2/26/2018 4:33:46 AM: All you doms beating your chest with:  you will obey me!!  StatementsApparently you miss the idea that following you will happen without the demand.  Some of us want to follow and will naturally fall in line if you actually lead, instead of screaming for compliance. 

6/30/2017 6:46:59 AM: not my blog but oh so VERY YESSS!!!!!     http://girlyjuice.net/5-ways-flirt-submissive/

1/15/2017 4:41:58 PM: there's a book written for business managers about leadership the concepts of which i think carry over to m/s very well. its unfortunate that only kink books are ever recommended for reading because the principles are the same. one of the more interesting concepts the author presents is 'leadership is a service'. if people could avoid being triggered by the word service and their biases as to what it is or isnt - there's a lot to be learned. one of the more interesting illustrations in the book is about this company. they kept the parts for their equipment in a locked cage and staff had to stand in line to request a part (the implemented STRICT CONTROL). a new ceo came in and did away with the locked cage. without changing materials or suppliers etc. the company saw substantially increased profit. why? by removing the cage, minor repairs were done sooner. they made it easier for the staff to do the job. because of this the big costly repairs were decreased. the reliability of the equipment was increased - they had more up time! more up time = more production + less repair costs = increased profits. on an emotional level - the employees felt trusted and empowered to do their job. there's an exponential payoff to building someone UP instead of tearing them down. people who feel appreciated will usually do MORE. management did not change their role. they were still the bosses and still drove the decisions. they set the goals and direction of the company. yet they reduced their level of control and got more results than they ever expected they could. taking charge vs taking over sometimes the best way to control things is to NOT

9/20/2016 4:01:16 PM: all you folks who write 'height & weight proportionate' should stop and realize that a person having ANY height and weight is a automatically proportion.meaning:  someone three feet tall and three feet wide is a 1:1 proportion.you aren't saying what you're trying to

5/30/2012 9:24:14 AM: d/s relationship   there are TWO components there...   one is d/s - that is sir, that is letting go, that is control, authority, deference and if one is so blessed with proximity - being spanked and hair pulled   and then there's relationship - caring, concern.  yes emotions and yes even from a man!  this is listening to how i got a flat tire, being patient when i cry about it and teaching me how to buy a new tire.   relationship is accepting and valuing me, THE WHOLE PERSON.   without this component you may be allowed to use the body, but will NEVER touch the soul and will never receive genuine submission   while its not a game of cards, d/s relationship is knowing when to hold them, when to fold them   note relationship does not mention 401ks; religion;  mothers or other such typical trappings of a relationship.   a true relationship is based on what you do, how you treat the person -- what is experienced with the person  and said feelings do not automatically mandate including such mainstream stereotypical markings.      two people can be wholly connected, wholly care and not have their lives wholly entwined.  or maybe its just more realistic to say that the entwinement of 401ks and mothers does not matter one whit in the reality of a genuine relationship.   submission is the soul unmasked... does not dominance have potential to be the same? for they are of the same coin. is it honestly viable for a man to be that vulnerable? and if the degree of his unmasking is matched equally by the submission he receive, is he truly vulnerable?