Collarspace.com

KingAndCo

Friends:
slavejenni
Are you an uncollared slave?
Slaves are not permitted personal modesty or privacy, physical or mental. They have no secrets, no personal possessions, no "hard" limits that are not imposed by physical disabilities and have transferred all rights to an owner. This must be YOUR desired reality, because that's what TPE means.

I expect a certain degree of cautious exploration on your part as this is a huge step and immediate agreement says you may not be genuinely committed or even truly understand the concept.

Race is certainly not an issue in any context. I prefer a slave shorter than myself, but that's simply a preference that may be offset by other advantages.

A slave will be dressed, if at all, according to their needs and circumstances. If dressed, appropriate clothing will be
determined by me - likely sweats or a robe unless I wish you to be calling attention to your role with clothing or costume.


Limits considered, but not accepted automatically.

Limits and safety are my concern, not that of my property. All slaves come with baggage; some have children, some have careers, some have families, some have issues. Most have more than one of the above. It's my job to sort all this out and make things work to the benefit and added value of those I possess.

I do not break my toys.
I'm more likely to set a limit than you, and the ones I set for your safety may surprise you.

A slave is a slave even when a slave is not feeling at ALL submissive.

Nonetheless, she will submit if ordered. Just as Master is Master even when Master simply wants to whine, sniffle and have a lap until the icky tummy goes away.

Tough noogies, suck it up and cope, just as I do.  

The trick to excellent Mastery is knowing when to do the mastering -and by what means.

Sometimes it takes a jerk of the chain, sometimes it requires chicken soup and tissues.

I work from home, so I can give more than the usual amount of attention to a new slave.

My slave/wife is short of stature, generous of curve, warm of heart and entirely adorable; a fact confirmed by the disturbing tendency of people to fall in love with her on sight. Both of us expect total obedience and loyalty from a slave; both of us have the experience and talent to deserve and easily earn that level of trust and respect.

We are perfectly aware that what will benefit one slave will damage another; there will be no reckless use, and the closer to edgeplay I get, the more cautious I become.

Both of us require absolute, transparent honesty of you and of each other. Nothing less. It's not just to sustain D/s; any poly requires honesty to function; the only difference is what will happen to a slave that is reluctant to be transparent. (a Non-Erotic, Non-Enjoyable correction)

Many Masters set submissives and slaves a test to determine how serious they are about their needs, wishes and desires. Here is my test for 24/7 collaring. You have to understand that you must give up your former life to be owned by me.
This is a non-negotiable requirement, and it means that you dispose of all entanglements and distractions I do not agree to accept, travel to me and submit yourself. I will require you to sign a durable power of attorney if I collar you. I need the legal ability to ensure proper medical and mental health care, should that be required.

I'm open to some rational mutual testing; I certainly wish to know a prospect quite well before even offering that opportunity. But ultimately, there is a leap that you must be willing to take, so if you cannot envision that as a possible outcome, do pass on by with thanks. 

No games, no fantasies, no cyber, and please, if you are not SURE that you are a slave, or need to be one, you are not for me.

Leave your ego at the door.

9/2/2009 10:03:42 PM
Once, way back when, a dominant wannabe accused me of being a "service oriented master."

I thought about it for a few moments and thanked him kindly. It's an accurate summation.

I really do not like dominating a situation, or a person. I expect perfect service. If I think someone is challenging me, just so they can be punished in a happy fun way, they will find out two things:

First. A punishment is never fun for the person being punished.

Second. An offense that requires actual punishment is a "no safeword" situation by definition.  That doesn't mean I will harm you... but I will take you to a place you absolutely never want to go again. Mentally and physically.

I will proably puke and feel like crap about doing it. That does not mean I won't do it.

This understanding is part of all serious negotiations. I'm an owner and a master. If you think being "owned" means testing me every day or so, just to make sure I'm "strong enough" to take your crap, manipulation and insecurity, please go after someone who thinks of that as fun.

I don't. It's not slavery (It's a kink, and your kink is not just ok, it's welcomed by millions).

I just find that frustrating and annoying, a dynamic that gets in the way of doing what I do well.  Which is ownership, training and Mastery; transmitting my understanding of ethical power exchange and becoming an indispensible slave.


8/26/2009 1:48:29 AM
Oh, just one thought before I wander off:

I find "rot in hell" celebrations about the death of Ted Kennedy to be remarkably unattractive.

Certainly it's direct evidence of the sort of person that, in crude terms, "I won't fuck with a borrowed dick."

Consider what saying that aloud says about you.

Oh, and consider this: a slave that speaks of her social betters that way - and he WAS - is not one that a Master can trust with their good name.

As a Master, I can and have said things like that. But then, I'm a free person. YOU are asking someone else to be responsible for your safety and well being. Words such as that might tend to compromise My public dignity.

As far as I'm concerned, the proper correction for that - first offence - is a harsh gag and a non-erotic correction. Second time, it's off to the body-mod shop for a tongue-splitting.

That would be if I felt you were worth the correction. I would consider - very deeply - if the proper response was not a public uncollaring.
8/25/2009 11:48:21 PM
I've been doing two BDSM related webcomics of late, "Dreamwalkers" and '"23".

If you want to know my mind on these matters, well, mosey on over to http://www.drunkduck.com/graphictruth and read through them.
3/27/2009 12:56:58 AM
My wife and I just relocated to Eastern BC - in the Boundary Region. Beautiful, rural; ideal for my needs.

We are currently seeking a live-in female slave. Young, pretty, masochistic and who's future lies in service. I'm interested in objectification, obedience training, and extended, severe bondage, sensory deprivation and erotic torture.

I'm not interested in anyone who considers themselves even conditionally my equal. If you are the sort I wish, you are nothing like an equal. You consider yourself to be a natural possession, of conditional value.

That means, once you are collared, you are a possession.  I take care of my own, but the fact that you are owned is NOT debatable.
8/6/2005 7:45:44 AM
It seems many wish a full biography individually crafted as a first contact. But what I'm willing to speak of initially is already in my profile. Therefore, it is my custom, if I contact you, to briefly introduce myself, say what it is about you that interests me, and direct you to what that interest implies. It's not intended to be rude, abrupt or brusque; it's intended to save us both precious time; when I write, I write LONG.

I do expect a courtious response, if only "no thank you." I'm looking for something quite specific and I presume you are as well, this is why I have a complete profile. Please refer to it before thinking I've said too little. Because while it's the same for everyone, that is BECAUSE it's the same for everyone.