| |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Browse |
|
|
|
|
|
Live |
|
|
|
|
Join |
|
Collarspace |
|
|
|
|
Dating |
|
|
|
|
News |
|
|
|
|
Glossary |
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
|
|
Alt |
|
|
|
|
Safety |
|
|
|
|
Toys |
|
|
|
|
Live BDSM |
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Welcome |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Login |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Male Submissive, 40, Dallas, Texas
|
Male Dominant, 45, Haverhill, Massachusetts
|
Transgender Submissive, 38, worcester, Massachusetts
| | |
|
| Back |
| KPM |
| Directory |
| Interests |
|
|
|
|  | |  | |
|
|
|
|
| |
About BimboMaker1
Founder and Managing Director of THE BIMBO PROJECT. ?
I've been "building better bimbos" since 1997. ?
I'm looking for the next girl. ?She's between 18 and 25, and wants to be transformed into a complete bimbo -- an ultra-feminine, object-of-desire. ?Classy rather than trashy, beautiful rather than a caricature.
The process is long-term, usually taking 2 - 3 years. ?And, yes, it is live-in since there's no way to do this effectively at a distance. ?I provide all the resources: ?cosmetic surgery, wardrobe, body modifications and corset training, professional makeup -- everything. ?In return, you become both my arm candy and my personal property: beautiful, devoted and subservient.
I've done this before very successfully, and am completely serious. ? You wondered where bimbo's come from, didn't you? ? You didn't think they created themselves without help, did you? |
|
|
|
|
There's a girl lurking about on CM named Ashley. And she claims to want to be a bimbo. Ashley makes a reference to me in her profile, claiming that I misunderstood her and misrepresented her. In fact, she got so petulant, she had my prior (very amused) post about her confusion removed. And she'll likely complain about this one as well.
Here's the simple backstory: Ashley claims already to have 725cc implants. She also claims she wants implants more than twice that size. She wants 2500cc implants. And she claims that she was smaller than a C-cup when she started the process of breast augmentation, getting 750cc implants in her first round.
Here's where credibility and believeabilty fail. I made the original point that I prefer implants that are 500cc or larger, round, and high profile. That produces the classic "bimbo" look rather than a smaller, teardrop, natural style. 500cc implants are considered large. That's half a liter of volume, or almost 17 ounces. Pick up the typical bottle of spring water, and that's the volume we're talking about -- half a liter and about a pound of weight. 2500cc implants would total more than a gallon of volume, and put eight pounds or more of weight on the girl's frame. The tissues, musculature, and skin couldn't support that weight without aid. And that means an industrial-strength bra if it were possible, and if any cosmetic surgeon would dare implant them.
Implants larger than 450 - 500 are almost never used in an initial procedure. If she wants larger implants, there's no alternative but to step up through several procedures. If Ashley really had implants done, and if she was "less than a C-cup" as she told me, there's no reputable surgeon who would have used implants larger than 350 - 450 for a first procedure. I know, I asked the cosmetic surgeon I use. Even placing them as "overs" would still stretch far too much.
In other words, the math just doesn't add up. Implants larger than 800cc aren't available in North America. Fewer than a third of women who have breast augmentation procedures will have implants that are 500cc or larger.
Ashley doesn't write well, and sounds like a middle schooler ("your a asshole for not stating the right things i said"). The sole photo on her profile that she claims is of her looks pirated. And I'm simply not buying the claims of a girl who cannot get the math straight about something as central to bimboism as are implants. Nice try, but the claims just don't hang together. |
| |
| |
|
|
WASTING TIME: Fantasy and Boundaries
CM is what it is. In some cases, even some real people can prove to be a disappointing waste of time, energy, and effort. And I was reminded of that again today.
The intensity of someone's desire isn't the only thing necessary to move someone forward. That desire must also be strong enough to overcome at least some of the societally-approved boundaries that have been accepted, adopted, and internalized in her past. In other words, unless the desire is powerful enough to move her in small increments into a new reality, then the result is nothing more than masturbatory fantasy at worst and a pleasant dalliance at best.
Take "B" (she'll remain nameless) as a case in point. She's a responsible and disciplined professional who has a desperately strong internal craving to become a beautiful bimbo. And the only path she sees to become that beautiful, busty bimbo is hypnosis or some other form of mind control. I now realize that she knows she won't be able to make the choices and take the tangible actions necessary to make her dream any sort of reality.
Now, mind control is about as real as Harvey the Rabbit. But what is very doable is progressive and repetitive learning that can replace the old with a new one, replace the old self-image and self-definition with a new one. With time, it is possible to replace old paradigms with new ones. However, it takes tangible action to begin behaving like an of desire in order to make progress. And that inevitably runs headlong into the boundaries long a part of the old self definition. One or the other will win.
I was disappointed that "B's" desire wasn't strong enough to move from fantasy to reality in even the most elementary ways: changing her hairstyle and makeup. It's a simple first step, and reversible. "B" claims to want to be busty, head-turning, beautifully sexy. She wants to inspire lust in men and envy in women. But a mousey, professional in pantsuits, minimal makeup and a severe hairstyle projects a very different image and attracts no attention.
"B" can certainly masturbate like a fiend to the images of girls who look like what she fantasizes she could. And she was able to make herself buy and wear a padded, push-up bra from Victoria's Secret to experience more cleavage and feeling naughty. But it stopped cold there. The ingrained boundaries proved too strong, too high, and too old to overcome beyond that. So the "watch out" that I've relearned is simple: I stop investing time and attention with any girl whose desire isn't strong enough to move her past even a safe and reversible boundary. If changing her visible persona and how she is perceived by others even in the slightest degree is something she simply cannot do in real life, I need to cut my investment early no matter how engaging and winsome she might otherwise appear.
Lesson learned once more. Thanks for your kind attention. |
| |
| |
|
|
The search continues, and the process is always amusing. Why?
--- 75% of the queries I get are from fake profiles, pre-op transexual men who haven't started hormone treatments and aren't living as female yet, underaged teenage girls who are trying to escape abusive homes, or from women from third world countries who haven't a prayer of obtaining a visa to live in the USA unless I was idiotic enough to marry one of them.
--- Of the remaining 25%, few have thought through the reactions of parents or other family members, the effect of interrupting a career, or the scale of commitment necessary to transform the "girl next door" into a head-turning, -of-desire.
--- Fortunately, only a tiny fraction are the man-haters who want to accuse me of being a misogynist rather than face their own self-loathing for being 40 lbs. overweight, unmarried, overwhelmed, and friendless.
The right "next girl" is out there. And her transformation will be great fun. In the meantime, the at least the inquiries are entertaining. |
| |
| |
|
|
Just by the way: I routinely decline all chat requests. The chat function on CM is miserable and frustrating. I'f you'd like to chat live, I prefer to use Yahoo. |
| |
| |
|
|
Profile has been up for less than 24 hours, and I'm already getting flamemail. Goes with the territory. Let me save you some time by answering a handful of questions:
1. Yes, the profile is legitimate. I've done this before, three times in the last dozen years.
2. Yes, I'm serious. I'm not "wealthy" but I'm "very comfortable." So paying for what I want is easily doable. That includes the cosmetic surgery, wardrobe -- the whole thing.
3. No, I'm not some sort of woman hater. But I'm honest about my tastes and preferences. And I enjoy the process of transforming a young woman into what I'd prefer. There are enough girls on CM who crave the transformation that connecting with one of them here makes sense.
4. No, I'm not willing to "stretch" the criteria. That means I simply want what I want. It doesn't mean that older women or taller women or larger women are worthless. It does mean that I'm being very clear about what I'm seeking up front. So, to echo countless profiles from submissive women: "If I'm not what you want, feel free to move on to the next profile."
5. To the handful of haters who felt the need, right, or justification to vent in my direction: save your breath or keystrokes. Your kink is yours, mine is mine. If the two don't intersect, that doesn't make yours "right" and mine "wrong."
6. Yes, I'm in Washington D.C. No, I'm not in government. Yes, of course, I will consider a "live-in" at the right point in time, as the real transformation begins. No, I'm not married.
If you're a girl who really wants to be transformed into arm candy, I'm easy to reach. |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Transgender Switch, 38, Kissimmee, Florida
|
Male Switch, 50, Atlanta, Michigan
|
Male Submissive, 47, New Orleans, Louisiana
|
Male Dominant, 47
| | |
Male Submissive, 50, Sheffield
|
Male Submissive, 26
|
Male Dominant, 19, Beirut
|
Male Submissive, 43
| | |
Male Submissive, 54, Annapolis, Maryland
|
Male Dominant, 48, Frisco, Texas
|
Male Submissive, 55, Tulsa, Oklahoma
|
Female Dominant, 30, West Texas, Texas
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |