|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No-one worth a damn can be summed up in a profile like this.
But a partial summary goes thus sufficiently cultured and intelligent, substantial capacity for emotional support, and mentally and physically in exceptional shape.
In all relationships - vanilla as well (in times past) - I very much enjoy being in charge, in control, and taking responsibility. (Im reliably advised that many people arent quite as good in taking responsibility as they are other two things.)
And who Im looking for, similarly, cannot be summed up so glibly, but...willing to suffer for my pleasure, able to be a compatible partner outside the bedroom as well as in (in my experience, this is the more difficult bit), hence must either be well-educated herself or willing to learn.
I dont think a long list of interests is needed - chemistry matters far more (and why constrain yourself only to the things you already know you like?)
Im British - Im polite, a gentleman, courteous and well-educated (and I sound like a BBC announcer.) Gentleman does not equate to gentle.
Results from bdsmtest.org 100 Degradation Giver 100 Dominant 100 Sadist 96 MasterMistress 88 Bondage Giver 73 Brat Tamer 71 DaddyMommy 63 Primal (Predator) 58 Exhibitionist 55 Non-monogamist 50 Experimentalist 49 Voyeur 42 Pervert
|
|
|
|
|
I think my profile might have been hacked. |
|
|
|
|
The end of an era: a (very) long-term play partner - since 1998 (aside from a period of time when I was married - I was strictly monogamous) - is moving away from NY. She was almost too good to be true - an Asian ex-stripper with a very high pain tolerance - and we also had a mutual fondness for interesting restaurants cheap and expensive. So until I find someone for the long-term, I'm interested in an appropriate replacement for play and dining. |
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you just want to hurt badly a woman who wants to be hurt badly. |
|
|
|
|
Ladies, please state your filters in your profile! I don't mind reading that a woman isn't interested in men over 50, and so she sends all mail from over-50 men into the bulk folder. I am irritated at the waste of time when a woman says nothing, I write, and the message gets sent to bulk because I'm too old. If a man doesn't read the profile - not uncommon, I gather - then let him waste his time. But for those of us who do - is it really too much to ask that you show just a smidgen of intelligent courtesy? |
|
|
|
|
Plenty of subs invite one to "stretch their holes". OK, I understand that to an extent - but if anything I'd prefer the opposite, as a tighter pussy and ass makes insertions (mine or objects) more uncomfortable/painful. Maybe that's just me, but I doubt it...
|
|
|
|
|
Just as no two women are alike, so no two subs provoke the identical response in me. Some profiles get me thinking, if she were mine I'd spend the time educating her in many (non-sexual) things, behave like a regular couple in public (mostly... ;) ) and we'd have a "romantic" D/s relationship (at least, as romantic as I ever get). And others, "consensual abuse" pretty much covers it. And I find it hard to decide which I prefer...probably whichever I get! |
|
|
|
|
The second golden rule: "don't be a dickhead".
It seems to me that there are many situations where, simply by following this rule, you will avoid trouble. |
|
|
|
|
Variety is (allegedly) the spice of life, but it seems to me that few profiles here recognize that (including, it must be said, mine). For example, do I want a gimp slave? No. Would I like to have a partner who I can treat as a gimp slave for a long weekend? Yes. Do I want my partner to walk around in a painfully tight corset and ballet boots the whole time? No. Do I like doing that to a partner for a fun-filled day? Yes. Do I want to make my partner go out all the time dressed like the cheapest stripper in Florida (if you're from Florida, insert another state here if you feel insulted: _______ ) No. Do I want to do this very occasionally? Damn right. Do I want to go heavy on my partner every time we play? No. Do I want to know that I can? Yes.
And so it goes. |
|
|
|
|
While analysing past partners after someone asked me the question, I realised that most of them were either dancers or goths (ex- or current) and in a couple of cases, both. I'm not sure that too much can be read into this, but amusing nonetheless. |
|
|
|
|
The greater the promise, the greater the disappointment. |
|
|
|
|
If I were running collarme.com I would:
1. have a far better system for detecting fake profiles - it surely doesn't take too much to realise that someone with the handle "Maryfred3" who is "seeking for a master" from "Alabama 24 miles from NYC" with a professionally taken photo of a generic hottie isn't kosher.
2. set up the search function so that you could choose not to appear in searches from people who you don't want to see you (fwiw Match.com used to work like that). |
|
|
|
|
Someone asks me, "what's your perfect sub?" Answer: "a glamorous woman who can sit still through Khovanshchina shortly after a heavy paddling - and enjoy both".
' |
|
|
|
|
I saw a journal entry from a sub claiming that if a male dom has been a member of this site for more than two years they must be a player, and so, beware. It doesn't follow. It's just bloody difficult to find a compatible LT partner - nor is it easy for compatible partners to find oneself. And I don't see why I should compromise what I'm looking for (which, fwiw, I think makes one more likely to become a player - if you're not that satisfied with who you've found so far, you're not going to stay with her; or at least you're probably going to try to find someone else). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Age: 21 |
| Ontario,
Canada |
|
|
|
| |
