| |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Browse |
|
|
|
|
|
Live |
|
|
|
|
Join |
|
Collarspace |
|
|
|
|
Dating |
|
|
|
|
News |
|
|
|
|
Glossary |
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
|
|
Alt |
|
|
|
|
Safety |
|
|
|
|
Toys |
|
|
|
|
Live BDSM |
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Welcome |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Login |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Male Submissive, 47, South Yorkshire
|
Female Dominant, 23
|
Male Dominant, 32, Montreal
| | |
|
| Back |
| KPM |
| Directory |
| Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
About essentialservant
EXPERIENCED AND ACCOMPLISHED VOLUNTARY SERVANT
I wish to state from the outset that although of natural submissive disposition I am not a practising lifestyle person. I entered into a voluntary agreement with a somewhat aggressive and demanding lady of Dominant disposition when I was 22 years old. I was orphaned in Infancy and brought up in various orphanages and foster parent homes. None of this has any bearing upon my choice of vocation. I have photographs but will not send any until trust is established and genuine interest is ongoing. This is about how we can help one another but with you firmly and rightfully in charge. My physical body would become and remain you're body for so long as you required such. If you lead a busy life and want and need a reliable and trustworthy, obedient male servant to look after you and you're home without reward are thanksgiving of any kind then I may well suit you? Once acquired and documents duly signed then I am yours to do as you please with within safe and sane reason. I was never utilized for sexual pleasure by my late lady owner. The genitals were kept locked away 24/7 for weeks on end before brief release then locking away again. You need not micromanage me because I am a motivated self started and get on with my work even if my owner is not at home. Being a weird chattel I believe that the true power lies with the feminine gender not the masculine gender. Woman give birth to boy child's and so own them and must decide by adolescents whether the boy child be a freeman or a slave man for other woman's benefit. Why did eve permit Adam and co to rule over and dictate to them when the world is better off with feminine rule? The Lady has since died in her early 80s of natural Causes in February 2016. I served her for 18 years and was very happy and contented in doing so. She was already in her early 60s when she employed me. She was a professional career oriented woman and also something of a loner outside her work though she did have 4 close and none judgemental lady friends who visited her for ladies nights in and also went on trips together. I was initially employed as a voluntary worker and had to sign a contract to that effect. I had to reside in her home and work varying but unspecified hours and could not work for anyone else during that time. This contract was renewed by mutual consent every 3 years. I also signed an employment rights waiver. I was not paid any salary whatsoever and had to pay her for my board and lodging and a share of the utility bills. Later down the line she took out a durable power of attorney over me and certain aspects of my affairs and after a decade she had me sign an Adult Adoption Agreement. It may sound incredulous to you the reader but by mutual consent she regarded me as being her actual physical property and I regarded her and being my Owner and Adopter. Her four friends were also instrumental and encouraging of that situation. I long ago discovered that I thrive when I am under the direction of one or more persons who are Dominant and controlling by nature but who are also safe, sane and responsible people. I have trained for and past examinations in several useful occupations that are directly related to and essential for my type of voluntary servitude and so am multi-functional in my range of servitude. I am a rare individual though not unique. I find that I honestly cannot function effectively when exposed to personal freedom and everyday decision making. Not everyone is entitled to freedom and human rights and not everyone wants or needs such in their life. I was left provided for in both my parents wills but I was too young to remember them. The legacy is controlled by Attorneys and Accountants and I am only permitted to take out a specified maximum each year and am given a reasonable amount to live on monthly. My legacy earns high interest and is substantial and nobody can have control of it other than the attorneys and accountants and me. The amount paid to my Lady Employer/Owner/Adopter was increased by 3% each passing year that I agreed to remain in her service. I was confined indoors for 6 days in any 7 days and accompanied her on shopping trips or to events she attended as required. When she was at work one of her friends was in her home and kept a watchful eye on me and made sure I did my work. By agreement I was required to wear a locked metal collar with a metal tag attached and her chosen name for me stamped into it. I was also required to submit to my genitals being restrained as she thought fit and to work naked doing my chores unless she had rare guests who were not her close friends when at events she sometimes had me full body shackled and this occurred in her home from time to time but was not a regular feature of day to day working life. I mostly wore an indoor servant’s uniform comprising clothing she deemed appropriate at any given time. To many of you reading this it again may appear incredulous but from time to time I was required to submit to what was referred to as maintenance discipline. This occurred around once a month and lasted up to two hours and one or more of her friends also joined in. It was explained to me that women often get stressed out and need to release their inner tensions and so maintain their health and wellbeing and that I must learn to tolerate the pain and discomfort during the session. I tolerated it over time but frankly, never liked the experience. I slept in a large cage beside her bed at night or at times in a emty walk in closet shackled to a ring on the skirting board that had a remote control locking device and a timer also. It was comfortable and I had a thick sleeping bag and good pillow. I am qualified and have certificates and licenses to practice according to my skills. Those skills are in:- Cooking and associated catering roles, domestic housekeeping and personal Valet roles, Propagating Gardening, General Handyman none apprenticed, Therapeutic Massage, respectively. I can also drive a motor vehicle. I own my own home which was rented out for many years and can relocate without undue difficulty. I will pay a fair board and lodging and utility bills fee monthly in advance. I seek to be employed in a similar type of situation but am open to suggestions. I have no preference for any racial origin, religious belief, nationality, sexual orientation, physical disability, body type and shape, etc. This is a serious profile containing a serious desire to be employed again in voluntary servitude and to be controlled and directed for my employers and my own benefit. I will consider any sensible and reasonable terms of voluntary servitude that any potential employer wishes to impose upon me. I do not expect many if any replies to my profile.
I am 6 feet 3 inches tall, Muscular build, 42 inch chest, 36 inch waist, 38 inch hips, well endowed. blue eyes, brown hair.
My particulars are contained in the sections without this written profile. Kind regards, Eugene Conners |
|
|
|
|
Let’s have a look at the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: Note that the Amendment is deliberately vague about anything to do with the freedom of consent to become and remain owned property and certainly does not prohibit that situation.
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The phrase “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted…” simply translates to –
“Slavery and involuntary servitude are illegal unless the court system (the state) makes it legal by criminal conviction or civil court order as in Adult Guardianship.
n other words…
“The state has the authority to enslave you simply by convicting you of a crime and sending you to private prison or requiring community service through state approved agencies.” The state can also authorise private individuals to own a slave on its behalf and even in partnership with it providing the individual has a written authority and been awarded a license to do so.
Now we must understand that slavery in the United States was not legal or illegal until individual states made it so. Instead, it was just an accepted practice of common law brought over to the United States by the English settlers who were already accustomed to owning slaves. While southern states continued with their tolerance of the ownership of people (of any race or color) either through slavery or by indentured servitude (involuntary servitude), one by one the Northern states individually outlawed the practice, though this was not necessarily done by altruistic means as much as political ones.
It is very important to understand the concept of freedom in this case. The colonists that inhabited the states as individual citizens had the freedom (the right) to own slaves and to indenture others for payment of debt. This was a right.
It is also very important to understand that this right, as with all rights, was taken away from the individual people both when individual states outlawed the practice and when the Thirteenth Amendment was amended to the Constitution. Thus, the right to own slaves was turned into a privilege, and immediately revoked.
Remember, a right is God-given. It is not something that can be legislated. It is freedom without oppression. Breathing is a right.
Also remember that a privilege is not a right. A privilege is not a freedom. A privilege is a state sanctioned action, only allowable by state decree or with permission through license or legal statute. Driving is a privilege, revocable at any time by the state.
The question here is not one of moral compass or civil right, but one of individual rights compared to state authority. This is a story of the state taking rights away from individual citizens, and creating a monopoly on slavery through it’s system of laws, as stated in section 2:
“Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.“
It doesn’t matter what your personal opinion on the slavery issue is, it only matters that you understand that the state is now the slave owner instead of the individual citizen.
Now, let’s examine the prison state that is America…
- The United States population accounts for approximately 5% of the world’s population.
- Yet, the United States holds 25% of the worlds prisoners in its prisons.
- That makes the good old U.S.A the #1 prison nation in the world!
- But, you see, that also makes the U.S.A. the #1 legal slave owner in the world…
Do you remember when then Vice President Dick Cheney was indited along with Alberto Gonzalez for conflicts of interest in investing 85 million in private prisons? I guess you can’t indict a slave trader if he is operating within the permissions and full support of the United States government:
Look, the politicians, courts, attorneys, lawyers, judges, and anyone else involved in this legalized human trafficking and slavery are not acting in the best interest of the people. They are simply compartmentalized cronies each contributing to a shameful slave and private prison business.
And the court system is set up to ensure a constant influx of new slaves.
What is even more disheartening is the fact that the majority of people subjected to this legalized slavery are not guilty of breaking the law, meaning they have done harm to others or their property. No, these state inducted slaves were guilty of “victimless crimes”, meaning that no one or their property was hurt. This means that the state is the “victim”. This means that a code, limit, statute, or other nonsensical legality (not law) was broken. This means that the government has set up a system in which it imprisons and enslaves good and innocent people for breaking its own outrageous rules. This means that for running a red light, you could become a slave too. This means that for holding up a sign in protest, you could become an involuntary servant to the government.
Private prisons do pay their prisoners (slaves) for their work, to the tune of .30 – .60 cents per hour. This is a loophole to make the private prison business the cheapest labor in America.
What is even more disheartening is the fact that the majority of people subjected to this legalized slavery are not guilty of breaking the law, meaning they have done harm to others or their property. No, these state inducted slaves were guilty of “victimless crimes”, meaning that no one or their property was hurt. This means that the state is the “victim”. This means that a code, limit, statute, or other nonsensical legality (not law) was broken. This means that the government has set up a system in which it imprisons and enslaves good and innocent people for breaking its own outrageous rules. This means that for running a red light, you could become a slave too. This means that for holding up a sign in protest, you could become an involuntary servant to the government.
Private prisons do pay their prisoners (slaves) for their work, to the tune of .30 – .60 cents per hour. This is a loophole to make the private prison business the cheapest labor in America.
Likewise, slavery was neither legal or illegal, it just was, until individual states outlawed it. Then this “amendment” came along and made it “illegal without permission” for all states, just like pot. All you have to do is run a state approved prison (pot pharmacy) and only conduct this slavery within its walls (pot clinic/pharmacy/store) to make it legal slavery (medical marijuana). The concept to comprehend here is God’s law or common law – meaning most prisoners did not break this law, which states “do not do harm to others or their property”. Instead, they have committed “victimless” crimes (the STATE is the victim – like running a stop sign) which makes them eligible for slavery in private prisons per the 13th Amendment (and some of those prisoner/slaves are only guilty of smoking a joint).
Marijuana is illegal without a (state approved) doctors preion, making it legal for state approved persons by state approved distributors.
Slavery is illegal without a judges (the STATE’S) preion (permission), making it legal for state approved institutions to have slaves which are state approved (condemned) individuals. This fact excludes consensual slaves but even they and their owners must first sign legally binding power exchange documents that take away the human rights and civil liberties of the consenting Adult and transferring those same rights and liberties to the owner and/are state to act and make decisions on the slaves behalf.
I don’t know how I can make this any clearer!
This system of outsourcing prisoners to privately held corporate prisons, only induces “the state” to produce more victimless (innocent) state appointed criminals in order to produce more prisoners (slaves) for the state sanctioned legal slave trade that our government has the monopoly on through its 13th Amendment to the constitution.
And one last thing… community service is not for the benefit of the community. It is the temporary indenturing of code violators who haven’t harmed anyone but the state. The only “community service” you are allowed to participate in are state sanctioned organizations or corporations which serve the state or are non-profit in name only, receiving large sums of contracted money for your service. This is not constitutional or lawful. It is slavery hidden behind a corrupt charitable FOR PROFIT company who uses your state approved enslavement as positive public relations in a public-private-partnership (ppp) with the government.
The 13th Amendment is unconstitutional. It must be abolished, as must legalized state sanctioned slavery.
Please pass this on , for if we do not liberate our brothers and sisters out of this legal slave trade now, we may soon find that the only job choices left in America are prison guards or involuntary servants.
|
| |
| |
|
|
Madam,
Why not show the Daughter these cartoon n depictions of a male slave?
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ancient philosophers
Philosophers justifying slavery
Throughout history there have been people who attempted to justify slavery. Many of them did so purely out of self-interest, in order to continue a barbaric trade, but some historical philosophers sought to justify slavery from the best intentions.
Aristotle
The great Greek philosopher, Aristotle, was one of the first. He thought that slavery was a natural thing and that human beings came in two types - slaves and non-slaves.
Some people, he said, were born natural slaves and ought to be slaves under any circumstances. Other people were born to rule these slaves, could use these slaves as they pleased and could treat them as property.
Natural slaves were slaves because their souls weren't complete - they lacked certain qualities, such as the ability to think properly, and so they needed to have masters to tell them what to do.
It's clear that Aristotle thinks that slavery was good for those who were born natural slaves, as without masters they wouldn't have known how to run their lives.
In fact Aristotle seems to have thought that slaves were 'living tools' rather like domestic animals, fit only for physical labour.
Slaves were not totally incapable of thought, but they only needed minimal amount of rational ability; just enough to understand and carry out their duties.
Similarly, slaves were not devoid of 'virtue', but once again, they only needed just enough to carry out their duties. But that 'virtue' was enough for them to be treated as human beings.
Aristotle doesn't provide any sensible practical method of recognising natural slaves, and without that it's inevitable that some people will be made slaves who should not be.
Aristotle also had a category of 'legal slaves'; they weren't natural slaves but through bad luck - perhaps being taken prisoner in war - they just happened to be slaves at a particular time.
Aristotle argued that if the world was just, the legal slaves would be freed, and if any natural slaves were by chance free, they should be made slaves.
Plato
The Greek philosopher Plato thought similarly that it was right for the 'better' to rule over the 'inferior'.
Homer
Homer seems to have thought that even if a person wasn’t inferior before they became a slave, enslaving them changed them in such a way as to make them a natural slave:
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Male Dominant, 38, Berkshire/Wirral
|
Male Submissive, 23, Tilbury, Essex
|
Male Dominant, 50, Witham
|
Male Switch, 29, Essex
| | |
Male Submissive, 29, Essex
|
Switch Couple, 40, london
|
Male Dominant, 51, Hemel
|
Male Dominant, 26, Southend
| | |
Male Dominant, 39, essex
|
Male Submissive, 58, Colchester
|
Male Switch, 41, essex
|
Female Submissive, 40, essex
| | |
|
|
|
|