|
|
DaddiesBelt
| Couple, 53/48, San Jose, California
|
|
I just realized that my profile text got all fucked up some time back when I tried to post a journal entry or something. I guess it's been that way for months because … who looks at their own profile, like, ever? (And, of course, basically no one initiates conversation to random couples with profile text that just makes no sense as a profile. It's not like i go browsing around telling other domsbor switch dudes, couples or dommes, to fix their shit.
So, for now I'm just leaving ths here until I have the focus to coherently describe what we're looking for as a couple (which is, mostly, what I'm looking for) as a submissive playmate cum sexual toy, because my wife is pretty much okay with any gal I'd be willing to invite into our bed, as well as happy to see me go off and have wild trysts and liaisons while she's doing her own thing (mostly playing WoW online, but also running (dungeon mastering) old paper and pencil D&D games over Zoom with her regular groups).
Obviously any submissive woman ("girl") who has a thing for getting draped over the lap of an older "Daddy" for a spanking, and being sexually used, sensually abused, and likes the idea of lots of cuddling, and spooning after care, should jump right into my mailbox and ship her pretty li'l ass right here, or something like that.
P.S. I don't know who needs to hear this, but "Daddy" doesn't mean YOUR father, li'l girl doesn't mean any actual daughter of mine (I've never had children, nor stepchildren) and roleplaying is about roles, not about putting on some corny, pornographic dramatic production. It's not play acting, but more about the metaphorical "daddy like" (paternal mixture of authoritarian nurturing).
Also, "Daddy's belt" is symbolic. It's about evoking that feeling of being a "li'l girl" and the special kind of anxious anticipation that comes from the prospect of being punished -- but not fearful of real abuse or any injury. That's a special vibe that has nothing to do with incest nor child abuse. Not that administering a belt whipping can't be fun. But my favorite is plain, old-fashioned, over the knee (OTK) spa nking
|
If you're chatting with someone from here over IM (perhaps because you got their Yahoo IM s/n from their profile here, but even if they've included it in a message to you) ... one very simple and quick way to sort out the scammers from someone you might want to talk with ... just ask 'her' to read your profile and explain why 'she' wants to talk with you over all the others who are responding to 'her' profile.It's simple and surprisingly effective. For some reason the Nigerians, Ghanaians, and other scammers and spammers here seem to be incapable of doing something as simple as reading your profile and saying anything about it.
When someone hits me up on Yahoo, claiming to be from CM and asks me 'where are you?' or any other a/s/l BS ... I simply tell them to go read this profile here. Try it.(Sure, some of they may eventually figure out that they have to put a little effort into the game ... but it'll still probably be over 95% effective for the foreseeable future).
Omo oro
I think I've learned a new phrase in Swahili today. A certain party here, who shall of course remain nameless due to the CM ToS, was trying to scam me for a $150 'moneypak' (basic Nigerian slave scam). I played along for a bit and when I'd toyed with 'her' (it) long enough I pointed out the obvious tells (praising the technique for weeding out those mugu who aren't quite dumb and desperate enough by using a poor quality JPEG image, and a pattern of bad grammar which is characteristically foreign (and seems to be distinct to those from Northwestern Africa).
Last I heard from 'her' was 'omo oro.'
Searching for that in Google I found some lyrics to a song, and pasting a whole line of that into Google Translate with 'Language Autodetect' set I get back a plausible translation for the whole line in which the words 'omo oro' apparently translate to something like 'am in turmoil.'
I'm guessing that, idiomatically, means something like 'I'm fucked.' (In this case it as also 'her' farewell. Followed by a disconnect).Perhaps Mitt Romney would like to learn that phrase for his concession speech. A little homage to the 'Kenyan' in the White House?
(BTW: Congratulations, President Obama. I'm glad we've prevailed against all that filthy lucre).
Another musing scammer foiled tonight. 'She' posts her phone number: 213-416-xxxx right in her profile (which, of course, I don't call, as it might be a trick to harass some poor schmuck who has never heard of CM). When I write to 'her' I get back a text message on my number from that same number. Of course we can't talk voice (for unspecified reasons). Calling just leads to a voice mail bot. (I'm guessing it's a hacked or forgotten mailbox at some company somewhere ... used only for SMS/text messaging redirection or whatever).
After a little small talk 'she' tells me that she's a model and wants to come visit me. However, of course, she need to get 'permission' from her 'manager' (which, of course, costs some unspecified amount of money, to someone in the Phillippines).How can anyone be ham-handed enough to fall for these? It simply boggles the mind.
If this site were ever to add the rather obvious features (show my profile only to those who have indicated that they're looking for someone like me --- a couple in our case and show me only the profiles of people who have clicked on 'Actively seeking' button(s) that match my profile ... if they set it up so that I didn't see any profiles for women who are 'not interested in men' or 'not interested in couples' ...
... well that would be easy. (They're just different sides of the same coin, limiting who my profile is visible to --- gay men and dominants of any gender don't benefit from seeing my profile here --- and limiting which profiles I see (I don't need to see profiles for women who are not interested in men, not interested in couples, or just not looking for a dominant for any other reason).
It would also mean that practically no real profiles show up. Only the scammers would show up for most men looking here.
(Of course getting rid of the spammers would also be relatively easy. That would make about 90% of the female profiles disappear).
Sigh. They'll never add features like those. It would severely cut into their ad revenues.
Remember folks, you are not collarme's customers. You are their product. Their customers are the advertisers. Every time one of you successfully finds what you're looking for (by way of a real-life playmate, slave, master, submissive, dominant, etc) then they lose a set of revenue generating eyeballs --- at least for a time.
I'm considering getting a toy for a naughty, needy girl:
http://www.howsyourbuddy.com/
... a 'love seat' cushion designed to hold a wand (Hitachi) firmly in place.
Anyone one to offer an honest, first hand, review?
|
|
|