|
Thought of the day: Why is rejection so hard to stomach online? God knows you get enough of it offline.
|
|
|
|
|
Gosh, someone is very angry. Two profiles to vent your frustration at yet another girl who won't have you?
I'll just put it out there... I have a tart tongue and limited patience. If people can't deal with this, don't email; I honestly thought these qualities were obvious to anyone who read the profile or journal.
As it is am decidedly creeped out that someone has so many problems with rejection that they'd go to the effort of making multiple profiles to share their anger with me and the world. Actually, let's move that up to very uncomfortable. It bothers me that there are women out there who are perhaps a little nicer and tolerant than I am, and that they won't see this side of you until physical contact and the potential for actual stalking is realised.
*sigh* The dregs of society. What exactly can you do with them?
|
|
|
|
|
Would just like to warn people about me.
http://www.collarme.com/personals/v/1055783/details.htm
Let the truth be known!!!!
P.S. I am really 65 and weigh significantly more than stated. Poor job, man whom I've no doubt sent a mocking reply to in the past, poor job.
|
|
|
|
|
Further thoughts about equality: If I wanted an equal, I'd get a dog.
You should laugh. I made a funny!
|
|
|
|
|
Thought of the day: Why is it necessary to request potential mates be able to behave themselves in public? What sort of women are you expecting to meet?
|
|
|
|
|
Second thought of the day: Why is it
that every second profile here lists intellectual discourse as their
reason for living or close enough? The majority
of these intalekshul types can barely construct a sentence let alone a well reasoned argument.
Never mind that so often this intellectual discourse is accompanied by a burning passion for the paranormal, occultism and alternative medicine. Am I the only one who sees a contradiction?
|
|
|
|
|
Thought of the day: Equality is overrated.
|
|
|
|
|
Sanctuary -
My land is bare of chattering folk;
The clouds are low along the ridges,
And sweet's the air with curly smoke
From all my burning bridges.
God l love Dorothy Parker.
|
|
|
|
|
Thought of the day: If your nick includes the word "wolf", I am not the woman for you. If you have a picture of wolves in your profile, if you wear tshirts with wolves prancing across them, if you consider yourself to be a pagan/biker/shaman/new age god type person, I am not the woman for you.
Why is it that kink is so full of these people? Is it the leather? The joy found in wearing the tanned, processed pelt of an animal just like your ancestors did as they strode across the countryside raping and pillaging, a faithful wolf at their side....
Get a haircut and buy a polo shirt.
|
|
|
|
|
Thought of the day: Blah to colds. The wicked person who got close enough to share their germs with me should be shot.
You are on my list, anonymous germfactory. On my list.
|
|
|
|
|
It was 30 degrees yesterday and something like 26 today and I have a disgusting, horrible, lingering until the end of time cold? I've clearly done something to anger the universe.
Still, more time to lurk the profiles here. Fascinating stuff. One thing that's been catching my eye lately is the number of profiles/journal entries quoting a study that there are 20 submissive women to every dominant man. Sources? I did a quick journal search and couldn't find much, but maybe I should have been a little more specific in my search terms... I wasn't, though, don't want a record of my searching for something like that!
So... sources, anyone? Was it published in a reputable journal? The study is always listed as being "real dominants" or "true dominants" or something like that. How has the author(s) defined a real dominant? I'm going to assume this study is like the ones showing autism to be caused by the MMR vaccination.
|
|
|
|
|
"Be self supporting". Is this another of the lines that all domly doms put in their profiles? Call me a purist, call me lazy, but if you want me 24/7 you're doing the earning. Even better is "Slave must contribute financially to the household". I've nothing against the poor being involved in the, erm, lifestyle, but that just seems so seedy. I hope you're not planning to pimp her out.
- Love, A. Gold Digger.
|
|
|
|
|
Thought of the day: I love seeing friends list consisting of super hot teen girls and utterly ineligible middle aged and up men. If your friends list looks a lot like this then do a little pruning.
I used to play with a man whose interests were so varied I often wondered if he picked them at random from the great big book of kink. One particularly memorable session involved prolonged foot torture with fine grained sandpaper (my pedicure was ruined but I was so well exfoliated may have actually been worth it) and watersports. I'll leave it up to you to imagine what that entailed.
Some people just attract peculiar partners!
|
|
|
|
|
Second thought of the day: Since posting about doormats (let me assure you that as doormats come, you will not get fancier) I've had some interesting and positive responses.
Why is it that most profiles claim to dislike doormats? Is it because it's just what you do? I.e. "I am ssc, rack, i truly respect women and do not want a doormat". Which is lovely, and will no doubt appeal to the sort of woman who writes poetry and dreams of a man in pleather pants but is so utterly generic that I'll immediately disregard as being unoriginal and a bit hopeless. Surely, if you weren't ssc, rack (bloody acronyms) and you despised women you wouldn't advertise it on a site like this. Great way to ensure only the nutters and women who are really men contact you. Obviously I roll my eyes and disregard any assures of sanity; this is the internet after all.
Which brings me to another peeve. Why is it that intelligence is always listed as a requirement in a mate? If you are capable of composing a sentence that does not read as though written by a well trained rhesus monkey then you are probably of average intelligence. Nothing more, nothing less. I will take all well written profiles to belong to intelligent people. Now if you want above average... that's when it gets tricky. You see, there are a limited number of people of above average intelligence, hence the name "above average intelligence". If you believe yourself to be in this category then contragulations, but take an iq test and send the results to me for independent verification. And giggles. I've taken one and it is quite fun, lots of pretty shapes and colours.
If you're clearly an idiot and request intelligence in a mate you will be single forever. If you are unaware of your idiot status best to just remove that requirement from your profile and avoid the embarrassment.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah-choo! My goodness, is it cold season already? I think so. Not that that stopped me from enjoying a nice evening out yesterday. I am paying for it today though.
Thought of the day: Do we expect so little in the way of communication online that anyone who is reasonably articulate and slightly witty is considered a genius?
I'm not brilliant, yet have been accused of being so multiple times. Let me stand as the poster child for private education.
|
|
|
|
|
Have Just been informed that I am 1. a man and 2. a fat and ugly woman. Which is it?
I imagine the spurned suitor who sent his female alterego on this little errand is lurking so I request clarification in order to put my mind at ease.
Frankly, my money's on the former. Everyone knows there are no girls on the internet.
|
|
|
|
|
Tacky = complaining about the women who've duped you in utterly vulgar language. As below it makes you appear gullible. Am I the only person reading these scathing attacks on CM users who have somehow wronged you and thinking RED FLAG. Big, big red flag. These are the same people who muse about what "real men" are and are not. Funny, I'd have thought this mythical "real man" would be able to take a setback with grace, humour and dignity.
If I wanted a child in my life I'd fly to Cambodia and buy one.
Another thought. Why are doormats so derided? Being a doormat does not preclude you being an interesting, intelligent person with a lot to offer. That said, I would be a fancy doormat with some sort of braiding and a pattern.
|
|
|
|
|
I do have to wonder at the number of profiles/journal entries complaining about scammers; isn't it just common sense that something too good to be true probably isn't? If you are a top shelf sort of person then you will attract the same (and the riffraff), however if you are not so eligible, then very quickly ignore someone who is and claims to be interested in you.
Simple.
-sydney999girl, doing her bit to protect the gullible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
