New profile coming soon.
Watch this space
--------------------------------------------
However, I need to clarify something I stated when my profile text was present.
Before I removed the text from the main body of my profile, in preperation for me producing a new profile, I said something along the lines (I can't remember word for word exactly) of:
"My (future) slave should not take it for granted that I'll love her. It is good fortune, not her right".
It has been pointed out to me that people who don't know me who read that may misunderstand. They may (wrongly) think that I mean I that I may not love my (future) slave full stop.
But that it is not what I intended. As such, I want to clarify that what I meant - and still mean - is:
I will, without doubt, love my (future) slave. But, if I love her in exactly the same way to the way I would love a long-term girlfriend or wife then that is good fortune for her, not her right.
If I decide that I want my (future) slave to not only be my slave but also be my girlfriend or even wife, and for me to love her as such, and for me not to have a girlfriend or to get married (to anyone else) but rather be monogamous to my slave then that is her good fortune, not something she should expect from me.
I say that NOT because it is me. I would say exactly the same about any M/s or D/s relationship. I say it is good fortune for any slave, male or female, to be loved in that way by his/her Master or Mistress, whoever He or She is.
I will, of course, tell a prospective slave exactly what to expect before entering into any agreement with her. I will enage in considerable real life communication with her to see if we're compatible or not, and then come to a mutually satisfying agreement.
I do actually want my (future) slave to also be my girlfriend, lover and companion. So I do not really want a poly relationship anyway. So a prospective slave would not need to worry about ambiguity.
But my point is, that me - or any Master or Mistress - desiring that is not something a slave should presume or automatically expect. My primary role will be as Master and her's as slave. Romance is not the basis of the relationship. Mutual honesty, trust, respect, understanding and love is.
I have actually noticed that it seems to be far more common for Dominant men and Masters to become boyfriend to their sub or slave than it is for a Mistress to. I have personally met and known of many Mistresses who have a husband or boyfriend but have a sub or slave seperately who they are never intimate or romantically involved with.
So, to use that kind of arrangement as an example, the sub/slave in such an agreement should not think his/her Mistress is unjust if he/she knows that the Mistress has a partner before entering into service with Her or that She decides she wants one at a later time into the D/s agreement, provided She makes it clear that She may choose to do so beforehand.
