Just a quick thing...

If you want to advertise that you are in to financial domination... that is, if you want to claim that you are using bdsm in a context where others will give you money... please, PLEASE spell the word correctly.

Financial. F-I-N-A-N-C-I-A-L.

Not finitial. Not finantial.

Thank you.

I feel I need a disclaimer here. I understand that many women play video games. In fact, it's getting awfully close to 50/50. Many of the women who play video games are attractive as hell. While there are some female gamers that are not, there are also male gamers that are not attractive; it's one of those things that happens with any given group. That said, I find it hard to believe that this comes from a woman:

"Hello boys and girls, my name is Princess Lindsay, I'm a financial Somme, don't like it, don't message me! I'm a huge gamer so I request usually Xbox live points. But we.can work.out.other things as well. Im into pretty much anything. Except kids, scat, and anything illegal"

Financial Domme who wants Xbox live points? The pictures are of a very attractive young woman, (which does not preclude her from liking video games) but it doesn't look like she's the type; she seems more the vapid party girl type who would look down on video games because she hadn't given them the chance to see how much fun they can be.

I'm at a loss for words.

***I would like to thank Degrademyholes for pointing out the sexist content this post originally had (which I did not intend). I appreciate your message, and I'm glad there was a chance to fix things, because you are absolutely correct.***

I have gotten so sick of reading some of these profiles that are written by clearly non-native English speakers, especially when they are pretending to be natives. So much so that I've decided to help.

Honestly, if you want, I will give you help with your grammar, your translation, and the tone of your profile. All you have to do is ask.

Offer stands for anyone, really. Just drop me a line.

Quick request for those who are advertising their awesome dominant power:

If your time is so precious, could you stop TELLING me it's precious so many times? I mean, say it once if you want, sure. No problem there. But the third time you tell me that your time is precious, all I can think is that it can't be THAT precious. Not if you wasted it saying the same thing over and over again.

Am I just a cynic?

Been a while since I've done this, but this profile demanded it.

First, the text in full:

I AM A WILD DOMINANT CHICK LOOKING FOR A LOYAL AND OBEDIENT SUB,iF U ARE A SUB THAT IS LOYAL AND FAITHFUL AND HONEST...LETS YOUR DOM CONTROL YOU ,,A SUB THAT KNOWS HOW TO PLEASE MY EMOTIONS ..THEN U ARE FOR ME..IF YOU ARE NOT A SUB THAT OBEYS THEN U NOT FOR ME...I WANT SOMEONE WHO IS READY TO LET ME SEND HIM MESSAGES AND WORK FOR ME IN ALL THAT WILL SATISFY ME... IF YOU DON"T MEET THIS REQUIREMENTS THEN DO NOT CONTACT ME.FOR I WILL BE SURE YOU ARE LOYAL AND HUMBLE AND OBEDIENT ENOUGH FOR MY URGES BEFORE I START UP A CONVERSATION WITH YOU..NOTE I A A WILD DOMINANT THAT GIVES YOU A TEST BEFORE WE START UP A CONVERSATION

Now, aside from the fact that the picture didn't seem to match this particular 'style' of writing, doesn't it seem like this is just like all those other messages, thrown into a blender and randomly taken out and put in all caps?

If you count, and exclude ellipses, there is exactly one comma and one period in this whole monstrosity. Oh, and there's also only one lower case letter. It comes (immediately) after the comma, in a place where the comma SHOULD have been a period. So in other words, the only lower case letter appears one of the only places where one SHOULD NOT have been.

Now, what's important to this 'person'? Well, loyal appears a lot. So does obedient (or obey). In fact, that appears to a level that almost seems pathological paranoia.

"If you are not a sub that obeys then you are not for me" Well, duh. If you're not someone who obeys, are you a sub at all? Debatable.

What I'm really curious about is how 'she' intends to be sure that people who contact her are 'obedient enough' for her urges BEFORE starting a conversation. What do you think? Telepathy? Clairvoyance? Precognition?

If she could do any of those things... shouldn't she be able to write a normal sentence?

I want someone to write "I'm new to the scene, but not to this site."

The number of times people include "new to the site but not the scene" or some variation is just staggering. And, thus far, has been consistent with the financial dommes (Still don't get it; feel free to explain if you want to), and the people who have NO idea how the scene works.

It's just such a "long time listener, first time caller" kind of thing. So tacky.

Come on now people...

"Well am Madam Lord single here looking for slave to own as my slave and be my property for life am single here and maybe we can be in a good relationship together"

At least TRY. Even a little?

For all those people who 'make' a profile and then promise to update it soon:

Why don't you just wait to make the profile until you're ready to fill it out? Are 'clever' nicknames really at such a premium that you have to reserve one???

I've noticed that I do a lot of making fun of female profiles... wait, sorry. I meant 'female' profiles. Anyway, I tend to give the guys a pass, usually because I don't bother looking at most of them. But I saw one today that just demanded my attention. And not because he was called Usuck4me or something like that. No, what drew my attention was the text:

"Looking for someone to suck me on demand. Most be willing to stay on your knees to serve me. May also serve as a bottom depending on your ass. Sissy trained a most. Most be discreet. I can host on the weekends only. During the week you would need to host."

First, I'm annoyed that he can't tell the difference between most and must. Most means the maximum possible amount. Must means required to do so. They don't really have anything in common. Once I could chalk up to a typo, but twice????

Secondly, this right here is what's wrong with bdsm in my opinion. Too many people see the idea of power exchange, the loving, careful, consensual play and exploration of deep fantasies, and all they get out of it is a big neon sign that says "hey, free blow jobs!"

As if that's all being dominant takes/means. Never mind the sub's pleasure (and there should be pleasure for all concerned... it's sex, it's supposed to be FUN). Never mind bondage, never mind other play of any kind. All that matters is that as a dominant, he gets free blow jobs.

Way too many people miss the point of bdsm. Way too many people claim to be dominant (or 'dominates') without having any understanding of what that means. The worst part of this is that people who don't know what they're doing get caught up in the idiotic rhetoric of things likes "Slaves don't get limits" or "it's never about your pleasure, only mine" or "Give me money because I don't like my job and I've decided to be dominant this week."

There was a time when bdsm was SAFE. Not just safe in the sense of safe, sane, and consensual, but safe in the sense of honest.

Can we be honest just for a second here? In the 'bedroom,' during a scene, you can go ahead and claim that I don't get limits, or that you don't care about my pleasure, or my well being, or whatever. But outside of those scenes, I need to know that you DO. That you understand that we are both adults and playing a FANTASY of things that we enjoy. That we BOTH get off on the idea.

Is that really so much to ask?

Seriously people? If someone wants to get something out of a relationship then they aren't submissive?

I know we all love the fantasy of all this, but let's keep in mind that at the end of the day, we are consenting adults. We are human beings who are engaging in this behavior because we WANT to. Because we LIKE it. Because it turns us on.

Does it turn a submissive on to think about never having a say in anything, never getting release, being submitted to torture after torture with no hope of reprieve and no care for what they get out of it? I'm sure there are plenty of people who masturbated thinking of something like that. It's a great FANTASY. But it isn't reality.

This is a give and take. That's why it's called power EXCHANGE. The submissive has to get something out of it. Otherwise, it's abuse. It's rape. And while that may ALSO be fun to pretend, it's just for pretend.

Wanting to enjoy yourself does not make you less submissive. Caring about someone's humanity and well being does not make you less dominant.

They just make you sane.

I think hypnosis is fantastic. Fun, sexy, interesting, and much safer than people think.

Maybe that's just because I don't believe it's real. I think that any kind of hypnosis requires the person being hypnotized to be more than just complacent, but actively involved. It's a shared deception between the two people. For those who use hypnosis to help them with real life issues, it's a feather like the one Dumbo had; it doesn't really do anything, but as long as you BELIEVE it does, then it'll work.

Sexually speaking, I think hypnosis is a very hot idea. The idea of someone having complete control over your very thoughts is just amazing. And it's insidious how it can work. You can convince yourself that you're just playing along, when actually, you're going deeper and deeper. Or you can pretend that's what's going on. The place you stop pretending is entirely up to you.

When 'under,' you can choose to be that much more submissive; it's like you've been given permission to give up total control, to not have to think for yourself. You pretend that you can't refuse your master/mistress/etc, and in so doing, you put a lot of power in their hands. All of it, really.

But it's still a game, and still a fantasy. You can be completely safe even when pretending that you're not. You can use 'mental bondage' or pretend to have mental pain, or anything you want. As long as everyone is in it for the joy of the game, then it's fine. When people start using it to exploit one another or take money, that I take umbrage to.

But at the end of the day, hypnosis is awesome.

Have you ever noticed how many 'financial dommes' begin their profiles with some variation of "I am your newest addiction!"

I don't think they understand what this is all about. When a man is submissive, it doesn't mean he can't help but serve anyone he meets. It doesn't mean that he will instantly be addicted to something he has never done or someone he has never spoken to. A man who is submissive is not a man without standards, nor is it a man without interests.

Nor, most importantly, is it a man without basic cognitive ability.

I'm a submissive man, and I support this message.

Let's look at another ridiculous profile, shall we? Here's part of it:

"I WILL BE WAITING FOR ANY RESPONSIBLE MASTER THAT WHICH TO DO ME WELL AND I WILL ALSO SERVE THE MASTER AS I CAN OK LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU SOONEST.BYE AND GREAT BLESSING FOR ANY BODY THAT READ MY PROFILE."

Master that which to do me well? What the HELL is that?

Clearly, this woman is not a native english speaker. I can forgive that. She also doesn't understand how caps lock works. But the worst part? This is listed as a female DOMINANT. That's right. She is listed as a dominant. But this? This reads like... well, like a retarded child in desperate need of ADD medication. But if we cleaned it up, it would read like a submissive, right?

This things aggravate me to no end. Makes it harder to see who's real with all this insanity.

This is just great...

"

looking for LTR submissive.  you age  should  be between 25-40.  you will learn to sever me how i know you  should be.  you will not have a name when you start to sever me.  know this  when you sever me your not only severing a female that is way above you  but also who ever she if   you should sever . so if your not in to females and males dont repley to my profile it will not work out. I dont  do cyber and i dont do phone calls sex. I'm Loooking for some one to sever me long trem. so be real and able to meet.

"

This is a great example of the importance of spelling. Serve means to act as a servant or slave. SEVER, the word she uses, means to cut away or slice off. Let me rewrite part of this thing with that change:

"You will learn to cut me how i know you should be. You will not have a name when you start to cut me. Know this when you cut me your not only cutting away a female that is way above you but also who ever she if you should cut"

There's also the simple thing: Your is possessive. You're is a contraction.

But we should probably avoid people cutting people apart dominant women, even when they ask you to. There's a good chance they are just hideously bad spellers.

Tip for people trying to use fake pictures on their profiles: Don't post a picture that still has the web link for where you got it from.

I mean really, people. This is tantamount to handing in a paper for a college class with someone else's name on it, crossed off, with yours written in pencil over top. No one believes that's really you.

I'm all for people indulging in fantasy, putting pictures that represent who they would like to be, or what they like to do, whatever. But if you're passing it off as you, take the time to be a little convincing.

Please?

It's amazing how many straight female submissives aged 24 are viewing my profile! They never say anything, never send me messages. Why, it's as if they weren't real people, and just 'viewed' every profile in the hopes that people would talk to them, turned on by the 'women' they see in the pictures, and happy about the age. 24 is old enough to know what you're doing, but young enough to still look like a teenager.

It's an amazing coincidence. Really.

I mean, how else can you explain why all these straight submissive girls are looking at MY profile? My submissive profile. It's not like I have an ambiguous name. bootdegrade doesn't shout dominant to anyone, does it?

I need more people to talk to. Please don't be shy. I like talking, I like friends, and I'm generally pretty bored.

I think I'm starting to understand the language that is Collarme. That is to say, the real meanings of words used in profiles. It's a complicated language, but I think I have cracked at least some of the code for the profile NAMES. If it includes:

 "Princess": financial dom (scam), pretending to be younger

 "Goddess": financial dom (scam)

 "Master": heterosexual male who may or may not think bdsm means "free blowjobs"

 "bitch": mysogynistic heterosexual male who may or may not be claiming to be something else.

  "Lady": dominant woman who probably ACTUALLY understands what's going on

  "slave": when used to express the person (ie, 'yourslave') it means submissive who doesn't really understand anything. When used to express what you are looking for (ie, 'bemyslave') it means looking for a female submissive who doesn't know any better

  "Mistress": likes the fantasy, doesn't understand the reality

I'm not saying these are 100% accurate. But they seem to hit more often than they miss.

Q: What is the #1 sign guaranteeing that someone has baggage?

A: When they insist that they have no baggage.

EVERYONE has baggage. If you think you don't, your denial is just part of it.

Direct quote:

"I'ma college educated with a wonderful career. I have no children. I love domination of women. I seek a truesubmissive bitch to coller, take under my wing, teach, guide, and use her."

Spaces, spelling, and punctuation unchanged.

Look, I can forgive typos. We all make typos. But the site we're on is called COLLARme. The correct spelling of collar is literally RIGHT in front of you. Upper left hand corner. Oh, and again at the bottom of the page, or in the address bar.

And I appreciate that you went to college. Education is important, even if it is usually overrated. But if you DID go to college, you should know that "I'ma" isn't a word. And again, could be a typo. Only it's not. Look at the rest of the sentence. If we forgive the spacing, and fix it for you, it says "I'm a college educated with a wonderful career." There's a direct object missing from that sentence. You're a college educated WHAT? Woman? Dominant? Third world country? Blowfish? Ox testicle? (If you ARE a college educated ox testicle, drop me a line. I REALLY want to know how that works).

Last but not least, the true submissive. Never mind the spacing thing; I've done it myself in this journal entry, and I'm not going to fix it. But tell me, what IS a true submissive? What makes someone TRULY submissive? Is there a way to be a FALSE submissive? I assume so. You could pretend to be submissive when actually you aren't, trying to top from the bottom. But it seems to suggest that there is a difference between submissive and TRUE submissive.

What are the qualifications? Seriously.

Two things.

First, the opening text of a profile: "I started out as a slave however my kidneys failed and I have switched and now I am my husband/slave Mistress."

I don't even care about the minor grammar mistakes. I just want to talk about the kidney thing. Is that somehow relevant? Am I supposed to think that kidneys contain/secrete the chemical that makes someone submissive? She became dominant as soon as her kidneys failed. She took a point to mention that. So it must mean something.

right?

The other thing: A picture of a girl wearing a t shirt that says "I have the pussy, I make the rules" is just fine. It's a cute shirt, and one I agree with. But when you're advertising that you are ONLY interested in women, it gets confusing. If you find a female submissive... don't you BOTH have the pussy? Who makes the rules then?

I swear, this site is better than a webcomic.

Wait a minute. You can get 'certified' as a Dom? Is that what all those "under the protection/training of" bullshit things are about?

Someone was a sub, but now, after extensive training, they have been certified as a Dom, and are ready to take their place.

This offends me.

First off, there's nothing WRONG with being submissive. This suggests that submissives are just people who haven't learned the right way to live yet. But if that were true, and if EVERYONE took this course (what do you think? correspondance? Night school?) then there wouldn't BE any submissives. And how would that work?

Secondly, where does the certificate come from? is there some sort of association that presents them? What are the course requirements? Can you double major in Dominance and, say, Architecture?

Is there an exam at the end? Is it written? Shouldn't at least part of it be oral (what a charming single entendre)?

I know they don't have that strict of an application process. In fact, if all the people I've met claiming to be "true dominates" (yes, that was spelled wrong on purpose) come from this school, then I have about as much faith in its curriculum as I do in a conservative Shiite Burlesque academy. Or, if that's too obscure, than in the American legislative system.

I wonder if the certificate is valid in all countries.

Personally, I'm guessing it's only valid in the Phillipines. Based on this site.

I think I might have it. Financial Domination, in a non-scam sense.

For sake of ease, let's pretend our financial dominant is a woman named Beth. And our submissive is a man named Steve.

Beth doesn't get access to Steve's money.

When they go on dates, Steve pays for everything. But he does this at the start of the night, when he gives Beth a whole bunch of cash; whatever he is willing to spend on the date. Whenever possible, she points out (on the date) that she is paying, saying things like "oh, I don't let him carry money" or whatever to humiliate him.

Outside of dates, she sets a spending limit for Steve. Steve can use this money during his day to day life to buy a candy bar, or pay for lunch, or whatever. But it's not very much. At the end of the week, if he went over budget, she punishes him. If he did not, she rewards him.

As for all this money he's not spending, Steve often times uses it to buy Beth presents. Things they can both enjoy in a scene, or things that will make her happy. Sometimes they do tribute scenes, where he gives her a gift and she decides whether it is enough for him to be worthy of an orgasm.

She 'controls' his money. But it's the illusion of control. Just like consensual slavery. It's the ILLUSION of slavery, not ACTUAL slavery. That would be illegal.

Kind of like taking someone's money without their permission. You know... stealing?

I didn't want to say anything, but I just can't help it. Too funny.

There's this person whose profile I have looked at. I don't want to embarrass her, so I won't give you her name. But she has a list of turn ons and turn offs, and I must make snarky comments about them. Here are some (not all) of her turn ons:

Boys who offer to "serve" Me without knowing a single thing about Me.
A boy with a brain and a sense of humor.

(Here I have to comment: aren't these mutually exclusive? Would someone with a brain offer to "serve" her without knowing a single thing about her?)

A boy who is not afraid of intensity - on all levels.

(What about one who is only afraid of intensity on the level of international pressures, or a scene that leads to permanent disfigurement or death? Again, the brain thing comes to mind)

A boy who is all man and knows his role is to please Me.

(A boy who is all man? How can a boy -by definition NOT a man- be all man?)

And then there are the turn offs:

Dishonesty.

Disrespect.

Immaturity.

(All legitimate. I'm with you here.)

Mindless doormats.

(Wait. Didn't you want someone who wasn't afraid of intensity and who would submit without even knowing anything about you? Although, you DO want someone with a brain...)
stupid people make me mad, espesially with stupid questions about my PERSONAL life

(God forbid a potential sexual partner want to get to know you as a person.)

Not into, furries, nor anything I normally do on the toilet.

(I got nothing funny here. I just think it's a great sentence)

I think I may have it figured out: She wants a sub with a brain and a sense of humor. Enough of both to realize that the insane things she lists other places are just jokes. She doesn't want a doormat, which is why she doesn't want someone to just submit to her without knowing anything about her. Wait.... yes she does.

Okay, I'm all confused again.

Suddenly, a whole lot of submissive females are looking at my profile. None of them say hi.

I'm not upset, I just think it's weird.

I've noticed that "hit me up" is seeming to become slang for "I am trying to scam you."

I hate that I keep ragging on financial domination, and I know some people out there do it safely, sanely, and consensually... but seriously. The number of people who claim they want to suck people's bank accounts dry and ruin them financially is kind of disturbing.

My favorite, though, is when they have multiple pictures (not all of the same girl) and insist that they will only play online.

I mean, don't get me wrong. I'm okay with pretending to be someone else. But not if you're using it to steal from people.

I identify myself as 100% submissive. But what does that mean?

  I am not submissive in my day to day life. As a student I always dominated the classroom discussions. As a teacher, I have to assert my dominance. Socially, I tend to take a dominant leadership role somewhat naturally. I like to organize things, I like to make the world in my vision, rather than live in someone else's.

  But in the bedroom, I have NO desire for control. I am not a submissive who will try to top from the bottom. I'm not a bratty sub. I'm not even someone who needs to be 'broken.' I dive into submission as quickly and as hard as I can.

  In the bedroom, I want to be submissive. No, it's more than that. I NEED to be. Even when having 'vanilla' sex, I am still submissive; it's more important to me that my partner have an orgasm than that I do. I'm not just saying that; I've been profoundly disappointed in myself when I have an orgasm before my partner, because I know that I can't keep going, and I don't think it's fair. Often times, my partner's orgasms will CAUSE mine. I am only satisfied with sex when my partner gets to float on the wings of orgasm. Even if I don't, I'm still satisfied (though I doubt I would continue to be over a long enough period of time).

  I've tried to be dominant. I had a friend in college who wanted to explore submission, and I was someone she trusted, so I helped her out. I tied her up, I blindfolded her, I teased her a bit, played with ice. I did nothing with pain, nor with humiliation. A hardcore dominant would say that even with her tied up and blindfolded, I was STILL submitting to her. And that's probably true.

  Nevertheless, I felt PHYSICALLY ILL doing it. It worked better than a cold shower, despite the fact that there was a naked woman who I found attractive right there, open for whatever I wanted to do. I've never been gayer than I was at that moment.

  That, I think, is what it means to be 100% submissive. No desire to be dominant sexually. Not a doormat, not a sniveling worm. Just wanting to be submissive in the bedroom.

  You didn't ask. But there's my answer.

I still don't get financial domination. People who say they have a fetish for money; it boggles my mind.

Of course you have a fetish for money; our world, particularly those of us stuck in America, are taught practically from birth how important money is. We're shown that money IS sex, that having it makes you a better, prettier, happier person. We get swarmed with the importance of money long before we start developing sexually. So once we do start, that need for cash is always a part of it. Even when we don't realize it, we ALL have a fetish for money.

I have a fetish for boots. I love the look of them, the feel of them, and yes, the taste. But in order to really have that fetish catered to, either I or the person(s) I play with need to have money; without money, they can't afford the better, sexier boots. And what makes them better or sexier? Partially, it's the price. It's all about the benjamins, as they say.

But those who claim to actually have a fetish for money make me wonder. Do you get turned on when you buy something? If you work as a waiter or waitress, do tips make you horny? Do you masturbate to the stock market? Can you spread cash out on a bed and that would be enough for you to want to have sex?

I don't like making judgments about other people's sexualities, sexual interests, or anything like that. If you are into financial domination, that's fantastic for you. I just don't UNDERSTAND it.

To me, when someone says "I'm into financial domination," I hear "I'm a con artist who wants to take advantage of your sexual interests to make myself money." That's probably not fair, but that's how I see it. Which is why I would like to have it explained to me.

So if you are someone who is into financial domination, actually INTO it, please explain it to me. Especially if you're someone who likes BEING financially dominated. I'm not going to do it, but I would like to pick your brain a bit.

Maybe I'm elitist, maybe stuck up, maybe hyper critical.

But for some reason, I can't take a dominant seriously if they don't learn how to spell and use basic grammar. In a journal entry, I understand; typos happen. But for your profile, the blurb you are using to attract people to you, shouldn't you take the time to do a quick copy edit?

"form" is not "from"

"Dominate" is a verb, not an adjective (I've mentioned this before)

Spell things right.  Please.

(for reference: this picks up pretty much right after the last bit about the ten rules I don't know. Enjoy!)

I didn't get much sleep Friday night. Maybe it was the tail in my ass. Maybe it was the collar, or the mitts on my hands. Probably it was the fact that the closest thing I had to a pillow was a soiled adult diaper, smelling heavily of my own cum and piss as it soaked into my skin and dried up.

Before I eventually drifted off, I tried to think of what the other rules might be. I have to be able to guess all ten before this game ends. Some of them I already know, or at least I'm pretty sure of:

1. I can't use the bathroom without permission. I can use the diapers they make me wear, if I want. But...
2. I can't change diapers without permission.
3. I can't use my hands. I think part of the theme here is that I'm a dog. It's not currently a concern; my hands are in mitts, so I couldn't use them if I wanted to.
4. Don't make noise. A good doggy is a quiet doggy. Part of this means I can't speak either.
5. Stay on my knees, or lower, around them. It took a knee in the crotch (twice) to teach me this one. But I've got it down now.
6. No touching myself. If I get any release, it'll be because they permit it, not because I want to. These mitts have tiny spikes, supposedly for traction. It doesn't hurt that they also stop me from touching myself. That's a sensitive area, and not one I want scratched up.
7. Keep my head down. Don't make eye contact with any human beings. I'm below them, just a doggy, so I should remember my place.

I did finally fall asleep trying to figure out the other three rules. I was right on the edge of figuring them out, I think. But then I was asleep.

Day 5, part one
She woke me up gently, nudging me in the side with her bare foot. She let me peel the diaper off my body, then helped me put on a new one. Again, there was a hole cut in the diaper and the shorts for my tail.

"Good morning doggy," she said once I was properly dressed, on my knees, and staring at her feet.

"Good morning mistress" I said. It was an automatic reaction. I couldn't stop myself. But I broke a rule, so she kicked me with the top of her foot, basically slapping me across the face with it. I almost said I was sorry.

"Kiss it for thanks," she said, then pointed her toes so I could kiss her foot properly. "Good dog."

She goes around the kitchen, making breakfast. It smells great, and I remember that I haven't eaten any actual food since the dog food in my bowl last night before the party. I stay still despite my grumbling stomach. A good doggy is a quiet doggy.

After a little bit, she puts two small bowls on the floor. One of them has clear liquid.

"I think you're going to have to mostly serve your Master this weekend," she says. "I just started my period." Then she puts the second bowl down. It's a red liquid. "So I won't really want to play much."

I look at the bowls and wonder if I can do this.

"Go on boy. Drink. Do it." The last words come out as a command, and so I lean forward and suck down the clear liquid. It's rum. That's good; might help with the second one.

I take a deep breath before going down to the red bowl. She puts her foot between my legs and teases me a bit. "Go on," she says. "Prove that you're a good dog."

I close my eyes, hold my breath, and go to drain the bowl. I've never done anything with menstral fluids, and I had no idea what it was going to taste like, but I was determined to be a good slave, so I went ahead and sucked it up.

It was cranberry juice. When I sighed in relief, she started giggling. "I just wanted to see if you'd do it," she said. "I would never have scheduled this weekend if I thought I was going to be indisposed. But you did good, doggy. Why don't you go into the bedroom and wake up your Master. I'm sure he'd like to wake up to you sucking on him."

So I crawled to the bedroom, where he was sleeping with sheets thrown off him. He was gloriously naked, but not quite hard. He stiffened up when I ran my tongue up his shaft, though. Stiffened up enough for me to put him in my mouth and start sucking.

As he made all those great noises, it occurred to me that this really would be a fantastic way to wake up in the morning. Then it occurred to me what most people usually have to do first thing in the morning.

Oh well. Not my first time drinking his piss.

For the love of god people...

Dominate is a verb. It means to have control over, to rule.

If you are someone who likes to dominate, then you are Dominant.

Dominant is an adjective. It modifies a noun and describes a quality of that person, place, or thing. For example, there can be a dominant ideology, or a dominant woman. A man can dominate his coworkers, or can dominate his submissive. But a man cannot be a dominate. Nor can a woman. There are no dominate females. There are dominant ones, but that's different.

Can we try to use the language we've all agreed on?

She looks at me with a smirk, adjusts herself, grinding into my skin. "open up," she says, as if I have a choice. With this gag, I couldn't close my mouth if I wanted to.

She giggles, and I watch between her legs. It begins as a trickle, snaking its way down her leg. Then it becomes a stream, hitting me on the chest.

She adjusts her balance and her aim, sending new jolts of pain through me as the stream comes closer and closer to my mouth.

She hits my face, getting some in my eye, but then, finally, she finds the right position, and my mouth starts to fill up with her urine. I swallow as best I can, but it does overflow a bit.

She finally finishes, looks down at me, and laughs again. "You are disgusting," she says. She steps off me. "Go clean yourself off, you filthy little toilet."

</fantasy>