|
Feminists. I don't like them as a rule. Sure I shouldn't whack them all into the same box and judge them as 'one size fits all', but then why not? They assume all females want what they want. Think what they think. And it's not true. Not for me anyway. Some say I should be grateful of the changes thanks to some feminists, like what? The right to vote? Vote for who, I ask? Have a good honest look at the calibre of pollies to choose from - sad if you ask me. Like I said - vote for who exactly?
Being either male or female does not make one person better than another. And it seems to me that feminists these days go to extremes. They want to be better than males - and then they call that equality. No man should beat a woman, I agree they did good things in that area. But then no man does beat a woman - only cowards do. And no, I am not talking about consensual S & M.
I for one love that a man is strong and masculine. I love to feel his strength and his masculinity. I love to feel both safe and completely vulnerable in his arms, in his hold, all at the same time. To me, that allows me to feel more like a woman than any feminist ideas of what I should be and want today. I like the man to be the head of the house. To feel the bliss that comes with allowing him the ability to have me yield to him .... even in the times when I don't particularly want to. I don't like weak men who want me to make all the decisions or allows me to sulk. But that doesn't mean I am either weak or stupid. I like to believe that I am intelligent and strong. I have withstood far greater pain than any whip or cane and I more than survived - I grew. Grew on a level that most people wouldn't even begin to understand or fathom .........
No man who demands obedience or gains submission out of fear for him, truly masters any girl. It's when she trusts him and loves him in depths that can't be described, where the need to submit comes from a need to love and give more of herself than she already has, that he then truly controls her and has her as his. When she can't not submit because of who he is and how he makes her feel ...... when she feels that even in the depths of her submission to him, that she still hasn't given him enough - when it comes from her very heart and soul and not from pleasures or pain ...... that's when he truly holds her in the palm of his hand and he can call her his. And he has to earn it. Just as she has to earn his dominance and trust. It's because of who they each are alone and who they are when together, and not because of any games or acts or play sessions. To me, D/s is a far greater and deeper thing than that. It has to be felt with the heart and soul .... meant and not played. And I don't want or appreciate any feminist telling me that this makes me unequal to him or any man for that matter - because it makes me so much more. If only they understood .............
Which is why I love to feel his strength and masculinity. I find great comfort in that. A comfort that can't be explained. It's all about feeling safer when with him than anywhere else on earth, while at the same time being totally exposed and vulnerable and having complete faith in him that he will never hurt me (not in the way that most people think of as 'hurt') .... instead he allows me freedom and the ability to fly ................ |
