. Women get so accustomed to that that they treat all men that way, making them more unpleasant. But, we keep trying. And we jeep searching.

Mistress Arletta:

Well, I would say it is the other way around; but, then, that is because I keep getting men trying to force me to be unpleasant. That's the way it has always been, even if they are looking for submissive women or just a girlfriend. Men tend to like nasty women. Not strong minded women, not strong bodied women - not usually - just bitchy, rude, money grasping women who would cheat on them quicker than a wink. They either want to submit to them or they want to subdue them. What they have no time for is intelligent, strong minded, strong bodied, reasonable women. So, yes, if I wanted to just find someone to do what I wanted, and I had no moral issues with it, I would go and call someone a few names, threaten to stick something up their butt, and, voila!: my bills would be paid, I would be ever so much healthier and prettier, my ex-husband would be beat up for being mean to me, and all would be lovely in my life, except for that amazing lack of conscience and tact. I like having a conscience. It keeps me entertained on those otherwise lonely nights.

Slave/sub:
I'm enjoying our conversation. My afternoon is a bit frazzled, but I promise I'll reply in a few hours!

Mistress Arletta:

Yes, well, I should be doing lots and lots of work, but, I have viruses, thanks to some jerk or another on this site. There's some person who claims to be from New York who has many profiles and sends out nasty viruses. Sometimes, unfortunately, he also claims to be from other places, or I would just avoid New York people. I have reported him, but, support never listens. So, my afternoon is very frazzled. See you later!

Slave/sub:

Hi, Ma'am! i'm finally home from work, so i can actually read Your profile and not try to write notes to You on my phone! 

i can see what You are talking about, where men are demanding a certain sort of behavior to fit their image of a Domme.  Is it really any different than a man expecting the Domme to dress in tight leather?  Or a man with a lengthy lists of things he wants You to force him to do?  These all have one thing in common: relationships, getting to know each other, are not the topic of interest.  That's not from where i come.  i love to play, too . . . but i want to get to know the person first and during and after. 

i have a silly question: how did someone send You a virus on CM?  i've never encountered that!

Mistress Arletta:

I don't know how someone sends viruses. If I did, I would be a far more dangerous person than I am now. Rahahahha. No, I still wouldn't be. I would just have a less messed up computer. See, I have issues with all of it. A man who is going to be submissive or a slave should not be making any such demands at all. I find it ludicrous that, in the main, the relationships stay exactly the same, and so do the outfits, regardless of what the sex is of the person claiming to be dominant in the relationship. The best way to determine if a woman is truly dominant, versus only pretending or only sexually, is to check her shoes, how many layers of makeup she has on, etc. Leaving room for interpretation by personality, profession, etc. I pretty much never wear makeup. When I do, it's because I want to. Otherwise, I don't, because I don't have to, just to feel like I have a face. And, most of the time, most people do not even notice. When they do, they are usually women, and they say things like "I wish I had the confidence to do that." And, yet, they often are the ones who think they are dominant. If you are a dominant female, you have the confidence to do that. Or, to dress up instead. Or, whatever. And, you are probably wearing comfortable shoes. I've never had to wear makeup and heels to attract attention. I have had to eschew them to limit it, though.

Slave/sub:

do agree with You.  Many people in the BDSM world have never "done anything".  They've thought about it forever, but they haven't actually done anything.  As a result, they don't really know what they want.  They think what they want is a woman to dress a certain way . . . they want certain acts, they want to be spoken to in a certain way.  In reality, they don't know what they want at all.  The problem is that these people don't seem to realize they don't know what they want.  Many of whom suffer from that lovely combination of "too little clue" combined with "too loud a voice"!  

For me: i seek a woman with whom i can have a conversation.  That's usually, in my eyes, a good start. :-)

Mistress Arletta:

That's a very good start. Having much luck with that? I've just had some nasty emails from a man who is local who says he is upset because I am unclear on what I want and obviously deceitful; but, in reality, he is a cross dresser and he knows I don't want one, so he is acting out. (sigh) Why do people take me making a choice of what I do or do not want as a slave as a personal insult? Why can't they just accept that what it means is we are not compatible and, then, move on?

Slave/sub:

It doesn't work well at all for me, given that I remain unattached. I've heard many people describe that sort of thing: a simple "I'm not interested" turning into huge personal insults. I don't quite understand this mindset, except to say it is SO frustrating as a male in the bdsm world! We are a dime a dozen, and finding anyone -- let alone the right woman -- can take so much out of a person! Not a justification or excuse, of course.

Mistress Arletta:

Yes, but .. I did not tell him I'm not interested. My profile says that if what you are into falls under my hard limits, not to waste our time, or something like that. Cross dressing is on there. We were not emailing each other, or anything. I had zero intention of personally rejecting him, as I did not know he existed.
If we had been in contact, I would understand it .. better.

Slave/sub:

By the way, on a little tangent, a LOT of dommes don't like cross dressers. 99% of the time, if I see a domme that shows an interest in cross dressers, she is a "pro" and needs to do this because of clients (pro dommes are often guided by what customers seek). One domme once remarked to me "what is so humiliating about wearing a dress? I wear a dress every day!"

Mistress Arletta:

From my viewpoint, well, for one thing I am not a domme. I realize that, for some people, it just means any dominant female, but, in point of fact, it refers to dominatrices, who are not necessarily dominant by personality. They are women who sexually dominate their partners and playmates, and, usually for money.

I am a Mistress, because I am the head of my household, always have been ever since I was an adult, and so I shall continue. But, that is a totally different tangent, and, most of the time I don't care, because I know the titles get interchanged, quite frequently, regardless of walk of life, around here.
I find cross dressers offensive. I have no qualms with men who are pretty, who want to put on makeup, who love to wear shiny satin things, or etc. It is no more natural or unnatural than when a woman does it. However, women do it to enhance their femininity, and their femininity is natural, because they are women and that is what being feminine means.
I am equally offended by women who simper, dress in sexy outfits, act brainless and prattle about how great it is to be feminine, because, they, like the men who do these things, have reduced the strength and beauty of the female sex into a gross caricature.
In the case of the men, however, they are also denying the strength and beauty of their own sex, instead of enhancing it.
People are too wonderfully made for that sort of shenanigans.
Besides, most cross dressers try to compete with women, and that's just wrong and weird. We get enough of that from other women.
What really, really offends me is T-girls, because they outright claim to be straight women on a lot of sites, and there are men who are looking for T-girls claiming to be straight men, and that makes it very, very hard to find someone to talk to if you are really just a heterosexual man or woman looking for your counterpart of the opposite sex.
Besides, high heels be damned, those boys have not put in the time or pain that comes with being female. When they pick up a guy, they do have to worry about being beat up, sure, for not being what he wants. However, so do women. On top of that, they have to worry about cancer of the uterus, cancer of the cervix, periods, PMS, possible pregnancies .. so, unless those men want someone to cut them open, implant a baby so that they can get stretch marks and permanently altered hip structure, etc.; or, unless they want someone to stop by and stab them in the lower back every month for a week or two, so they have some concept of the pain and trauma that is associated with being a woman, they should just not their silly shite off!

Slave/sub:

I've heard similar arguments about that: until he has to deal with PMS, what business does a man have to speak of his own femininity? :). But You have a very good point that most cross-dressers are trying to dress and act like a caricature of what it means to be feminine. I suspect this is because in the BDSM world, cross dressing is about humiliation. The humiliation is about losing ones masculinity. As a result, the whole thing becomes about taking something away, not about enhancing anything.

Mistress Arletta:

But, to me, it does not insult him - it insults femininity. Anyway, if someone likes doing it, it is hardly being forced. So, yes, what is so humiliating about wearing a dress? She is right. It would only be humiliating if you made them do it in front of their family or something, who were not aware and who would be shocked, and that would be mean to people who made no agreement to be treated that way; or, it would be humiliating for a man who was absolutely against it. And, I have done that to men, who kept saying "Why don't you get all dolled up?" and "It's not that hard to keep your stocking straight, your makeup  and hair 'done', and to walk in high heels and it enhances the mood, so there is no excuse to not do it. Women have to be men's fantasies."
Yep, I have taken some of those men and forced them to wear women's clothes, keep their makeup and hair done, walk around in high heels, and act like they think women should act in public, so they would have some clue of what they were talking about. They were not so much humiliated, as horribly frustrated, broke from all the money that goes into it, and with painful feet.

Slave/sub:

I knew one woman that was a Domme that lived with her sub boyfriend. He used to cross-dress a lot, and she got SO annoyed that he could handle heels better than she could! Ultimately, there is nothing humiliating about wearing a dress, in and of itself. It can, however, be quite erotic in the right mindset, with a couple that shares this together. But, a man demanding "make me wear a dress, dammit, so I can feel humiliated" is a bit silly! I do recall an experience that was not humiliating, but humbling. I have been put in a maid's uniform at various times when dommes have me do maid service. The simple uniform puts me in a mindset that I am a servant, here to serve. Not humiliating, as I said, but humbling: something very different.

Mistress Arletta:

Yes, well, I no longer deal in generalizations. That is to say, it does me no good to say "Some people like it." as I am not here to find out what some people like. I am here to find what suits me and cross dressers do not suit me. I would not find it erotic, I would find it insulting and I would throw the baggage out.
Besides, I believe with God there is some leeway, due to circumstances (ie:David eating the loaves of presentation), but, those circumstances truly have to warrant it, and he says not to dress as  a man if you are a woman, or vice versa. Obviously, a man who wakes up to find himself dumped in the desert, nude, should not eschew the dress when it is proffered by the helpful group of ladies traveling through. That is a very good reason to wear a dress, even though you think it is wrong.
I have to think it is wrong, because I believe in God and he says it is wrong, and, in most cases, he is provably right, since most men who dress like women sexually confuse themselves and other men and this adherence to assuming the visual aspect of "femininity" is what makes someone feminine hurts the relations between the sexes, promotes useless selfish sex above love and companionship, and generally helps screw up entire societies. The proof being that the entire societies are screwed up and very few people have any clue, anymore, who or what they really are.
However, there is this weird little desert tribe where, every so often -  I can't remember if it is every 5 years, once a year,  or what - all the men put on excessively odd makeup and robes (they look like desert dwelling drag queens) and perform very weird dances and facial tic sort of movements (think Tina Turner as the Acid Queen in Tommy) in the hopes of enticing women to them, and, then, later, they come around on camels and steal the women away from their home, if the woman wants to go.
Now, those men are doing much the same thing, by way of dressing, as the men who are cross dressers. The difference is that they are not denying that they are men, or trying to sexually confuse anyone, or wearing women's clothes so as to even inadvertently cause that sexual confusion. They are just being men, as men should be, according to their ways. So, it is not what you wear, so much, as WHY you wear it.
Also, there is the fact that part of being a Dom, Domme, Master, Mistress, etc. is to teach and guide the other person to being a better, more capable version of themselves. Now, there is nothing about abusing someone's mind, making them feel bad about themselves, that can possibly be construed as teaching them and guiding them to be a better person.
Better can be construed in several ways - but, if you are making them into something that is non-functional without you, or a total outcast in society, or a caricature, or in denial of their own true, born natural state of being, then what you are doing, whatever it is, is not something that can possibly be construed as "better".
People always ask "Well, what do you do for me?" and to some extent they are right to ask that, because there is no good reason to put yourself into the hands of someone who is simply going to use your money, ruin your mental and physical health, and, then, toss you aside when you can no longer play to their satisfaction. Those people are not Masters of anything. They have nothing to teach, they have nowhere to guide you, and they will not make your life better, in any fashion.
However, what truly dominant people do for slaves and submissives is rather subtle and hard to explain. It is not so much that they perform a specific task, usually; it is that, by their strength, they become a most excellent catalyst, focal point, touch stone, sounding board .. they are a strength to turn to, with rules to bind you in and keep you safe from the world when it is too much, and someone to care for the opinion of beyond all others - but, not so that they can send you out to a Qwik Stop with cum on your face, and you feel good about making other people uncomfortable; but, so you can move more confidently in society, knowing that, whatever anyone else thinks, you are doing the right thing and you know it, because they have told you that it is so and your goal is to please them by what you do.

Therefore, sometimes, there are things that are needed - again, not specific activities, but, more, things that bring about specific feelings - from time to time, for the sake of helping the slave or submissive remember that they should, can, and do please this person whom they belong to. That is why it is good, for instance, to sometimes cage a slave, so that they learn to wait with patience and that they can do this; or, to make them hold a position, so that they learn that they do have endurance; or , whip them, so that they know they can endure pain to reach a desired goal. That goal, in that case, being the knowledge that they endured, that they were brave, and that they pleased their owner. But, it translates into the work environment, into self confidence, into being bold enough to raise a hand and say " I have an idea." when you are sure your idea is worth sharing.
That's what they should be doing for slaves and submissives. So, that, if the slave or submissive moves on, or the owner is tired of them and moves on, or the owner is ill or dies, this person who has served them is a more whole, better person, who has the wherewithal to brave the world by themselves and take care of business. Even if the owner is no longer there, they have the memories of the rules, the sayings, the activities that helped make them a better, stronger, more capable person to help them along.
So, just like with cross dressing, it is all about emphasis and most people's emphasis is misguided, at best. Which, if that's what they are into, is their problem. My problem is finding people who have the right emphasis, as I am very tired of slaves who think it is all about being broken down, tortured, abused, and abandoned - and, yet, still hope for love and romance, and walks in the sunset. (sigh)
I find men in stockings, by the way, enormously attractive. In the Rocky Horror Picture Show, I am totally enamored of Tim Curry's character, when he is prancing around in stockings and a garter belt, with his nipples showing, looking all manly. Then, he puts on a dress that has funny bumps around the chest area, and I lose all interest.
So, if a man were to tell me he wants to wear stockings, a garter belt and matching panties, I would be relatively okay with that. If he wants to stuff a bra, call himself Cynthia, and giggle girlishly at me, I have no use for him.


For the record, yes, the man who was just sending me untrue and bitchy messages is right in one respect: he certainly has the right to dress however he chooses to dress. Then, he loses the point, because, I did not attack him over the way he dresses, he attacked me over my personal choice not to own a slave who dresses that way. I have the right to choose not to own a cross dresser! Even if he really, really wishes I would change my mind. So, if you are a cross dresser, and you want to be owned by me, decide which is more important in your life, and, act accordingly.
Vanilla: Two definitions. I have been thinking, again, about this term vanilla, and how many people use it to so disparagingy, when, mostly, it is not a bad thing; and, when, mostly, they are engaged in the seeking out of the bits of it that are the worst. Which has led me to considering the whys and wherefores of that, and deciding that, really, there are two different definitions of vanilla, to my mind. Because, you know, the world was fairly well always "vanilla", being ever so shocked by things that would fall under bdsm, and, yet, the world, while being "vanilla' created stocks, pillories, gibbets, chains, slavery, numerous torture devices, whores, bondage of the mind, bondage of the body, and bondage of the soul. Whips were used on numerous people, for varying reasons, human flesh was eaten, and bestiality occurred. Therefore, "vanilla" and "boring" are not synonymous. Vanilla does not mean "an absence of whips" or "an absence of slavery"or there never would have been slaves that were whipped. It does not even mean "an absence of sexual slavery" since the American slaves were bred with their master and with other slaves of different ethnicities to make better stock, some of them were kept in what amounted to whore houses, and a good lot of them were whipped. Obviously, the Romans were big on using slaves in a sexual manner, at various ponts of history, and were not adverse to forcing them to torture and kill each other for amusement. But, none of them subscribed to bdsm, as it was not a lifestyle, so they just went about being "vanilla". If that is not what is meant by "vanilla", then, what is meant? And, how come, sometimes, that is exactly what vanilla is used to describe? Back to the two definition theory. Vanilla 1: This one is a definition of vanilla, as it is meant by people who say such things as "BDSM is not about sex", I do believe; because, they are looking for something beyond that common, nasty, vanilla slavery, where people are treated like bodies and used as mere flesh, without their owner ever entering into their feelings, thoughts, needs, desires, or engaging in a real relationship with them.? Vanilla1 is a very depressing state of ignorance of the spiritual aspects of ownership. Vanilla 1 people torture your body because they like to hurt others and are nasty. They do not look on it as giving, sharing, teaching, and if they become sexually excited by their actions it is not excitement with and towards their "victim" because it is not consensual, and their victim really is a victim, who is not at all happy to be there. Vanilla 1 people do not think of others, and are out for their own selfish needs. Vanilla 1 people, in fact, make up the majority of people in BDSM, because, try as you might to keep the buggers out, they will infiltrate your space, and they will try to twist your life to fit their needs. So that all of a sudden, bdsm is all about the fulfillment of their selfish desires, playing here and there instead of intensely intimate relationships, abuse and degradation for the sake of the abuse and degradation rather than as a means of learning humility. I mean, let's face it: If anyone tells you they are your Master, or your Mistress, and that they are going to make you a better and happier person by taking everything you own, then shitting in your mouth, and you believe them, you are an extremely Vanilla 1 couple. You like to be abused and oppressed and will do anything to get it, and they want your money and to laugh at you for having shit stains on your teeth, and they don't care how they have to humiliate themselves to get that, either. I wish all the Vanilla 1 people would go away, as they are truly clogging up the works for those of us who desire true contact between persons, not just contact of flesh and the purchase of bright, shiny objects. How do you tell a Vanilla 1 person? Well, if you meet a man who is married, who says that he wants to fulfill a woman's every desire, but, cannot get along with his wife as her desires are not interesting to him, you have met one. If he was a Vanilla 2 person, he would seek to fulfill her desires, and the fulfillment of them would be his desire. Instead, he is seflishly taking away from her and giving to someone else, in order to get what he wants. Vanilla 2: Most highly despised by Vanilla 1 people; this is because Vanilla 2 people are the base from which everything good and interesting is made. Vanilla 2 people want to commune with your soul, they are lovers, they enjoy walking in the park and holding your hand; they can love you, with or without whipping you, with or without you whipping them, and writhe with joy over the happiness that their seeking to fulfill you has brought you both. Vanilla 2 people may have fetishes, they may have preferences, but, they are willing to explore yours, too, so long as there is no damage being caused to the spirit of the persons involved. They have limits, they respect your limits. In fact, they respect most everything. Vanilla 2 people do not seek to bring discomfort to the world, but, they seek to find their own happiness intermingled with the happiness of others. These are people who want to own slaves, or be owned, as an expression of something more than just flesh that is controlled.? These are the people who can "TPE" you into sheer dizziness with a glance. Yes, they may also engage in some of the same activities as Vanilla 1 people, but, the reasons for doing so are vastly different, at least on most days. How do you tell a Vanilla 2 person? Well, I suppose the easiest way is that their profiles are not full of how wonderful they are, and either is their conversation. They have conversation, they care about what you think and feel. They never burst into your inbox with "Submit to me now" unless it is followed by a chuckle and in response to your journal entry over how so many idiots have done so. In other words, they are willing to engage you in mind, body, and spirit. This is not boring vanilla, even though it is often law abiding. This is sweet, tasty, hard to get, high quality vanilla that makes you long for it and want to taste it over and over. And, yes, sometimes, sprinkle it with something a little darker, or nuttier, or spicier, but, to always, always, have it on your tongue and deep inside you.
A small, enlightening conversation with a slave type: him: ?It seemed to me that unless I am offering money, most people aren't very interested in being served. At least through D/s relationships there is opportunity for genuine service that seems to be appreciated. me: Money is not service! Unless, it is part of a greater dynamic, such as the full blown relationship. If we were living together, you gave me your money, I used it to buy groceries, pay the rent or a house payment, dress myself up pretty, etc. then it would be service and it would be power exchange since it is going back into the whole mix of living together. If we are not living together, and you hear that I can't pay my rent and you volunteer to pay for it, that is a kindness, something beyond the service. If I order it, then I'm just a gold digging tramp. Mind you, I wouldn't say that is true about lesser things, such as "Come over, bring a pizza and a movie." or "Let's go where you can buy me a flogger so I can use it on you in a nearby alleyway." Money does have a way of getting involved. But, there are limits and always should be. Most people who want to "serve me", in fact, offer me money for sex or money to not have sex with them and make them feel bad about it. Neither of which is how I wish to live my life. I keep telling them "This is nothing like fetching me a cup of tea." It is very disappointing to me. Though, there is an older gentleman (older than me, younger than you, to be more accurate) who may be visiting me from Ireland who has made no such demands, so I think he might be genuine. What I want is to live together, as a family (for lack of a better word), sharing our lives together, with the slave/Mistress dynamic. I don't want it to be all gross, painful, or self centered for anyone. him: I have always imagined living in a community formed intentionally by? conscious decision by people who may engage each other at different levels including intellectual, emotional, sexual, service, material sharing, spiritual, and any other way that is agreeable to them. Such a community could welcome those who are by nature submissives and slaves as well as those who are naturally dominant. me: I'm not interested in polyamory. Sexually, I'm very monogamous and I have to really care for the person in a very special way, or it's just no good. But, communal sort of living can be quite lovely, I have found, so long as someone is in place to have the final say and that someone must be someone relatively sane and with the best interests of all, as individuals and as the group, at heart. If I have slaves, I will not insist that they do not have sex, but, I will insist that they do not bring women back to my home, that they do not try to have it with me, that they do not go around sexing up the other slaves in front of me, or acting irresponsibly. In other words, you treat the slave home like a family home, and assume it is a family of persons who are respectful of each other and not into incest.
Old profile, still of interest: Do not expect me to contact you. It may happen, but, I doubt it. I need serious slaves who are ready to engage in a real, in-person, full time, 24/7, 365 relationship as owned persons. By the reading of this profile and taking action, you will be showing me that you are one of them. I am not here to be judged by slaves. My ways are what they are. True slaves will reorient themselves to my methods. Do not ask my interests, or what I will or will not do to, for, against, or with you. When I have reason to believe you are acceptable to me, you will be told what you need to know. Answer the questions below, cutting and pasting them into a message and giving your answer below each question, in a neat and orderly manner. You may break them up into sections, or even send them one at a time. Do not ask, or try to guess, what answer I want. What I want is honesty. As I will read your answers, your profile, and judge if you seem to be compatible, on top of answering the questions, you would be wise to go and rethink your profile as most of the "slaves" I have encountered on here, thus far, have done a piss poor job of representing themselves. Your profile should reflect (live for) those things that must be a part of your life, because without them you would break, and (hard limits) those things you cannot live with, because living with them, you would break. Then (hate) those things which would be suitable for punishment, or which you hope not to have to engage in, but, which you will engage in if ordered.And, of course, (love) those things which, if an Owner wished to reward you or see you smile, they could give to you, do to you, or allow you to be a part of. If you are interested in knowing me, you will alter your profile to the standards mentioned, above, and you will also change your profile, to show that you are asking to be considered by me, to show that you are not currently actively seeking anyone but friends (at least until I am done with you), and you will write to me and ask me, specifically, to consider you. If you want me to believe in your sincerity, you will also send a photo or video that has you (I need to see your face, your eyes) holding a sign that says "Please consider me, Mistress Arletta?" Or, you may write it upon your body Here is one question that will save us both a lot of time, potentially: Are you looking for a domme (woman who is sexually dominant) or a dominant owner? If you are looking for the former, we are done. If you are looking for the latter, proceed. Questions for slaves: 1. To what extent should you be allowed to set the tone of the relationship? 2. To what extent should your owner be allowed to set the tone of the relationship? 3. Are you seeking sexual play, physical pain, emotional pain, or acceptance most? 4. Are you truly relocatable? How long would it take you to relocate, and, why? 5. Is your good service contingent upon living conditions? As in, would you refuse to start with someone who did not have a dungeon? Would you refuse to stay with someone who did not allow you to sleep in a cage, or who insisted that you did? Why? 6. Do you accept, as fact, that woman have the right to decide what to do, or what not to do, with their own bodies? 7. Is it more important to you, personally, that you should sign over everything to your owner or that your owner does not ask for everything to be signed over? 8. Would you rather give or have it taken by force? (Regardless of what "it" is) 9. Do you have an opinion on what thought processes, dressing styles, activities, duties, looks, lifestyles or punishments make someone a true slave? If so, what are they? Why? 10. Do you have an opinion on what thought processes, dressing styles, activities, duties, looks, lifestyles or punishments make someone a true Master or Mistress? If so, what are they? Why? 11. Are you seeking to be forced into sexual situations that you would not put yourself in, otherwise? 12. Are your fetishes (whatever they are) something you can live with having part time? 13. Do you have certain criteria you look for in an owner? If so, what, and why? 14. Are your fetishes something that you could forgo altogether for the greater pleasure of full time service as a completely owned slave? 15. Do you hope to be a slave for a lifetime, to the same person? If not, what length of contract are you hoping for? Why? 16. Are your fetishes something that must be utilized by your owner to get you motivated to serve? 17. Can you work for others, or engage in sexual activities with others, without it affecting your loyalty or service to your owner? 18. How do you hope to be treated in public, by your owner? 19. What is your relationship like with your family and friends? Do you still want to visit them and do activities with them? 20. Do your friends or family know you are a slave? Why? And, how would you handle keeping them in your life, if you could choose the method, while being a slave? 21. Can you accept that you may have to do things you will not like, of a day-to-day living variety, such as reading from books that you do not like, attending meetings that you do not enjoy, cleaning things that make you gag, cooking when you hate to cook? 22. Are you looking for a romantic or sexual relationship with your owner? Which? Why? 23. Do you think that your money is to be used in trade to buy your Mistress' affections? 24. Do you want a Mistress who is a goddess, claiming to have powers over you, controlling your will and forcing you to perform vile acts? Why? 25. If someone sets you the task of cleaning the kitchen, does your head fill with ideas related to sponges, scrubbers, how to operate their dishwasher? Or, does it fill with thoughts of you in stockings, face ground into the linoleum by the booted foot of your owner, feeling your butt plug jiggle in fear, as you are growled at and told that you did it all wrong and must do it again? Which of these two scenarios, above, comes closer to your thought processes? 26. Do you want a Mistress who claims to be a dominant woman, not a goddess, who wants you to work for her, to fulfill her needs, but, who is basically loving and kind when you please her, but, can be quite harsh when you have crossed the line? Why? 27. Will you serve publicly, if your Mistress requires it? Why? 28. Do you think slavery is shameful? Why? 29. Name three movies that really make you laugh. 30. Are you sensitive to odors, such as the odor of garlic? 31. Has anyone ever accused you of being uptight? Why? 32. Are you a toilet slave? Why? 33. Have you read my journal entries and blog, yet? Have you sent me the photo or video mentioned? Have you changed your profile? Have you done any, or all, of the above-mentioned things that you should do if you wish to impress me with your sincerity? Why? 34. Have you ever dreamed of helping a woman transform herself into the beauty she should be? Of undoing the evils wrought by other men? Why? 35. Are you truly heterosexual, not willing to be forced to be bisexual? 36. Name three movies that really make you cry. 37. Name three songs that inspire you. 38. When you think of being a slave, do you think of being whipped, of being tied up and sexually used, of kneeling and kissing feet, of waving a palm frond to cool the heated, glistening breasts of your Mistress, of kneeling on a cobble stone floor scrubbing the tiles, of being a Butler who answers the door and takes coats and fetches drinks, of being a maid, of being a cook? Or, what? Why? 39. Do you think Spartacus was wrong to rebel? Why? 40. Do you dream of the good old days of southern slavery, when you could have been bought and sold without so much as a by your leave, worked to death, fed to dogs, without anyone caring as much for you as they would have for a lame mule? Why? 41. Does who you choose to accept as your owner is hinge upon them fulfilling your fetishistic needs? 42. Name three books, or authors, that you love the writing of. 43. What are your religious beliefs? How much do you adhere to the teachings thereof? 44. What are your political beliefs? How important are politics to you? 45. Are you interested in me because of my size? 46. If you could not serve a woman - absolutely could not - would you serve a man, instead? Why? 47. Do you read? What? 48. What is your prior experience as a slave, servant, or submissive? 49. Do you fairly well at grammar and punctuation? 50. Does who you choose to accept as your owner hinge upon them fulfilling your sexual needs? 51. Does who you choose to accept as your owner hinge upon them being the religion that suits you best? Or, upon them having no religion, if that is what suits you best? 52. Can you differentiate between an order that is inconvenient/ a big step, and an order that is actually dangerous? IE: Someone tells you to buy a house (big step) or someone tells you to buy a house and put it in their name, immediately (dangerous step). 53. Do you believe slaves are less than human? 54. Do you believe men are less than human? 55. Why should I want you as a slave? What assets will you bring to our relationship? 56. Do you believe in monogamy? 57. Do you want to serve without being considered to be a man, but, to be seen as this sexless worker drone? 58. Can you teach your skills to others without feeling superior to them? 59. When you receive an order to do something you do not particularly enjoy, do you feel put upon, disappointed, punished, trusted, owned or what? 60. Would you rebel against an owner who wanted to give you herbal supplements, vitamins, a high colonic, hydrogen peroxide therapy, or other alternative health treatments? Why? 61. What do you hope to get out of slavery? 62. Would you rebel against an owner who wanted to teach you their religious beliefs? Why? 63. What sort of slave do you hope to be (sex, pain, domestic, caged, trusted servant, lover with some combination of sex and pain and domestic, ???)? 64. Do you believe that women can only dominate men by their sexuality? 65. Is giving money to your Mistress a pain, a pleasure, or both? 66. Can you serve a woman who is married to a man, who would not be your Master? 67. What kind of housework (including yard work) do you actively enjoy doing? 68. What kind of housework (including yard work) are you good at doing? 69. Can you serve a woman who is married to a man, who would be her Master? 70. Are you ready to perform a small task to prove that you are capable of obedience, domestic service, thoughtful service, and financial service, all at once - that will cost less than $100.00 and has nothing to do with you giving out any financial information to anyone else. 71. Can you serve a woman who is married to a man, who would be your Master? 72. Are you likely to be jealous of other slaves? 73. Describe your interest list by going into detail as to why things are an interest or hard limit, especially fetishes. For instance, if you are into ass play, do you hope to perform anal sex on your Mistress, do you hope she will use a strap on to perform anal sex on you, do you hope she will force you to have anal sex with other male slaves, are you into felching, do you enjoy being spanked and that's all the ass play you mean, or what? 74. Do you think your Mistress must believe in female supremacy? 75. Are you prepared to sign contracts, letters of intent, and whatever else is necessary for a fully legal, binding agreement, complete with exchange of address and other contact information, notarization of documents, and etc? You may ask me questions, slave, as far as proof of my existence. If you want to know what I seek, think, feel, what interests me, then, learn to read. I will not reply to you if you ask, as I have provided much by way of journal entry, and you may also look up my yahoo blog. I am not here to converse randomly with slaves. I am here to find ones that are compatible enough, in thinking, that they can be trained to do as I need them to, so I may commence living in the style to which I wish to become accustomed. If that seems to be you, we will discuss contracts, and, if all goes well, begin to serve and be served, within a week. Since it has been asked: Yes - slaves, submissives, Masters, Dommes, Mistresses, or any other persons who feel the urge, may freely use these questions as a means of screening, or as an enhancement to their profile or journal entries.
Is it wrong to want to change your name, acquire three slaves, travel abroad, and be known as that mad half-gypsy woman of mystery? Really? Is it?
IP address madness!  I was reading a slave's profile, wherein he told how to look up someone's IP address.

Going to the site, I was immediately told what my IP address is, and, that it is listed with three databases as being a spammer. So, I went and looked up those three databases. Two of them did not have that IP address listed, and one didn't even exist.

Then, I see something that says I can look up geographical information and put the IP address in there. It gave me results from two different providers. One said I was in Tucson, AZ. The other one said I was in Denver, Colorado.

Weird, eh?

Well, maybe the person in Denver is a spammer? I thought IP addresses are supposed to be unique, though?
Today, I am the Ultimate Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything! Surely, something good must happen on this day? During this year?

Oh, yes, I believe it must.

10/8/2010 8:28:25 PM


The changing of the profile:


As  I recently wrote to a slave, with a wonderful name: "What  
I want, is to own a few slaves for non-sexual, non-romantic usage. Not  
looking for masochists, puppies, whores, sissies, or anything but, good,  
strong, capable men who like to serve. Really, I do not care if they  
are in chastity or not; if they want to be caged or shackled, or not; if  
they wish to wear a uniform, a loin cloth, or just regular clothes when  
at home. What I care about is the slave mentality: Obedience, desire to  
serve, striving to do the work well and in a timely manner, and enough  
compatibility to also make them enjoyable companions.There is a  
slave house I had found, back when allegedly this Canadian slave was  
going to come to me (he decided, at the last, he couldn't handle full  
time slavery and relocation), that was to be purchased by the slave(s)  
and transformed by the slaves. That was the Tucson house.


It was perfect  
for the needs of myself with a few slaves. A few being somewhere  
between 1-6.Now, since then, the place has either been sold or  
taken off the market, so I would probably have to find a new place.  
Though, if it was taken off the market, there is still a possibility  
that they would accept offers.


Anyway ....  I also want a slave  
house in or near Edinburgh. And, to that end, I want slaves, as much as  
possible, who are mobile, either because they are retired and drawing  
retirement pay (or otherwise non-working but with money of their own) or  
because they have that sort of work that can be done most anywhere. So  
that we can travel, half the year in the US, half in the UK, more or  
less.


And, if they start doing that three months on, three months off  
thing, perhaps we'll also find some place to visit that is not either  
one of those countries.Does any of this interest you? "Only,  
I should correct myself in one thing: it would not be purchased by the  
slave(s) because the slave(s) would be my property and, therefore, it  
would be purchased by me, through my property being utilized in the most  
efficient and forthright manner possible.


Sometimes, the  
best things to write on profiles or journal entries come to me whilst I  
am writing something else altogether. Weird, that."I want one of  
two things: a proper husband, in a monogamous marriage where I am the  
head of the household - with or without added kinkiness in the bedroom,  
or rules about furniture, etc. as it turns out to be; or, full on proper  
slaves who will not touch me without permission, will not talk to me  
about their genitalia unless they need to go to the doctor or some such  
as that, and who accept that they are owned: mind, body, finances,  
everything."


That, above, is the succinct version of all the below:Dominant: commanding, controlling, or prevailing over all others; very important, powerful, or successful; overlooking and commanding from a superior position;being the one of a pair of bodily structures that is the more effective or predominant in action IF  
you are looking for a dominant woman, then be prepared for her to be  
commanding and controlling, to be in the superior position in the  
relationship, and to initiate the actions of the relationship.


IF you want to make the rules, learn to be a Dom.

IF  you want monogamous love and romance, and are not into degradation,  
anal penetration,  serious masochism, pornography, cuckolding, etc. and  
you want the women to take the reins in the relationship, but, you are  


capable of having good quality vanilla sex too, I might be interested in  
you.


IF you want a non-sexual, fully committed Mistress/slave  
relationship based on old-fashioned hard work and servitude, where you  
would be a real slave whose treatment - whether very good or rather bad -  
would be at my discretion - if what you want most is to give, to serve,  
and to be guided in life - then I might be interested in you.


IF you want to demand that kinky things are done to you, or to be treated  
like anything other than human, go away! I  have a toilet, and I would  
like you to clean it, on schedule, not be it.  I have dogs  I can visit,  
and if I wanted any more, I would go get one, and it would be better  
company than a person pretending to be one, as well as a better  
conversationalist.


I am not weak, I am not scared of men, I do not need to make them less than men to handle them. Nor, do I hate them. Men are lovely, wonderful people, some of them and I quite enjoy their company. But, I am not having sex with one, unless I am married to him.  So, he can be a companion, a slave, but, not a lover or sex toy.


I hope someone reads this and understands, this time around!And, do not come at me with the usual b.s. about how I have to change my  mind, or settle, or etc.  Mistress' do not have to change their limits  
to please the slaves!It strikes me as very odd that the men who quote the alleged uber dommes, those few women who have bothered to  write about their experiences and ideas and publish them (who are, in no  
way, extraordinary in their dominance), and who clamor after that sort of lifestyle are:

1) Full of demands and ideas.

2) Afraid to commit or submit.

3)  self-admitted readers of books that the uber domme has said should never be read by men, and, therefore, disobedient to their ideal.


In other words, they are everything those women would have rejected. Quote me no more from books you should not have read, and compare me no more to women I am not. My life will be lived my way, and so shall my slaves be led.


If  you want to be a slave, start as you intend to continue. Practice obedience, hard work, make yourself ready to serve, and think of me -  learn about me - before you contact me. If you write to me,  asking what I am into, what I believe, what I want, or offering  euphemistic sex (as if I don't know that oral "worship" is still just oral sex), offering to be used in ways I do not wish to use anyone, I  will know that you are not taking this seriously.


If you were taking it seriously, and you thought we might be a good match, you  surely would read this profile and my journal entries, maybe even ask  the people on my friends list what they know about me. I'll do  
it, when considering you! And, if I find that you are lying - like the  Dom/slave who claims the transexuals just come and ask him to befriend  them, when, according to them, he is the one who started chatting them  
up - you will be no part of my life.  

10/9/2010 7:58:40 AM


Obviously, this is not about bdsm, exactly, but the same rules apply, if you change the words  from "boyfriend" for instance to "slave" and from "love" to "want to serve"; or, whatever is appropriate. And, even more obviously, if one is talking about a romantic relationship within the context of bdms related activities, that goes ever so much more so. So, here are some pertinent questions and answers/ suggestions I found, Googling, this morning, whilst wondering what exactly do I need to know about a man to know if he is right for me enough that we should meet and all (and, what does he need to know about me):How do I know if my girlfriend or boyfriend really loves me?You  
really can tell if somebody loves you or they don't love you. If they  
love you, they're willing to go out of their way for you. They're  
willing to do anything for you. And they're also willing to do things  
that they really don't want to do, because that's true love.What do I need to know about my partner before we have sex?Before  
your first sexual encounter with a new partner, you really need to do a  
lot of things. Number one; you need to be responsible. You need to find  
out their sexual history. You need to definitely talk about use of  
birth control as well as a way to prevent sexually transmitted diseases.  
You also need to find out what each of your expectations are in the  
relationship. Does somebody just want a hook-up, or do they want to have  
meaningful relationship with you?You should make sure to discuss some things before you actually make  
such a big commitment as moving in together. Awkward though such talks  
may be, you really need to know these biggies in advance. First off is money. Are you both expecting to go on being completely  
independent with your money? Will you pay half the rent each or does one  
of you have considerably more money than the other? Maybe you will even  
want to open a mutual bank account. Money is a very tense subject but  
it is better to grab it by the horns before it's got you in a corner, so  
to speak. Another big fight starter is housework. Even if you  
are from similar cultural backgrounds there is still room for a lot of  
disagreement here. Maybe one of you is much neater than the other.  
Again, come to an agreement before you move in together. Sort out how  
often you think cleaning is necessary, your minimum comfort level and  
what tasks should be done by whom if you decide to split them up rather  
than taking turns with everything. Lastly, it is a good idea to  
know how both of you like to spend time. If one of you wants to go out  
clubbing every other night while the other wants to have quiet, cozy  
evenings at home you are headed for trouble. Make sure you have  
something you both like to do. A long term relationship needs to be  
based on friendship as well as love.Agreeing on some house rules  
explicitly will magically improve your life together. We all have our  
own unwritten rules that are obvious to us, but not so much to those  
around us. Getting it all out in the open early on will save a lot of  
damage.None of this, mind you, exactly answers what I was wondering about, but, it is all good advice, in general; and, I post it here, because I think so many people focus on "bdsm" in a bdsm relationship, that they forget the real focus should be, still and all, "relationship".  

10/9/2010 8:35:32 AM


Good morning various slaves, subs, Doms, Dommes (dom de dom dom dom) and assorted other hooligans!It is now a balmy 8:06 am. The air conditioner is still off, as it was since late evening, yesterday. Or, was it early night? How come no one ever says "early night" except in the context of making an early night of it? No one ever says "It was early night, around 9:30 pm I'm guessing, for evening was already past." Never! Well, remind me, and I'll put that, or something like it, in a story. Why should "evening" get all the fun of sprawling itself around the later hours of the day and crowd proper night out?Anyway, the air conditioner is still off, but, it is starting to feel like a bad idea. I feel like a cookie in a low temperatured oven. The edges will get all hard and burnt, crispy even, whilst the middle stays white, doughy, and cold. Last night, I met someone who threw off my equilibrium. I don't know why. Well, I know why I met him. He wrote to me. I don't know why it affected me so; I just know it did. Sometimes you just meet people and there's some instant connection, or desire. Sometimes it is that you would instantly desire to connect your boot to their face, even though they have not done anything wrong, yet, and even though you seldom kick people and never in the face. Then, later, you find out they like to skin puppies, molest children, accost nuns at cross walks, or are otherwise just big, fat, stupid jerks that even other big, fat, stupid jerks find annoying and disgusting due to the sheer overkill involved in their jerkiness. Sometimes, you just want to take the person home and kiss them repeatedly, in between far too much talking, and sending them to the kitchen to fetch tea. This is more like the latter, and nothing like the former.  Well, I suppose my boot might just get near his face one day, if I keep feeling this way, but ... kicking? No. If we had met in "real time", as they say - because, apparently, they can type 72 wpm but only in fake minutes - I would suspect him of being a pot smoker, and that this is my allergic reaction kicking in. For, up to a certain point, pot smoke makes me more attracted to a person. Then, it makes me feel homicidal, so, don't try guessing the point. It will not help you!Or, I would suspect him of having rubbed himself all over with garlic. Same effect, except that garlic does not give me headaches and make me depressed or want to hurt other people. It just makes me happy, and, apparently, smell funny.But, no, for we were nowhere near each other and whatever attraction there was was based on ... ????If I had seen his photo, first, I would suspect me of being shallow. This is because he has an adorable face. Handsome but a little goofy, reminiscent of Jeff Goldblum, who is tall, dark, and goofy looking in a way that is detrimentally sexy. But, I did not see his photo first, so, I was attracted to something else, entirely.There I was, tossing and turning all night, not solely because of him, but, believe you me, he did not help at all. For, as the man said (the very thin man)  "New words, a love so strong it tears their hearts to sleep, through the fleeting hours of morning"No, it's not love. We've never even had a proper chat, yet. But, where does love start, exactly? It is being charmed, to be sure, and maybe it is the place at which love begins. Or, maybe it is the place wherein the seed of love is planted, right before being pissed on, kicked about, scorched into oblivion by the sun, and blown away by the winds of change. I don't know!I do know that I stayed awake, tossing and turning, wondering things. How would he take what I said about ....? Does he think ....?  Would he like ....?  Where can I get a cage that ...?As the same man also said "Love is careless in its choosing, sweeping over cross and baby  Love descends on those defenseless, idiot love would spark the fusion."Unfortunately, there are many interpretations of what the man said, in fact; but, all the same, the beginning and middle are solid. Love just meanders about, throwing itself on people, without so much as a "By your leave, Madame." and all of a sudden, without quite knowing why, you've turned into a sleep deprived idiot, who is rambling about a stranger, to other strangers, whilst typing at a speed of 69 wpfm (words per fake minutes).My equilibrium is shot. I know if this turns out to be less than a good idea, for us to know each other, I will be hurt. It will not be tragic, if that happens, but, it will be painful. And, all this, over so few words .. The thing is, you meet some people and it's like the mental equivalent of that sound, that lets you know the amp is on and near the microphone. You can feel there is this connection and it is just on, and on it stays, until someone does something stupid.I hope it has good reason to just stay on, then.  

Answers for slaves: Because, fair is fair - though, obviously, they will be answered from my point of view, not those of a slave, and I may alter them in that respect - I am answering the questions I have asked on my profile. Please note the format. You are expected to follow it.

Questions for slaves:
     

  1. To what extent should you be allowed to set the tone of the relationship?
It varies, by how much tone even needs to be set. Obviously, I am seeking slaves to fulfill my needs, not theirs; but, I am hoping to find slaves that can be happy fulfilling those needs and where, by the fulfillment, the slave will also have some of their needs met. I am interested in companionship, though, as well as hard work, financial servitude, entertainment. So, I would say maybe 75 percent of it. As in, I wrote the basic contract, but, the slave certainly can ask for alterations, therein, or I might make some based on knowledge of the slave, so that it is a contract that suits us both. Also, as in, I choose how we eat most of the time, if the slave does eat or not; but, there is no reason I cannot, sometimes, let him cook or order what would make him happy, or allow him to not cook if he is ill. I don't believe in running slaves into the ground, physically or mentally. So, yeah,  some days more, some days less, but, about 75 percent, on average.

2. To what extent should your slave be allowed to set the tone of the relationship?
   Somewhere around 25 percent. Keeping in mind that "the tone" is how the relationship goes, in general. As in "The tone of the restaurant is swanky." or "The tone of the neighborhood was lower middle class." It says nothing about day to day activity. I set the majority of the tone (if it is sexual or non-sexual, if it is companionable or does the slave simply work and wait in the corner for me to summon him, etc.), but, I am not going to micro-manage the slave at his every task. So, some of the tone, whether it is a happy relationship, whether we are both fulfilled, is up to him.


3. Are you seeking sexual play, physical pain, emotional pain, or acceptance most?

I am only interested in physical pain or emotional pain when it is conducive to growth as a person, or incidental to the existence of humanity. Acceptance is a lovely, wonderful thing and I'm all for it. Sex - is for love and marriage. If the slave wants to marry me, and I want to marry him, and we do it, then, I am very interested in sexual play.

4. Are you truly relocatable? How long would it take you to relocate, and, why?

Technically, I am. And, quite a while, if I had to pay for it, but, very little time, if someone else were paying for it. Long enough for them to prove they exist and aren't cannibals, things like that. Why? Too many crazy people in the world. But, my job, I can do anywhere there is internet access and all my children are grown, enough.

5.Is your good service contingent upon living conditions? As in, would you refuse to start with someone who did not have a dungeon? Would you refuse to stay with someone who did not allow you to sleep in a cage, or who insisted that you did? Why?

Serving me is not contingent upon living conditions, no; except as they are affected by law. Right now, I live in a one-bedroom apartment (flat, to you, Brit!). Any slave who wanted to serve me, now, would have to get a nearby apartment, buy a house, find a campground, etc. This is not because of me, but, because of management of the building. I would be fine with him having a futon chair bed or sleeping on the floor, in a closet, etc.

6. Do you accept, as fact, that woman have the right to decide what to do, or what not to do, with their own bodies?

Yes. Everyone has that right, to a great extent. The one real quibble I have with that is when it comes to abortions. Partly because I think people should take responsibility for their actions, partly because I cannot imagine loving a child based on what their other parent has done, and partly because, in the case of a man who did not rape the woman, he should have the right, of a father, to choose to raise the child, if the mother does not want it. I do not believe murdering people is the best option to make your life more convenient, even if they are very small people who cannot be seen by the naked eye, yet.

7. Is it more important to you, personally, that your slave should sign over everything to you or would you not ask for everything to be signed over?

Personally, I don't want everything to be signed over. I do think I should have control over the money of the slave (the income, maybe even the savings he has already), and that is rather important, as I think it undermines the roles of me being the owner and him being the slave for me to constantly say to him "Please, will you buy me .." or "It is time for me to pay the bills, so I need you to give me. .." 

My original thoughts, which no slave seemed to want to accept (but, which were based on things that happened, at my behest, when I was a slave) was that the slave should keep his property (vehicles, real estate), and do his best to make a profit from them, or keep them in use, without them being a burden of debt. Or, he could sell them and keep them money, and any investment of that money, whatever it yielded in gain or debt would be his. And, in addition to that, he should keep 20 percent of his income (whether wages or retirement), after taxes, to save toward paying taxes of any sort, emergencies, presents, special trips or treats for himself when he has the time, and for the future.

Most of the people who objected to that, turned out to be the sort of people who talked a good game and then disappeared when it came time to go further. So, screw them, I am going back to it. It is not in the contract, as it stands now, but, it will be.

Anyway, so, he keeps those sort of things. I would have some say over his property. Such as, I told this lovely gentleman in the U.K. that if he was my slave, we might travel back and forth between the countries. In which case, since he already has a home there, his property would be a most excellent, money saving option. Yet, he could rent it out to vacationers or something, the rest of the time.

8. Would you rather have it given or take it by force? (Regardless of what "it" is)

Generally, whatever it is, I would rather have it given to me.

9.Do you have an opinion on what thought processes, dressing styles, activities, duties, looks, lifestyles or punishments make someone a true slave? If so, what are they? Why?

Why, yes, yes I do. Not the dressing styles. That's silly. How they dress, the activities and duties, looks, lifestyle, all that muck, don't matter a whit, as far as determining if they are a true slave. Thought processes, however, do. Hence why I ask questions! I don't want persons who are looking to fulfill their nasty little needs, who come at me with "I" statements and attitudes, for instance. I want people who need to give, who would be happy to be of use and needed, and respected, by another person, for what they are. Those, to me, are true slaves: doing the duties of slaves, by free-willed choice.

10. Do you have an opinion on what thought processes, dressing styles, activities, duties, looks, lifestyles or punishments make someone a true Master or Mistress? If so, what are they? Why?

Again, the rest really means nothing, but, the thought processes are vitally important.Although, sometimes, you can tell, by the looks, what the thought processes are, or, at least, where they are lacking. It's like what people say about men driving huge trucks obviously over-compensating. If you meet a Mistress who is a pouty-lipped, fake-breasted, stiletto-heeled, pvc or leather clad vixen, she's probably just a woman playing a role for the money she hopes to gain. Mind you, she could still be a dominant female, but, she's not being true to her nature, for some reason. Maybe it's because it's her job and the costume helps, in which case, no problem. However, if she is just demanding tribute, without giving you anything in return, she's not a pro domme, she's just a gold digger who is lying to you. So, in that way, yes, looks are important. Be observant!

However, the thought processes - man, that is really hard to define. Truly dominant people may sound arrogant, because they expect to get their way, but, they are not arrogant. They do not lord it over others, unless it is in play. They can sit down with their slaves and have a meal together, laugh, share stories, and, still be the obvious dominant. And, it is that their thought processes are different. They have that certain confidence, knowledge of self, that many other people lack. Dominant people also make good slaves for that same reason.

A true Master or Mistress is a dominant person who wishes to control and teach others, regardless of if it is in the capacity of slave ownership or otherwise. And, they can. Because they have enough confidence in themselves to open up to others, to learn the other person, and to guide them. They can do it with loving patience (Buddha, Ghandi), they can do it with strength and general snarkiness (William Wallace), or they can do it while utterly failing to destroy the bullying monster they used to serve, about 40-50 years before Tom Cruise makes a movie about it. Look it up! I won't explain that last bit. You do not find them by looking for the best, brightest, funniest, strongest, but, by looking for the one who walks through the crowd as if they belonged.

11. Are you seeking to be forced into sexual situations that you would not put yourself in, otherwise?

Nope.

12. Are your fetishes (whatever they are) something you can live with having part time?

All except for the fetish of owning slaves and being served by them. And, yes, it is a fetish. I need it. Some of it is just the usual selfish motives (I don't want to go make my own oatmeal, but, I sure would like some), but, it is a definite, definite fetish. It thrills me to order people to do things and then they do them. And, sometimes, I like to tell them to do things that are for no real purpose at all, except to give me that thrill. I mean, seriously, do you really think you make a comfortable footstool, slave? No, you don't - not most of you, you bony, shaking, sharp-spined, unsteady things! However, you are a lot more thrilling than the every day ottoman, while you are trying.

13. Do you have certain criteria you look for in an owner? If so, what, and why?

Uhm .. yes. I want it to be me!  Haha? Fine!  I look for slaves that like themselves and want to be liked by their owner. The kind that have a positive outlook about life, that will accept punishment, but, do not feel that punishment defines them.

14 Are your fetishes something that you could forgo altogether for the greater pleasure of full time service from a completely owned slave?

Since that is my primary fetish, no. But, uhm, sure - if I had someone come to me and say that they would be my slave, do whatever I said, but, they really, really, really hate being a footstool, so, could I put it in the contract that I would never use them as one, I could do that.  What I cannot do is give them something that, to me, is morally, hygienically, or ethically repugnant.

15. Do you hope to own a slave, the same one,  for a lifetime? If not, what length of contract are you hoping for? Why?

Well, I am not sure a lifetime is feasible, but, then I don't know how long either the slave or I will live, either, so .. .  It is my thought that the contract should be reviewed every year and during that review, it can be discussed if things need to be tweaked or if , perhaps, it would be best to go our separate ways. I hope to have the sort of slaves who will be happy with me, though, and where we can sort things out so that we can remain happy, together. I don't enter into long term relationships, looking forward to their demise. It always sucks when things end, and we should always be trying to make sure they do not. So, outside of health issues or someone being smitten by love, I don't anticipate there being an end to the relationship. I do plan for it, just in case, mildly, by contract.
 
18. How do you hope to be treated in public, by your owner?

Skipped 16 and 17, as I could think of no way that it would make sense for me to answer them. I hope that my slave will treat me with respect, and behave as a gentleman to all.  If not on his own, then, he will be trained to it.

19. What is your relationship like with your family and friends? Do you still want to visit them and do activities with them?

Three members of my family are fully aware that I am looking for slaves. One of them is a bit of a blabber mouth, so, maybe the rest of them know, too. I don't care. I am doing nothing wrong, and, if they ask me what it means, I will tell them.

I attend the Kingdom Hall, though not as often as I should. I don't think most of them would understand me owning slaves, so, I won't bring it up. Unless I move and start attending a new one, and I have a slave by then. Then, I could enter into the place as someone who owns slaves, and let them deal with it, as they will. Because, again, I am doing nothing wrong, and if they ask me what it means, I will tell them.

Absolutely, I will be visiting and doing activities with friends and family. If I do not tell everyone, and let the chips fall where they may, I will simply ask the slave to act as a roommate, neighbor, friend, co-worker, or etc. when around them.

22.  Are you looking for a romantic or sexual relationship with your owner? Which? Why?

Skipped 20 and 21, because, it made no sense for me to answer.  No, I am not looking for a romantic or sexual relationship with my slave. However, one does not choose who one falls in love with, so .. if I fall in love, and he does, then, we will see. I do not have sex outside of marriage, though.

23. Do you think that your money is to be used in trade to buy your Mistress' affections?

I think that money is a good way to make sure the bills are paid and can often buy pretty things and fun for all. I am not seeking slaves for the sake of money, though. If all I wanted was their money, I'd go get a sugar daddy, move to Nevada and become a whore, or something of that nature. So, no, money is not to be used in trade to buy my affections. It's just money. If the world goes to hell in a hand basket, and we are tramping through the woods together, foraging for whatever we can find, and you are one eyed, one legged, and slow me down when I'm trying to escape the soldiers, you'll still be my slave. However, uhm .. let's try to avoid that, eh?

24. Do you want to be a Mistress who is a goddess, claiming to have powers over your slaves, controlling their will and forcing them to perform vile acts? Why?

No, thank you! I have absolute proof I am not a goddess, in that I cannot bring anyone back to life or materialize in a shower of gold coins. I am a woman. It is enough.

Also, I am religious. I love Jehovah. I love Jesus. I would not offend them by pretending to be anything close to what they are.

Also, vile acts are called vile acts for a reason. Why would I take someone I thought enough of to allow to serve me and treat them that way? Why would I treat anyone that way? I do not want to be a vile person, so, I do not engage in vile acts - which making someone else do them would be a vile act.

I love people!

26 . Do you want a Mistress who claims to be a dominant woman, not a goddess, who wants you to work for her, to fulfill her needs, but, who is basically loving and kind when you please her, but, can be quite harsh when you have crossed the line? Why?

That's me, more or less. Though, I would prefer you never cross that line. I would so much rather we have a good time; but, I will punish you if you need it. Might sometimes use similar actions just for discipline.

27. Will your slave serve publicly?

I can't imagine why they would. I mean, yes, fetching  things, carrying packages, that sort of thing. But, to noticeably serve as a slave? I don't go to those sort of parties.

28. Do you think slavery is shameful? Why?

Slavery, as a concept, no. It is an honorable and viable method by which to boost an economy, help your family out of debt, share lives together, fulfill inner desires. Much of what has been done in the name of slavery is disgusting and shameful, though. No one should be oppressed, torn from their family, tortured, raped, or worked to death for any reason.

29.  Name three movies that really make you laugh.

The Three Amigos,  About A Boy, Life of Brian

30. Are you sensitive to odors, such as the odor of garlic?

Some odors, but, never garlic, unless it is old. If you wanted to entice me, you would rub garlic behind your ears, I love it that much! My daughter is always complaining about the pungency of my cooking.

31. Has anyone ever accused you of being uptight? Why?

Many times. Usually because I would not have sex with them or I didn't think that its father raping them was a good reason to kill their own child. To me, however, being uptight is more about not being able to walk through a crowd that has to many of some other racial  or religious group in it, and things like that. Or, like the person who ostracized me for sitting on a motorcycle - not even riding it, just actually leaning my buttocks on the side of it - because they were so against bikers.

32. Are you a toilet slave? Why?

No, and I don't want one, either. Totally unhygienic, and, uhm .. yuck! Have a little respect for yourself!

33. Have you read my journal entries and blog, yet? Have you sent me the photo or video mentioned? Have you changed your profile? Have you done any, or all, of the above-mentioned things that you should do if you wish to impress me with your sincerity? Why?

Yes, no, no. Because, no one asked me to, including me. But, I will probably get around to it, since, after all, I am answering the questions.

34. Have you ever dreamed of helping a woman transform herself into the beauty she should be? Of undoing the evils wrought by other men? Why?

Yes; because, sometimes, people are beautiful but very tired or just need better nutrition to let it shine through. And, I am an artist, after all. And, one of those women is me!

35. Are you truly heterosexual, not willing to be forced to be bisexual?

Yes.  I, one time, let someone I was serving push me into that sort of situation and it was so gross, so nasty, so unnatural. I would never do that to anyone.

36. Name three movies that really make you cry.

Err.. I forget the name of it, but, it's Bruce Willis, black people, and diamonds. Is that Tears of the Sun? Schindler's List, obviously, once I saw it. And, actually, About a Boy and Life of Brian.

37. Name three songs that inspire you.

The Year of the Cat (stunning word play); American Pie; So What (by Pink)

38. When you think of being a slave, do you think of being whipped, of being tied up and sexually used, of kneeling and kissing feet, of waving a palm frond to cool the heated, glistening breasts of your Mistress, of kneeling on a cobble stone floor scrubbing the tiles, of being a Butler who answers the door and takes coats and fetches drinks, of being a maid, of being a cook? Or, what? Why?

When I think of slaves, I primarily think of them as being step and fetch it sort of slaves, because it is right when I sit down and realize I left my drink across the room, and situation of a similar nature, or when I am too tired to cook, that I most wish I had them. However, I also think of the palm frond waving and the butlering, and maybe them playing music and being generally entertaining. I do not think of using them sexually, though, again, if I was in love with him and he were in love with me, and we were married .. mmm   But, don't count on it, slave.

39. Do you think Spartacus was wrong to rebel? Why?

Bit of a moral dilemma, there. I do not believe in rebellion, but, I also do not believe in unjust treatment of slaves, whatever the reason they are slaves, or the enslavement of people in an unjust manner, for that matter. So, he was not wrong to rebel, I guess, but, the way of rebellion might have been wrong. However, I don't know what he could have done that would have produced a desired outcome.

40. Do you dream of the good old days of southern slavery, when you could have been bought and sold without so much as a by your leave, worked to death, fed to dogs, without anyone caring as much for you as they would have for a lame mule? Why?

Absolutely not. The fact that slaves were being treated that way was a very good excuse to abolish slavery. Besides, that sort of slavery, based on kidnapping  and racism, is wrong, anyway, all the time.

42. Name three books, or authors, that you love the writing of.

Shakespeare, the entire Holy Scriptures, Stephen King, Georgette Heyer, Douglas Adams

43. What are your religious beliefs? How much do you adhere to the teachings thereof?

I am a Christian, but, not a part of Christendom - I adhere fairly well in the big things, such as not going around killing people, raping them, etc. but fail often in the smaller ways. I am a work in progress.

44. What are your political beliefs? How important are politics to you?

I am a people person, not a Party person.

45. Are you interested in me because of my size?

The most I could say I am interested in slaves looks about is that I am vitally worried when a real pretty boy shows up. Oh, and I do prefer slaves that are taller than me, really tall, because they can reach things up high easier. And, uhm, tall is impressive and neat to look at. But, I'm not overly worried about looks, size or otherwise.

46. If you could not be served by a man, would you accept the service of a woman, instead? Why?

Sure I would, so long as she understood, too, that it was non-sexual. I prefer men, though. Women are bitchier and harder to control, in general.

47. Do you read? What?

Yes, I do, though not as much, lately, as I would like to. Old books, new books. Mostly fiction or self help sort of things, blogs, short stories, some magazine or newspaper articles. Whatever strikes my fancy. Not too much by way of horror, and not pornographic materials.

48. What is your prior experience as a slave, servant, or submissive?

I had four Masters, technically. Two of them really count, though. I helped them with business, wrote out contracts, trained other slaves, stepped and fetched it, did heavy labor, modeled for catalogs of fetish wear (mainly)that were sold exclusively to the filthy rich film and rock stars, posed for art projects, lead singer, drummer, manager (sometimes we were in bands), dancer, hostess, whatever they needed. Not sexual, not pain.

49. Do you fairly well at grammar and punctuation?

Fairly well, indeed, I do.

50.  Does who you choose to accept as your owner hinge upon them being the religion that suits you best? Or, upon them having no religion, if that is what suits you best?

No. It hinges on them being respectful. Though, there are certain religions I simply would not put up with.

51. Can you differentiate between an order that is inconvenient/ a big step, and an order that is actually dangerous? IE: Someone tells you to buy a house (big step) or someone tells you to buy a house and put it in their name, immediately (dangerous step).

Yes. Which is why, though the basic contract does say, in effect "Buy me a house" and even specifies which house (if it is still available), it also specifies that the slave will not sign it over until after the fourth signing of the contract. For one slave, I even put after a year's trial, instead. And, of course, it is negotiable, depending on the slave's mental state (having been terribly screwed over by others, for instance), financial status, etc. It can be removed altogether, if necessary.

52. Do you believe slaves are less than human?

No. And, I wish they would also stop believing it.

53. Do you believe men are less than human?

Not even the creepy ones.

54. Why should I want you as an owner? What assets will you bring to our relationship?

Prior experience and knowledge; a naturally dominant disposition; an ability to listen, hear, learn, extrapolate information, a different thinking pattern that allows me to use both logic and intuition quite readily, at one and the same time, more often than not; concern for your welfare and safety. Some talent, which, if bolstered, might actually lead us to being in a position for you to cease your wage work and go on to full time service to myself and volunteer service that I would send you out to do.

55. Do you believe in monogamy?
  
Absolutely.

56. Do you want to serve without being considered to be a man, but, to be seen as this sexless worker drone?

Uhm .. I do not have to think of slaves as sexless beings. I do not have to reduce people to less than human to feel capable of leading. If they want to be in chastity and can follow my rules on it, they may. Otherwise, they may have sex or not, as they have time for it. Their sex is not in or of service to me. Unless, again, we fall in love and are married.

57. Can you teach your skills to others without feeling superior to them?

Uhm .. yes. However, I can also be taught by them, while feeling superior, as in the one in charge, all the same.

58. When you receive an order to do something you do not particularly enjoy, do you feel put upon, disappointed, punished, trusted, owned or what?

Most of the time, if I give a slave an order to do something they do not particularly enjoy, it will not be for punishments sake (though it might be, sometimes), and I do not care if they feel disappointed in having to do it, so long as they don't start questioning my authority over it. They should feel trusted, owned, and proud to be of service, doing the work to the best of their ability.

59. Would you rebel against an owner who wanted to give you herbal supplements, vitamins, a high colonic, hydrogen peroxide therapy, or other alternative health treatments? Why?

I might give the slaves herbal tonics if they are ill, vitamins if they seem to need them, or such as that. But, if they seem to be healthy, I  probably will not, unless they are also interested in this subject.

60. What do you hope to get out of slavery?

Fulfillment of desire to own and control, acceptance, belonging, help that is cheerfully and willingly given, time to write, companionship, entertainment.

61. Would you rebel against an owner who wanted to teach you their religious beliefs? Why?

If a slave asks "Why?" I will explain. If he asks "Why not?" I will explain. If I am ill, he may need to read to me. If I want to listen to something aloud, he will have to put up with it. If I have guests over, he will treat them with respect. If I have materials, he will treat them with respect. If I need a ride to meeting, he will chauffeur. If he wants to learn, he will ask.

62. What sort of slave do you hope for (sex, pain, domestic, caged, trusted servant, lover with some combination of sex and pain and domestic, ???)?

Pain to the extent of accepting lessons in discipline and punishment, caged if I feel like it, trusted servant absolutely, domestic absolutely. ??? maybe. Not sure what ??? would be, but, I might need that in a slave, one day.

63. Do you believe that women can only dominate men by their sexuality?

I believe the men I have dominated have, primarily, not had anything to do with my sexuality, except most overtly. As in, we did not have sex, I did not try to tease them. They were turned on, sometimes, but, they did not try to touch me and they did respect me.

However, the men I had sex with were always my thralls, even if they tried to rebel occasionally, until whatever point I was done with them. It was not intentional. I'm just that good.

So, no, and, yes. What is defined as sexuality, by most, is part of dominance. The people who are truly, truly sexy are those with a strong personality. But, it does not mean the woman has to have sex with a man, or sit on his face, or even let him look at her (as is evidenced by Chinese history) to make him her slave.

64. Is giving money to your Mistress a pain, a pleasure, or both?

Hopefully, both. It should hurt a little, be a sacrifice, but, not a ruination.

66. What kind of housework (including yard work) do you actively enjoy doing?
 Dishwashing, sometimes; cooking, raking.

67. What kind of housework (including yard work) are you good at doing?

See 66. Actually, if I am in a good mood, and feeling well, I can enjoy most of it and be good at it.  I don't want the slaves to always do it all, but, I do want them to do most of it.

69. Are you ready to perform a small task to prove that you are capable of obedience, domestic service, thoughtful service, and financial service, all at once - that will cost less than $100.00 and has nothing to do with you giving out any financial information to anyone else.

Nope. Not me. And, either should you be, yet. Maybe later, though. Maybe as a celebration of the first contract signing. Maybe.

71. Are you likely to be jealous of other slaves?

Which means am I likely to have more than one slave. And, the answer is, I might. I am open to it, but, just finding one is quite, quite hard and I certainly would take that one's feelings into consideration as I would hate to destroy a beautiful thing with a thoughtless act. But, that one should know, going in, that I might have a few slaves, not just the one.

72. Describe your interest list by going into detail as to why things are an interest or hard limit, especially fetishes. For instance, if you are into ass play, do you hope to perform anal sex on your Mistress, do you hope she will use a strap on to perform anal sex on you, do you hope she will force you to have anal sex with other male slaves, are you into felching, do you enjoy being spanked and that's all the ass play you mean, or what?

I did that before and it is in my journal, somewhere.

73. Do you think your Mistress must believe in female supremacy?

lol  No. I've met females and many of them are dinks. Besides, many wonderful men, throughout history, were noble, virtuous, strong, etc. without being female. I believe all humans are, more or less, equal; but, many of them are of stronger character here, or more ability there, etc.

74. Are you prepared to sign contracts, letters of intent, and whatever else is necessary for a fully legal, binding agreement, complete with exchange of address and other contact information, notarization of documents, and etc?

Fairly prepared. I've never done this, for myself, before. I do have a contract, but, I am not sure that things should not be rewritten, to make it more legal. Or, maybe, it is a matter of we should all just do our best to stay out of court? That sounds more fun to me!

Well, this is the format, except where I skipped some questions and seem to have lost one, altogether. (sigh)  Well, do your best, boys!
"As a child, I can remember liking to be the robber when playing cops and robbers so I would be the one wearing the handcuffs ...." The above is an excerpt from the profile of some submissive sort.Now, this should tell you something about me. See, years and years ago, I had started to tell someone, who claimed to be dominant, when they asked about how I played as a child, a very similar thing, in that it was how I liked to be the robber. In fact, I started to tell it to more than one person, over the years. They always interrupted me and told me the reason I liked to be the robber was because I am submissive, because I wanted to be handcuffed and caged, that my true nature recognized this even though my upbringing was against it, because .. blah blah blah .. Arrogance, boys and girls, is not dominance; and, it was arrogance, their need to appear dominant, that stopped them from listening and started them spouting nonsense. Here, however, is the truth that they missed. As I child, I can remember liking to be the robber, when playing cops and robbers ... because the robber was under less constraint of rules, more free to pursue his own will. Cops had laws and rules they had to follow, made by another. The robber had taken itself outside of those rules. Besides which, how fun it is to surprise the police, when they think they have you and you turn the tables and handcuff them,instead. That's what they get for failing to properly assess the strength of the perp, and assuming that they are the stronger one in the relationship. Suddenly, it doesn't sound so submissive, does it? Let that be a lesson to you, Doms. More times than not, you should just let the other person finish answering your question.
This (which was on my profile): "From this moment on, I will not show my face, and I will alter my age, ethnicity, location, weight, height, etc. randomly, or, sometimes, omit them altogether. None of those should be deciding factors in if a slave will serve a Mistress, who is neither seeking love nor sex from those she owns. You will not be serving a body type, or an age, or a skin tone, or a place of residence. If you are acceptable, you will be serving me, a person." - it did not work out so well. One or two persons got the concept, but, most were not reading the profile, anyway, so I was getting a lot of messages from people thinking I was right next door to them, or who were wondering why I was claiming to be from West Burbank in London. Silly people! READ PROFILES! That is what they are there for.
Oh, look! I seem to have scared everyone away, again, by being dominant all over my profile.
Important quotes from various dommes/female dominants:

I cannot tell you their ID as it is against the rules of this site, but, I can tell you where to find them, which is on the message board, here: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3501946/tm.htm

  • "I have had offers of the kind you have---and when the rubber hits the road, they DISAPPEAR. Because guess what? I am a person with credentials! So Mr Sub and I are entering into a binding contract, complete with engagement letter, description of services and expectations, etc etc. There is NO WAY I would let myself get busted for failing in fiduciary duty to satisfy someone's kink. Sure, I'll count your shekels and keep you on an allowance AFTER the legals are done."
  • "You're not laughing because you're not intelligent enough to understand how clever I am."
  • "I don't think you need to worry about him, they love to talk about the idea but the moment they'd have to pay they disappear.
  • "I've been joking with a few female friends around here that it's hilarious, if you block them they come back with another name, but if you pretend you charge, they disappear all by themselves! "
  • "I worked as a pro Mistress for years and one of my earliest lessons was, don't ever take a sub who wants to feel exploited seriously. He will be presently getting off on the idea and will keep you talking and arranging things as long as possible but when you reach the point where your ready, he will be ready to disappear. Don't let him waste anymore of your time."

And, why are these quotes important to me? Because, I already know they are all true, especially the last one.


What I desire above all else is a true slave, who gives freely, from the heart; who has no desire to bend me to his will, but, has every desire to learn my ways;who understands he is a laborer, and who wants to labor; who understands he is never to be my lover and only in some measure to be my friend; who does not need to be broken; who knows he is human, not dog, not toilet. Someone who fits into my lifestyle (with God), in a natural, easy fashion, who is not afraid to ask for consideration, but, who is sure that he is not owed it.

Here is how it will go:

One of us will approach the other. We will examine limitations of proximity, finances, and those set upon us by career, family, religious beliefs or actual physical limitations. You will freely tell what it is you need both as a man and as a slave. If, in these ways, we are compatible, and if we can understand and respect each other, that is all that is required.

When you come to me, you come to me as a slave who is putting his trust in his owner. As someone with trust, you know that I will make sure of your care and keeping, of body and mind. Exercise that trust. Know that you may have hardship, boredom, tedium, moments of humiliation, times of doing what you would rather not or of not being allowed to do what you would wish, but, that is the life of a slave; and, a slave is what you are choosing to become.

I am not here for your pleasure, but, you are here for mine. Do not seek to judge my activities, past whether they are harmful to you. It matters not if they are foreign, or something you have not lived with before. If they are not harmful, they are not your concern.

If you cannot accept this, you are not a slave at heart.


As I said before, the photo here is highly representative of my life. If you want to know what I said, as to why it is so, read my journal entries. Read them, anyway, if you are serious. You have all the time in the world to read them and to discover me, before you contact me, and very little in which to do so once we are begun.

If you have read this, and if you are a slave who may be interested in serving me, send me a message that says "cabbage patch bumpkin" as the first words, whatever it says otherwise.
Let me explain something about sex:

For me, it is an extension of love, not punishment or cruelty, and not something to be done with mere objects, animals, subhumans, or in a purely selfish manner.

If you seek to have sex with me, without it being an extension of love, then it is by force and oppression, as, otherwise, it is against my nature. A slave does not seek to force or oppress anyone, do they?

Let me explain something about love:

There are four kinds, and many variations are possible within those kinds, as to how one shall live.

One form of love is purely selfish and it says "You do things for me, you give me things, and, so, I love you."  I will definitely feel that for a good slave, if no other kind.

One form of love is pure madness, of the mind, but, leading the body and spirit along. It keeps me awake at night, pining for a touch, a glance. Anything is possible, when this love holds sway. I could sit at your feet, you could sit at mine, we could both sit on the floor and roll about freely, or both sit close and cuddle. When I feel this love, I stay in love, until the person I feel it for kills it dead with acts of disrespect, insults, lies, or simply moving past it, losing it, and so no longer giving response. Otherwise, it waxes and wanes, but, it does remain.

That is the sort of love I need to be in, for sex to be remotely interesting. When I love this way, I am your slave and you are mine, not by contract, but, by nature. We own each other. We do for each other.

Now, am I going to think a person I feel that way about is inferior? Want to treat him with cruelty? Despise him? Forbid him to talk to me, send him away when company comes over, and all that? Hardly!  He cannot be my slave, in that way. He cannot live by the same rules and restrictions as other slaves. It would do me serious harm for it to be so.

Harm? Yes. A woman wants to be loved, wants the man to speak from his heart, wants signs of affection in small gestures, impromptu presents, and she wants to give the same. It would not only destroy the possibilities of that happening, but, it would cheapen and make a lie of anything of that nature if it did occur. After all, a slave who acts a fool for love is a slave who should be beaten and reoriented to his work; and a slave who is allowed to make impromptu gestures is, after all, only doing it by order and permission. It means nothing, unless it is done by free will.

So, again: I do not have sex with slaves. It is not because I am against sex, or slaves, it is because owning your lover means never being pursued, wooed, won, or allowed to give to them as freely as you wish for them to give, and take. I want romance - slavery is to practical and full of rules for romance.

Love makes us slaves, but, of a different sort.
Lifestyle Orientation beliefs Questionaire: (copied from profile of a slave, changed only for the sake of bettering both spelling and grammar.)

1. Are you aware that although actual Slave Ownership is illegal that there are still legal enactments on the statute books that can facilitate Power Exchange relationships between Dominant and Submissive individuals?

Yes.

2. Would you be willing to enact one of these legal Power Exchanges so that you can acquire actual authority over another individual to act on their behalf concerning their affairs and well being?

Yes.

3.  Do you believe that there is  both the essential need for and desire within society to acquire a Power Exchange between both Dominant and Submissive individuals so that the former can have legitimate power and control over the movements of and direct the day to day activities of the latter in the service of the former for their direct personal benefit?

Yes, and no. Power exchanges are not acquired, they are made between two or more people.  I believe it is a desire to have real, as in legal, authority, as well as authority by permission. However, I do not believe it is essential as I have had many slaves, in the past, with no hint of contract, who served me quite well, having recognized me as a true master and themselves as true slaves by nature.

And, by the way, that was my answer from the other day. Since then, I have decided it is quite necessary, because, as it has been pointed out before, there are a lot of fakes, fantasists, fetishists posing as slaves. A real slave wants to sign up, fully, legally. So, yes, let us do that.

4. Do you believe that all submissive individuals who volunteer to become the chattel bondage subjects of the Dominant individual,be it irrevocable or fixed term subjugation,should sign over all right to be responsible for themselves to their Dominant Owner so that said Owner can be possessed of the legal right to exercise legitimate power and control?

No. I believe the word "should" is too strong. Some are not ready for that step and to force it upon them, from the start, would deprive them, and their potential owner, of a very rich and rewarding experience that may, eventually, build up to that sort of ownership. I would not want a slave who wanted me to take full control right away - they don't know me, yet. I want loyalty, trust, given by knowledge, over time.

5.  Do you believe that during the period of the irrevocable or fixed term voluntary subjugation that the Submissive individual surrender itself in its entirety and that it ceases during that time to have any entitlement whatsoever to any  freedom, human rights or civil liberties?

No.  No one who is human ceases to have human rights. Much of what "slaves" on this site seek I would not do to my worst enemy. They ask to be treated as dogs, and, it makes me think that I would keep my dogs far, far away from them, now that I have seen the cruel and despicable manner in which they think dogs should be treated! And, by the way, even if one were to have power of attorney, adoption papers, a contract of servitude, etc. there are still laws governing the treatment of any and all human individuals. I am not a criminal. If you want a criminal,  look elsewhere. If you want someone you can respect, here I am.

However, I do believe that the voluntary slave ceases to have rights that he or she has no use for, and this is part of the power exchange, that I willingly help them remove the weight of those rights from themselves; since, of course, it is in pursuit of their happiness.

6.  Do you believe that there should always be a social distance between the Dominant power and Subservient individual and that there cannot be any  equality of status between the two since one is possessed of total power and the other is entirely devoid of any power whatsoever?

I think only an idiot would believe a slave has no power. That is a gross simplification of facts. And, really, how can there be a "power exchange" if all parties concerned do not have power? However, yes, I do believe there is always a social distance between Owner and owned.

7. Do you believe that the Submissive should adopt certain recognized postures in the presence of the Dominant power in order to reinforce the fact that one is superior and the other inferior and as a  mark of respect and devotion?

I believe that is none of your business. What I do or do not want my slaves to do is between me and my slaves. If I choose to have them kneel, stand on their head, or do the hokey pokey, or simply come in and say "I am here." that is because it is what I desire from them; and, what I desire is what should occur. I will not be contractually obligated to perform.

8. Do you believe that it is the prerogative of the Dominant power to determine whether or not the Submissive entity should be utilized to provide sexercise stimulation and that the said entity should have the genitals kept locked in chastity restraint at all times except for when and if required?

I believe you are using a euphemism to hide the fact that you are asking if a dominant can force a slave to perform sexual acts without actually being allowed to fully engage in the fulfillment of their own sexual desires. I hate that! Speak plainly: Do I believe it is the prerogative of the owner to force a slave to perform sexual acts with mouth and hands, or otherwise, and do I believe the slave should be forced to be in a chastity device, unless their genitalia is needed for the owner's amusement?

Yes - if that is the relationship they have defined by contract. No. if they have defined some other sort of relationship by contract. Do I need it? No.  I don't have sex with slaves. As  to the chastity thing, I could take it or leave it, as I am not afraid of the big, bad penises hiding in the forest. If the slave desires a chastity device, they should state so, plainly, and then prepare to wear it except for when they are allowed to have the key to remove the device, clean it, clean themselves, have release if they must, re-affix the device to themselves, and return the key to me. Or, perhaps, they may be released if I give them free time to go to a concert or somesuch, as well. Chastity is for their benefit, though - them not bugging me about their sexual desires is for my benefit. Oh, look: another power exchange!

9. Do you believe that when irrevocable,voluntary subjugation is enacted that the Submissive entity should be permanently marked with the Insignia of the Dominant power so that all recognize the commitment involved ?

I believe that if I receive a slave that is marked by another dominant, I find it rather off-putting. Therefore, I would probably not mark a slave, permanently, just in case I do not live forever. I might, though. So far, I have thought of no mark which I would wish them to bear.

10. Do you believe that the Submissive entity should wear a locked collar has a token of its voluntary,irrevocable or fixed term subjugation to the Dominant power?

I believe that the word "can" or "may" is more appropriate. After all, what if I do not want the slave to wear a collar? Then, suddenly, I am being ordered, or contractually obligated, to do something I do not want to do, so that something I do not want to have happen can take place for the pleasure of the slaves. Who, then, is serving whom?

I do like collars, sometimes, as they are pretty, and they set a tone. However, I bloody well hate turtlenecks and to be discreet in public, with a big old locked collar on, one would have to shove the slave into turtlenecks more often. Should I suffer for their fashion sense, being forced to see slaves dressed in ways I do not approve of, just so that they are allowed to preen about, wearing their locked collar.  A better solution is that they have an earring, a certain style of dress, a certain sort of hairstyle, and/or other things of that nature, that mark them as mine by their combination, to those who are in the know, for public usage; and, for private, perhaps they will be allowed a collar.

Or, perhaps I will get them a collar that is more of a necklace, instead. There are many alternatives. I will settle on which works best for me after I have the slaves.

11.  Do you believe that in appropriate situations the Submissive entity should wear locked movement restraint shackles or plastic movement restraints to restrict but not prevent movement?

Yes. However, what those appropriate moments are, that is up to my discretion.

12. Do you believe that the Submissive entity should be gagged or hooded at appropriate times as necessary to facilitate control has necessary in given situations?

See answer for 11.

13. Do you believe that a Submissive entity should sacrifice itself when necessary to endure prolonged painful suffering for the direct personal benefit of the Dominant power so that the said power can derive three dimensional euphoria and general well-being?

I think you slipped entirely onto another plane of existence, and are speaking in an alien tongue, where many of the words sound the same as Earther words, but, the meanings are vastly different. (grin)

Yes, when necessary, certainly: however, I sincerely doubt it is ever necessary to experience three dimensional euphoria. Sounds awful. Do they have a pill to prevent it?

Or, are you employing euphemism, again?  Don't you really mean: should the slave have to allow itself to be tortured for the amusement of its owner? Because, the answer to that is:

Yes, if that is the relationship they both contracted to occur; no, if they contracted for some other type of relationship. And, anyway, I think you are hinting that you want to be tortured and are hoping to be tortured and humiliated, which makes you a fetishist, not a slave.

Remember, when someone slaves away at a hot stove, all day, it has nothing to do with butt plugs, whips, insults, or loss of human rights: it has everything to do with hard work, endurance, obedience to both need and duty, and exhaustion.

14. Do you believe that the Submissive entity should be kept in a state of perpetual naturism so it is humiliated and degraded and constantly reminded of its inferior nonentity status except when the Dominant power has guests or family present?

If I said no, would you transform into something unnatural? What would that be? And, is it on the same plane of existence as the three dimensional euphoria?

If you were not being euphemistic again, would you mean do I think slaves should be kept in the nude? Because, the answer to that question is: no! Well, yes, for the people who want it that way, no for the ones who don't. I do not. That is gross - pubic hair, splooge marks, dead skin cells, possible shite stains on the carpet, the nasty smells of human bodies that are far too intimate to experience coming off of someone I am not sexually attracted to - gross! And, why would it be humiliating, anyway? It's just nudity. We all have bodies, so why be ashamed? You should be ashamed to be trying to force me to look at your naked flesh, but, if I want to look at it, and you want to be treated that way, where is the shame?

15. Do you believe that once a  Power Exchange has been enacted that the Submissive entity should be regarded has being the de facto Property of the Dominant power for the duration of the agreed timespan?

I believe that as soon as the contract is signed the "Submissive entity" who is really probably a rather dominant person who happens to want to be a slave, since being a volunteer slave is hardly the province of the weak spirited, should be regarded as my property, since that is what they just signed up for. Power exchange or no power exchange, for the duration, they belong to me. I do not guarantee power exchanges, certain tortures, or anything else but a dire respect for hard limits and religious principles, safety of body and mind and spirit, and, a few other similarly important things. That's the beauty of not being the slave: one does not have to promise the moon, only that there will be air.

16. Do you believe that the Submissive entity should not be shown any kindness or compassion or given any praise,thanksgiving or reward for the performance of their voluntary servitude whilst in a state of Power Exchange Subjegation has de facto Property?

No. For goodness sakes, I have thanked shopping carts! Let's get back to reality, though: VOLUNTEER, VOLUNTARY, VOLUNTEERING: slaves who can be described in this way, they are doing things of their own free will. An owner is not required to thank them, but, they should be required to show a little compassion, and they certainly can give praise. Why not?

 If the slave did a good job, and you never tell them, you are only enforcing the belief that you cannot be pleased, and if you cannot be pleased, they may as well not try as hard, eh?

As you punish them for when they are not doing well, so you should praise them, on occasion, for when they are doing well. Positive reinforcement is a very effective tool for training the human psyche. And, by should, I mean that the slave is not to expect praise, but, I say to the owners that if you do praise for good work (sometimes) and punish for bad work, it helps the slave understand, better, what pleases you and how to perform.

17. Do you believe that the Submissive entity should contribute both to its own upkeep and the upkeep of the Dominant power at all times during the duration of the agreed Subjugation?

"contribute"? No. The submissive entity is being used as a slave, and, as a slave, it works and it wages are earned. This is not contribution, this is the owner utilizing the slave to earn money. However, yes, it should be for the duration of the agreed subjugation.

18. Do you believe that a formal and elaborate collaring ceremony in the presence of a lifestyle ordained clergy person and invited congregation would serve to enhance the solemnity and sacred nature of the Power Exchange Subjugation and so make it more meaningful by the exchange of solemn vows in the presence of witnesses?

I believe my yes means yes, and my no means no. This is not a relationship between us and God, so, no clergy is required. It is meaningful, more, if other people know about it, though; and, to some degree, other people will know about it. For some, you will be known as my slave (I say to whomever is reading this who such a statement is true for), for others you will be known as that wonderfully helpful neighbor of mine. In all cases, they will know you are mine, in some regard.

19. Do you believe that during the entire period of the duration of the agreed voluntary Subjugation under Power Exchange Control that the Submissive entity cease to have any contact with family or friends and preferably terminate all contact irrevocably so it can concentrate upon servicing your personal needs exclusively?

I am looking for 24/7, 365 , eventually live-in, slaves. If the duration of the contract was for a month or two, sure, it would make sense, but, for a year, several years, maybe a lifetime, that would simply not be practical to cut their ties to family and friends. Their contact would be limited, but, no, it would not be severed.

20.  Do you believe that the Submissive entity should be housed in appropriate facilities that befit its nonentity status, such has a Cage,Cupboard, Basement/Cellar, Attic/Loft or similar when it is resting overnight or when it is not required for service at a particular time?

A "Submissive entity" is not a "nonentity", it is a "Submissive entity". Right? So, this question makes no sense, because, again, someone just can't be trusted to speak plainly. (sigh)  Given my druthers, the slaves would have separate slave quarters, where they would sleep, bathe, use the toilet, and maybe even cook for themselves and eat on occasion. It can be very formal for slavery and involve chains and locks and a bare room except for a bed or cot, or it can be a much simpler thing where it is an oasis of small comforts that would only be taken away in case of a need for punishment. That would depend on the slaves and how they function best.

Please remember these questions are to ascertain compatibility of lifestyle Slavery belief systems.They are not demands or dictates concerning how I should be treated once entered into such a Power Exchange Subjegation.

Well, then, you should have said so, at the beginning, as they certainly do sound demanding, in places. I might have answered differently, if  I wasn't busy feeling "led through the nose" during the reading of some questions. My ideals wouldn't have changed, but, my level of smart-arsedness would have.


1. Do you personally believe in Human Chattal Bondage Slavery has being both essential and desirable in todays modern world?

This is a badly written question and it should be rewritten. To save time, I shall attempt to answer it, anyway, based on what I believe it means to ask:

I believe it is desirable, and, for the serving of the desires of those who wish to be slaves or who wish to own slaves, in the truest sense possible, it is bordering on essential.

2. Do you actually seek to acquire consensual Ownership of a Chattal Bondage Subject to utilize in your personal service for your direct benefit?

Those are not the words I would use, but, essentially, yes. And, no, you may not ask what words I would use. I am a writer, and, as such, I might use a great deal of varied words, changeable by time and mood, so don't ask questions that will lead to an hours-long discussion of semantics.

3. Would you prefer the legal protection that facilitating the enactment of power exchange statutes can afford you over the more precarious and none legal power exchange that is more usual?

Probably. I mean, in the end, it is more important that you are entering into a relationship with a person you can trust, then anything else. I would prefer legal to not legal, though, whenever possible.

4. Do you believe that once owned a person can no longer be considered a freeborn but must retain the nonentity status of a Subject in perpetuity even when it is no longer owned has property by any particular person?

No. Slaves can be set free. Slaves can purchase their freedom. This is tradition, in most cultures that ever had slavery. They would still have the slave mindset, more than likely, and still seek to be a slave, again, but being a slave is taking on a position, not a disposition. 

I am a writer, because I write - it is also in my nature, in that I cannot be happy and fulfilled without writing. You may be a slave, because you slave - it may be in your nature that you cannot be happy and fulfilled without being a slave. Fine! But, if you are not in service, you are not a slave; you  are a person who aches to be a slave.

5. Do you believe that a Subject should be devoid of any and all freedom,human rights and civil liberties by virtue of the fact that it is legally owned property?

No. I gave further answer to this sort of question, somewhere above.

6. Do you believe that being a nonentity the subject should remain for the most part(certain situations exempted) in a state of perpetual naturism as a visible sign that it is property and so owns nothing?

Already answered, above, somewhere.

7. Do you believe that to facilitate proper control over the nonentity subject and display your claim to its ownership,that you should place a locked collar around its neck, a made to measure chastity restraint locked on its genitals,movement restraint shackles(when appropriate) and a brand or tattoo on its servile anatomy?

Already answered, above, somewhere.

8. Do you believe that the subject should be engaged in a variety of useful servile labor for long hours each day to keep it occupied and maximize its potential in your service?

Yes. Except on the days when I wish it to be otherwise.

9. Do you believe that the subject should be housed in shackles within the confines of a locked cage within a locked room/basement/attic when resting overnight or when not required for service?

Already answered, above, somewhere.

10. Do you believe that a subject should be utilized to endure painful suffering when required so has to alleviate the stressful anxieties or increase the pleasurable activities of the legal owner and that it should be restrained for the duration of any therapeutic flogging/torture session?

Already answered, above, somewhere. Or, close to. Let me put it this way, if I want to make you suffer pain, and I own you, and your contract does not preclude that sort of treatment, then, yes. Otherwise, no.  I'm not interested in giving pain, and, if I was going to be doing so, it would almost certainly be due to a need for punishment.
Question (just sent me, same person as below):

Dear Mistress Sarletta,

I think you misunderstood my question. I understand that it isn’t all about sex and that some mistress/slave relationships are non sexual to the extreme. But even in antiquity household slaves were expected to adore their owners. Whether the owners showed affection towards the slaves probably depended on the owners. But these were slaves that were purchased and the owners held the power of life and death over them. In consensual slavery, the slave relinquishes control to the mistress not out of fear but out of adoration. And I can not speak for others, but to be manacled to a bed every night, get up at the crack of dawn to perform the prosaic and mundane chores you require, and suffer the punishments you met out for infractions, there would have to be a very deep bond between us (not a sexual bond but something even stronger). I had a mistress who like you considered the idea of any type of relationship with a slave to be repugnant and even though I did not want a sexual relationship it bothered me that she felt that way. If I serve you and you allow me to serve you, we are doing each other a service. But if you feel repelled by my service then how can you expect me to continue?


Answer (in three parts):

Slave, I think you misunderstood my answer, and, I am sure you have misunderstood me. Whyever would I be repelled by the service given to me?

I  have never said that a slave must be manacled to a bed every night, get up at the crack of dawn, and perform mundane chores, or suffer punishments. Those are things that many slaves I have spoken to desire, so as to more deeply feel owned.

You are exactly right, in that if you wish to serve me, and you do serve me, and I allow you to serve me, then, we are doing each other a service. And, if you wish to be manacled, bound up, caged, or otherwise restricted in movement, for your own peace of mind, then, that, too, is me doing you a service.

I do not have sex with slaves because I worship God, and God says to not have sex outside of marriage, and, I am not marrying someone I do not love. If I fell in love with a slave, and the feeling was mutual, then, that would be a different story. I will not have someone running about, however, telling me that it is love, when it is his duty.

You assume that I would be repelled by the service of a slave, but, since the service I require is not sexual, and what is repellent is someone trying to force me into being their whore and calling it service to me, if he is a very good slave, he will simply actually give me the service I desire and seek his own selfish sexual gratifications elsewhere, when he is given time for his own pursuits, and it will not be an issue.

The problem is not me not wanting to have sex with slaves, then. The problem is that most people claiming to be slaves are not, in fact, persons who are voluntarily entering into an arrangement of mutual fulfillment; they are people seeking to barter the use of their flesh, money, and time, for the sake of having their own fetishistic desires fulfilled and hoping for an "owner" that will barter her flesh for the same reason. That does not make slave and owner, simply two more whores loosed upon the world.

I am not a whore. I do not wish to own one, either.

PS: You still got the name wrong. One more time and I shall take it as a purposeful insult, as you have been corrected at least three times, two of them being today. It is Mistress Arletta  not Mistress Sarletta Hence why there are only three instances of the letter 's', and not four, in my ID.

Oh, and one more thing:

Exodus 21:2 “In case you should buy a Hebrew slave, he will be a slave six years, but in the seventh he will go out as one set free without charge. 3 If he should come in by himself, by himself he will go out. If he is the owner of a wife, then his wife must go out with him. 4 If his master should give him a wife and she does bear him sons or daughters, the wife and her children will become her master’s and he will go out by himself. 5 But if the slave should insistently say, ‘I really love my master, my wife and my sons; I do not want to go out as one set free,’ 6 then his master must bring him near to the [true] God and must bring him up against the door or the doorpost; and his master must pierce his ear through with an awl, and he must be his slave to time indefinite.

You see? This is speaking of a slave who is under no threat of death, with absolute right to freedom, who still, after all, chooses to be a slave. Why? Because, he loves his master and he loves the life he has with him.

And, that is precisely the point. I want slaves who will love me, and the life they have with me. To that end, I may make some concession to their fetishes - such as being collared, shackled, forced to rise early, made to stay up late.

These are not things for my benefit. I live a relatively simple life and what I need most from slaves is  wage work, some basic house chores, a bit of gardening, handyman repair and maintenance, and some impromptu service, from time to time, such as chauffeuring, the fetching of tea, helping with a little project around the house (tiling a floor, installing an air conditioner, making a dress, etc.). It's the slaves who want the slaves to be chained. And, as it is not something that harms me or affects my moral stance, I have no reason not to indulge them, as long as they are doing well.
Question (just sent me):

Dear Mistress Sarletta,

I have contacted you before to tell you how much I enjoy your journal entries. Even though we are miles apart in distance, age, and what we seek in a relationship, I use your thoughts, ideas, and wants as a sort of Rosetta Stone to decipher my own views towards this life style.

I can well imagine that the plethora of idiots on this site keeps you busy answering emails, but I wonder if you might answer a question that I have? Since we live in an age and country where forced slavery is outlawed, what we have on CM is consensual slavery. You, as a potential slave holder, can not go down to slave market and purchase a male to serve you in the manner which you describe. So you are forced to find a consensual slave to serve you. But if you prohibit that slave from possessing any romantic notions toward you and certainly no sexual contact (and in fact state that the idea of an amorous relationship with your slave, because he is your slave, is repulsive to you) what is the motivation that would bind a slave to you? I am not taking about these idiots who get there jollies fantasizing about being under your whip.

If you have the time and the inclination, I would cherish your response.

 

Answer:

 

It is Mistress Arletta, (name removed)

What is it that keeps people being in awe of Buddha even though he is long dead and was really just some guy who walked around and thought things?  What is it that makes a student love that one teacher, even though they are teaching a hard subject that the student never wanted to learn before?

Slaves are not for sex, they are not about sex. If anyone is looking for a sexual relationship out of it, then, they are not a slave. Slaves, consensual slaves, are persons who desire to do for, and give to, others. It is what makes them feel fulfilled. They want to be owned and cherished, having been accepted for what they are. And, believe you me, there are plenty of them out there. Unfortunately, most of them have been extremely abused by people who think it is all about sex and pain - which are fetishes, not components of slavery; and, many of them are not relocatable.

To slave means to work, you know? There are many people, the world over, who want to work and to do what they work at well, and to be appreciated for that. Some of them would like to go a bit deeper than that, and, some of them would like to do it while wearing shackles. They are all lovely people, who should never be despised or abused. And, for those people, the relationship is set in these activities. It is their deepest fulfillment to serve, to be allowed to serve, without anyone trying to make them feel as if it is wrong, unwanted, or unappreciated.

I was a slave to two men, whom, if they showed up, I would still do anything for. They were the only men in my life who did not try to force me into a sexual relationship. One of them beat me with his belt, once, and then he learned who I was, and more of who he was, and stopped doing that. I never had to give them money (but, sometimes I did anyway), nor did I expect money or other compensation (though, I got it, sometimes, anyway). I helped them with their work, and I was glad to be of use, to help someone further their own goals which I could respect, or to do their work better so that whatever was bad about it had less negative impact upon the world.

What kept me there was mutual respect and love. Any sex we had was always with someone else. One does not need sex to feel love or respect, and, often, it causes the opposite reaction. If a woman is having sex with a man, and he is enjoying the sex, she never knows, after all, how he feels about her.

I do know that most people who claim to be slaves would not serve me unless sex was a component of the relationship, so, I do know how they feel about me, and how that is, is that I should be serving their penis. Which is hardly a slave-like attitude for them to be having, so, at least we are all in agreement that they would not be good slaves for me. Pity, though, about the few really good, true slaves that are just too far away. (sigh)

Here is something, where, again, I noticed a lack of choice on CM in areas where more choice would make this site so much easier to utilize:Ass play: the choices are that you can live for it, love it, like it, have no opinion, dislike it, or it is a hard limit. Do you know what is not asked? "Giving" or "Receiving".

 

What about subs and slaves who are intensely into being told that they are not worthy of putting their nasty little penises anywhere else?What about Mistresses and Doms who want to tell the subs and slaves stuff like that? Or, to order a slave to service all the other slaves like that?

 

Which, by the way, I am not saying that I want to do any of those things. Just saying, maybe some people are only into giving or only into receiving, so, they either have to lie and say they are into it, or lie and say they are not into it.

 

Same thing with whips. If I put I "live for" whips, that could mean I really love making them, I love watching other people get whipped, I love to be whipped, I love to whip other people, or all of the above, at once. Wouldn't you be more interested to know if I was into giving whippings, receiving whippings, or making whips, than whether or not I was into the far more vague category of "whips"?

Do you have any idea how disturbing it gets for a slave or sub to be told that their Master or Mistress (etc) are into ass play, only to find out that it means they want the slave to get behind them? Probably about as upsetting as for a Mistress to be told her slave is into it, and then to find the slave getting on the wrong side of her. People need specificity!

Questions for slaves:
  1. Do you believe that you should set the tone of the relationship or that your owner should?
  2. Do you accept the fact that woman have the right to decide what to do, or what not to do, with their own bodies?
  3. Is it more important to you, personally, that you should sign over everything to your owner or that your owner does not ask for everything to be signed over?
  4. Are you seeking someone to have their way with you, or are you seeking someone to have your way with you?
  5. Can you work for others, or engage in sexual activities with others, without it affecting your loyalty or service to your owner?
  6. Are you looking for a romantic relationship with your owner?
  7. Are you looking for a sexual relationship with your owner?
  8. If someone sets you the task of cleaning the kitchen, does your head fill with ideas related to sponges, scrubbers, how to operate their dishwasher? Or, does it fill with thoughts of you in stockings, face ground into the linoleum by the booted foot of your owner, feeling your butt plug jiggle in fear, as you are growled at and told that you did it all wrong and must do it again? Which of those two scenarios comes closer to your thought processes?
  9. Does who you choose to accept as your owner is hinge upon them fulfilling your fetishistic needs?
  10. Does who you choose to accept as your owner hinge upon them fulfilling your sexual needs?
  11. Does who you choose to accept as your owner hinge upon them being the religion that suits you best?
  12. Do you believe slaves are less than human?
Here am I, in a manner most unseemly, being put on hold by someone who claims to be a slave, while he sorts out his feelings and whether or not he can accept how I choose to use my own body and care for my own spiritual well being. And, yes, slave, that is what you are doing.

You are not thinking if you can accept what I want to do to your body, because it is a fearful thing that I suggest. Rather, you are trying to decide if you can accept what you may easily accomplish, but, you simply do not wish to do. Which is, after all, not a very slave-like trait.

If a slave cannot accept that its owner has a right to choose not to engage in sexual activity with it, how will it accept anything else. After all, it is not as if I asked it to simply abandon every lustful thought or never have release. It is with me that it will not have release. One person, out of millions of possibles, and for this the whole question of ownership is at stake? Hmmph!

This, minus his name, I show you, of what I wrote to him this morning:

"Giving it thought, I have come to a realization of what it is that particularly perturbs me about your question and your reasoning behind it, ___ and it is this:

What you question has nothing to do with your abilities, or your limits. You are judging my worth as a Mistress by my ability to be adapted to your desires. That is exactly the opposite of how a slave should think!

You are right: you do have to accept my ways, to understand them; but, not because you approve of them, but, because they are my ways. If you really wanted to be owned, by me, you would not question these things. You would be questioning the important things, like if you could do such a thing as purchase a house and if it would be wise to do so, how much control you want to give a person over your livelihood, if you may be allowed to live without chastity device or with it, if you can live without shackles or with them.

The rest - if you are a real slave, you must accept that a Mistress will have her will. I was not asking you to do anything beyond you. If it does not exactly suit the free man, ___, what is that to the slave?"
Have gotten right burnt out on finding slaves who are non-sexual but obedient. I firmly expect to be rejected by the last one tomorrow, because I do not wish to play with his penis. And, you know, it is not that I do not like to play with the body of a man, at all; it is that I must be inspired to think of him that way, by his personality, by my feelings for him. I do not seek out slaves, lovely little worker drones, to fall in love with.

However, I could fall in love. Is there anyone out there to fall in love with, though? Hmm .. that's the million dollar question. And, no, I do not mean it is about his money. lol

I fell in love, once before. He was a man of serious strength of character, intelligence, hard work ethics, tolerance, romantic notions, all wrapped up in bright colored weird tattoos and tight black leather, perched upon a motorbike. Bit of a freak, kind of a smart ass, claimed at least to be a lover of God. I love him still. Anyone who wants to take his place, they have a fair bit of going to turn my head.

I am, however, willing to let you try.

Wild romance, making " a fool" of oneself, unbridled passion, respectful longing from afar, seeing the woman and offering service to help her be the woman she longs to be, these are all good things. Do you have what it takes?
Are you mentally excited at the thought of being useful, owned, and controlled? Do you want to live under established rules? Is this something that is not about sex to you? Can you serve without making it about sex? Without making it about pain? Without expecting to be severely abused or degraded?

I need slaves, 24/7, eventually to be live-in and hopefully to be permanent, under contract, slaves.

It is not that I believe slaves must be completely chaste. It is that I believe owners should not be having sex with their slaves, and I am not sexually attracted to people who function, in my life, somewhere between that of being children, pets, and household appliances.

Those who need sexual release can choose to pursue a slave or switch female to marry who would also serve me, or to wear a device and clean themselves once a week, or to discreetly pursue outside interests when they are given time and permission to do so. I would have the last say on all matters, but, I do say that these are viable alternatives to those without self control and with a libido.

You will be a worker first, entertainment second, companion (non-sexual) third. I will train you to my specifications and, if I deem it necessary, you will have others in your life to help you learn your role better, to function better.

If you are interested in this, and are not here to fulfill your own nasty little lusts, maybe we should talk.
Why is it all slaves claim they are willing to do whatever it takes to please a Mistress, but, few to none are willing to refrain from doing something when that is what it takes to please a Mistress?
Many times, in my life, I have been told by certain men that they needed to serve so badly that they would, and did, gladly attach themselves to a woman simply to help her pay her bills, or carry her groceries, take her animal to the vet, clean her nasty apartment, cook her dinner, care for her while she is ill, etc. because that was as close as they could get to being her slave.

I want those men in my life, and for them to come to me for those reasons - but, with the knowledge that they will be owned, when all is said and done, not just used.

It's that simple.

I have a basic contract written, which is for slaves who are long distance as most slaves are. There are rules to the reading of the contract, listed at the top of it, but, the summary of those rules is this: You have one week to decide if you want to serve me and ask for changes in the contract to help you serve me better. So, don't ask, unless you are ready!

I have those rules because so many people want to pussy-foot around, saying they are ready to submit and then saying "But, just one more question." It can drag on for months, which is a big waste of my time and energy, especially when you consider it is usually happening with several potential slaves at once. So, now you know, if your week is up, there are no more questions. Make your choice and live with it.

On the photo: It is highly representational of my life and needs: There is a child in the background, that I am looking toward through the mirror; someone is chauffeuring me; there is my art work in need of care and finishing; the place is cluttered with my work and in need of a thorough cleaning and organizing; the mirror needs to be dusted; and, here I am, multi-tasking when I should be resting; I love photography, though I am not very practiced in it: and, I'm just not all there, mostly through doing too much for too many others with too little help. IE: The focus isn't really on me, but, it needs to be, now, to make a prettier picture out of my life.

(grin)
Examples of punishment slave may expect:

A. For cursing or being ugly with the mouth, the slave may be slapped in the mouth.


B. For being testy (bitchy, cranky) or argumentative, the slave will be given corner time.


C. For using the Mistress dishes to eat with, the slave will be gagged with a locking gag and not allowed to eat for the rest of the day.


D. For using the Mistress' toilet, the slave will be locked in a cage and not allowed to use the restroom again until morning. He will, however, be fed and watered, liberally, and expected to eat every bite and drink every drop. He will, then, clean up whatever mess may have been made as a result of this punishment. He will, then, clean himself up, and clean the Mistress' entire restroom.


E. If the slave fails to perform all his duties for the day, due to punishment (such as in D.) he will finish them and his next day's duties on the next day. If he has still failed to finish all his duties, he will be punished as at F. This is also true of slaves who fail to remember not to cuss, repeatedly, are argumentative and not easily corrected, or for any other behavior exhibited by the slave which seems to point to them being incorrigible, as obedience, loyalty and respect are also duties.


F. If the slave has failed to finish all his duties on any given day, by his own failure and not by the order of his Mistress or circumstances beyond his control, this punishment may be utilized: his duties will be assigned to other slaves for one day, or they will be set aside for one day. During that day, the slave will be caged, gagged, and bound or trussed up in some fashion pleasing to the Mistress, for the majority of the entire day. At intervals, the Mistress will have him released from the cage, so that he may position himself to receive between 1 and 15 strokes with a whip, belt, taw or similar tool upon his back, buttocks and/or thighs. After this whipping, the slave will have his gag removed, receive a drink of water, have his gag replaced, and be returned to the cage where he will, again, be locked in and bound into position (not necessarily the same position as before). This will continue through the early morning and possibly into the late afternoon, after which, the slave will be allowed to cleanse himself, the cage, the ball gag, etc. as necessary before being manacled to the bed he has been assigned, to rest. Any or all of these activities may be done by force, with the help of other slaves or other persons, if necessary. It is hoped that by the next morning, the slave will be very eager to avoid this, and, so, not dilly-dally about his work.


G. If the slave breaks a dish, the slave will replace the dish from his own allowance.


H. If the slave engages in a fight for any other purpose than the protection of others, the slave will be whipped, flogged, caned, or striped with a belt, tawse, or similar tool, no less than 25 times, by the Mistress.


I. If the slave is sexually explicit toward the Mistress, family member or guest of the Mistress, other slave, or other person in general, so as to disturb and give offense, making them feel sexually assaulted or harassed, the slave will have much the same punishment as F., but, the use of Tiger Balm, red pepper flakes, icy hot, ice cubes, or other painful but not permanently damaging ointments, unctures, additives, spices, etc. may be used on his scrotum, penis, mouth, or rectal area, including the possibility of fresh, peeled ginger being placed inside his anus.

The Mistress reserves the right to alter, omit, administer in part, or administer more than the punishments listed above, and the slave and the Mistress both accept that this is the right of the Mistress without necessitating the rewriting or breaking of the contract, in that the slave has agreed to obey the Mistress and the Mistress has agreed to love and train the slave, each to the best of their abilities.

Examples of chores that slaves can expect:

The Mistress is desirous of a gardener, The priorities of gardening take precedent over all other duties of labor, save the duty to earn wages. To this end, the slave will study gardening for the Southwest, and, should the Mistress relocate to another climate, the slave will study gardening for that area. The slave will attend classes and lectures, read books, talk to other gardeners, join gardening clubs, submit a list of needs to the Mistress for the purpose of the care and keeping of her plants, or whatever other methods need reasonably be employed for the purpose of being a worthy gardener, and do his utmost to make sure that the Mistress' garden, plants for landscaping décor, and house plants flourish.

The slave will be absolutely required to clean the Mistress home and the slave quarters, in addition to gardening duties and earning his wages. Since the slave has no absolute schedule for his wage earning work, there will be allowed the ability to transfer one day's work to another day, on the days when the slave must be working for his wages for an extended period of time which keeps him from his housekeeping, as the wage earning does take priority. In general, however, the housekeeping, and other duties currently known to be needed to be performed by the slave at the time of signing of the contract (starting when he has relocated to the “slave house” ) will be and go, without excluding possible additions, subtractions or alterations of duties as the Mistress sees fit, as such:


1. On all days:

a. the preparation of breakfast, lunch and dinner, following suggestions, menu plans, or guidelines provided by the Mistress; unless, of course, the Mistress chooses otherwise. This includes helping the Mistress to prepare meals if she so chooses, serving the meals to the Mistress, and the making and serving of any beverages or snacks as required by the Mistress.

b. Cleaning the kitchen after the preparation and/or serving of each meal, snack or beverage, including the rinsing of dishes, putting away of leftovers and condiments, and ensuring that, by the end of the day, the dishes will be clean, dry, and put away, the kitchen will be tidy, and all trash (including from other rooms) will be removed from the home of the Mistress and the slave by 10 pm at the latest, unless instructed otherwise by the Mistress.

c. Chauffeuring Mistress to shopping, movies, visits with friends, or other forms of entertainment, to doctor's appointments, or wherever else the Mistress may need, or wish, to go, as the Mistress prefers; and, joining or aiding Mistress in these excursions as she sees fit.

d. Possible assistance to the Mistress in the pursuit of her artwork, as needed, in whatever way is needed.

e. Cleaning kitchen, living room, bathroom, bedroom(s), hallway(s), etc. as needed, generally as prescribed by the Mistress through her 15-minute room clean up plans.

f. The slave will be responsible for all laundry duties, including learning which garments need to be cleaned by hand washing, dry cleaning, separation of darks, whites and colored garments as is necessary (which it is not always necessary); proper washing, removing all soaps that might irritate the Mistress' delicate flesh; the use of dryer sheets or fabric softener; learning to “turn out” fleece garments; stain removal; cleaning of equipment and laundry room; folding; ironing; and, putting away garments in the correct place and in the correct fashion. The slave will keep track of the dirty laundry and at any time there is enough for a load, it will be completed immediately. If the Mistress discovers anything folded or hung incorrectly, it will be redone. If a garment is destroyed, through the fault of the slave, then the slave may have to pay for a new garment, pay the price of the old garment, and/or may be physically punished for this carelessness.

2. On Mondays: After a training period, the slave will take over the majority of the work of the Mistress at her work as copy editor. This work may also need to be done on Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, but, is usually done, in the majority, on Monday and usually lasts between 4 - 10 hours.

3. On Tuesdays: Traveling to the house of the sister of the Mistress to clean living room, kitchen, and bathroom in manner prescribed by the Mistress, except where reasonably altered to suit the needs of the sister. However, this may be transferred to another day, at the will of the sister.

3. On Saturdays: Washing of clothes for both Mistress and slave, if needed.

4. On Sundays: Chauffeuring to meeting.

Examples of protocols slaves may expect:

General Morning Behavior/ Protocol

A. The slave will awaken at approximately 5 a.m., by what ever method best employed to waken himself (alarm clock, asking another slave to help him, for instance). Upon waking, he will remove himself from the bed he has been assigned for the night, make the bed, move to the bathroom to wash himself, brush his teeth, floss his teeth, rinse with mouthwash, moisturize himself, take his morning supplements if he has been assigned any, don his loincloth (or other clothes if he will be leaving for work or performing outside chores or otherwise has been told to wear other certain types of clothing), brush or comb his hair, and to wait. Another slave, the Mistress, or someone the Mistress sends will come to unlock the slave from the manacle that binds him to the bed and help him into his day time wrist manacles.

B. The slave will, when unlocked from his bed and dressed for his daily work, eat breakfast in the slave quarters, and then report to his assigned duty, unless the assigned duty is to prepare breakfast. If the assigned duty is breakfast preparation, the slave will immediately report to the kitchen of the Mistress to consult the correct menu plans and cook or otherwise prepare a meal for the Mistress. If she has guests there, the slave will prepare a meal for them, as well, if instructed. Since the slave is serving in the kitchen, the slave may make himself some of the same breakfast as the Mistress, at the same time as he makes her breakfast, to be eaten in the kitchen, after the Mistress and/or the Mistress' guests are served; or, he may choose to eat the same breakfast the other slaves ate, instead, after he has finished in the kitchen. The slave will clean spills and drips as he goes, rinse dishes as they are no longer in use, and make sure all dishes, burners, etc. that he used or touched are clean before he departs the kitchen. After the slave meals are done, and the Mistress is also through with her morning ablutions and her meal, the slaves will come and kneel, greeting the Mistress good morning and telling her of anything that might be different about this day (ie: longer hours, shorter hours, they feel ill), while she checks the calendar for appointments, etc.

C. The Mistress will have her second meal at, or near, 9:30 am on most days. This is because the Mistress prefers to have the majority of her meals, excluding possible snacks, before 3 pm, usually having dinner around 2 pm, at the latest. It is better for the digestion. Lunch protocol will be much the same as breakfast protocol, with the other slaves seeking out a snack or meal from the slave quarters but the slave on kitchen duty being allowed to eat the same food as the Mistress, except that he must wait until the Mistress is served, before he eats in the kitchen.

D. Most housework of the more intense variety, such as clothes washing, cleaning of specific rooms, cleaning the oven, car repair, building on the courtyard, etc. will occur in the morning, whenever possible.


Afternoon Behavior/Protocol

A. The last main meal of the day will generally be served around 2 pm. The slaves who are able will attend this meal and eat at the same time as the Mistress, though she will always be served first. They will bring in their lower table and stools or cushions for a place for their meal to be served, or simply sit on the floor to eat, but, will never eat directly with the Mistress in her own home. The slave assigned to help with or cook the meal will serve his fellow slaves before eating, but, they will remain until he is also through with his meal. There will be conversation about the day, or wherever conversation leads to. All slaves will help clean the kitchen and dining area after the meal, before returning to their assigned duties.


Evening Behavior/Protocol

A. In the early to mid evenings, there will be entertainment, if there is entertainment wanted by the Mistress. The slaves will attend and/or perform as she has given order. If they are not to attend or perform, and their duties are finished for the day (as they should be) they will either address themselves to more work, be lent out to another for more work, or retire to the slave quarters where they will change out of their loincloth, be manacled to their bed, and may, instead, improve their minds with reading before sleeping for the evening. However, on most nights, if the Mistress is around at all, the slaves will attend.

 


 


Examples of protocols slaves may expect:

As this slave exists for the pleasure of the Mistress and is a human male of an adult age and at least average intelligence, this slave will devote himself to learning proper procedure, protocol and etiquette, as defined by the Mistress, to include, but not to be limited to:

Every day /”Any situation” Protocol:

A. Addressing the Mistress as Mistress, Mistress Arletta, or Ma'am in private or in public at such times as when public speech can reasonably considered to be private; but, addressing her as Ma'am or Arletta when in public where speech cannot be reasonably considered to be private.

B. Always waiting to eat until after she is served, regardless of whether in private or in public, unless ordered to do otherwise.

C. Walking at least a few steps behind the Mistress, on most occasions; walking ahead of the Mistress in order to open doors for her in public settings or at the outer door of the entrance to the Mistress' home when she is either leaving or returning; walking beside the Mistress when crossing streets.

D. Only entering the home of the Mistress when scheduled or invited, unless due to an emergency situation such as fire, flood, serious injury, serious illness, invading armies, earthquake, gas leak, or other emergencies which threaten loss of life or limb of the Mistress, the slave, or someone of their acquaintance.

E. Kneeling and waiting for permission to enter, at the entrance to whatever room the Mistress occupies, when she is at home. Yet, always moving ahead of her, to enter the store first, open the doors where doors need to be opened, step out and open her car door when parked, etc.

1. If the slave is chauffeuring the Mistress to some place where he will not be entering in, the slave will pull up to the nearest legal position, relative to the door, and allow her to exit; he will then watch for her to exit the buildings, so as pull up to the entrance or as near as possible to pick her up when she is ready to leave. This is the same rule for any family or guests that the Mistress may have the slave chauffeur.

F. Addressing all other females as Ma'am or Miss, and all other males as Sir, regardless of their position or status. The exception being that the slave may continue to address his own family and friends, should he be addressing them at all, in the manner that they are accustomed to.

G. Never testing the Mistress, to judge the Mistress' worth as a Mistress. The slave will do his best to follow protocol, perform tasks and chores assigned, generate an income for the sake of the Mistress first and the “slave house” second, show politeness to all, refrain from fighting with other slaves, and to serve the Mistress in any other way she wishes or needs to be served.

H. To always look for ways to build up the Mistress' life, by increasing comfort, happiness, health, safety, and general well being in ways that reflect the Mistress' own choices with how to live.

I. To always greet the Mistress good morning and goodnight, though it does not always need to be those exact words.

J. To keep a journal and write in it, at least 15 minutes a day, detailing his thoughts, feelings, and activities. This is to be shared with the Mistress whenever she requests it.

K. Online, if the slave should remain online and in such a site as there might be persons who are considered Mistresses, Masters, Dommes, slaves, or submissives, where the site is geared toward bdsm activities or talk, the slave will represent himself as the property of Mistress Arletta, and will not seek out conversation with other Mistress or dominants, real or pretend, without the permission of the Mistress Arletta. To whit: the slave will change his profile on the site where he met the Mistress to indicated that she owns him, and he will also change his “actively seeking” status to the one indicating that friends are all he is seeking.

L. When the Mistress family or friends are at her home, and they are family or friends who are not aware of the slave and Mistress relationship, or if someone in a more official nature in society (work men, police officers, clergy, postal employees, etc.) is present, the slave will not enter the Mistress home, even if scheduled, unless summoned.

1) If the slave is already in the home, when the door bell rings or someone knocks, he will immediately shut off any noisy tools, such as a vacuum before Mistress answers the door. He will shut off any water he may be running, turn off any cooking that may be dangerous to leave for a few minutes, and move quietly to the exit which will allow him to move to his slave quarters and await the Mistress there.

2) If the slave finds or suspects that he is unable to make a discreet exit from the Mistress' home, he will, instead, remain quietly where he is, trusting that the Mistress will do her best to keep the visitors from him, or to explain his presence to them should that be impossible to keep them from the presence of the slave.

M. The use of cuss words, curse words, swearing is offensive and shall not be practiced. It shall be practiced to not do these things. The exceptions are where the slave is quoting or naming a movie, entertainer, song, book, or person where these sort of words happen to have been used (and the Mistress wishes him to do so), reading this contract, explaining what was said by someone else to the Mistress, or in some other way being a legitimate use of the words for the purpose of informing the Mistress of something she needs to know. If the slave is found to utter these words or phrases that offend the Mistress, the slave will immediately be slapped in the mouth. If he continues, he may also be subject to more rigorous punishment. These words and phrases include, but are not limited to: ass, cunt, slut, fuck, god damn it, oh my fucking god, omfg, goddess, Goddess, asshole, shit, fuckle bunny, fuckhead, fuckface, ass rimmer, eat my ass, suck my duck, eat shit and die, eat shit and live, fuck you, fuck me, fuck my life, fuck the world, yeah well fuck them, fuck off, fuck off and die, burn in hell, go to hell, on the highway to hell, nig-ger, kike, spic, wap, dago, little white shicksaw, ofey, ofay, cracker (obviously, this may be used when mentioning the food or food group), white bread (same rule as cracker), jigaboo, jungle bunny, towel head, sand nig6ger. Obviously, the spirit of the speech is at least as important as the actual words used.

N. The slave, regardless of what other languages he speaks, will address the Mistress in English, preferably as spoken by the more well-bred American types, unless she has given him leave, or directly asked him, to do otherwise.

O. What is the Mistress' is the Mistress' and is not for the use of slaves, unless exceptions have been given.

1. If a slave is working in the home of the Mistress and finds himself in need of using the bathroom, he will remove himself to the slave quarters to do so. If possible, he will obtain the permission of the Mistress first. In absolute emergency situations, he will leave her home, without permission, for this purpose. If she notices, he will apologize, but, he will not interrupt her day to tell her of this, unless it is to inform her that he is ill.

2. Slaves who are assigned to prepare meals may bring their own glass to drink water, their own dishes to serve themselves food upon, and may even have some of the same drink as they have prepared for the Mistress in their own glass. They are not to use the Mistress' dishes or utensils for their own need, however; they will only use them to prepare food for and serve food to the Mistress.

3. Slaves will have their own laundry soap, bedding, dishes, toilet tissue, cleaning supplies, wash cloths, towels, clothes, etc. They will only touch the Mistress' items if in service to her or if she has given them express permission to do so. They will never ask to use them, but, will wait for the Mistress to give permission or not to give permission as she sees fit. IE: The Mistress tells the slaves to wash their loincloths and bedding, and they do not have enough laundry soap for the loads. They will inform the Mistress they only have enough laundry soap to do half the work, or that they have run out. She may, then, choose to tell them to use some of her laundry soap, to wash them without laundry soap, to only wash the loincloths and to wait to wash the bedding until more laundry soap can be obtained, or, whatever else it is in her head to order them to do.

P. The slave will earnestly seek ways to improve his mind, his understanding of the Mistress, his knowledge of ways to serve the Mistress (ie: learning about gardening in the southwest), and will ask the permission of the Mistress for time set aside to pursue these goals, for such things as reading time, the attending of classes (which he must also ask if the Mistress will pay for, if they are not free classes), the seeking out of other persons with more knowledge in this area of service or work, etc.

Q. In general, the slave will not leave the home of the Mistress without the Mistress or a family member or a guest of the Mistress being with the slave. On the occasions where the slave must leave by himself, or only in the company of another slave or other slaves, the Mistress may assign him a cell phone by which to stay in communication. The slave will leave the cell phone on, whenever possible, and answer it as promptly as possible. If there is an emergency, he will call or have someone else call, the Mistress as soon as possible. If it is still possible, and affordable, the cell phone will be one that has the capability of only calling the few numbers the Mistress allows. Regardless, the slave will be accountable for the minutes used, and if the minutes are significantly more than can be accounted for by his conversations with the Mistress, the slave may receive a paddling or stroke of the whip, or similar punishment, for each excessive minute used, at the discretion of the Mistress and upon explanation by the slave.

R. As the Mistress does not celebrate birthdays, national holidays, or religious holidays, outside of the Memorial of the Death of the Christ, the slave will not greet her with holiday greetings, wishes for a happy birthday or speak to her in ways that indicate he is celebrating such even so much as near her property; nor will he purchase presents for those occasions for the Mistress or for her guests or for her family. To speak so will be considered the same as cursing or swearing and will receive the same punishment.

S. The Mistress will not be interrupted in activity or speech, for any reason barring emergency.

T. The slave will not engage the Mistress in conversation, without permission. If she chooses to speak to the slave, he may respond, but, he will not initiate conversation, except in matters of extreme importance. He is expected to be out of sight and out of mind, unless the Mistress chooses to grant him an audience or otherwise spend time with/on him.

  1. There will be a very small lamp in the living room that has a small nite-light bulb in it. If the slave needs to speak to the Mistress concerning something significant or extensive, the slave will turn this light on. When the Mistress see it lit, she will approach the slave at her convenience, and allow him to converse.

  2. If the Mistress chooses to allow the slave the freedom to speak, she may turn the light on, or, she may simply inform the slave in writing or in person. This indicates to the slave that he is free to make general conversation as the Mistress would enjoy it, at this time, and he may speak openly, but, respectfully.

  3. The Mistress will have several areas throughout the “slave house” for writing notes to the slave, as well as having provided charts. There will also be an area, near where the Mistress sits to write that will have a message center where she will know to check for messages from the slave, should there be a need for him to leave any. This will be one of the primary methods of communication between Mistress and slave.

When in doubt, the slave will fall into proper social etiquette as defined by current polite Western societal standards or as define by Miss Manners; slave will ask for clarification of what he does not understand that he needs to understand, give good advice and/or physical assistance to assist his Mistress in matters of which he is likely to be more knowledgeable or capable, or sees her making a definite error (but, always, politely and keeping in mind his status and her own); and, slave will use his own mind to be self-governing enough not to make unreasonable demands upon his Mistress for time and attention. Unreasonableness is to be defined by Mistress, as well as Mistress's laws and rules, and societal laws and rules of social etiquette.

See the list below, in partial explanation of the list to the left of my profile. I am only doing this for the bits that often get asked about.

Lives For:
Volunteerism - I used to "volunteer" by helping neighbors, going out to the streets and sweeping up broken glass and bagging up nasty trash (it was that sort of neighborhood),and many other things besides. I would like to do that sort of thing, again, but, with slaves. Helping people is very important. If you do not like to help people, I do not need you in my life, at all.

 Loves:

Collars - I do love collars, in that they are pretty and seem to make slaves happier. I only wore them for special occasions, or because I felt like it, as a slave, with the two Masters that counted most. We did not need outward shows with jewelry to define our relationship, and, I still do not. I do not believe a slave being collared is what makes them a slave. Asking a slave "Are you collared?" is like asking a married person 'Are you ringed?" Which, in fact, I have never heard anyone do. A collar is jewelry, a symbol, not a relationship. So, yes, I will probably give my slaves a collar, for at home or for special occasions, and, maybe a ring or something for when they are away from home and the collar would simply make people nervous. Probably. Because, jewelry is pretty, and it is sometimes nice to touch it or look at it and think of the person who it is associated with. Just don't treat it like a talisman.


Housework - I do love housework, both in that, sometimes, I love to do it and in that I really want someone to do it for me, or help me with it. Sometimes it is very relaxing to me. I do not want slaves with attitudes who tell me I cannot do it; nor the ones who think they are above it. Housework binds you to the home, the people in it. We both want that experience, so, hand me the sponge and be quiet. I'll tell you when I need you to put the dishes away. Got it? I have these "15 minute" plans for every day cleaning. I used to have charts for spring cleaning, etc. too. I will probably have them again. I would like a well maintained, well organized, clean home. It will probably be cluttered, but, clean. What can I say? I write, read, paint, draw, want to get back into beadwork, love to cook. Interesting people who love to expand their knowledge and to create make clutter. Good thing the slaves will be there and help to bring order from chaos.



Alternative Medicine - Doctors are for things you cannot cure yourself. In general, for my problems, alternative medicine works better: herbal supplements, proper eating, hydrogen peroxide therapy. Very good stuff, that. Don't tell me it doesn't work, as I know it does. Yes, I will probably give you supplements or vitamins, tell you to do oil pulling when ill or make you a broth from a recipe that helps build up your immune system. I use spices, a lot, in cooking, for this reason as well as for taste.

 

 


 Tolerates:

 Hard Limits:



 

 Queening - Is sexual and gross.Since it is considered part of submission, and I do not like it, you will not do it, with anyone.


  

What is it about so-called slaves, male variety, who cannot even so much as say goodnight, thank you, I changed my mind and am no longer interested, please, use someone's title when it is given to them, and who can and do go about making assumptions as to people's moods or which bit of a contract can or cannot be negotiated without asking?

Is politeness, as one might expect from any well brought up stranger, too much to ask from a slave?
So, you want to be a slave as in "a Roman, Egyptian, Old South American" style slave? First of all, make up your mind which one you want to be, and stop making assumptions about them all being the same.

In the majoirty, Egyptian slaves and Roman slaves were fairly alike: they were captured as spoils of war, or they sold themselves into slavery, in the main. These slaves, in the main, were treated with respect, allowed to visit with or even live with family and friends, allowed leisure time if their work was done. These slaves, with startlingly few exceptions, were nothing like the slaves of the Old South variety - they were not chosen by color, they were generally treated with respect, bred to other slaves in the majority and not to their Master as their Masters, in the majority, would never have, for an instant, considered making their children into slaves. And, in general, if a man sold himself into slavery, it was only himself that went. His house, his family, they were not part of the deal.

The slaves on the southern plantations, in North America, and the treatment they received, are a great deal of why it is now illegal in North America to own slaves. Many of them were also treated with as much respect as a Master or Mistress was allowed to show them, mind you; but, there were serious laws in place against allowing someone to give them freedom of movement even if it was desired.

They were maligned as being evil, stupid, shiftless people who were incapable of caring for themselves. They were treated as so inhuman that many Masters believed that a child created between them and a slave simply was a better slave for having a touch more humanity in it, but, would never acknowledge that this was his flesh and blood. In fact, many of them raped the mother slave, then the daughter slave, then the daughter of that slave, too, on down the line, incestuously breeding more and more slaves for his benefit. This was considered crude behavior, by some, and the sort of people who treated their slaves well did their best to avoid mixing with those sort of Masters who treated their slaves in this manner, but, it was not something they were ever arrested for and no one considered a child that was only half black as having the same rights as a white child, or even half the rights, for being half white. This is something a Roman would never have legally been allowed to do. If a child had Roman parentage, even by half, especially if that half were the father, he had full rights under the law, including the right to buy his freedom (if he even were a slave) and to live as a free man.

There are many documented instances of the abuse of slaves, in the old south, that goes beyond anything that any person in their right mind would willingly participate in. Perfectly good slaves bought, worked to the point where their bodies and spirits were completely broken, and then, having found to be no longer useful, slaughtered and fed as meat to the dogs. Fathers bred to their own daughters, noses being chopped off as punishment, slaves being hobbled as a matter of course because their new owners knew that the treatment they would inflict on the slaves would be so horrific that anyone in their right mind would run and they didn't want them to get too far. 

So, which slave do you want to be? The one that has sold himself into slavery, who can expect to be treated with respect even though he may be worked quite hard, who is still allowed contact with his friends and family when there is time for it? Or, the one who has been taken against his will, forced into slavery, or who was born into it, who either leaves behind the family he has or is raised up with a family that he knows he can derive no comfort of hearth and home from, since his mother, father, sisters, wife, daughters and sons can all be sold or worked to death, as can he; who is going to be treated as  a mindless piece of meat who must sit in silence as his wife and daughters are raped before his eyes, who has no comfort, no joy, with whippings for no reason but that someone hates him, with no solace but that soon you will fall down from your burden and the dogs will be well fed?

If you think about it, and you still want to be a slave like in the old south, I don't want to know you. I have no use for slaves who want to be tortured, abused, maimed, raped or killed.

I have a lot of use for slaves who want to give of their time and energy, who enjoy domestic activities and are going to be happy to be working for me.

To me, 'Safe, Sane and Consensual', really means something. 'Safe' means that even the slaves has rights. They will never be starved, never have their body parts lopped off, never be burnt with cigarettes, never turned into some human monstrosity through burns or tattoos or plastic surgery that no one else would want, never be beaten without good cause; and they do have some say in what happens to their body, being allowed to choose if they will be marked or altered, because it is still their body. Their body must work for their owner, but, they have total right to its safety, if not its comfort. 'Sane' means that everyone in the relationship is dealing with the fact that they are both humans, of whatever sex they were born, and in a country where slavery is illegal so that everyone involved is aware that this is by mutual consent, and everyone is aware that there is a difference between public life, family life, and life at home in private. 'Consensual' means that the slave has a great deal of say, in entering into the relationship, of how it will go; and, the owner will provide periodic times in which the slave may have the right to ask for release or changes, even after the point where the contract is signed. It is not just to be consensual going in, but, it must remain consensual.

Now, we all have differing view points on what is and is not sane, obviously. For some of us, the idea of being whipped, at all, is sheer madness; whereas, some of us see no problem with the removal of genitalia. I would say, in general, what is sane is what would, in the end, leave the slave a person of sound mind and body who is capable of caring for themselves, should the need arise, in case something befalls the owner. I would also say sane is realizing that property that has been fed good, nutritious meals, gotten adequate sleep more often than not, and is comfortable enough that the cold and heat are not affecting its ability to work, is property that is going to work harder, faster, and better.

I don't believe any of us have a disagreement on what the word consensual means, though - and that is something that I see ignored by so many person, on their profile or in their speech with me. "Slaves" want to be taken, tortured against their will. Well, that is just no part of bdsm.You have to willingly enter into it, and, once you have, you may get a lot of surprises of the painful, pleasurable, boring, tedious, cold, hot, wet, and/or sensory deprived sort. Those things will be "against your will" as you will not ask for them and you will be "forced" into them, if you do not move into them gracefully, on your own, because that is exactly what you signed up for. Therefore, since you do want it, it is not against your will, in actual fact.

Safe, well, that's a harder call. Slaves don't necessarily want to feel safe, and their owners often like to make them feel unsafe; but, there is a balance, a point wherein the slave can feel unsafe - having no idea what will happen - while still being safe, knowing that certain things will never happen. For instance, there would be a crop, a paddle, nipple clamps, some candles and matches, and a few assorted other items layed out where the slave can see it and then a blindfold is put on the slave. It knows something is probably going to happen, and it will probably involve at least one, maybe many, of those items. But, which items? When? How will they be used? Therein lays that feeling of not being safe. Yet, it knows that it will not be killed or maimed, so, it is safe.

This is a very serious thing, to enter into slavery. Notice, I do not say to be a slave, or to own a slave, but, to enter into slavery. It doesn't matter which role you take up, slave or owner, it is still a very serious thing. Anyone who enters into it would do well to give it much thought, and to choose the slave or owner who is best suited to their style of living, their way of thinking. Which means, they should know what their needs are, versus what their wants are, versus what they will put up with, versus what they cannot do.

A slave should know what he has to offer. He should not make bold claims that he cannot back up, and he may not want to reveal his full  monetary worth at once, lest the owner accept him out of greed rather than out of compatibility. He should not lie, but, he does not need to reveal to someone, who is still a stranger after all, the extent of his property. It is enough to tell them what assures them that the slave is capable of earning enough to make sure that he is not a burden upon the owner.  Therefore, the owner should likewise know what they need the slave to be capable of giving.

This is not just about money, however. This is about all aspects. It is easy to feel desperate, driven by your need, and come to a point where you are agreeing to things that, in more rational moments, you would never want to live with. Yes, equally for those who would own as those who would be owned, because the need is the same even if the actions it drives you toward are not. So, it is important to know all these needs, wants, desires, dislikes, and what would absolutely break your spirit, and to look for compatibility, most especially, in the "needs" and in the "breaking of spirit" categories, since, of course, are what affect you most. The other things, they are great, but, if someone fulfills all of them but only while expecting of you the things that will destroy you, they are not going to be a good fit, are they?

Please, please, really think about this, all of this. You don't have to agree with every word, and I am sure most of you will not, but, I hope you will consider it, all the same, and, for your own safety and the possibility of your own future fulfillment, as well as simply to stop wasting your time talking to the wrong people, study yourself and come to know what you really seek. And, I hope you then, armed with more accurate knowledge, find your happiness.
Here is a little hint for you "slaves":

If you decide you do not want to be owned by someone because of trivial matters, like their looks, location (if it is feasible for you to be relocated to them), activity that they want to do that will not affect your religious beliefs, health, mental safety or be illegal, activity that you want to do that they will not engage in because it will affect their religious beliefs, health, mental safety or it is illegal, food that they will or will not let you eat (when you are not allergic and the food is healthful to you), that they prefer you clothed or nude and you would rather be the other way - in other words if you do not want them because they are not bending over backward to mold themselves to your will, and they expect you to show them time, attention, respect, and that you will mold yourselves to their will - then you are not a slave.

If you are not a slave, stop wasting the time of those who would own slaves.

This journal entry is brought to you by the letters F and U. No, seriously .. I get "slaves" who are not looking for sex, writing to me out of the blue, telling me they could never serve someone who looks like me - when I didn't even make them any offers, mind you; but, these same slaves write to my daughter - who is not a dominant- and demand to submit to her, based on her looks.

Now, would a person who seriously wanted to be owned, controlled, in a non-sexual manner, go after the young, hot babe who doesn't know shite? Or, would they go after the experienced, older woman who has a few decades of experience?

Then, of course, there are the slaves who agree with everything my contract says, except, they think they should be beaten more and it should be put in the contract that I will give them 20 lashes a day. Which is, of course, them demanding that I be contractually obligated to serve them in the manner that they think is fit. Which is, of course, the best way to be serving me. Yeah, right!

Then, there are the ones who say they agree that there should be no sex. Who then go on to detail how they want to be filled with lust, as I horde their cock away in its chastity device, so that they can rub themselves up against me, perform oral SEX on me, play with my breasts, do sexual things to my arse and their own, and then I can take off their chastity device and "milk" them. These are people who need a dictionary, a mental health check up, and a sound slap from the Dairy Board. That is so not milk, boys!

Then, there are ... oh, never mind. You get the picture. There are so many people on this site who claim to be slaves, or to want to be slaves, who cannot even show basic politeness to the people they are claiming to want to know and possibly serve, who make demands for service from the people they allegedly want to serve, or who reject the people they allegedly want to serve at the merest hint of a problem.

Now, I have no issue with slaves who are very much different than I am. I have no quarrel with a slave who is a cross dresser that wants to be beaten twice a day while being called a filthy ass bandit deciding he does not want to submit to me, based on the fact that he knows he would not be happy. I am not one of those who believes that slaves have no right to so much as an opnion, especially when they are free men when I meet them. By all means, look for someone who is compatible, to a great degree - who will not force you into things that will destroy you, who will be interested in some of the same things you are, who is not a sadist if you do not like pain, who is a sadist if you do like pain. It's important to look for compatibliity; but ...

Slave: we are all human. Someone is going to put the toilet paper on the roller the wrong way, drop a glass, gain a few pounds, lose a few pounds, want you to scrub the floor when you would rather watch tv, get cancer, recover from cancer, be 5'9" instead of 5'6", age, learn more, want to hike less, and/or etc. No one is going to fit every last little hope and dream you have, every last fantasy you conjure up in your mind.

Therefore, you - yes, you, slave - need to get your shite together and figure out, for yourself, what you really want from being owned and how much you can handle. What you need versus what you think you want, what you can live with even though you might not want it. Stop fantasizing, or it will never happen. Fantasies can be perfect. Dommes, Doms, Masters, Mistresses are not. Either are slaves.

Do you want perfection? Stay in your own head. Do you want reality? Then, lose the ego trip, read the contract, ask questions, negotiate for what you NEED not what you beat off about late at night, sign the contract, shut  up, bring me tea.

Can you handle that?
So, I show these two slaves this contract I had originally written for a slave who flounced off, all pissed that I refuse to be truly harsh and I have not a demanding bone in my body, and.. blah blah blah ...

One of them tells me he doesn't see how work would be compatible with the degree of control I want of a slave.

The other one tells me that it opened his eyes, and he realized what a huge step slavery really is,  and, again, mentioned how controlling it all is.

Amazing, huh, how three people can read exactly the same document and have wildly different viewpoints?

Truth is, my contract is amazingly flexible, in some aspects (see journal entry, below, about that) and the ones where it is not flexible are in regards to a slave being respectful, obedient, loyal and hard working.

Are there slaves out there who want to work and be respectful, who know how to read; I mean, not just let words fly into your eyeballs, but, comprehend?
For those who have looked at, are looking at, or who will be looking at the contract:

  • It was not written for you, specifically. 
  • Some things are highly negotiable and some things are not negotiable in the least.
  1. Financial aspects of service: that this will happen is NOT negotiable; but, how it will happen and to what extent is extremely negotiable.
  2. Chastity: That the slave will be non-sexual towards me is not negotiable; the wearing of chastity devices, what kind, for how long are all negotiable.
  3. Relocation is not optional; how, when, and where to one does relocate is.
  4. Obedience, loyalty, respect, acceptance of punishment are not negotiable; what sort of schedule, punishment, duties are.
  5. The lack of use of butt plugs, dildos, strap-ons is not negotiable; the use of manacles, cages, bondage is.
This is not necessarily a comprehensive list of all that is not, or is, negotiable; but, it probably covers the majority.

Found something else to add, now. It is an email that I wrote to a slave who had looked at the contract, and who has reservations on some issues in a way that makes me think, because of him not totally fitting the contract, he is about to flee.


"You may not be sure that work is compatible with what I want, but, I am sure of it. I think you have built things up too much in your mind. Broken down to its most basic, what the contract says is that you will be a slave who will work for your Mistress, follow her rules, respect her beliefs, and that is because you seek to serve, not because you seek pain or abuse.

I am not abusive. And, if you note, it says in the contract, in more than one place such things as "unless the Mistress chooses otherwise" in regards to punishment, chores, etc. In other words, the contract gives guidelines of behavior and a rough idea of expectations, based on no particular slave, with no knowledge of his net worth or his work schedule or religious beliefs.

You would not be signing THAT contract. You read THAT contract, to get a rough idea of if you could live that way. Then, you consider what you could not live with and why, and you find out if that could be changed. And, you consider what you NEED to still be the man of conscience that you are, such as religious meetings, some time with family on certain days, contact by phone, friends being allowed to visit, maybe a free day every so often so you can go do .. whatever ...  And, you ask about that. And we talk about those things, and see if we can come to an agreement that suits both of your needs, many of our wants, and some of our desires."

In other words, slaves, if you read the contract I send you, when I ask you if you want to read the basic contract, or if you ask me to be allowed to read it, you need to keep in mind that the key word is "basic". It is not for you. Your contract will be written with that contract as a guideline.

So, think about that.
Person 1: The best way to teach obedience is through kindess

Person 2: Matter of opinion.They need a short, sharp shock.

Person 1: If you want them to cringe. If you want an obedient dog, you must be firm but kind.

That's from 'All Creatures Great and Small', which, if you knew things I knew, you would know is a set of short stories written by a veterinarian about his practice.

And, why do I tell you this.

Because, so many of you tell me you want to be treated like a dog, less than human, so I should consent to beat you, as beatings and abuse are the only way slaves learn. However, it is not the way dogs learn, so if you want to be treated like a dog, expect to be treated like a dog whose owner wants obedience and work, not just fear.

Person # 1 (some more): Here me out! One first establishes an affectionate relationship - this causes little trouble, beause the dog, being uncomplicated, makes all the advances -then, takes command. If the dog transgresses, one shows disapproval, not by inflicting physical pain, but, thus: one takes the dog's head in hand and shakes it to and fro like this. (More or less a forced "no" gesture while looking disapproving). All one has inflicted, you see, is loss of dignity. The animal won't cringe, but, she'll remember the expression of disapproval.

Slaves wanted.

Real slaves: no sex toys, dogs, sluts, or seekers of abusive relationships need apply. Though, if you consider yourself more servant or companion, that might  work, too. 
  • Read my interest list? Are you compatible with it? Do you have many things you like, love, or live for that are on my hard limits list? Be honest and rational, and let us not waste our time.
  • Must prove ability to follow simple commands, understand writing, and efficiency.
  • I do not care about your looks, and I am not here to cater to your fetishes.
  • Possible allowance of outside relationships that do not interfere with service to me and mine, in order to fulfill a need of the slave which is not to be fulfilled through service to me.
  • This is what will work up to a 24/7/365 live-in position, long term, with reassessment and possible renegotiation of contract on anniversary (or near to) of signing contract.

I believe in behavior modification, discipline through the setting of schedules and tasks and reasonable consequences for most behaviors and mistakes that are likely to occur in decent, task oriented slaves. There may be mild play with cages, shackles, etc. or more serious play with them, but, I am not a bully and I will not be bullied into becoming one just to satisfy your pain fetish.

You must be:

  • Heterosexual by nature.
  • Respectful and respectable
  • Interested in serving and giving to others, first and foremost.
  • Willing to enter into a 100 percent non-sexual slave/Mistress relationship.
  • Able to withstand much oddity, weirdness, and silly talk.
  • So sure of your desire to serve me, that you are willing to relocate, willing to beg to be allowed to serve, and ready to prove yourself to me.

If you fit the criteria, please do message me and I will allow you to view a basic contract which may be, if we progress to that point, altered to suit the talents, abilities, and schedules of the individual slave.

 

I am a religious person, as in I believe in God, and I believe that slavery is not wrong, that it can be acceptable to God, if it is done well. "Done well" means, for one thing, it is not about the oppresson of a certain ethnic group, and it is with the understanding that one still does unto others as one would have done unto them. In other words, I will not treat a slave in a manner that, if I was a slave, I would not enjoy being treated.


I am not into pain, or a slut, I have no wish to have my face used as a stool, I do not like to be insulted, I do not wish to be raped, I do not like to be laughed at or poked with sticks, and I darn sure do not want anyone pissing or crapping on, or in, me.

 

I do, however, enjoy a wee bit of ritual, non-sexual bondage, isolation beds and tanks, chains, gags, speech restrictions at times, good solid punishment when I have truly done wrong, and, mostly, clear, firm instructions and rules from someone who I know has personal knowledge of my capabillities and who will allow me to be of use, who will appreciate the work, and who will value me for what I have done, and, to some degree, also as a person.

 

So, since I know this is the sort of slave I would like best to be, and these are the things I would have someone do unto me, these are the things that will be done unto you. It's not all pleasant, sometimes it is exhausting, painful, scary, or downright tedious - but, it is also fulfilling, rewarding, and, sometimes, fun.

 

 

I am seeking an eventual live in slave TPE situation. The slave would wear a loincloth or casual clothing, or whatever else I want him to wear, around the house, including his collar and chastity device and any other restraints I saw fit to use on him - which would mostly be after his serious chores were done.

I will be compassionate yet firm and quick to inflict punishment as warranted. The slave will work for wages. The slave will sleep in or on whatever I provide for him and will accept it with gratefulness.  The slave will do whatever work he is assigned for whomever I allow the use of him, and he will consider it the same as serving me.  He will be responsible for all household chores  that I do not care to do and which other slaves are not assigned (should there be other slaves).

(That is based on the profile of a slave, who started out with a profile that said "i expect" and has now moved to "will" He's getting there, though, I think. In the meantime, thats what I wrote to him, which is a bit different from his profile, as it is based on my wants and needs, rather than the wants and needs of a slave.)
The Mistress, this Mistress, is not always right. Sometimes this Mistress is terribly wrong. Sometimes, she forgets things. This is because this Mistress is font of fallibility, having been born human. Yes, this Mistress is human, as the slave is human, and, she has no belief that having been born in possession of a vagina makes her omnipotent. That is your safety, that is her sanity.

She, like all great leaders who came before her, whether exalted rulers of great nations or heads of simple, small households, has the right to rule because someone has submitted and given it to her; and, because, she knows what to do with it. That is our mutual consensuality.

Now, if you are a person who wishes to be ruled over, to have your hours scheduled for you, your money managed, your actions set and noted, punishments meted out, state so, plainly. If you must give to others, let it be known and let it be rejoiced in. If you happen to like the feel of a manacle around your wrist, a collar around your throat, a cage around your body, state it with boldness, as someone who has come seeking, not what is shameful, but, as someone who knows that this is, perhaps, a little different than what many would ask for, but, still and all, perfectly moral, sane, and desirable.

Let us have no talk of how you are inferior and that is why it must be that you become owned property. Why would this Mistress own inferior property? You will be property because you want it, and someone will allow it, and, because, you know what you are doing; the same reasons, as why this Mistress will own property: the two sides of the same coin. There is your total power exchange.

This Mistress seeks slaves for the sharing of life together, in our respective roles. She can and will punish transgressions that she considers punishable. She can and will make that decision for herself, and, sometimes, show mercy. In like manner, she may also do those things traditionally used by her for punishment of slaves, to the slaves, simply because it is her desire to do so. She will state so plainly, not hiding behind excuses made. That is dominance.

And, the slaves will submit, because they enjoy submitting even if they do not enjoy the activity for any other reason than they are being allowed to give to the Mistress. That is submission.

The slaves will work hard for the Mistress, striving for quality and quantity of work, never sacrificing the former for the latter but hoping to achieve both. When the Mistress is seen by the slaves, in her silken gown, bedecked in jewels, looking healthy and happy, smiling up at the man she has chosen to spend time with, they will feel pride in their work and joy that they were allowed to give so to the Mistress, as their lives will be that entwined with her own. And, when the Mistress calls them to her and allows them a little treat, they will happily accept it as a gift, knowing that the Mistress chooses to do this thing as it makes her happy to do so. There are times they and the Mistress will joke together, sing together, cry together. There are times she will not notice them, as her mind is focused elsewhere and they must function in their roles all the same. Sometimes the Mistress will be right there, working beside them, and, sometimes, she will leave them to work what is good in her absence while she visits friends or family. They will function, keeping the Mistress in mind, and slaving for the good of her household, to please her upon her return. That is slavery.

The Mistress will work the slaves hard, sometimes to exhaustion. She will, also, for her own reasons, occasionally call for a day of rest and play, celebrating in the joy of life with her slaves, allowing them to enter into her joy, while still maintaining the correct degree of separation between Mistress and slave. There are times the Mistress may take slaves with her for a holiday. There are times she may leave the slaves and trust in them, in her abilities in having selected and trained the right slaves to suit her needs, and, she will know that upon her return, they will have given her reason to be proud of her property. That is ownership.
Let's see if I can get this concept across to anyone:

I want slaves who can sleep in a bed, be allowed out of the house by themselves, wear regular clothes, never get tortured or put in a cage, and who could still obey, do good work, and know that they are slaves.

If you are one of those, then, maybe, we can discuss if you are allowed to sleep on the floor, cage time, to wear shackles, dress in a uniform or loincloth.

Because, what I want you for is work, entertainment, companionship. Someone in jeans and t-shirt, or a nice suit, who is not on his knees groveling or pretending to be a foot stool, should be at least as able to accomplish them as someone who is lightly clothed, groveling, and chained to a wall.

You need to be someone who understands, in their own mind, their need to surrender their life into the hands of another person for the sake of being allowed to give; a person who aches to be of use. If you are this person, perhaps we would suit.

If you want to be used, if you think that the real bits of slavery are the chains and pains and not the service, we will never be in agreement. So, be honest, and waste not your time or mine.

"The recent work adds a new twist to older theories about the roots of human aggression. While Freud saw aggression as a basic human drive that had to be channeled by the controls of the ego and superego, many psychologists now feel aggression stems from faulty thinking and a penchant for retaliation that verges on the paranoid.

Some current findings are consistent with such older views as the idea, inspired by the work of Alfred Adler, that the bully is compensating for deep feelings of inferiority.

''We find that bullies have a strong need to control others,'' said John Lochman, a psychologist at Duke University Medical School. ''Their need to be dominant masks an underlying fear that they are not in control, and they mask the sense of inadequacy by being a bully.'' "


Hmm .. and, what does that mean, in regard to the aggressive Doms and Dommes, who have to insult and threaten, treat subs and slaves with extreme cruelty, in order to appear dominant, Professor?

And, what does it say about the slaves who  believe that's what dominance looks, acts, and growls like?

So many people, so afraid to simply be themselves! Tsk tsk ...

 

It is now my sincere belief that there is one guy on this site, who writes the profile of every straight or semi-straight Canadian slave  male, and who then, for reasons I cannot fathom, uses each one to contact me and see how many weeks of my life he can waste.

Funny, the Canadians I knew, when I lived in Alaska, were good, thoughtful, honest people who would never tell you that they belonged to you and then proceed to pull the rug out from under you, after wasting a good bit of your time in negotiating contracts. One could take them at their word, totally.

What happened to those Canadians, and who replaced them with this large pile of ass hats which has, unfortunately, infiltrated CM?

 

Well, as I said to the last one, just now (11/29/2010):

 

"No? Ah well, you haven't done one thing for me, yet, so why start now? You are an idiot, you know? You would have had what you were seeking, according to everything you told me that you wanted. Which means you either lied about what you wanted, or you walked away from it due to your lack of understanding. Either way, that's pretty stupid. If you want to be a slave, you need to learn honesty and understanding.

You would have been worked very, very hard and gone to bed exhausted, because you would have gotten up to do your wage work and then you would have done hard labor, in between periods of studying and going to classes to learn more of what I needed you to know, and you would have been lent out as labor for the sake of helping others, and oh my how tired you would have been, and how useful.

And, that's not even including the enforced cage times, the times of serving as a footstool, the enforced whippings on schedule just to practice submitting, the times of being forced to serve as a pony for the other Mistresses at the parties,  the exercises, and etc.

But, you said it all, with your little ego trip telling me how you'll find a Mistress who deserves all the bounty that you offer. No, not your words - mine are better. However, it is what you meant.

All you needed to do was listen and trust.

And, we would have both been happier; well, more fulfilled.

Idiot."

 

If someone says "I am slaving away at the dishes.", what does it mean?

Does it mean they are caged at the dishes? Or, that they are bound and broken at the dishes? Kidnapped at the dishes? Being forced to give blow jobs at the dishes?

No. It means they are working hard at the dishes.

So, if you are a slave who would toil for your Mistress, I may want you. That is a true slave to me. If you are a slave who wants to be bound and broken, I have no use for you. People who are bound and broken are no good at cleaning the kitchen. They tend to bleed all over it and drop cups with their clumsy little bound and broken fingers.

Seeking slaves of the straight, male, non-cross dressing, absolutely not sissy, hard working variety: "worker drone" is an apt descriptive. They must want to work, be obedient, to serve me.

There is not a specific set of criteria for the slave beyond this, as I have a wide variety of interests. I am a writer, so writers, especially those who enjoy Douglas Adams and Terry Pratchett, are very welcome. I want to invest in Real Estate, and/or to fix up homes for people because they need help, so, handymen, floor installers, carpenters, and those knowledgable in house repair, remodeling, plumbing, electrical work, etc. are very welcome.Those who wish to be worked hard and financially dominated will be considered, too.

However, I do like companionship as well as domestic service, assistance in projects, yard work, etc. You will not be an "it", you will be a well rounded person who I can respect and be respected by as individuals, outside of our roles we live out together,  as well as in them.

I used to tell people I don't have a fetish, but, that's not exactly true. I do have a fetish. Now, I like leather, and spanking is fun, and flogging someone can be darling. However, those things I could take or leave, most days, so they are not my fetish. Ownership, directing others, making things work, putting the pieces together into the puzzle so that the picture becomes whole, that is my fetish. I want to own you, to know you inside and out, good and bad, and mold you into what, for me, is good. That is my fetish.

And, so, what I seek is the companion for that - the one who wants to become the good for me, for me; who wants to give, to be controlled, to be one of the pieces put together to make a beautiful picture. I have no desire to take away your life. I want us to enhance each other's lives, so that we can be a comfort to each other against the world, our home an oasis away from those who do not understand our true natures.

 

 

 

Here is an idea:

  • If I am not your type and I contact you, indicating that I am interested in you serving me, politely say you are not interested and move on.
  • If I do not contact you, do not contact me to tell me so, as it wastes both of our time, and move on.
  •  And, while you are at it, do not assume that simply because I contact you it means I want you to serve me, I want to serve you, or there is some sexual interest on my part, as I assure you, if any of those things were true, I would tell you.

 

Today, I walked down to Fry's (1/2 mile), then to Wendy's (1.3 miles), then to the Family Dollar store (1.1 miles), then back home (0.7 miles). This is the same day where I read a nasty little message from an allegedly dominant male as to how he would think "lazy slobby ick" about me, if he were a slave. Hmm .. I wonder how far he walked today? I wonder how far he walks in a week? I wonder how far he'd walk with a cold, in the hot sun, in the dust that he is allergic to? And, I wonder how pretty he would look while doing so?

Then, I wonder where the hell he gets off, realize that he doesn't - and we are both in agreement about that, I guess - and, I go on about my business.

Then, after I wrote that, above, I walked to Fry's, and back home, again. (1 mile)

The Mad Queen Ardeliah

The Mad Queen Ardeliah

That is a digital painting/digital manipulation by me, and is posted here for those who want to know more about my artwork.

This is the description that sits beside it on the art site where it has been posted for some time:

"You will see this on another art site, under the ID of Eclectia. That is because Eclectia is me. So is DSWilde! Anything bad you read about either is only borne out of jealousy. * grin * Here is what the description says:

I was inspired by a wonderful photograph of some stairs in France (you can find it in my favorites) to finish this piece.

Took me several hours to complete – not quite sure how many severals but more than usual, I can tell you!

I have many variations that now I must decide to toss or keep. This is how I end up with a room cluttered by disks!

Thank you for the inspiration, handsome man whose name I forget!

This illustration is for a story I started long ago, which has altered much over time, and so far is just something I amuse myself with. It is being considered to finally set it down all in words and to send it out into the world. I’m a little hesitant as once it is penned (so to speak) it will be permanently as written and. . well .. I guess all children must grow up and be what they will, even the ones we create in our minds and with our hands. Yes?

and here is what the handsome man, whose name I forget had to say:

*euristis:iconeuristis: Jan 9, 2007, 6:17:11 AM
wow! Thank you so much, your postwork is amazing! I’m honored! :hug:

You can answer me in French, English or Italian…as you wish
Portfolio: www.euristis.com
Personal (french): www.cerise-b.com

Just so you know I had his permission to play with his stairs!
......................................................................................................

The Mad Queen Ardeliah is from the land of Ordine, in the world of Ordem, in a parallel’esque universe. Or, if she’s not strictly from the land of Ordine, it is, at least, wherein she has/is reign(ed) "

 

 

Long ago, I had a Master who observed that, as I did work for him of the sort that I had decided it is best I do (for I knew how to do it, while he had yet to learn it all the way, and I was a faster typist, etc), that he spent his time fetching me tea and waiting nearby, on a stool, until I needed him.

"This is hardly right," he told me "that the slave girl should be sitting so comfortably, demanding silence, while I fetch tea and wait on the stool."

"But," I explained, "It is right, because I am doing this work for your benefit, and the cord for your computer only reaches so far, and your chair will not come out from behind your desk without disarranging your whole office. There is no choice, but, that you sit on the stool, because you need to be here and the stool is all there is."

"And, the tea?" he inquired.

"If you need a car to work, you give it oil. If you need a slave to work, sometimes, you give it tea." I replied.

"Then, it seems to me that I would be better off as the slave." he replied.

"Then, be the slave." I replied.

"Okay, I will." he said.

"Good, "said I. "Now, slave, go and fetch me that tea, then, sit there quietly on the stool in case I have need of you. I have work to do."

This is around the time in my life when he quite gave up on training me as a slave, and, instead, ordered me to start training slaves.

As he observed, at the time, regardless of title, what I saw as fit to do was what was done, so, it is best that I train slaves to do as I see fit.

 

The slave, mentioned below, who told me that he belonged to me, has just been told, by me, that he blew his last chance for my attention.

After much ignoring of me (in that he, sometimes, read messages, but, he did not reply to them), he finally messaged me and told me he needs time to step back and decide if this is really what he wants. Which I find excessively odd, since he has been on this site rather a long time, and he has pursued a relationship with me more than once and cried off claiming fear, then, it was he who came to me, again, and told me that he was sure this time - both that he wanted this and that it was with me that he wanted it. And, now, we are back to waffling? Really?


Well, I gave him some very light orders to follow, while he was thinking. Nothing involving money, very little involving time, just a little something that would help his thinking and give me reason to believe he was at all serious. I told him he could start by acknowledging that he got that email. He read it yesterday evening. I know that because I checked to see if he had read it this morning, not because he wrote to me and told me he read it.

So, no acknowledgement of its receipt by him and no following of the ever so mild orders within. Therefore, today, I told him that those orders had been his last chance. As in, I am done. I will not be writing to him, I will not be considering him. I told him if he ever wants me to believe him again,he will have to do something quite big, quite impressive, to capture my attention and prove that he is actually serious. Otherwise, he needs to stop wasting my time.

To be fair, he is no worse than many others, who also do much the same. There are so many men, here, who waffle on the edge of slavery, never stepping in, never shuffling off to whatever it is that does not frighten them, but, standing there, calling for attention, wasting the time of persons who stand in its reality.

Well, men: as long as you live your life being afraid to take what you want, even when it is offered to you directly, you are going to be very bored, possibly very miserable, people. And, yes, I can say this is mostly about men, not just because I am seeking men, but, because most of the real slaves I have ever known have been women. They are able to make that level of commitment, with it actually being what they say it is, instead of pretending they are bargain shopping for the best curves for the least price- as if that is what slavery is, ultimately, about!

There is another slave who is, currently, engaged in the same thing. That is, he is engaged in consideration of if to serve me or not. He has not approached me numerous times, beforehand, so it is not the same situation. However, it feels like it is leading into it. So, I told him, today, of a point in time at which he has to have decided, at least, whether or not he will be serving me.

I mean, if you know what you are, what you want, and, that this other person is real and claiming to want the counterpart of that, you should be able to decide, fairly quickly, if they are the person for you or not. Especially when they are not asking you to immediately sign over your finances or etc.

Will he decide? I don't know. What will he decide, if anything? I haven't a clue. All I know is that I have spent far too long on this site, with having almost zero results, although I usually hear from several slaves a day who claim to want to serve me as I wish to be served. (sigh). Something has to give!  It's exhausting me, and, all this rejection over trivial details is not kind to one's ego.

"Oh, yes, Mistress, you are everything I want, and none of the other Mistresses have ever offered me anything close. Only, may I have a butt plug, too?"

"No, slave, you may not. I'm not into that."

That's usually when the cussing starts. It is always when the leaving occurs. Mistress will not cater to his every whim, Mistress will not tart herself up like a whore for his amusement. Therefore, Mistress is not real.

(sigh)

Where are the real slaves?

I am headachy, tired, and, probably, I shall have to go help clean an apartment today, as well as attend my daughter while she goes to buy her dress - which will, hopefully, still be at the store. My knees and fingers hurt, I want to collapse. Where is that dratted slave with my tea?

Well, I have a slave now. He did, indeed say so.  Waiting for a change of profile and location, now.

And, we are off to a bad start. (sigh)

Well, he told me he was scared, and being scared is understandable. Not paying attenton to your Mistress long enough to know that she gave you a very simple order, much less not following the order, is less so.

There is a teaching of Christianity, slaves, that goes like this: Faith without works is dead, as is works without faith. What does it mean, and why am I telling it to you, now?

It means, it is not enough to believe, you must also do the work inspired by the believing; and, it is not enough to do the work that someone who believes would also do, you must believe.

In the same way, a slave must not just want to be a slave, but, the slave must do the things of slavery; and, it is not enough for someone to go through the motions of slavery, but, they must also want to be a slave.

You can tell me that you are my slave, and, I will tell you that, yes, you are. Then, I will wait for you to prove it, by actually doing the things that a slave shall do. When you begin to act as a slave, I will continue to act as the Mistress who owns the slave. Otherwise, I will find another slave, who not only says, but, does.

Here is another subject, but, related. Slaves and training. Why?  I mean, most persons claim they have served as slaves before, sometimes for decades, and, yet, they need to be trained and broken as slaves? Does that make sense?

It doesn't to me. I never needed to be trained to be a slave, and I am not subservient. I am more about higher goals, lofty ideals, work ethics, moral standards, than a desperate need to sit at someone's feet. However, if it were the right someone, I did enjoy it, immensely.

I mean, if you are going to be operating heavy equipment, and you have never done so, then, someone needs to give you a clue, more than likely, how to do it. Maybe, you even need extensive training in it. That makes sense.

But, if you have performed domestic service for someone for more than a month, even yourself, you do not need to be trained to perform domestic service. You need to be told the particulars of a person's diet and schedule, discover where the equipment is kept and where you will be sleeping, and then you do it.  If you do it wrong, because they are so particular that they cannot stand seeing you use the blue sponge for the yellow sponge duties, then you need more information and training as to their particular methods. Still. you do not need to be "trained and broken into slavery".  Slavery is very simple in it's process: you want to submit, to give, obey, you want to do things for others, that is what you do, and, voila! You are a slave.

It's not brain surgery, and, it should not have to be.  If you must be beaten, tied up, whipped, kidnapped, nipple-clamped, surgically altered, caged, shackled, have all the fun sucked out of your life, removed completely from family and friends, ordered to do every last little thing, have your arse filled with a butt plug to get you started, or etc. then you are not a slave! You are something else, altogether.

A slave may enjoy any and all of those things, yet, they would not consider it slavery if that is all there was, and, they would forego all of that for a chance to live as a very simple slave, instead, if they must; because, a slave's true fetish is to be owned and to have someone to focus their life, their work, etc. on.

 

"That is a depression I can understand (I said to a slave, who is depressed over never being able to find what he wants in life).  Don't worry, however, about keeping me up. If I want to leave, I will leave and if I want to stay, I will stay.

All I want is real slaves who really live by my lifestyle, not only their own.  I am willing to accommodate fetishes which do not offend me, and none which do.  I don't know why this is such a hard concept for people to grasp. They want me to reel out a big fantasy for them. I want the slave where being owned, being told to do this, do that, and knowing that they have done it well and that I am pleased with them, is their fantasy.

I don't understand why it is so hard to find. When I was a slave, I was enormously happy to be of use, to help someone accomplish their goals, ease their body and soul after a hard day - and I'm not talking about sex. I'm talking about massage, aromatherapy, reading to them, good conversation. removing their coat when they came home, helping them out of their frozen boots and into some nice, warm wool-silk blend socks and slippers; preparing hot meals that were both tasty and served on time. I loved to wake up in the morning and walk down the long, cold hall, getting the fires started (or getting the slaves who did such things started), running the bath water, laying out the clothes, making sure the meal was ready, and whether I was allowed to sit with them and eat or I ate somewhere else, if I slept beside them or at their feet, or on the floor, or in the kitchen, or in a bed in a room with other slaves, or in a modest bedroom, or in a bedroom fit for a queen made no difference to my service. Except, of course, it is a little easier, when one is a little less stiff and a little less cold.

That's all I want. Good work slaves, who go out and earn money, or stay in and earn money, and do chores, and are companionable. If I had the funds to do so, I would take the good work slaves who did not work for money, but, alas, I am not there, not yet. If I had slaves, though, I think, in a year or two, I could be. Maybe five, tops. Assuming the world does not fall down around our ears, in the meantime.

Hey, this is rather good. I think I shall post it in my journal.  lol"

And, then, I did, with minor alterations.

 

Well, I had posted a sample contract, the basic contract for slaves who are not living in the same country or state as I am, but, who would be intending to relocate, for your edification. Apparently, education is not permitted to be given nor is curiosity allowed to be sated via journal postings, however, as it has disappeared.

If you want to see it, ask and I will send it to you, as I have been doing with the people who want to see it. It'll just be that much more annoying and time consuming than it would have been.

Quote from the profile of a slave, that are simply beautiful.

"Apologies for a negative start, but I'd like to sort out some of the dross first. If You are seeking a worthless worm, or cash pig; please look elsewhere for Your victim. i do not wish to be above myself, but i do value the person i am, and expect my eventual Owner to do the same."

"i do not serve because of Your penis, or Your vagina, but because You as an individual inspire me to submit. i believe this different to a submissive or slave who are generally focussed on matching someone to their fetish"

"i hope to find an intelligent ground Owner, Someone who like me finds BDSM not to be Their hobby, or lifestyle choice but actually, Their very soul as a person. In my dream, i would eventually, like to find a 24/7 relationship, but, to be Owned and belong, is the main priority."

"i am not part of the Big Brother, Simon Cowell, brainwashed generation and find that torture to be one of my few limits - seriously!"

This is a real slave at heart. Probably not one that would be suited to my needs, but, one who understands that being a slave does not mean losing your personality, and that it is a desire to serve that makes you a slave, not a desire to fulfill your kinky little need and a willingness to put up with pain  or bitchiness to get that done.

You could learn a lot from this man!

Why does "without limitation" mean that I must deny my true nature. A true slave, without limits, can sleep in a bed,  be fed on bon bons, and still be a slave, as well as he can live in a dungeon and only be fed gruel once a day, if he is lucky. That is a slave without limits - neither dictating to the Mistress as to if she is allowed to be cruel or to be kind.

A slave without limits can be afforded dignity.  A slave without limits can be taught to respect himself and others. A slave who must be a toilet is a slave with serious limits to his personality and who places serious limitations on the whims of the Mistress.

(sigh)

Things do change,drastically, at times. I logged on this morning, and wrote the journal entry, below, about how I may or may not have a slave. Well, I have not heard from that slave, again, today; but, another one, who had sort of waffled off, has returned, apologized, and we are discussing the terms of his contract.

This, if it works out, will be a very pleasing match, I do believe. He is polite, without having to be corrected constantly, and, he has the sort of work that makes him relocatable, which means he also has the sort of work that may lend itself well to him being a traveling companion, as well an at-home slave.

 

I may or may not have a slave, at this point. There has either been a serious misunderstanding, or he is a game player. He has until the end of today to prove which is the case.

If he is my slave, he is a rather bad one; as in, no discipline, no training. Which could be because he is rather old for having no experience with being owned, yet.  I give him the benefit of the doubt in this, for now.

I hope he is my slave, as, per what he has told me of himself as a person, if it is true, I could really respect and like him. For now, however, I wait, I pray for guidance, and I continue to seek.

MissSix
Female Switch, 29, Los Angeles, California
Male Dominant, 55, South Amboy, New Jersey
Female Dominant, 23
MissOquist
Female Switch, 44, Anaheim, California
MissBehavingSub
Female Submissive, 39, St. Paul, Minnesota
MissTiff
Transgender Switch, 46, Hobart
MissRachel2003
Female Switch, 20, Ozark, Alabama
Female Dominant, 42, newcastle
Male Switch, 21
Female Dominant, 35, Watertown, Tennessee
Female Dominant, 26
Transgender Submissive, 38, Hot Springs, Arkansas