Typhaon

Conception and clarification  

in those days It seems the name of dominant became a synonym to I want to get laid, abuse you violently physically and mentally and in exchange you will recognize my superiority and call me 'masters'. For this we have to thank the porn industry and the countless porn movies who painted dom s as savage wearing latex and holding whips. Further to this many people seems to not understand the difference between dominant, sadist and masochist, those are three different unrelated terms  

a sadist is not always someone who inflect physical pain (this reminds me of an old joke few of you will understand, a masochist walk in into a bar, he sees a sadist having a beer, the masochist look at him and tells him please beat me till I lose conscious the sadist reply with a sadistic smile, No). a sadist is not always a dominant, it is just someone who derive sexual pleasure from inflecting pain. A dominant is not always a sadist.  
A masochist is not always a submissive; masochist is someone who derive sexual pleasure from receiving pain. Example jean Jacques Rousseau he felt pleasure by being spanked, was he a submissive? Not really, actually he would be anti-Dom/sub lifestyle, still in a way he was masochist.

 
submissive... everyone has his own definition for this that comes from different background and interrelated mechanism, but we shall all agree that a submissive is someone who willingly give up his/her freedom and accord authority to his dominant/masters over his soul, way of thinking, body.  the source of authority remains in the willingness of the submissive to submit. However this submission is not a green light to the dominant to turn against human values

.  
a Dominant is someone who willingly accepts the submission of the submissive while acting in the best interest of the submissive in a certain framework. taking someone submission is a great responsibility as you become in charge of every aspect of their life. as a dominant you are entrusted with the most expensive treasure they have which is themselves as a Dominant our authority comes only from their willingness to submit, and as soon as this willing disappear the power goes with it

Is power over submissive legitimate?

Unlike what people think, you don't become dominant overnight, neither by wearing latex this barbarian image is just harming our society and strengthening the prejudices about us. I truly believe that dominant and submissive characters are formed at an early age and they just become visible with age, they are engraved in us.

Dominant and submissive are characters we exhibit that influence our lifestyle and take us to our optimum zone, and only when we are in that zone we can reach ultimate happiness.

(to illustrate this in one of my companies, I have a great employee, highly educated, socially smart who was able to maximize our profit, in return i decided to promote him to a managerial position and that's when his productivity and his team productivity declined. a lack of managerial skills? I Doubt he is a certified PMP, he was just not able to perform in a dominant position, as soon as he was demoted he was able to perform again at his best, because he was told what to do, and he was able to perform tasks in a great way.)

A question that has always challenged me, us as dominant how do we legitimize our power over the submissive, Yes I can get a submissive to do what I want if I use violence but is that power legitimate. The answer is no they are doing it by fear. But still they don't leave, they don't quit, nothing legally is binding them to us, if a submissive out of nowhere decides to quit, us as dominant we can't do anything about it, however they don't. I have seen it many times where some idiotic so-called dom abuse the submissive and he/she stays, but why? For sure the power we are having found its source and legitimacy somewhere.  I found the answer to this question to be that when a submissive enters our world he willingly gives up his freedom to the Dom and not only his /her freedom but as well entrust the dominant on every aspect of his life. so our power over submissive is legitimized by the trust they havein us.

Always be good to your submissive, show her trust, lover and act in her best interest, they are our only treasure.

Conception and clarification

Today I had some free time so decided to kill time by scanning through random profile. Myself being influenced by Nietzsche, many other philosophers and my experience I was deeply disappointed by people's understanding of this lifestyle. It seems the name of dominant became a synonym to I want to get laid, abuse you violently physically and mentally and in exchange you will recognize my superiority and call me "masters". For this we have to thank the porn industry and the countless porn movies who painted us as savage wearing latex and holding whips. Further to this many people seems to not understand the difference between dominant, sadist and masochist, those are three different unrelated terms

a sadist is not always someone who inflect physical pain (this reminds me of an old joke few of you will understand, a masochist walk in into a bar, he sees a sadist having a beer, the masochist look at him and tells him please beat me till I lose conscious the sadist reply with a sadistic smile, No). a sadist is not always a dominant, it is just someone who derive sexual pleasure from inflecting pain. A dominant is not always a sadist.

A masochist is not always a submissive; masochist is someone who derive sexual pleasure from receiving pain. Example jean Jacques Rousseau he felt pleasure by being spanked, was he a submissive? Not really, actually he would be anti-Dom/sub lifestyle, still in a way he was masochist.

submissive/slave... everyone has his own definition for this that comes from different background and interrelated mechanism, but we shall all agree that a submissive is someone who willingly give up his freedom and accord authority to his dominant/masters over his soul, way of thinking, body...  the source of authority remains in the willingness of the submissive to submit. However this submission is not a green light to the dominant to turn against human values (I saw actually an ad to sell a "slave" this is not a lifestyle, this is human traffic. i can write pages about this. but here i am just trying to clarify my conceptions.

Dominant ahh, this word, I personally embrace domination, cherish it, it's my way of living, it's the essence of my character, it influence the way I speak, the way I dress the way I move the way I think...  unfortunately today a dominant status is being exploited on every possible way: I have seen people asking for money because they call themselves dominant (paying them tribunes), I have seen people asking for submissive to fix their houses on short term contract, I have seen many crazy motivation to become dominant. Well a Dominant is actually someone who willingly accepts the submission of the submissive while acting in the best interest of the submissive in a certain framework. Submissive and taking someone submission is a great responsibility as you become in charge of every aspect of their life. as a dominant you are entrusted with the most expensive treasure they have which is themselves as a Dominant our authority comes only from their willingness to submit, and as soon as this willing disappear the power goes with it.