| |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Browse |
|
|
|
|
|
Live |
|
|
|
|
Join |
|
Collarspace |
|
|
|
|
Dating |
|
|
|
|
News |
|
|
|
|
Glossary |
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
|
|
Alt |
|
|
|
|
Safety |
|
|
|
|
Toys |
|
|
|
|
Live BDSM |
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Welcome |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Login |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Dominant Couple, 38, Maybe Later
|
|
| Back |
| KPM |
| Directory |
| Interests |
|
|
|
|  | |  | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
About Zarovich
MY TOP FIVE REASONS FOR YOU TO IGNORE MY PROFILE
5) I endeavour to be as polite, respectful, communicative and open-minded as possible. If you’re looking for someone who is rude and abusive from the first email, I’m not the right person for you. When it’s time for me to be rude and abusive to you, you’ll have consented to that but not before you’re sure you want to go there.
4) I have very strong views on what an M/s relationship is about. Physical sex isn’t in the top five of those views. It’s in the top ten, but not the top five. If you think that an M/s relationship happens exclusively in the bedroom, then I’m not the right person for you.
3) I am not looking for an easy f*ck. I can get one of those in my local bar. I’m more interested in a woman’s mind than her ability to open her legs. If you are unable to be cerebral about why you’re looking for an M/s relationship, or unable to carry on an intelligent conversation without resorting to txtspeak, then I’m not the right person for you.
2) I expect you to be wary and sceptical in the beginning. As such, I expect you to ask questions about what you might be getting in to and I’m hoping you’ll want answers not silences. I am looking for someone who embraces slavery as a lifestyle and will expect the same level of commitment to that as she herself is willing to offer. If you’re looking for someone who isn’t willing to put as much time and effort in as you are, then I am not the right person for you.
1) I already own a slave and we are looking for a girl who wants to actively join that relationship. The ultimate goal would be for all three of us to share one life with both of you on same level as slaves. If you aren’t actively interested in being part of multiple dynamic relationship, then I am certainly not the right person for you.
Proud of the fact that I'm often referred to as 'the scary weird magician guy' by people who know me, I've ventured here to see how long it takes me to earn a similarly fitting epithet.
I’ve owned my slave (nic here: fcktoyZ) for the past four years and we are here because we’re interested in finding a second female slave to add to our relationship. We are not looking for a male slave and whilst toy has thoughts about dominating another woman, she has no desire to dominate men. toy would ideally like someone who views slavery the same way she does and the best way for you to find out what that means is to talk to her. Whilst we may be open to the idea of an occasional playmate, we’re primarily looking for someone willing to join us on a 24/7 basis, so it’s important that we all get along. We would be willing to consider someone inexperienced if they were sincere but a certain level of maturity about slavery as a lifestyle is essential. If you’re just looking for something online then we are not for you – a certain amount of any relationship begun here has to exist online initially, but we are looking for someone to join a relationship offline so if all you seek is an online relationship, then we are certainly not for you.
Because of the fact that, and often rightly so, many women filter out the hundreds of generic mail responses they get into their bulk mail, your initial contact from us is most likely to be from toy.
You’re right; this profile contains virtually no information about me. I don’t like the concept of potted biographies so I’m not going to write one myself. You’re the only person who can decide what you think of me and the only way you’ll get enough information to discover that is to break the wall of silence. I'll answer all messages that are comprised of at least three coherent sentences that don't resort to any form of txtspk.
|Z|
|
|
|
|
|
TOP FIVE AMUSING THINGS SINCE ARRIVING HERE
5) People who stamp across their personal profiles "no one-liners" or something to that effect and then proceed to send me a one-line, poorly spelled, often badly punctuated sentence. Um... If you won?t respond to them when they?re sent to you, consider it a courtesy to you on my part that I won?t bother replying to yours either.
4) The obvious spam-profiles. C'mon, I mean who really falls for those? Sure every once in a while we can all get taken in by them, but some of them are so blatantly hilariously obvious that I'd be amazed to learn they got a single response. Let?s not forget the (so far) 20+ profiles with pictures that I was able to trace back to commercially avaliable material on the web. Yes, it is easy to find the entire series of shots your profile photo came from. You know who you are.
3) Friend requests from people who I've never spoken to. There's a little social engineering trick known as history-building where you join a networking site and rapidly persaude as many people to 'friend' you as possible making it look like you have a legit history on the site. It?s sad, and that makes anyone using it most likely fake. If you and I haven?t spoken via email at least twice, I will not even consider a friend request from you and simply delete it.
2) Dommes who email me thinking that their ?request? that I submit to them is going to make me have a complete personality change and drop to my knees. I?m going to assume you send a lot of those to anyone you run across and you?re getting very few responses. The last woman who really wanted to see if she could possess me in that way wound up submitting to me when she couldn?t crack me. You won?t do any better than she did. If you think you can, make sure you know your own collar size before writing that first email.
1) Those who assume that just because I?m male and on this site, I?m not going to waive the right to be picky. I have a list in my head in just the same way that you have one on your profile and, much like you, I want someone who checks most of the boxes on my list too. I?m not known for one-sided compromises when it comes to women and you are not going to be the exception. I have a spine, I can get laid anywhere I want, I can?t stand cybersex and I am not looking to live my life online; the thing you need to garner from that rhetoric is that just because I?m on this site does not mean I?m lonely and desperate for someone. I?m sorry if this offends, but I consider turnabout fairplay in a scenario like this. |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Male Dominant, 53, Chgo NoShoreBurbs, Illinois
|
Female Dominant, 24, Springfield, Missouri
|
Female Switch, 22, Vacaville, California
|
Female Dominant, 51, Buffalo, New York
| | |
Male Dominant, 47
|
Female Submissive, 21, Midlands
|
Male Dominant, 35, long island, New York
|
Male Dominant, 48, Rochester, New York
| | |
Female Submissive, 36, Chicago Suburbs, Illinois
|
Male Dominant, 21
|
Male Dominant, 36, Clinton Twp., Michigan
|
Male Dominant, 53, Wagoner, Oklahoma
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
