Once I had an elaborate profile, complete with some thoughtful prose and a catalog of interests. It's nice to scan a page and know that person doesn't work for you, or that you have some crucial charactetistics in common. Nevertheless I don't feel it proper to reduce myself to a page, and sometimes the info is as about as much a hinderance as it is helpful, as people tend to overemphasize the inflexible, static words on the screen. Reading further might illuminate things about my character, but it will not define me or my capabilities completely. If you truly wish to discover these things you are going to have to do that personally via correspondence, conversation, etc. 

I have no cookie-cutter model or paper doll for the person(s) that would capture my interest. The fact that I have no rigid outline of "her" in my head does not mean I lack rigid standards. Attraction is a must, as is the ability to hold a conversation. Morevover I find the merits within the most headstrong of switches all the way down to doormats and everything in between. That does not mean I do not discriminate, nor does it mean I will pursue either extreme. Frankly I find we have relied too much on labels for our convenience, and upon that reliance we have dismissed and overlooked people we might otherwise have found worthwhile and rewarding as friends and prospects. I believe the exchange begins with the interaction between two persons. If there is a current it progresses/escalates. I seek to establish that current and pursue the possiblilities from there.