|
|
|
|
|
|
I am Jasmine, but you may call me Jas. I am half English, half Irish and I possess the traditional attributes of my background: austere, artistic and maybe even refined...at times. br />
I am no caricature of 'a dominatrix'. Perhaps you could think of me as a woman with an edge, and an eye for power dynamics. Whether it is the truth or not is for you to find out.?
My basic stats, or somewhat oddities, are: I'm (very) tall at?almost 6ft, a natural redhead/mildly freckly/blue eyed/pale and I am of an athletic build.
?
I am a law student and very studious, almost religiously. I enjoy interesting conversations and the?unusual people from which they originate. From western philosophy to poetry to horror films to martial arts to classics. I require good food, music, books...
?
I seek an interesting individual, whether they be a sub, or a switch. Preferably between the ages of 18 and 35. Not looking for exclusively dominant men, thankyou. ?
I don't understand why some dominant people seek?'quiet' partners. I quite like the complex rebel, the one who?pulls against the reins. For me, I like the struggle in the power dynamic. However, I do appreciate those with more laid back and introverted personalities. In return, they may receive some compensation for their troubles. Perhaps even my adoration? ;)
Perhaps...
?
I have recently become accustomed to friendships and more?with other dominant types. I perhaps even seek a 'power couple' type of status. I am not of the jealous type so it seems interesting to me.
?
And a last thing: I cannot be bought for a price. To those who seek financial domination or my affection in return for money, I am not your woman. I do this for my pleasure . You are much more than a bank account number to me. Also, a picture with your message would be good. Thankyou.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, and don't call me Mistress straight off the bat. A stranger to me is a stranger. |
|
|
|
|
Advice time for you all. I will not reply if you message me off the bat demanding explicit acts from me. I find it... insulting. I will without doubt not reply. |
|
|
|
|
Quite irritated at the moment. Someone sent me a very carefully written response to me a few weeks ago. I have been busy so I didn't reply for the moment. I just tried to go back and find it just now because it was quite endearing, and they've either unsent it or I've deleted it. Fab. |
|
|
|
|
Two subjects to report back on:
Firstly, my previous post wasn't attempting to shame anyone who dresses femininely because they think it's pretty, or because they like to, or because it expresses them. I'm not attacking cross-dressers, or trans women. I kept getting messages from people who misunderstood that.
Secondly, I would like to request that people stop telling that they will pay me, or your little euphemism 'tribute', for me to do things for them. I'm sorry to say, but I can't be bought. My time, affection and respect can't be bought... There's other people who can cater to your needs if you give them money, so I advise go to them. You should keep in mind though, it is a form of sex work. I have no problem with sex workers, but I am not one. I do this because I am genuinely dominant.
It reminds me of something I was told once. I was told that women are prostitutes, as they fall in love and marry the man who gives them the biggest ring, the most diamonds, the man with the greatest wealth. I disagree with this statement, as many people marry for love these days, and even those who do marry for money may be doing it for security. Still, the sentiment remains. But I may discuss that in another journal. |
|
|
|
|
Here's some food for thought, a question to you all out there in the BDSM community.
I am merely questioning the standing norms of practice.
To the point, I get many messages from men asking me to make them a sissy/dress them up/numerous other scenarios. Personally, this does not interest me much. It led me to think on why people want this, and why being dressed as a women is so degrading and humiliating. It's a self evident predisposition among some that being dressed as a woman, using women's names etc has an erotic degrading effect.
In addition, it doesn't seem to be a common practice of a female sub to be dressed as man, made to use male names. It is of course not considered to be erotic nor degrading.
I put the question to you, why is degrading to be womanly, or display feminine attributes?
It also seems contradictory, at least to me, that a man would want to submit to a woman whilst also finding something about being a woman degrading.
It's interesting to question these things. I personally believe using someones sex/gender/race/age to degrade them is sloppy and unimaginative. People are made of many more features and characteristics than those, and thus can be exploited in much more depth if you care to dig deeper.
Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
This can all be so dull sometimes. Alas, what am I to do? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
