icitinuri

Male Dominant, 46, NYC,Italy,Islands, New York

I have noticed allot of people are so concerned with having a picture attached or receiving a novella in an initial email and are unawares of possibilities that a Letter of Introduction offers. So for the gormless(often implying lack of capacity of will to remedy the condition), those unfamiliar with the Lexicon (types of relationships between words as well as how words were created), and lazy. This is not a command. If you have received a request for a Letter of Introduction you can safely assume that I have read your profile and found something that has caught my attention, inspired my passion. I have taken the time to fill out my profile (my calling card in the modern sense) including interest sections, provide a picture. Giving you the opportunity to do the same and if interested provide the requested letter to open our conversation. I can assure you that I am looking forward to your early response.

In Response to a question.... Tala you have hit the nail on the head religious zealotry/ fanaticism by its very nature is exclusionary, just as any other philosophical exercise is built on the pre-existing framework of established theory so is any reformation of religion, a book you might find interesting to read is Hegel's Logic, aside for the necessity of the times referencing as you will see the church (but makes a brilliant disclaimer), presents a basis to original thought or his absolute Idea free from the constraint of divine origin. It goes back even further; the idea of beauty to be revered and not hidden comes down to the question of virtue vs. voluptuousness. It is precisely the distinction Xtians missed and mistakenly condemns Pleasure for; he (Xtians) desires voluptuousness and does not attribute any virtue to it. Pleasure with all its consequences, was for the ancient Greeks, the sentiment most virtuous and fecund in grandeur's. They did not attach to it those ideas of shamelessness and immodesty, which Israelite tradition, along with Xtian doctrine has handed down to us. Herodotus says to us quite naturally: " among the barbarous races it is considered disgraceful to appear naked". When the Greeks or the Latins wished to insult a man who frequented "daughters of love" they called him Moechus, which merely SIGNIFIES "adulterer". On the other hand, a man and a woman, who being free from other bonds, united themselves, even though this were in public and whatever their youth or age might be, were considered injuring no one and were left at liberty. One sees the life of the ancients, or our life could not and cannot be judged by the moral ideas that come to us from Geneva, or Rome. There is confusion here, how can "modern society" still utilize the Greeks as "moral roll models" then? One considers Aristophanes exceptional? Yet we possess important fragments of fourteen hundred comedies, due to one hundred and thirty two other Greek poets, some of whom, such as Alexis, Philetor, Srattis, Eubolos, and Cratinos, have left us admirable verse, and no one yet dares translate this "shameless" and sublime collection. Xtians quote always, for the purpose of defending Greek customs, the teachings of some philosophers who condemned the sexual pleasures. Again there is confusion here. Those scattered moralists reproved all excess of the senses indiscriminately, with out the existence, for them, of a difference between the debauch of the bed and that of the table. More over, these austere "philosophers" were generally regarded by antique society as abnormal and dangerous madmen; they were mocked on stage, treated with blows in the streets, seized by tyrants to serve as court buffoons, and exiled by free citizens who judged them unworthy of submitting to capital punishment. It is then by conscious and voluntary deceit that modem educators from the Renaissance to the present time have mis-represented the antique moral system as the inspiration of their narrow virtues. If this moral system were great- if it merited indeed to be taken for a model and to be obeyed- it is precisely because no system has better known how to distinguish the just from the unjust according to the criterion of beauty: to proclaim the right of every man and woman to seek individual happiness with in the limits set by the rights of others and to declare that there is nothing more sacred than physical pleasure- nothing more beautiful than the human body. Such was the "morality" of the people who built the Acropolis; and if I add that it has remained that of all great minds, I will but state the value of the common place. What is this counsel of sentimental intrigues to use as a guiding maxim? The French have the idea "Love! Why dost thou form the happy state of all beings and the misfortune of man? It is because, in this passion only the physical is good, and the moral side is worthless" Where does this come from and how does it happen that across the perversion of antique ideas the Greek sensuality remains like a beacon. It is because sensuality is a condition, mysterious but necessary and creative, of intellectual development. Those who have not felt the demands of the flesh, whether as a blessing or a curse, are incapable of understanding fully the demands of the spirit. Just as the beauty of the soul illuminates the features, so only the virility of the body nourishes the brain. The worst insult that Delacrois could address to men-- that which he threw indiscriminately at the railers of Rubens and the detractors of Ingres was the terrible word "EUNUCHS" For me the worst insult I can address to them is; A GOD TO THEM! And seeing that they have received this and the subsequent disease morality enough said.

Male Dominant, 30

Male Dominant, 44

Male Submissive, 40, Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Male Dominant, 30, round rock, Texas

Male Submissive, 33, memphis, Tennessee

Female Dominant, 41

Male Dominant, 27

Male Switch, 30, Malaybalay City

Female Submissive, 29

Switch Couple, 35, Newcastle

Female Dominant, 23

Male Dominant, 75