Mystress05

Female Submissive, 49, San Jose, California

Female Dominant, 33, Charlotte, North Carolina

Female Dominant, 63, Sacramento, California

Wow. you know what's really sad? when losers have multiple accounts on here because they keep getting blocked for harassing their Superiors :) Come on- get a life!! LOL... Although I'm a bit flattered that the scum on this site put so much energy into hating Me. Must be doing something right! Cracks Me up... :)

These emails from losers make Me laugh out loud: "YOURE AN ONLINE SKANK. WASH YOUR KEYBOARD SO IT STOPS STINKING UP THE PLACE . JUST LIKE YOUR CUNT STINKS UP NEW YORK" What does that even mean? I wonder what effect you think this little note will have on Me... Do you think your pathetic email will make Me go cry in the corner? Or maybe it will keep Me up all night wondering if I'm immoral? I'm not harassing you or hunting down subs/slaves to serve Me; they search for Me. There are loser males everywhere looking for a reason to exist and earn for the greater good, I simply provide that for them. If you're not one of them- good for you! I applaud you, and if I could give you a ribbon or sticker- I would! However- W/we probably aren't a good match, so move along to the next profile... I know there are many who strongly disagree with Me. That's your prerogative. And hey- if sending Me these one liners gets your rocks off, then I guess I did My good deed for the day- other then that, like I said, I just find them humorous and go on living as if you didn't even exist. 'Til next time...

From www.thefinancialdominaionmagazine.com Paying bills for your Domme not so sexy, buying her a pretty red dress - where do I sign up? Let me take it back to the essential meaning of financial domination ? male/female or it sub contributing money and gifts to ensure a better life, way of living, enhanced lifestyle and simply making life a lot more pleasant and financially easier to the ?Lady? or female/male or it of superior nature in his/her/its mind. With other words the service given by a financial submissive in a tangible way to the one chosen by that person to be honored and worshiped in that manner. (Now if that wasn?t clinical and generalized enough I will spit!) What it doesn?t mean?. Sugar Daddy or Momma! With other words, you as the submissive should never expect anything other then what she is gracious enough to wish to offer you in return. If that is as little as her ?thank you? and her smile because she is happy with your contribution then you have chosen that type of person. Don?t bitch about it. However, if you think you can BUY attention, affection, SEX or that you can DEMAND anything other then what she offers in return (and believe me a lot of Ladies offer a lot more then a ?thank you? and a ?smile? in return if they are worth their salt) then you are not a submissive but a wanna be sugar daddy. Wrong fetish! Now having that out of the way, let me get to the actual point of the posting. I have noticed over the last 4 years now especially that for some reason financial submission has taken a huge turn away from that very specialized service rendered. I have seen some very ignorant posts claiming that if a Mistress/ Goddess etc opens her positions up for the subs or slaves to pay her bills she is just looking for a free ride and is just a beggar. I have been told by various ?subs? that paying a bill is just not sexy and that they feel like a Domme worth her salt should be able to pay her own bills. I have heard Dominant Ladies cut others down for adding this as part of the positions available. All around I have read, seen and listened to folks on both sides of the fence dousing the ?service of taking care of the Lady? as a beggary, lowly idea and more. Now that bothers me for several reasons. 1. Regardless if she can afford to pay her own bills or not, if you are a financial submissive and it is your desire to make her life easier then why are you even thinking of barking at paying one or all her bills if you can afford to? Don?t you think that doing so would enhance her lifestyle? 2. It used to be that a submissive would have taken it a personal affront if his ?Lady? had to pay for anything her-self if he had the money in his pocket to take care of it for her. Now I see so called ?financial subs? acting as if paying or buying something for her is a personal affront if it is not something they FEEL would excite them. There are more points, but I am not trying to turn this into a personal bitch session. So I watch ?service? now being conditional on what the submissive thinks he ought to do and that makes me say. You are not submissive, you are a fetishist. When I hear, see or read about financial submissive males deciding what they think is good service instead of the Lady in charge making the decision of what she sees as good service then that makes me grinch. Real meaningful service is not what is sexy, it is what makes her life better. Trust me when I say I will value a submissive that is willing to tribute to me regardless of what I CHOOSE I want tribute for. Be it my little red dress for $150 or my Electric Bill for $150. Which do you personally think will make my life easier? If I have a lousy new dress or I can spend my hard earned money any which way I choose, because my worthy and loyal sub took care of my bill for me like he should? Let me take this even further along the line of sexy. You want your Goddess to be spoiled correct? That is hot, isn?t it? A pampered, spoiled, stress free Goddess who can enjoy her life the way she would like? Well if I have to spend 40 + hours a week working my ass off and worrying if my bills are going to be all taken care off, get so damn tired that I can barely stay awake after work, have to run home and run my household (and yes we do have households to run idiots!) and then barely have any time to relax, how spoiled do you think we really are going to be? Now, you as the sub who supposedly lives to make sure we are contend and happy, stress free and always have enough time for our-selves and YOU, should see your service in making sure she DOESN?T have to work as sexy. Now I know you boys have families, many of you boys are married and baggage. I know that most ?rich? or ?well off? males don?t have a Domme, they have a Mistress (the other kind ? you know the woman you fuck around with and cheat on your wife with) or eye candy. They have a sugar baby. That is why we seldom only have one financial submissive, because we know one of you little piggies can never do good enough for. We understand that. We appreciate that little fact. Now let me go for sexy from my personal point of view. When I work from 6 am until 9 pm / 7 Days a week as I often do, the last thing I feel like doing is putting up with your little dramas and fits. I don?t feel hot, sexy or even remotely interested in dealing with a pig who thinks a pair of stockings as tribute buys him 2 weeks of my time in chat and cam. Now you come on here and ask me humbly? Goddess what bills do you have due right now and how much are they, decide to pick one that you can afford covering that month and pay it for me, I now can cut my work hours for that day and pay attention to you instead. I will be more then happy, smiling and pleased. Which at that point should get your cock hard as a rock. Now you go and buy me a new red dress that is great, but I am working so damn much I won?t have the time to go out and wear it and show it off. So, yes I love it and I hang it in my closet, but in the end it didn?t make my life any easier. Just a note for you to rethink, what is really sexy as service, from this ladies point of view. Now can I pay my own bills? YES with much hard work. Should I have to? NO!!!

Female Dominant, 43

Male Dominant, 28, Davie, Florida

Female Submissive, 50, Rochester, New York

Male Dominant, 49, kalamazoo, Michigan

Male Dominant, 38

Female Submissive, 31, S Mpls suburbs, Minnesota

Male Switch, 25, Toronto, ON

Female Dominant, 48

Female Dominant, 52, San Antonio, Texas

Female Submissive, 36

Female Submissive, 54, Conroe, Texas

Male Dominant, 52