|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figured I'd re-do this thing yet again to more accurately describe what I'm looking for and hoping to obtain.
Before we get into the fun facts, the vanilla side is (sadly) important as well and I'll detail a bit about my day to day life. I currently work as a chef, I support myself and love my work, there's very little that's more satisfying than crafting a dish that customers or friends go crazy for. I enjoy things like photography, fishing, reading, writing, and video games. I have an admitted "geek streak" that any girl would probably have to deal with at some point or the other, but I'm not obsessive, I just know what I like.
As for the D/s aspect of my life, I live in a humdrum town where we're still getting used to the whole "gay" thing, much less accepting of people involved in the particular lifestyle I've found myself drawn to, so while I've yet to actually own a sub of my own, I've attended a few parties in Philadelphia and have been reading about the life since I was a teen. In that time I've had ample free-time to ponder and imagine all the things I'd enjoy doing to and with my submissive, be ready to deal with a little "creativity". There's very little I'm actually not interested in (Or at least willing to try) and outside of the obvious such as scat and age play, I'm quite interested in learning every little quirk there is out there in BDSM land. Care to be my little test subject?
While I have no strict criteria for what I'm looking for in a girl, I do ask you be intelligent, able to hold a conversation, and above all be truly submissive. I've no interest in a girl who'd dom from the top, or the tons of girls on here simply looking for a boyfriend with a bit of kink to him. I've lived that life, and I'm sure you have to. I'm bored of it, and if you're not feel free to move right along.
Ideally she'd expect nothing, and have that fairytale attraction I read so much about where only her Master matters and most everything else is a side-project. I'm a man who's very much more concerned with who I'm spending my life with as opposed to how. You should be much the same.
I can relocate if need be, and if you're from out of state and looking to relocate yourself, that's quite fine too. One big issue with any living arrangement, however. I plan and already have gears in motion to see the world to get a much broader culinary background. First stop is France in a year or two and then onto Japan, England, and who knows from there. This is a very real life goal for me, and one my submissive would not only be willing to accept, but should very much want to. Who wouldn't want to see the world?
Very real. Very serious. Have pictures, voice, and body to verify, but unlike most, I'm not comfortable with posting pictures or incredibly indepth information about myself on a website that anyone has access to, so if you'd like a picture or to simply get to know me better, feel free to drop a line.
|
|
|
|
|
A few great quotes on some of the sites I've been visiting/re-reading.
"Because I draw for my Dominance from a place that is
creative, aggressive and that thinks of itself as "fun" and caring,
not hurtful, there is a limit to how much I may draw from that place
depending on how sure I am of my partner. The more I know and am certain
that what I draw from it will be perceived and received desirably, the
more I can draw from it."
"Absolute submission, on the other hand, is centered upon itself and
remains constant in all circumstances. It is unconditional and unlimited,
and there is no distinction between contexts since one is a slave always
and in all ways. The M/s (as absolute D/s invariably is) relationship
is not a traditional couple relationship but a symbiosis, where dominance
and submission are not only the defining characteristics of the relationship,
but the relationship purely and simply. As a result, where submission
usually grows out of love in mainstream D/s, in absolute D/s love sometimes
grows out of submission."
"I will never lord My dominance over you. you are
submissive, I am dominant, two sides of the same coin, one by itself worthless."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
