Collarspace.com

I'm a Dominant male and have had experience with a variety of different d/s relationships. I'm a normal looking and acting person, reasonably intelligent and reasonably attractive. I think that once you have experienced a real life d/s relationship that you can't ever really go back. I don't find the ritual aspects of d/s very appealing. I think it is about challenging yourself to tear down internal barriers by exploring and experimenting. You should be breaking rules, not adding more artificial limitations with rules of engagement and special code words. It isn't about going through a range of activities with props and costumes. It is about discovering who you are sexually and unleashing what most people keep bottled up all the time - or don't even acknowledge is there. I've been doing it since I was 23 and I am always amazed at discovering new things about myself, about others, about sex. I have taught before so if you don't have any experience with it, I like to teach. I think d/s is an engine to drive both Dominant and submissive forward into a deeper, more intense sexual relationship. As a Dom, I am drawn to women who are submissive. Their need to be dominated and made to do the things they need to do and be the person that they need to be attracts me to them in a very primal and instinctive way. That provokes me and pulls me into taking control of them and pushing them out of their shell and a little out of control. It is a repeated pattern of push and pull, an engine that drives things forward in a way that becomes instinctive and without conscious thought until it becomes just a natural and constant way of interacting. I can't change who I am if I wanted to. I am Dominant and I am drawn to submissive women. I am not judgmental, to me all fantasies are OK to discuss. I've found that you never know what you are into unless you try it (and try it with the right person). Everything is right with the right person, as everything can be wrong with the wrong person. So you have a novel there. If you find any of it interesting, drop me a line.
12/23/2012 11:35:20 AM

I've always thought that online matchmaking is often an voyage through social purgatory.  There are some well-adjusted and interesting folks here, to be sure, but they are often hidden under many layers of those who are not.  I think most come to this process with the expectation there will be some effort made at self-selection.  You read someone's profile and then make a decision about whether or not you ought to talk to them.

 

I think the problem is that there are many people that don't understand this process.  I've identified three possible causes.  One is that they lack self-awareness and the ability to make a self-assessment that is alignment with reality.  They think they are someone different than who they are so they believe they have found a match when they have not.

 

The second cause is that there are people that do not know how to make an assessment in the first place.  They only see people and desire them based on what they look like, and send a message that is informed by their desire and has nothing to do with what the other person wants.  

 

Third are those that are aware that self-selection ought to happen but choose to ignore it.  They message every new person to this site.  It's the spammer's approach: I may send out a hundred messages that are ignored but all it takes is one.  And the hundred messages doesn't cost me much (especially for cut-and-paste) so I can do this all day long.

 

The chief problem with the approaches above, especially number 3, is that it annoys the entire population of the site.  It degrades the experience for everyone to the dubious benefit of a few.  It renders this experience of Collar Me as barely functional.

 

The recommended solution would be to limit the number of new contacts each individual can make.  I only contact a few people per month.  I really can't see any reason why more than one new contact per week would be necessary but I suppose one per day would be reasonable.  

 

The socially clueless might argue that most people don't write back, to which I would argue that if they received fewer messages that were higher quality and actually relevant to their interests than the response rate would probably go up significantly.  Then the clueless might need to start investing some effort into their messages.

whoreashley48
 
 Age: 30
 San anthonio, Texas