Collarspace.com

Horizontal Line
Vertical Line
Horizontal Line

Horizontal Line

Vertical Line

Sum ergo dominor (I am, therefore I dominate), I seek ownership of a woman as property, 24/7/365, nothing more and certainly nothing less, plain, simple and totally non-negotiable. I am a dominant sadist, with little regard for convention or a woman's expectations. I am unapologetically a male superiorist and believe women exist for men's use and pleasure. I seek neither approval nor validation from those below me nor do I particularly care what the world thinks. I am what I am, and I refuse to make excuses... Having begun this journey over 40 years ago, I am, what is often referred to as, "Old Guard" and believe in enforced protocol. I recently found the following comment about "High Protocol" that sets out my attitude precisely: "In that once known and understood, it allows no room for error in judgment, lack of common sense or forgotten manners." I have no interest in "slaves" who think they can dictate the rules, or who believe their preferences make any difference. Email from those whose profiles are a list of their rules and demands are routinely (and immediately) deleted. Similarly for lists of hard limits (if real ownership is what you seek, it cannot exist as long as you believe you have any rights, much less the right to dictate what will occur between us) I understand this disqualifies 99% of the supposed "slaves" on this board, and that is fine. What I seek is not the ordinary nor are they in great supply. It is the rare woman who can truly surrender herself and her humanity to become chattel, totally and permanently, And willing to joyfully suffer the pains, humiliations and degradation I choose for her, but, for those for whom there is no alternative, I offer over 45 years of experience owning and training such women. If you are one of the few for whom this truly resonates, please message me...

Horizontal Line

2/5/2018 11:22:02 AM
In the category of Clues, here is a quote from an alleged slave's profile that really doesn't get it...

After listing her rules, she states:

"MEN WHO THINK BEING A DOM MEANS THEY GET FREE SEX >>NEED A CHECK UP FROM THE NECK UP>>>>trying finding out what the sub wants .dickheads"

Silly me, after all these years thinking that the Master/slave paradigm somehow entailed surrender, obedience and subserviance...

At least they offer comic relief, you really cannot make this stuff up

10/15/2017 7:34:27 PM
A charming sub sent me this quote, regarding my last entry. I felt it on point enough that I would share it: Peter Masters said it best in A Year of Dominance In Week 12 When the Slave is Ready It may well be that there's someone right for you, but they might look and act nothing like what you have in mind. Whatever rules or ideas you have about getting what you need, abandon them. Get out of the driver's seat and give up on the idea of you deciding what the right person needs to be. You might not recognize the right master for you, the right slave for you, even the right teacher for you until you accept that they're not going to appear in the form you want. They're not going to behave how you want.

10/2/2017 10:24:00 AM
I just had the most bizarrely  "interesting" exchange of emails I have ever had on CS (or CM, for that matter), truly worthy of the sobriquet "Theatre of the Absurd (for those fans of Camous).

I responded to a self styled slave (she had registered herself as a slave (presumably with TSR) and had her slave number tattooed on the back of her neck, but had never actually submitted to anyone, much less having been owned) whose profile sounded as if she may have actually had a clue (though rereading it in retrospect, there were also clues as to why she was unowned).

When her response to my email both neglected to answer the few basic questions I had posed and quickly degenerated into a rant about how none of the men she had spoken with or met for coffee were either dominant or worthy of her submission I began to understand.

She has a romanticized picture of Dom Charming (without any of the imperfections, failings or paradox that make one human) who will, by aura alone sweep her off her feet and deposit her, submissively kneeling, before him. Her submission to him would be both total and automatic, needing no prompting from rules, discipline or ritual,and he would know, from the acts she chose to do in surrender that no further training, correction or correction were necessary (or expected).

As for my impertinence at expecting her to answer my questions or my presumptuousness at even considering that in order to actually be a slave she would have to surrender her belief that her slavery will follow her dictates and that she will be required to do so many things she considered beneath her, this was obviously proof that I was not a "real" Master, because if I were I would not question the perfection of her slavery, once she decides to give it.

When I suggested that some experience might alter her views, that there was no "real" Master, without foible or imperfection (except in books) it became obvious to her that I was unworthy of so fine a slave, especially if I expected her surrender to include such disgusting elements as touching her or (dare I even suggest it, sex). 

Suffice it to say, our dialogue was short lived, though amusing.  I guess I am still shaking my head at the idea of a wannabe slave registering herself as a slave and being presumptuous enough to have herself tatted with the #, and then bragging about doing it.  I guess it is the M/s equivalent to downsizing/outsourcing, but to herself?... 



7/20/2015 8:15:06 AM
I seem to be asked far too often what type of ownership I seek (presumably meaning sexual, domestic, etc). I thought my diatribe about purported slaves who try to set the rules had made it clear that I am talking about actual ownership 24/7/365, no time outs, no "I was too busy" or had other things to do. I expect (actually demand) the right to put a slave to any use that pleases me at any time and in any place (subject of course to the societal constraints I choose to accept to avoid unwanted entanglements with the law), be it domestic, social, sexual or otherwise. Is the concept of full time 24/7/365 ownership that foreign here on CS that I need break it down to all its component indicia?

5/8/2015 8:23:25 AM
I recently found this explanation of slavery on a woman's profile and liked it enough that I share it here. I did not write this and, though I subscribe to the attirudes expressed in it, I cannot and do not take credit for it.

"There are a lot of definitions for the word "slave" and to us when we use it we refer to internal enslavement, not external obedience. To us slavery is a state in which a woman is compelled to serve internally, she doesn't have a choice, she doesn't "choose" to obey, she finds herself doing so. This doesn't mean she never disobeys but it means as long as she is enslaved, she cannot ever make the choice to leave, because no matter how close she gets, she won't be able to go through with it. It also means her behavior, good or bad, is a direct result of a response to the man who masters her. Learning what to do to cause the response a man wants is how he controls her. Not by beating and external force, but by actual control of her internal response, inspiring her to serve and obey. That to me is real control and it takes a very close and deep understanding of a girl to accomplish it. We are not a BDSM based house, but are based on this internal enslavement and domestic and erotic service. "

4/3/2015 9:00:18 AM
I just read a number of profiles, all supposedly seeking 24/7 tpe ownership and slavery that all raised the same red flag for me. The were very clear in their insistence regarding their rules for ownership and/or their unwillingness to relocate.

It is possible that, being older, my generation defined ownership in less sophisticated ways (I am easily classified as "Old Guard" and still remember when BDSM was basically existing underground, and TES meetings were in church basements amid the AA literature) but it was always assumed that in surrendering ownership, the slave agreed to accept her Master's decisions for her, (in theory, without question or bitching, in reality, despite it).

Am I the only one who takes issue with the statement "I am a no limits slave seeking 24/7 ownership, EXCEPT I will not relocate or alter my life in any manner that does not suit me, nor will I do ...."?

I am not so sure that mainstreaming BDSM out of the closet and into social media is necessarily a good thing. There was actually a certain cachet in knowing that the people who had searched the darkness to find others of this bent really needed and wanted to be there. 

3/12/2015 9:47:45 AM
my preference is for mature women, not girls, thus I will not be getting rid of a slave for a younger slave. That said, the down side is that as time goes by, I will continually push you further and further. Not being young and new, your allure will continually be in your willingness to please, ever taking greater amounts of humiliation, degradation use and abuse to satisfy my desires. Any relationship, if it falls into a routine, becomes boring. The idea is not to fall into a routine. Thus, you will become my "yes" girl, gratefully accepting whatever I choose for you.

I seek to own a slave as property, pure and simple. Not just physically, but mentally, too. It is towards that end that I will constantly question you, often asking about the same things in different ways. Initially, to understand both your experience and your thinking and later to take control of your mind such that you are trained to think according to my dictates and desires. It is my intention that you will become a totally open book, that even your most private thoughts are open to me. Thus my use of you will be complete and you will not even be allowed the luxury of retreating into private thoughts, as you will be trained to surrender even those.

It is not an easy life nor is it a surrender most women are capable of. It will take a lot of work from both of us and will require more from you than you have ever given before. The reward, however, is the true freedom of real slavery. 

If what I have outlined interests and appeals to you then I am interested opening a dialogue about owning you. I will not ask if you choose to become mine, nor will I offer to tailor what I want and demand to suit your concerns, as those are not choices for you to make. The only choice that is yours is to decline and walk away.

1/13/2015 11:24:38 AM
Why do so many " slaves' " profiles sound like they think they are the ones in control? What they will do, what they will not do, what they expect and demand!!??

Were it not so pathetic it would be funny. (In the realm of "I own my slave and she gives me permission to say so..." !!!??)

I read one today that began (before informing the world of her concept of slavery) "I am not what you would usually consider a slave". Maybe I just led a very sheltered life of dominance, but I thought the whole idea of slavery was that the slave would be (or at least become) EXACTLY what I considered a slave to be. Silly me, next I'll begin expecting her to obey me and do as I tell her merely because "I said so" Quelle horreur!

Vertical Line

Horizontal Line
Horizontal Line
lifesparadox
 
 Age: 26
 Greenville, North Carolina