|
|
|
|
|
GoodBoysOnly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everything interests me until I get bored.
A reasonably-educated, reasonably well-adjusted, reasonably good-looking, reasonably-fit and reasonably-reasonable man from England here, looking over his shoulder at his disappearing youth.
If I say I would "love to talk to anybody", I sound desperate. So I would love to talk to anybody.
No wait, I would love to talk to anybody who realises that "u" and "r" are letters and not words.
Best wishes to all. Or A/all if you're A/anal about these T/things.
|
|
|
|
|
Thought: It strikes me that the 'dominant ladies' who spend vast amounts of time complaining about - well - everything, are showing an inabilty to 'roll with the punches' and 'take what life throws at them', that ill-befits someone who claims to be 'Superior.' |
|
|
|
|
A message to the numbskulls who insist on using 'vanilla' in a semi-pejorative 'I'm-much-more-interesting-than-they-are' sense.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/0/19343285
"Some have an anise flavour, you might see some caramel, there's obviously some floralness, fruitiness, prune, some types that have much more of a chocolate character. You might find honey notes, jasmine, hay or tea, smokiness, woodiness, resin... there's a whole lexicon of vanilla,"
|
|
|
|
|
There's so many profiles from ladies saying what they are not (sorry, what they are 'NOT'), and so many profiles saying what they don't want (sorry, what they 'DON'T WANT').
What about some positive thinking, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
I found this on a "lady's" profile.
It seems the men on this site are too fucking stupid to read a simple bit of text.
I sent her this message :
Re your journal entry of 8/9/2010. What does it say?
Deleted Unread. For Shame!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, John.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj-4t9drUlM |
|
|
|
|
What on earth is with this new rash of anorexic-looking "dominant ladies"? True, you don't need to be physically strong to dominate someone, but if you're thinner than the whip you're carrying, maybe you should rethink your diet, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
Warning to men in England: if you see a profile claiming to be from a "28 year old businesswoman" in London, it's a definite scam, and a fairly transparent one.
"She" says that she is looking for a "chauffeur, personal assistant and butler". Fine, of course. But the problem is, "successful businesswomen" can hire such people in an instant, and hire experienced and good ones, without any problems at all.
So why go to the trouble of inviting douchebags on CM to apply? It makes no sense. If you want a chauffeur, contact an agency and hire an experienced and able one. That's common sense.
The kicker is the final part, where "she" says that "initial contact will be with my male slave". If you contact this "male slave", don't be surprised if there's a "contact fee" or an "application fee", or something of that sort.
In fairness to him, his scam does beat the "give me your money" scams. It's a little more sophisticated, but ultimately, pretty easy to read.
Anyone who claims to be rich, and is surfing CM seeking applications for "staff" is either retarded (ergo, not a "successful businesswoman") or lying.
Oh, and any profile that has the words "I am beautiful" or "I am a beautiful woman, you can be ABSOLUTELY sure it's a scam of some sort.
|
|
|
|
|
..And the ladies treat me kindly
And furnish me with tape
But deep inside my heart
I know I can't escape...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's yet another of my Friendly Words of Advice:
Ladies, if you have even five minutes to arse around on this site, your time is NOT "precious".
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Peeved By:
I keep seeing this quote on the profiles of several ladies.
"I make mistakes, I'm out of control, and sometimes hard to handle. But if you can't handle me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best"
- Marilyn Monroe.
Okay, decent enough quote, and semi-meaningful....
Until you remember that the person who said it was not only wholly dependent on men and felt lost without them, but also chose to pill herself to death at the age of 36. Not really a role-model for the strong, modern, dominant woman, is she?
|
|
|
|
|
Regarding my previous entry: I am so sorry that (for once) I was not wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck to my American friends against Ghana. But really, no, you
can't.
I hope you do, however, and I will be back later to eat
major humble pie if I am wrong ;-)
Incidentally, I am usually wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
David, Robert, Joe, Glen, Ashley, Michael, John, Stephen, Matthew, Jamie, Ledley, Stephen, Aaron, Frank, Joe, Gareth, James, Shaun, Michael, Peter, Wayne, Jermain, Emile and Fabio....The Nation Is With You, And England Expects!
...some of us expect you to lose, probably on penalties. But PROVE ME WRONG!
|
|
|
|
|
Pet Peeve, Number 3563:
Ladies (and men, I imagine, though I don't tend to troll their profiles); you are looking for someone who PIQUES, PIQUES, PIQUES your interest. NOT someone who "peaks" your interest. And definitely not someone who "peeks" your interest.
Glad that's sorted.
(In an ironic twist, "piques" comes from the French word for "pricks").
|
|
|
|
|
I saw this comment on a "woman's" profile today.
"Men if you can't
read I am a lesbian So don't bother sending me email."
Well, toots, if the guy "can't read", then writing it out in your
profile isn't going to make much difference, is it?
What is WRONG with some of these people?
|
|
|
|
|
"I smoke. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your fuckin' mouth."
(The wonderful Bill Hicks)
*Lights a menthol*
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, firstly, NO FAKES!
Secondly, nobody who yells "NO FAKES!"
Get over it, people. What the hell is a "fake", anyway? What kind of "authenticity" are you looking for? And do you think that a "fake" reading a "NO FAKES!" profile is going to think "well, I'm a fake, but plainly she's not interested in fakes, whereas everybody else is, so I'll give her a wide berth and bother one of those countless individuals who love fakes."
Surfing the profiles here, I see so much utterly-laughable rudeness. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: nobody is forcing anyone to be here. If it makes you so angry to be on this site, maybe you should think about - I dunno - not being on this site?
Oh, and love and peace to all, as usual. ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
BDSM "Communities" = A Confederacy Of Dunces.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I've seen several "Its my birhtday 2day so send me stuff!" messages from ladies and alleged ladies - so, since it's MY birthday today (thank you, thank you), I've decided to try it, to see if it works for actual guys who don't deny being guys:
Send Me Stuff!
(I'll update on the results at a later date. I'm not overly optimistic)
Update: I got jack. Hold The Front Page!
|
|
|
|
|
Update on my last journal entry:
We did it.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're lucky enough (ha) to live in the UK, make sure you do the decent thing and download/buy the legendary "Killing In The Name" by Rage Against The Machine, anytime from Sunday to Friday. Let's do this.
:-)
Great tune, and my new theme song.
"**** you, I won't do what you tell me."
|
|
|
|
|
Amusing email from an alleged lady today, informing me curtly that I had misspelled "realize" as "realise".
That's nice, toots, but one must always bear in mind the differences between English and American English. I'm sorry if that colo(u)rs your opinion of me.
Well, when I say "sorry", I mean "not sorry". |
|
|
|
|
Question of the Day:
Which is more laughably-tedious? Those ding-dongs who insist on capitalizing words like "me" in the middle of a sentence, or those ding-dongs who don't capitalize anything at all, including the word "I" and the first letter of a sentence?
i'd say they're about equal, personally. But that's just "Me".
|
|
|
|
|
Seldom do I read a journal entry that I agree with more than this one, posted by a lady. Thank you to her for the question and the observation.
"Quick question about something I've noticed on the main page: Why are all male dominants rediculously, hilariously creepy and generally either rednecks or WoW nerds? Terribly unattractive men demanding pretty young ladies to delight in their misguided "domination", always updating about "rude" subs who don't want them (read: too good for them) or complaining about whatever else? As if these bottom-feeders are ENTITLED to a slave, without understanding the true nature of the responsibility..."
Good point, and the answer is simple - Misogyny. Ladies will never - I think - fully understand how much so many men HATE them. And I don't use that word lightly. Many, many guys on this site - "submissive" or "dominant" or otherwise. Simply hate women and are looking to "dignify" their misogyny under the "respectable facade" of "BDSM". I like most ladies. I like the ones who aren't idiots, anyway. But many guys just HATE, HATE and HATE, and anyone who doesn't realise that is going to get their heart broken.
As for many of the "submissive" types. They expose their hatred through fear. Less dangerous (although many of them can turn on a dime, of course), but more irritating, in many ways, since they often claim to "worship women". They don't. They fear women.
Like I say, there are always exceptions. Like me. Honest! <Grins>
|
|
|
|
|
Curious. I saw a "lady" on this site yesterday who was from Ukraine, where I spent a mostly-happy summer this year. Her English was good, and I sent her a message congratulating her and wishing her well. She wrote me back a short but polite "thanks", so I -obviously - took that as an "in".
An "in" to discuss my favourite subject - FOOTBALL! ("Saaarker" to those people unfortunate enough to be North American or Antipodean). I asked her what team she supported. Was it Dynamo Kiev? Shaktar Donetsk? Arsenal Kiev? Vorskla Poltava? Metalist Kharkiv?.
Answer came there none.
I saw her online today, and reminded her that she had not responded to my query. And she had blocked me!
Plainly, not a football fan. Poor her. If anyone would care to discuss football with me, do go ahead and send me a message. |
|
|
|
|
Currently Amused By:
This phrase "tribute", when they mean "give me money". When I see a profile with "I demand tribute", I often message the individual with "I bet you're a lovely person, and I hope that's a good-enough tribute". There are so many buzz-words that the ignorant sheeple of this site bleat with regularity, but "tribute" is particularly laughable. If you want money, say you want money. Don't say "I demand tribute" say "I'm a money-hungry douchebag". Or, alternatively, if you want to show yourself as *gasps* a tad human, say "I have bills to pay, too". The exchange of money for sexual/pleasurable favours is understandably something that makes many people uncomfortable, but when someone uses the sheep-word "tribute", all they are doing is demonstrating their own shame.
And why on earth should they be ashamed? Curious.
And yes, yes yes, I know "tribute" historically means wealth that someone gives another person as a sign of respect. But that's even better. If I have NO respect for someone, they are presumably obliged to offer their services to me for nothing!
If you want money, "ladies", say "I want money". It's simple.
|
|
|
|
|
Profile Quote Of The Day:
I love this one:
"I am a lesbian. That means men do not contact me"
I always thought "lesbian" actually meant "a female homosexual". I guess I will have to get a more up-to-date dictionary.
|
|
|
|
|
Profile Quote Of The Week, absolutely genuine:
"since collarme doesnt list all of the things im interested in, just wanted to list a few of them here:
bullwhipping, spitting (receiving), cumplay, master/owners who arent shy (exhibitionists), master with lots of body hair (im shaved), public play, dirty white, middle eastern, nasty armenian, dark and dirty and rough indians, hard european, hispanic, black or very very hardcore asian men"
From now on "Nasty Armenian" will enter my lexicon of "truly awesome fetishes".
Laugh of the decade. Thanks to the individual in question. Let's hope I see lots more not-at-all-racist profiles in the near future.
Give me strength.... |
|
|
|
|
Remember this, with thanks, as ever, to the Wondrous Stephen Patrick - thank you for many things:
You have never been in love
Until you've seen the stars
Reflect in the reservoirs.
And you have never been in love
Until you've seen the dawn rise
Behind the Home for the Blind.
We are the pretty, petty thieves
And you're standing on our streets
Where Hector was the first of the gang with a gun in his hand
And the first to do time, the first of the gang to die....
|
|
|
|
|
Alrighty, ladies, and alleged ladies, just a friendly note, lest there be any misunderstanding:
Just because you choose to give yourself a title like "Mistress" or "Domina" and because you think of yourself as a "Superior Being", it does not mean that I feel impelled to refuse to call BS if I see BS, or that I am somehow prohibited from saying what I feel. In the words of the great Stephen Bantu Biko: I Write What I like.
"I have chosen to give myself a title, therefore you must defer to me in everything"..nah. Sorry. I am well aware that many guys take this attitude, too, and it's equally moronic from them. I expect better from ladies.
I defer to those people who have proved theselves intelligent and open-minded enough to justify my deference, and who can appreciate my deference for what it is.
I don't care what title you give yourself. I don't care how much "experience" you claim to have. Nor do I care how "real" you claim to be. A stone is a stone, a spade is a spade, and an idiot is an idiot.
And no, this is not directed at anyone specific. Chill out, paranoiacs! Just a general Statement of Intent. Or a Statement of Lack Of Intent, I suppose.
Hope that's nice and clear. Best wishes. :-) |
|
|
|
|
Laugh Of The Week (So Far):
Saw this on a woman's profile:
"Conservative / Republican, seeking the same. Intelligent conversation a must".
Those two sentences just don't belong together. I suspect she has a long wait.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, if I see this irksome little slogan on ONE more profile, I am going to put my fist through my monitor. Sure, I will probably injure myself, and incur the expense of a new monitor, but sometimes, I just can't help myself.
"Life is not measured by the breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away"
*Gags*
How twee and vulgar, and it doesn't actually make any sense. Grrr! |
|
|
|
|
Why do I have to point this out?
- Ladies, and alleged "ladies", if you don't want men to message you, you can send them to your bulk mail without ever having to see them.
- If you are aware of this, and have already set your settings to bulk messages from males, what the hey is the point of telling guys "not to bother"? Does it offend you so much to think that guys would send you a message that..you'll never actually read? In what realm of fantasy does that make any kind of sense? How bitter are you people?
- If I see a "guys, don't even bother/try it/think about it" message, it's a fair bet you'll be sent an "I bothered" message from me :)
I really think there should be two collarmes - one for those who are willing to get messages from men, and one for those who are not. Because these bitter ladies and alleged-"ladies" are really irking me deeply. Chill, all of you. You know it makes sense!
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Listening To The Ramones, To Calm Myself Down.
Awesome band
"Jackie is a punk. Judy is a runt
They both went down to Berlin, joined the Ice Capades.."
Bless them.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Pondering: Why on earth are so many people on this site proud to be cliches? Why do so many people on this site actually seem to aspire to be cliches. You can deny the complexity of humanity and the complexity of sexuality for as long as you wish, but in so doing, you are, necessarily, denying The Truth.
Just my two cents, of course, and therefore worth less than two cents. |
|
|
|
|
Currently Puzzled By: Those assorted ding-dongs who insist that "anyone contacting" them "must be real". What, as opposed to a hologram? What the heck does that mean?
Remember the immortal words of Lennon, J:
"Nothing is real. And nothing to get hung about.."
Relax, guys. Just..relaaaax! |
|
|
|
|
I'm in a quandary right now, and trying to decide between two choices. The question is "what is the most irritatingly over-used and yet ABSOLUTELY meaningless word on this site?" and the choices are "Lifestyle" and "Community". Choosing which is most annoyingly-meaningless and yet depressingly-overemployed is like having to choose between sleeping with George Dubya Bush or Janet Reno. Both are equally irksome. Anyone care to share their thoughts?
No, thought not. Oh well. |
|
|
|
|
Well, three months away and nothing much has changed. Most of the women seem to be moaning a lot and most of the guys seem to be giving them reasons to do so. Having said that, it's good to be back. |
|
|
|
|
I have returned. And boy, do I have some stories to tell? Phew! |
|
|
|
|
Well, if anyone cares (and why should they? I know I don't), I am headed to Eastern Europe shortly for three months of teaching work, and will be without internet access. Fear not, however, for I shall return (barring plane crashes, car crashes, or some bizarre Eastern European plague, at least).
Best wishes to everyone. |
|
|
|
|
Top Five Lesser-Known Beatles Songs. Youtube them at will. Abusive or polite begging-to-differ messages welcomed:
1. I Call Your Name.
2. Think For Yourself. (A George-ian classic)
3. Hey Bulldog.
4. I'm Down.
5. She's Leaving Home. (not my personal choice, actually, but a lady asked me to change it. So I will. I won't be changing any of the others).
|
|
|
|
|
It's strange. I go into a "lesbian-friendly" pub in my hometown (a hotbed of gay people, bless them all) and the ladies in there are, generally-speaking and not to put too fine a point on it, hardly gorgeous. Nothing wrong with that, of course. They're not interested in what I think about them, and why should they be?
I log onto collarme, however, and at least 50% of the "lesbians" are stunningly beautiful blondes or brunettes with model-type figures and dazzling eyes.
I wonder how this could be? The mind literally boggles.
On the other hand, one key difference is, if I say hello to a lesbian in a pub, she doesn't tend to scream at me "NO MEN!! I AM LEZ!!" and yet so many profiles here say exactly that.
I wonder how this could be? The mind literally boggles.
Send me your searing insights, should you be so inclined. There must be a solution to resolving this Mystery. |
|
|
|
|
Sweetest News Story Of The Week:
I find Mickey Mouse to be an unerringly irksome cartoon creation. Not quite from the Scrappy Doo school of utter irritatingness, but certainly in the Second Strand of cartoon douchebags which includes ..well, most of the Disney "favourites", actually.
And when I heard the news that Wayne Allwine, voicer of the aforementioned moneyspinning-rodent for 32 years, had died this week, I read the news with a significant degree of neutrality.
Until, that is, I read that he was married - for eighteen years - to the lady who voices Minnie Mouse.
That touched this black old heart, actually. Only for a moment, it has to be said. |
|
|
|
|
Another Amusing Profile:
Actually, in fairness, this is almost certainly basically a typo; and who doesn't make those from time to time? But the pompous tone of the whole profile made this one a small classic, for a nitpicking and often-bored douche like me:
Journal Entry (Excerpt): "I get many responses daily regarding the journal entries I make on this site, but the truth of the matter is, I'm extremely selective... to the point where I might be called "fickle".... and if you're not sharp enough to read My profile/ad that CLEARLY states I am looking for submissive males between the ages of 30-45 years of age, don't whine and bitch to Me."
Profile (Excerpt): "I am a young Beautiful Amazon in search of my ideal male slave between the ages of 35-45 years of age.."
So if you're wondering what "clarity" truly is, now you know. Mind you, her definition of "clear" is pretty similar to that of my ex-w*fe, so I can't be too judgmental.
Or, indeed, too "fickle". |
|
|
|
|
Another Amusing Profile Entry:
Absolutely genuine, of course, and allegedly written by a female:
"You must be able to take 10" in any hole to even begin a conversation with me."
Anyone who can cope with "ten inches" in their ear-hole or nostril deserves a medal. One does, however, wonder what state their brain will subsequently be in and whether they will be able, physically, to continue what is certain to be a fascinating "conversation".
|
|
|
|
|
I remain convinced that there is nothing - nothing - in life more beautiful, more meaningful and more poetic than a football (saarker if you're unfortunate enough to be North American) game played well.
Shaktar Donetsk of the Ukraine and Werder Bremen of Germany play in the UEFA cup this evening. Let's hope for a classic. I shall update when the game is over.
Update: Shaktar won a deserved victory, beating their opponents 2:1 with a goal in extra time. Good game. |
|
|
|
|
I saw this on a journal today. Absolutely genuine.
5/19/2009 7:45:21 AM:  IT IS AMAZING HOW MANY ILLITERATE PEOPLE ARE ON THIS SITE! _______________________________
5/19/2009 1:20:55 AM: THE MOST DISCUSTING THING IN THE WORLD TO ME......
Typing in caps, of course, is perfectly literate and not-at-all "discusting".
|
|
|
|
|
To The Legions Of Folks Lambasting "Fakes" And Proclaiming How "Real" They Are:
Consider this quote from Kurt Vonnegut.
"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful what we pretend to be"
And when I say "consider", I mean "think about it". Mmmmkay? |
|
|
|
|
Currently Reading: "The Raven" by Edgar Allen Poe. The best bad poem in the English language. Phenomenal piece of work.
More from Eeyore:
"It's not very pleasant in my corner of the world at three o'clock in the morning. But for people who like cold, wet, ugly bits it is something rather special."
|
|
|
|
|
A good friend (yes, I do have them) asked me today "is there anything that doesn't piss you off?"
And the answer is "yes, Eeyore".
"Good morning, Eeyore," said Pooh.
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning, which I doubt," said he.
"Why, what's the matter?"
"Nothing, Pooh Bear, nothing. We can't all, and some of us don't. That's all there is to it."
"Can't all what?" said Pooh, rubbing his nose.
"Gaiety. Song-and-dance. Here we go round the mulberry bush."
I love him. I want to be him. Maybe I already am. |
|
|
|
|
What is it with this tedious phrase "bi-curious"? I have added that to my extensive and ever-growing "stupid phrases" list. God bless the gay people of this world, but if a guy ever said to me "I'm not gay. I am just really CURIOUS about what it would be like to sleep with a guy", I would cordially suggest that the second sentence might tend to directly contradict the first.
Think of it like this, if I say to you "I've never tasted an oyster but I am really damn curious about what they taste like". What advice would you offer me as the best way to sate my "curiousity"?
Anyone who would say "Go taste a freaking oyster, then!" gets ten points and the contents of my pocket; some fluff, some paltry change and a used train ticket. Well done. |
|
|
|
|
Currently Irked By: The phrase "for free". In point of fact *sniffs haughtily* something cannot be "for free". It can only be "for nothing" or "free".
Also Amused By: The continuing use of the word "pampered" to mean "manicures, pedicures and massages" etc. It actually, historically, means "to overfeed".
More very-dispensible vocabulary and grammar tips as and when I am bored enough to offer them. |
|
|
|
|
Currently Irked By: The pejorative use of the word "vanilla". Not only is Vanilla the King of Ice Cream, with its use in all sorts of lovely ice-cream based dishes like banana splits, and as an appendage to various pies and cakes (apple pie with strawberry ice cream, anyone? Is that a "hell no", I hear?), but to use it as a word to degrade, downplay and patronize people who basically do their own thing and imply that they are ipso-facto "dull" because they don't share your tastes, is wincingly-arrogant and silly. Vanilla is a very versatile, pleasant and subtle flavour. If you want to avoid conformity, avoid slipping into the shackles of a "new conformity" which is neither considered, nor literate, nor thoughtful. Rant Ends. (to be resumed..very soon, I imagine) |
|
|
|
|
Quote: "Only contact me if you believe women are superior to men". So wait, if someone doesn't think that Imelda Marcos or Margaret Thatcher (to name but two) are "superior" to Nelson Mandela, the Dalai Lama and Mahatma Ghandi (to name but three), they should avoid contacting you?
Phew, glad we cleared that one up! |
|
|
|
|
Currently Amused By: Those people who state in their profile (and mmmkay, I exaggerate slightly) things like "I am looking for a male who is 6 foot 3 or over, and height/weight proportionate. Pisces or Aries. I wil accept Librans if they fulfill my other requirements. He must be between the ages of 39 and 42. He must be professional, preferably a neurosurgeon or Supreme Court Justice. He must have black hair and be a cat-lover and he must own a sports car. Preferably a Porsche. He must must must be located within 15 miles of Clodhopper, Idaho! [Population: three women, four men and several worried sheep. Nearest town - 20 miles away] and be called Andy, Thomas or Cletus"
Those sort of things are priceless enough. But when the poor searcher writes profile updates, bemoaning her lack of success in finding what "she seeks", I hope everyone will forgive me for being unable to stifle a huge cackle. There's nothing wrong with being fussy, folks. There's also nothing wrong with being a lil bit realistic, ya know? |
|
|
|
|
Lordluvaduck! Judging from some of the profiles here, a lot of the laydeez are sitting behind their computers, with people holding guns to their heads, forcing them to read messages on collarme, and then to write their insightful reflections on their profiles and journals. That, I conclude, can be the only explanation for the permanently-pissed-off tone of some of the profiles. Unless you DO have guns held to your head (and I really hope none of you do), please be advised: you're not impelled to be here. You can log off at any time and do something more productive. "Nice and friendly" beats "sour and angry", always. Always. Always. Regardless of what you fancy your "BDSM bent" to be. |
|
|
|
|
Currently Amused By: Speaking about yourself in the third person. I was raised to believe it is the exclusive preserve of God and Norman Mailer. That's what "this one" thinks, anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Currently Amused By: Those individuals who "insist" that everybody contacting them is "drug and disease free". I guess that will discourage the vast number of people who try the "I am an HIV positive, syphillic crack whore. Are ya interested?" approach. Back to the drawing board for them, plainly. Good work, folks! As for the "no married men!" people, if that doesn't weed out the cheating husbands, nothing will!
|
|
|
|
|
Newsflash to the Legions of "NO MEN!!" Banshees (bless 'em all, of course): You can send messages from males straight to your bulk folder without ever having to read them or even know they're there. "Don't have a cow" as the son of the Greatest Philosopher Of Our Age would opine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Age: 40 |
| Lake Villa,
Illinois |
|
|
|
| |
