SavageryofSin

An interesting trend I have noticed, of submissive posting photos of their plethora of adult toys. Why?

I am sure there are some out there who get off on the idea of seeing the various objects you have inserted into yourself, but they are wrong. You, the submissive, are the ultimate toy. You are what satisfies and aggravates, those pieces of plastic and leather are merely additives. Frankly, they can take away from the true enjoyment.

If you are going to take the time to frame every fuck toy you have on an animal skin rug and get the correct lighting so your studded paddle reflects just so, take the same time framing yourself, at least. Five photos of a dildo later the decent are most likely gone.

As the old saying goes, success is dependent on effort. If you can't even put forth the effort to correctly spell the word you, or make your profile a semblance of the English language, what do you think you are going to get? Surely not quality.

You are supposedly searching for a relationship, or at the very least companionship. An inappropriate place for text language stupidity. Especially since these offenders are the same people who put up a shot of their tits. Are you really shocked you only get idiots, when that is what you yourself portray? A wanna be porn star that can't spell you.

After a few days having returned to this website my submissive, and wife, asked about a curious trend. Where as before I put on my profile that I was married, I would receive a plethora of messages daily. Now, I receive very few.

On the other hand where she would receive only a handful of messages, not displaying the usual photos that attract the masses. She now is awash with messages from would be dominants.

To me the answer is fairly clear, it's who the audience is. A submissive sees I am in a relationship, I am happy, I am not interested in more than a conversation at best. They move on. A "dominant," and I use the word loosely as I have gotten to read these mails, sees that a submissive is in a relationship and is peaked. Why? Because what would thrill a man who spends his life unsure of himself more, than to "steal" something from another man. Thus proving his superiority.

Shocking as it may be, somehow I am not terribly worried.

I do browse profiles, I enjoy the read. One I came across today was rather amusing, it was a female slave profile complete with pictures. The contents, however, were written by someone else. The gist of it was this:

X woman is a fraud (the one in the pictures) she proclaims to be a submissive but will not listen to me, there for she is fake and wastes time. I have given her many chances to do as I have told her to do, she will not, she is a terrible human being. She is self centered. This is your warning to avoid this terrible person.

I edit out her name, because I do feel a bit of pity that she is going to be associated to his stupidity. I say his because while women can be petty and ignorant, it seems more realistic to be a weak minded male. The ones pretending to be something they aren't tend to not take rejection well.

I don't understand to be honest. This goes to the same area of men who write submissives on here and say kneel or do this or obey me. Do you think that one message will make them submit? I am sure there are domme's who likewise fall into this category of ignorance but I haven't heard about it, being that I talk to straight females for the most part. Submission is the choice of a sub, a slave. It is like love, trust, something earned. Why would you want anything that was not earned? I can guess that they just want to jack off. Well I assure you folks, pussy is better, a warm mouth is better, a tight ass is better. Invest some time, invest effort, get a clue, get a brain, and you might get laid.

I have returned from an absence, things here have not changed. It is not surprising, nor disappointing. Perhaps it is a flaw in me, however, that I care. The world wide web does not suite me, and this contributes to my absence. A computer screen gives courage to a coward, anonymity to the false, and fertile hunting grounds to the predator. In the real world I can say you are wrong, I can say your actions are not acceptable.  The words are heard, they are respected, and in some feared. Here my journals amuses, or offers a brief glimpse to an otherwise blind person.

What do I mean by courage to a coward? Men, and to a lesser extent women, who outside of their home are meek and sheepish are offered a portal by which they can be strong and brave. But as actors mimic a drama they go overboard, courage is mistaken for bravado, bravery for a loud mouth. Here in this world without senses the ugly can be beautiful, physically, emotionally, sexually. They can be appealing when otherwise not. But by far the worst to me is the predator, served up a menu by which he or she can select. The nature of a submissive makes them more vulnerable to this action than any other. Taking into account the number of submissives who have/are abused in a variety of ways it is not surprising they are the prey. A "dating" website with a plethora of women who have been emotionally hurt, suffer from low self worth, and prescribe to an alternative life style. There are few female submissives here who have not been preyed upon by a being who suffered the courage, the anonymity, and the belief of superiority given over by the world wide web.

So caution and hark girl, do not confuse arrogance and confidence, bravado with courage, and question for disrespect. Questions inherit interest, desire. The nature of "to question" is curiosity. Be that the truly courageous, truly confident, and truly dominant ever desire a curious creature at his feet.

For what it is worth.

Due to a recent series of messages let me clarify a few things. For those of you easily amused you might want to glance down this list because, yes, I have gotten requests related to everything mentioned here.

1. Once again, I am a straight male. I have no interest in other men, whether they have cut their genitals off, turned them inside out, or not.

2a. My semen, socks, boxers, shirts, saliva (or other bodily fluids), eyelashes, photos, belts, condoms (used or new), and fingernails are not for sale.

2b. This means that I am not willing to breed your wife nor am I willing to impregnate you and your girlfriend.

3. As it says I am a dominant, I am not interested in dating dominant women. As it says I am not interested in poly, there for being able to fuck your submissive girlfriend does not make it any more appealing.

4. I AM NOT A PERSONAL TRAINER. If you do not like the way you look, get off your ass and do something about it, or grow to accept the way you are. Advice, if asked respectfully, I am willing to give. I am not, however, here to "whip you" into shape.

Let me help you out some. If you say you are mature in your profile, and especially if you message me to say you are mature, S does not equal Z. Interchanging the two on the end of a word is not mature. To and too do not equal 2, for is not equivalent to 4. Typos, misspelling, these are things that are accidents or understandable mistakes. English was not my favorite subject. However the before mentioned things are malfunctions, laziness, stupidity. You want to hit on me, you want to talk to me? Might get a better response if you don't speak to me like I am your fifteen year old crush in middle school, I don't care that typing 2 instead of to saves you a portion of a millisecond, or that you think boyz is cute compared to boys. I'm not a boy, I am a man, and I am not interested in girls. I am interested in women. Know the difference, you might get more of a response.

Predators and prey. It's what I think of when viewing some submissive profiles, and most likely not for the reasons you believe. One out of three profiles seem to be women who are owned and who's owners are looking for a second, third, fourth, fifth girl. Apparently it is the job of said submissive to try and solicit women for these positions. I am a bit confused by this, since there are profiles designed for couples, and you think the owner would be the one looking.

So it's predator and prey, but taken to a whole new level. Fishing. You take said bait, stick it on a hook, throw it out there, and hope it catches something, and from the profiles, most likely the clap. My ego isn't so weak yet that I need more than one woman to feed it. I guess I am old fashion but I look for my own women, and when I find one I tend to keep myself busy with it. I have never had the free time in a relationship to contemplate third of fourth parties, and though I own two cars. Inevitably one is neglected, sitting in my garage, pretty, but not used. On rare occasions where the weather is fine, and I feel like a good cruise, I take it for a ride. Bare this in mind, any gullible subs out there, a man can own many cars, but he can only drive one at a time.

A sore shoulder the last few days has me spending a bit more time then usual on here, and I have noticed something that strikes me as amusing. Slave "registry." You go to a website, you get a number, and bam you are a registered slave. What the hell is the point in that? If I am with a woman she is my submissive, I don't need her to be a registered anything to know that. I am not looking for the barcode on her ass cheek before I fuck her to make sure it's registered. I understand that objectification is a kink, I do. But really? Registered slave? This goes back to the whole nerd convention thing, with sir battlehammer or lord wizardwonder, now we are using internet databases to register like layway shoppers in wal-mart.

Journals back to back, I know I am getting wordy. Sometimes however you see something that inspires you. The following letter was sent to a female friend of mine, a submissive obviously. Her profile is, for lack of a better term, bland. She describes no sexual desires, nor does she even have a picture of her body up. This individual, however, must have been reading "between" the lines I suppose, my money is on he didn't even read it. Enjoy, and remember while this is funny it is also somewhat sickening. Let it be a warning to be careful whom you interact with here.

You've no doubt received hundreds of messages by now without finding one that made you tense with the recognition that you have found a man capable of both control and cruelty.

Until now.

I look at your profile, and I recognize your type of slut. The abuse that you crave is so extreme, so unacceptable to the outside world, that to even talk about it cheapens it. No scene can approach the violent and humiliating fantasies in your head, because you would always have a safeword, you would always feel just a little bit silly dealing with a man who would accept your limits, who would subject his power to any sort of restraint.

I accept no restraint, and I need none. I delight in taking a woman and turning her into a bitch, a panting, whining, needy little cunt who begs for pain and orgasms and more tasks to complete to please me. Because whatever other women might be good for, you and I both know that sluts like you are only worth anything when they're pleasing their Master.

Are you ready to please, little slut?


I disagree with much said here. But I will keep it to a handful of words, master, restraint, and control. He accepts no restraint, he boldy states, yet in turn says he has control, while masterying cruelty. To me these are the words of a "fake." Mastery begins with oneself, it is holding control not only of others but showing the restraint needed. Just because a submissive gives of her will, of her control to you, does not give you the right to dis-respect her limits, to dis-respect her. Cruelty is not a pleasant word, I understand humilation is a kink and many partake of it. I am not here to pass judgement on those individuals, I have already stated my feelings on that particular kink many times in this profile. But men such as displayed here strike me as the type who must push down, must hurt, degrade, and lessen so as to increase their own self worth. These are weak men. To damage something to make themselves feel healed, feel more then they are. Bare in mind that this letter was a hello, the first impression of this man. It is people like this that have our community taboo, that have police monitor our clubs, our gathering places. Does this individual sound stable to you? Safe to you? A new member glimpsing our lifestyle and recieving this type of greeting would surely not speak highly of it after that point. Thus concludes my rant.

I don't sleep often, and having already worked out at 4 am boredom sets in. I find myself cruising this website, looking at the various female profiles. Some women strike me as attractive, inevitably they have naked pictures and I find myself disgusted. Most strike me as not so attractive, and inevitably they have naked pictures and I find myself horrified. But what I notice the most is profiles that say owned by so and so. These profiles always have a journal entry from the "master" who then proceeds to tell everyone he is upset because people keep messaging his slave. Remove her profile.

One that stands out to me is a master J, complaining about people sending messages about what they want to do to "his" slaves ass. Why you wonder? Because the profile is made up of 1 body shot, then 5 naked ass shots of "his" slave. This isn't abnormal of course, but the part that strikes me as amusing is that he goes out of his way to call the men who do this doms, while he is a Dom, pointing out that by not capitalizing the d he is insulting them. This is sad on two counts, one that apparently people find that insulting, and two just about everything to do with "master j."

"Stop looking and thinking about my slave's ass that I have five photos of up, or else I won't capitalize you!"

And people wonder why I feel insulted when idiots like this say they are the same exact thing I am, a dominant.

I tend to read the majority of mail I receive, as such I clearly to need to state a few guidelines to save my time.

If you are an "owned", and I use the term very loosely here, female do not message me fishing for affection and attention. Why would I want anything to do with a female who is either too ignorant to alter her profile, or so pathetic to be "owned" by a man who cannot control what is his.

If you are a dominant female, telling me I am attractive and that you would like to be with me, while a compliment will not make me suddenly see "the light."

If you are a homosexual male, of any orientation, I am straight, and in fact can think of nothing more un-appealing than these messages, for without fail they prove the stupidity of the average male on this web site extends to all sexual orientations. I am not a personal trainer, and I am not interested.

What is the point of marriage? In most modern religions it is a state of monogamy, in many countries it is defined as something between a man and a woman, note A. I get no fewer than five messages a day from women who are either married, dating another, or just ended a relationship with a "master" who was married. They all proclaim the same thing, that this man owned them. No, is my response, this man shared you. If you are married to someone, and you "give all of yourself" to your master...what is it that your husband is sleeping with everynight? Most ask for secrecy, to keep this lifestyle away from their husbands...or the masters to keep it from their wives, then why are you married to someone who cannot fulfill what you supposedly are? Taxes? The reasons is simple, to these people it is not a lifestyle, it is a sexual kink. They get off on it at a physical, and only, physical level. I believe poly to be disgusting, not only an abuse of something that is suppose to show the love, the trust, the bond between two people (and two people alone) but proof of how desperate people are to have sex, or be made to feel valuable by the ability to have sex with more than one person. I am a Dominant, I don't share what is mine, I never will. I am also confident enough, and good looking enough to be picky to the point where I don't need to slum it out, and settle for a married woman to get laid. Which is what the vast majority of the "masters" on this site due, share a woman with her husband so that they can get their rocks off, because frankly they can't get it anywhere else. Pathetic.

Something I found entertaining is that many of the females who write me have profiles that say "owned." In the same token I have seen countless female profiles created by male masters for their slaves, or edited in some way. The notes that read "my master reads my messages so don't send me anything bad." Does this mean the woman/women are incapable of ignoring these "bad" messages and must respond "badly" without their owner their to watch over their shoulders? Doubtful, it is more liked to the insecurities of the male. That is why many of these profiles, and many of the submissives on here, are here at the beset of a so called master. So excited to tell the world he owns something.

If you are so incapable of controling your own insecurities it does make sense to force your submissive, your slave to state such ownership and screen her communication. But as a Dom, or Domme for this matter, one is (by definition) a creature that should leak confidence from every pore, in every step, every motion of life. Now this is not to be confused with arrogance, arrogance is the ignorance in place of confidence.

Just an entertaining line of thinking, that should be shared.

Am I surprised? No. The purpose of my profile was to display the ignorance of the current community found in places such as collarme. In conjunction with a female submissive friend we created profiles, took pictures, and placed ourselves on here stating that we were not here for sex, or searching for anything in particular. As of today I have had thirteen requests for sex, or to be a dominant to a person, sadder is that these are not all from women even though it is clearly stated that I am straight. Nor do they take place after conversatin, but instead are the manner by which these people open the conversation. My female counter part has suffered similar things, both men and women. Though she has by far suffered the worse, the level of ignorance displayed by the common Dom male, and I use this term loosely for I believe there is very little Dom or male about them, is nothing short of indescribable. Not only are these elderly, unattractive, and mentally deficient individuals but they have been given the impression that they are a god's gift by some of the equally sad females on this web site. I do not need to suffer the responses such as hey sweetness, hey sexy, or submit to me now! That she does, though I do get to hear about them and share with her mirth. I have uploaded a few more pictures that I believe are more suited to the crowd of this web site. I will state it once more, come at me with intelligence, respect, and manners, we will get along just fine.