Collarspace.com

Demspotis

Demspotis - photo 1
Demspotis - photo 2
Demspotis - photo 4

Friends:
lilpuresubNotSoSimpleMisSalomeWarriorKittenLilMissMisery
SubsDesiresjesuilkittenlucysweetsub1985xLaceAndLeatherx
pikichanD
"Dominance Oblige": the responsibilities of a dominant towards submissives; to me this includes an obligation to guide the submissive (or anyone who submits themselves to my dominance or authority in any capacity) towards their blossoming into the highest potentials of their nature, pysche, status, and will. I also apply this (as far as is appropriate) to submissive friends who don't have a formal relationship with me.

Dominance oblige also includes the needs to: respect any negotiated and agreed-upon limits; (IF it is among the sub/slave's needs; otherwise not) provide TLC and nurturing; discipline (of course!); protect. Dominance oblige is an ideal of a good dom/me. It's both pragmatic and idealistic, because a happy and fulfilled sub or slave is probably going to be more pleasing and provide superior service.



My mode of dominance and my interests are fairly flexible, so if you're a submissive female in need of any of the following types of domination or guidance, it may be worth your while to contact me. To help, I'll give you a brief definition of what they mean to me.

Master - owner of a slave or pet, or sometimes Dominant of a submissive, usually a sexual relationship.... Disciplinarian - Dominant specializing in guidance of a submissive person, with authority to mete out punishment, may be platonic or sexual ... Mentor - Includes mentoring in the "vanilla" sense, but expanded to include guidance, advice, and perhaps training in bdsm matters ... Daddy - Like Mentor, but with a paternal feeling and greater closeness and intimacy, may or may not include age play of some sort ... Tutor - teaching of any kind of learning, with corporal and other discipline as a learning aid and motivation OR like a mentor, but a little less close ... Friend-with-a-firm-hand, who can be both strict and tender as needed - a more casual type of relationship with spanking or other bdsm elements added ... Dominant lover - does it need an explanation?

In all of the above, details, rules and conditions are usually negotiable.

I'm an intense and intelligent musician, writer, and philosopher (among other things), looking for slave-girls, pets, and submissive and/or spankable friends. Also ISO girls to dance while I make music, for our mutual enjoyment. My music is mainly "world"/folkish (while often innovative, much more traditional than New-Agey styles). Would also consider playing to accompany the dancing of other men's girls (dancing mainly for their man's pleasure). Also would be happy to meet up with with other compatible musicians, of course, vanilla-wise or otherwise. :)

At this point, I am looking for friends first, which may develop into closer relationships, but my friends can (unless I happen to be in a mono-amorous relationship) ask me for discipline, training, consolation, orgasm, or other intimate attention. These are "fringe benefits", which female friends are welcome to ask for, and those who wish can also offer their "benefits" to me; but it is NOT a requirement for friends to either ask for or offer any "benefits". While I'm largely inclined to want a friendship to develop before getting more intimate, exceptions might be made under the right circumstances.

I'm also happy to hear from dom/mes and others on a friendly basis, for discussion and conversation.

My ethnicity is a mixed Euro- and Native-American background. All ethnic backgrounds are welcome. I have a preference for red hair and green eyes, but I appreciate and enjoy a very wide range of types of beauty, from all ethnic groups. Also particularly interested in contacting or meeting women from steppe cultures, especially if loyal to their traditional (pre-Abrahamic) religions. Another "want" of mine is submissive "Amazon" (female warrior, martial-artist, etc.) types. I am very old-fashioned in many ways (this DOESN'T mean "Victorian"...), and if you only know modern culture, you will have some learning and adjusting to do. I'm not "Gorean" but I am very familiar with that culture and the literature it is based upon, and my old-fashioned ways are mostly Gor-compatible and Gor-friendly.

Have special needs? Can supply things like mentoring or tutoring with (or without) old-fashioned discipline; confession and penance (not sacramentally); discipline-oriented motivation for weight-loss (with positive and negative reinforcements); slave-training; character-reform training, or other things. Need or something else? It won't hurt to ask...

I'm not much into online role-play, but am certainly happy to exchange messages for conversation, and to offer guidance and advice, including to new and potential dom/mes, since I've had requests and questions from fellow dominants. At this point, I might consider working with couples, too.

One of my main "vanilla" "hobbies" is studying languages, so one of the things I can best tutor for is languages, and I'm also interested in writing with people who want practice, or who would like to help me improve. Languages that I'm particularly interested in, and have some familiarity with: French, Japanese, Sanskrit, Hindi, Bengali, Esperanto, Panjabi, and all Celtic languages. But many others also interest me, so feel free to contact me in regard to others as well.

Note: I'm located in the southernmost borough of New York City, Staten Island. At least that's what foreigners call it. ;-) Its real name is Aquehonga. -Put this in your profile if you know someone who has survived or died of cancer-
2/13/2014 8:06:31 PM

Giving credit and thanks where deserved - a very good friend recently found some of her personal info posted maliciously on a profile here, and the CollarMe acted promptly upon notification. Her thanks and mine for exemplary service and concern for safety!

12/28/2009 8:52:07 PM
The newest of my two current pets recently commented that she is not a "mindless doormat", which inspired me to think that it would be a good idea to invent an intelligent doormat: it could detect enemies and friends, and welcome them accordingly. Perhap it could trigger a trapdoor leading to a pit or interrogation room for enemies, while opening the door for friends. :)

For the record, I don't particularly want "mindless doormats" for girls. I suppose I might find a use for such a one, but I prefer girls with minds and spirits. :) And there are better places to keep girls than on doorsteps!
9/29/2009 10:56:00 AM

NOTE: My phone line is in need of repair, so my time online may be minimal or not-at-all for several days.

7/5/2009 9:12:28 PM

On the Boards, someone had compared Gorean philosophy to Scientology, on the grounds that both are connected (though in different ways) to science-fiction authors. The fact is that the Gorean "lifestyle" is not a religion, while Scientology most definitely is. The Gorean "lifestyle" could perhaps really be best described as a culture.

It's worth considering what is Gorean religion, though, since there is a religion mentioned in the Gor books. To the best of my knowledge, however, it is not part of the Gorean lifestyle here on Earth. This is not hard to understand: the Gorean religion in the books deifies the alien species (called "Priest-Kings") that has many times brought specimens of humans (and many other species) from Earth to Gor. Most people on Gor don't know what the Priest-Kings actually are, and never have any contact with them.

This religion is administered by a caste called "Initiates", which seem to be based on a mixture of philosophical schools and priesthoods of the classical world. A very few even of them are said to be aware of what the Priest-Kings are, and they keep it a secret, on the grounds that the people at large are entirely unready to deal it. It's important to note that Initiates only rarely figure in any important way in any of the books; by and large, that religion is just part of the background context.

The thread in which I saw the comparison with Scientology was mainly asking about Gorean philosophy, what it is, and if and how it could be validated. Not too surprisingly, most non-Goreans see the male-dominance and slavery as the predominant elements in Gorean thought/philosophy. That's not what Goreans would place in the forefront of their thought.

As judged from the books, the really important things to Goreans are their values, including among others such things as honor, caste duty, and a range of loyalties, such as to caste, family, friends, comrades and city.

The last mentioned object of loyalty brings us to what is probably the cornerstone of Gorean thought: the Home Stone. The Home Stone is the object and symbol of a free Gorean's political identity and loyalty. Each city has a Home Stone, usually a simple rock taken from the soil upon which a city or a home is founded. People who live outside the cities of Gor, such as the peasants, very often have a home stone of their own, one to each home, each free household.

But let us go a little deeper... what is the word in the Gorean language for a Home Stone? It is: "Gor"! In other words, it may be said that their planet is itself a Home Stone for all of them. Or perhaps it may be seen in the opposite way: the Home-Stone is their own piece of their world.

Ah, but back to Gorean thought or philosophy. In reality... errr, that is to say, in the literary creation of the Gor series... Gor is an entire planet, with many cultures... in addition to its mainstream culture. The mainstream culture is itself comprised of many different independent city-states, with their own cultural variations. So, the fact is that it makes no more sense to speak of one single "Gorean philosophy" than it would to speak of one single "Earthling philosophy". In either case, there is no such thing! Neither our real planet, nor the fictional Gor, nor the real sub-culture here that is based upon the culture(s) depicted in the books, is one-dimensional, nor one-philosophical.

7/1/2009 6:26:38 PM

Happy Canada Day to all our Canadian friends!

6/30/2009 10:13:23 PM

I would like any friends who have dropped out of touch for one reason or another to know that they are always welcome to contact me again. :)

Hey, even if for some reason they can expect to be in trouble, how bad could it be? ;-)

6/18/2009 11:57:50 AM

I see a current thread entitled "Why are Big women called 'curvy' ", which has a number of good comments posted.

Maybe the best one... from a language point of view... is one that points out that the OP was mistaken in thinking that the fact that 'curvy' is used by and for some big women does NOT mean that it cannot also apply to slimmer women.

On the other hand... some people have used it, as well as the mostly-synonymous "voluptuous" to refer to bigger women specifically as opposed to slimmer women.

The problem in these cases is an unnecessarily dualism. As the good poster said, "curvy" can apply to both slim and large women. This is the same as with "beautiful".

For a bit of fairness, I will point out an analogy among us men: it is possible for a man to be muscular (usually considered attractive in itself) but still have an unattractive face, at least to some people (tastes in faces being very subjective).

So, what actually is "curvy" and "voluptuous"? As I understand it, these words mean that the women had a defined traditionally feminine figure, with wide breasts and hips, and a visible waist. It's often easier to see a woman's shape more clearly from the back, because belly fat can hide a waist from the front.

Or, in a slightly less rigorous definition, curvy can simply mean that the woman has a noticeably "feminine" shape (no matter how big or small overall; this is as opposed to a woman whose figure is not so pronounced. This can happen either when a woman is too slim, or too large.

It's well worth noting that it is body fat that makes the curves for the most part. The hips do also depend on the width of the pelvic bone, but a bit of fat is usually part of it. So, a woman is usually more shapely... and more healthy and fertile, with a nicely balanced amount of fat on her body... not too much, and not too little.

9/1/2008 6:38:59 PM

For those in NYC who might be looking for Gor books early in the series, the used book store (is it East Village Books?, I'm drawing a blank, and can't find the business card right now...)on St. Marks Place, half a block west of Tompkins Square Park had somewhere near 10 as of Saturday.

8/25/2008 9:22:33 AM

Sudden thought: I'm very curious what people have in mind when they list "mathematics" as a hard limit on their profiles. We all use math every day in life, after all. And let's not forget that everything a computer does is really math, and a computer program is really a very complex formula for binary mathematics. What we see on the screen? No matter what it is... it's a big, tricky GRAPH!

But, OK, I'm still wondering what is it that people, especially subs, are afraid of, that makes math a "hard limit". Are they afraid that a dom is going to make them kneel while he or she lectures you about integral calculus? Or that they might be punished by being made to solve problems? Or maybe be forced to recite pi, and get a thwack for every mistake?

I am genuinely curious what people have in mind, and would be happy from anyone who cares to share their thoughts on why they make math a hard limit?

Oh, and for the record, while I don't hate math, I also am not a mathematician, and couldn't, for example, lecture you on integral calculus if I wanted to. :)

6/22/2008 8:59:57 PM
FOREPLAY - Foreplay is a most important part of sex, and fun, too. What it means is all the touches and caresses and other ways to stimulate that we can do before we put a certain something in certain places. While a slave, maybe even a submissive, might at times be "used" perfunctorily, without foreplay, it's USUALLY a very good idea for a woman to be prepared for sex with lots of foreplay.

Why? There are some profound differences in sexual arousal and orgasm, between men and women. Men are usually ready for sex as long as they have an erection, which in many cases happens without any foreplay.

Women, on the other hand, often need foreplay to get to a state of arousal in which their bodies are really ready. Women have several stages of arousal. There are websites with good, detailed descriptions of the stages, and I suggest searching for one of them. If a woman is penetrated before reaching the right stage, it can be uncomfortable for her, and will certainly be less than ideal in any case. And much better, if you do things at the right stage.

Women are also capable of having strings of orgasms. This means that we can use this simple rule of thumb about when to penetrate, especially if we are not familiar with the stages of arousal: Give her at least one orgasm from foreplay alone before starting sexual intercourse proper. (And girls, if your man is going by this rule, DON'T FAKE! For that matter, don't fake at all - your man can't learn what works for you if you pretend it's working.) This rule of thumb is also helpful for anal penetration, because she will be more relaxed and open after an orgasm.

Is there some fellow dominant out there wondering why he should go to this "trouble"? I can think of two reasons at the moment: 1) It's fun, and masterful, to bring your girl to increasing levels of arousal, and right through orgasm(s). and 2) It will make the sex better for you, the more she enjoys it. And vice versa. A "precious cycle"... so much nicer than a vicious cycle. :-D
6/3/2008 6:20:42 PM
Wait... "dom" DOESN'T refer to world domination!?!!? Well, speak for yourself! Heheheh... or should that be Mwahahahah!
2/13/2008 6:22:40 PM
CURTIS SLIWA PUBLICLY PADDLED -

Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa received several whacks on the backside with a wooden spoon at a community center meeting on Staten Island, a borough (one of the five main divisions) of New York City, along with a mouthful of soap. This was an act of contrition (supposedly humorous), observed by Staten Island politicians, for having made an on-air joke about the supposed number of organized crime figures living on Staten Island.
1/30/2008 9:34:39 PM
And now for something completely vanilla!

Last week I was walking around midtown Manhattan, when I got a coffee craving, so I walked into the next deli I passed. This happened to be the Hello Deli which is often featured on the David Letterman show, and who was at the counter but Mr. Rupert G.

So... now I can attest that Rupert G. makes good coffee! Much better than Starbucks, and much cheaper. :)
10/19/2007 6:22:52 PM
My two-cents on whether it is possible to be an "unowned slave"...  

It might be reasonable to say that in a legalistic sense, it is not possible to be a slave without an owner, since the normal and normative definition of a slave is an owned human. However, especially (but not exclusively) in Gorean contexts, there is a concept of slave as a type of person; and certain situations when a slave might not be owned by someone, in which case she (or he) is claimable by any free person. Unfortunately, I have heard of this principle being abused by some online Goreans who act as if any unowned woman is claimable.  I think I recall (but would have to research and check) cases in the Gor books wherein a girl is asked if she is free or slave, or even just "Who are you?" and answers that she is a slave. The girl in question has neither submitted to anyone nor been claimed by anyone, but has declared herself slave. I would call this, as others do, a "stray". I would have to say that it is at best a gray area. (In the books, they are not left unclaimed for long, of course.) And it is, and should be, a rare thing, under special circumstances alone.

I would caution people not to try to enforce that principle, except in places where it is the recognized rule. For example, if a CM member describes herself (or himself) as "slave" while looking for an owner on this site, it should not be assumed that anyone who wants can just claim that person. Rather, it is often meant as a label to show that that is the kind of relationship they want to have.

There is a point of view (among some Earth people; I'm not sure about Goreans on this point) that in order to be consider truly Free, one has to be in good standing in society, with membership in a caste or a tribe, or citizenship in a legitimate City-State or other legitimate state. (The legitimacy of states can be a controversial point, so that the Freedom of large numbers of people is disagreed upon...) That perspective leaves a sizeable class of people who are neither Free nor slave; some might call them strays. But that is probably an extreme culture clash at work. :) 



  
10/19/2007 2:44:11 PM

The Gor novels are science-fiction, NOT fantasy, and I would further classify them (with the possible exception of the earliest several in the series) as similar in principle to the novels of Friedrich Nietzsche or Ayn Rand in that they are meant to express and propagate a philosophy and worldview.

I think that some people confuse them with fantasy because the characters fight with swords or other non-firearms. The reason that there are no firearms among Gor's humans is that there are aliens on Gor who destroy any such weapons with lasers from a satellite... and THAT shows that it is sci-fi. :) Furthermore, there is no sorcery, so the series is not "swords-and-sorcery", the usual definition of fantasy novels. And on the other hand, though many may not realize it, swords or other blade weapons are still in common use in combat in the modern world. Even here in NYC, there have been cases where on one hand, people have been murdered with swords, and on the other, an occasional burglar or other criminal has been fought off with a sword.

In a thread in the Gorean Lifestyles message board, I recently saw a remarkable assertion that people get to Gor (in the books) through some sort of "transdimensional gateway".
Sorry, NOPE! The books leave no doubt that the usual mode of transportation is space ships. (Again, Scifi.) This isn't always clear to the imported goods, though, because they are usually fully sedated before and during transit; this fact is explicit in many of the books. 

For those who don't know, Gor is described as a planet in the same orbit as Earth, but on the opposite side of the Sun. It is said to have been moved there from the dominant species of the planet, who are insect-like, and so long-lived (due to their scientific abilities) that they are practically immortal from the human perspective. Make that the Earthling perspective, because the Gorean humans have a technology, "stabilization serum", which prevents aging in most individuals. The humans, along with some other species are on Gor because those aliens (the Sardar or "Priest-kings") have brought them there at various times throughout the ages as biological specimens, and let some of them free and wild, only interfering to prevent the development of firearms or other technologies that would pose a threat to the Priest-Kings. 

There is another sentient alien species, "Kurii", huge carnivores who may be seen as vaguely bear-like, who are trying to conquer the solar system. The background to the Gor series includes the war between the Priest-Kings and the Kurii. Both Kurii and Priest-Kings usually see humans as a much lower species than themselves, but whereas the Priest-Kings are either benevolent or at least non-interfering for the most part, the Kurii think humans are a nice snack, when they're not otherwise useful.

Keep in mind, dear Reader, that most of the scifi elements are probably not especially important for the lifestyle... unless of course, the books are true, and there IS a war for the solar system raging unseen around us. ;-)


7/30/2007 11:16:13 AM
An open message to "newbies", and everyone else: please do not meet privately with anyone until you know them and they have earned your trust. First meetings should always be in a public place; and the same for any subsequent meetings until you are ready to take the risk. Even so, there is always some risk of things turning ugly, even in a long-time relationship.  
A reason for doing this is that if you get a sense of danger or of something not being right, you can leave relatively safely.

In fact, you might even be wrong about the person. But if you have a feeling of danger, it is much better to be safe. Any dominant who is not out to harm you will understand; and you can always try again later if you decide you might have been wrong. But if you ignore a feeling of danger, and perhaps go off privately with someone, you could end up assaulted, abused, or worse. So, please stay careful.
7/19/2007 9:11:02 PM
I'm intrigued and a bit amused to notice this mini-trend in my life: I appear to be attracting women who are former- or otherwise-dommes who now wish to experience the submissive side of the equation at my hands. My long-distance pet, for one, is also currently looking to gather a small herd of her own pets, mostly girls. She has said that I'm the only man who has inspired in her the desire to kneel and serve. And a new friend from this site, with whom there is a mutual hope of my teaching her submission after we've gotten to know each other better, has hitherto been dominant. At other times, other dommes have said things along the lines that if they were to submit it would be to someone like me. Most interesting... heheheh {walks off, jauntily brandishing a quirt}  
6/20/2007 10:23:39 PM
IMPORTANT UPDATE:

I have recently acquired a lovely, wonderful pet. {happy} It is an open and long-distance relationship; I remain available to those prepared to share my attention.

A nice little success story it is: she and I met here on CM about a year ago, perhaps a few months less, and have been talking regularly ever since then. Early last week, she said that I was the only man she had found that she sincerely wanted to kneel to, and so, she then asked me to take her as my pet, and of course I did.
5/9/2007 8:42:08 AM
On Mentoring

I've been told recently that "mentoring" has gained a very bad reputation in some circles, because of some who have called themselves Mentors, and then have abused the concept and their supposed protegees.

My perspective on this is that if it is not a positive and beneficial relationship, then it is not mentoring at all. A so-called Mentor who is harmful to a protegee is only a false mentor, maybe even an "Antimentor". :)

A good Mentor nurtures, advises, guides and helps his or her protegee, and tries to encourage her or him to improve; preferably in all ways, though in a bdsm context, it might or might not be specialized towards bdsm matters. 

Some complaints about Mentoring, from what I have heard, have to do with some Mentors filtering contacts for newbies, and abusing this responsibility to prevent even good prospects from having a chance. Personally, I am not particularly interested in filtering contacts; I might do it if specifically asked to, but to me it would make more sense for a protegee who was "in the market" (the only person I Mentor, which is in "Daddy"-mode, currently is in a relationship, so filtering prospects not an issue for us at all) to ask me to check out those whom she found of interest.

To conclude, as I see it, genuine Mentoring is by nature a positive relationship with nurturing and guidance for a protegee, with a high degree of trust and affection.

Questions, thoughts or insights may be taken in account in future edits of this post.
5/8/2007 8:21:47 PM

Thoughts on Beauty

1) Something from one of Robert Heinlein's novels ("The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress") comes to mind, which goes something like,"There are no homely women, but some are more beautiful than others."

2) I've read some "minority" women complain about beauty standards being defined by the "majority" populace. Doubtless true to some extent, but then again, very often only some of the majority fall into the fashionable mode of beauty as it is at any particular time.

I say that people should not let others dictate to them, especially some fashion or beauty "industry", what is or is not beautiful. For myself, as I've written on other occasions, I know that some movie stars that are conventionally considered beautiful are funny looking to me. And many women who are considered by some to be "plain" are very cute or beautiful to me... very attractive in any case. :)

3) And my final thought for today: I had an interesting experience this afternoon that may shed some insight into standards of beauty and their adaptability. I was walking around Chinatown here in NYC, and after a couple of hours of seeing mostly Asian people, suddenly I saw a blonde white woman nearby. My first impression at that moment was that she looked very strange. A second later, my mind adjusted itself, and I realized that she was a beautiful woman by the standards of white people... but I had become used to the beauty of Chinese and other Asian women just while walking around this afternoon. Later on I walked uptown for about thirty blocks, and amused myself by looking for different kinds of beauty from different ethnic groups. Doing this kept in my mind one of my standard thoughts: that the beauty of members of any ethnic group has to be judged on its own qualities, and in fact, every individual woman should be seen on her own.  It is certainly unfair to judge someone by standards of beauty derived from a group that does not look like that person. In the end, we go back to Mr. Heinlein's observation... the basic idea is: women are beautiful! :)

4/5/2007 5:54:39 PM
Just a thought about my style of dominance for the benefit of my interested readers. In most circumstances, I do not want to have to bark out orders constantly: it's best when my submissive knows what to do without being directed at every step. Of course, in training, a lot of instruction may be needed, but a result of good training should be that orders should  not be needed all that often. This is in fact good leadership technique in all contexts. So, once a girl has had enough  time to get to know me and my likes and dislikes, she should be able to take initiative and to anticipate my desires. Another point in my style is that I normally give "aftercare" after a punishment: reassurances of affection, cuddles, etc. Rest assured, however, that when I see the need to discipline, I do so as sternly (or not) as I consider appropriate for the infraction.
3/7/2007 10:08:06 PM
I want to give some encouragement, and due respect, to the dom/mes and subs and others here who are in legal-age teens and early twenties.  Some people bother those younger people  as somehow "too young". First of all, I remember that I was not too young at that age: I knew  quite well my nature in that side of life. I have no reason to doubt that this is just as true for the people who are that age now. Secondly, if someone is old enough to be on this site, vote in political elections in most nations that have elections, drive an automobile, and join a military force to kill or be killed, then who can say that they are somehow too young to know that  they are dominant or submissive and live and love accordingly? That being said, there is something to be said, in many cases, for seeking advice and mentoring from people who have more experience and/or acquired wisdom. In short, I  say to our younger brothers and sisters, if you are sure of what you want, then be proud and firm and don't listen if someone tries to belittle you for your  youth. If you  are NOT sure, though, you should be very careful, and definitely avoid rushing into any "play".  Best wishes to all!
2/13/2007 11:18:59 AM
For some reason, for several months, I've been unable to access this site: instead of loading up, the page just stayed blank. Yesterday night, the problem, whatever it was, disappeared as mysteriously as it had appeared, so here I am again. :)

Looking forward to hearing again from my friends, and of course from interested (or just friendly) women and girls!
10/26/2006 9:51:42 PM
My birthday is coming up next week, on the Celtic New Year. Anyone want to usher in the new year by receiving a good-old fashioned fertility-rite spanking?

Ah, well, I can't really suggest it: the people I am currently talking to are either: platonic only, not available, far away, or new enough contacts that it would be reckless of them to put themselves in that position just yet (and unethical of me to allow them to be so reckless).

Seriously, I want to wish all a happy, auspicious and safe Samhain! May the new (Celtic) year bring you blessings and joy and prosperity.
10/24/2006 11:21:03 AM

LATIN LESSON - Yippee!


I decided to look up all the "dom-" words in my Latin dictionary today, and here are what I found. They'll be interesting and maybe useful.

domabilis - tameable;
domina - mistress of a house, lady, sweetheart (ie, vanilla "mistress"), queen, ruler, controller;
dominatio - irresponsible power, despotism, arbitrary government;
dominantes - absolute rulers;
dominator - ruler, governor;
dominatrix - despotic mistress;
dominatus - absolute power, rule;
dominium - rule, power;
dominor - to rule, to be lord or master, to    domineer;
dominus - lord, master, head of a house, owner, possessor;
domito - to tame, subdue;
domitor - tamer, conqueror, victor;
domitrix - [feminine of domitor];
domitus - taming;
domo (domare) - to tame

9/28/2006 9:24:37 AM

FANS OF THE GOR BOOKS TAKE NOTE -

The current issue (October 2006) of the Smithsonian magazine has a good article about Iraq's "Marsh Arabs". These people are the real world models for the Rencer people who inhabit the great delta marsh that surrounds Port Kar. Saddam Hussein tried to destroy them, their way of life and their ecology, which should be accounted among the greatest of his crimes. The article explains their history and gives an overview of their society and culture, and especially talks about the efforts being made to restore their great marsh, and their way of life, as well as the desire of many of them to modernize.

The author, John Norman, based most of the Gorean cultures and subcultures on real-world historical peoples, suitably adapted to the peculiar animal life of Gor and the various other peculiarities of that world. He does a very good job of describing the culture of his various peoples and their traditions. Some negative qualities in his work have been pointed out by critics, but this aspect of his work is a very glowing positive. Readers who are not familiar with traditional ways of life have little way to know that.

Anyway, Goreans on Earth should take note of the situation of these Marsh Arabs. Some people may even have means and opportunity to help, whether for sentimental or ecological reasons. Aside from the nebulous Gorean connection, consider that that Marsh at the delta of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers has been continuously occupied since and maybe before the dawn of civilization. Except for the period when Hussein drained the Marshes. Almost immediately after his ouster, the people began to restore the Marshes, but still much work remains to be done, and damage to be repaired. Sadly, the Marsh also remains at risk from other sources, especially the increasing drawing off of water from the Rivers, including and especially in their northern reaches, in Turkey. This disrupts the Marsh ecosystem as well.

7/20/2006 10:30:38 AM
I have a couple of different things to talk about this time.

Since I've been talking to the old friend I found here, as mentioned in a previous entry, I find myself much less interested in talking to anyone new. Actually, I remain very much interested in talking to people, especially girls, as friends or in a mentoring capacity; and in the same vein remain available for mentoring, tutoring, and some forms of discipline. In truth, too, my conversations with her have not produced any commitments... but it is she who has my main attraction and interest for now.

My other topic is the difference between dominance & discipline on one hand, and abuse on the other. Sadly, there are abusers who think they are being properly dominant. I call attention to the principle of dominance oblige as mentioned in my profile text. This principle is one of the main things to make a difference. There are middle grounds, of course, so don't read a stark duality into my comments.

A good person understands that there are ethical obligations going both ways in any kind of relationship; the good dominant, like the good noble, or good employer, knows that he (or she) has obligations to the wellbeing of those who accept dependence on them, just as the submissive, subject or employee owes good and honest service upwards. The good leader of any of these types uses a wide variety of means to exercise that leadership.

The bad leader, including the abusive pseudo-dominant often relies mainly on one means alone: terror. This means direct terror, through violence or threat of it; or indirect terror through creating irrational fears of anything but the status quo created by the bad leader.

The bad leader is often misled himself, and does not understand that their techniques usually lead to disaster for their dependents and for themselves, and they rarely see it coming.

In that regard, the good leader (or good person in general) does not have that all-powerful self-certainty, but instead tries to improve himself, and to continually look for the best way. He has and gains confidence through actually learning what works well; the bad leader, the abuser, the tyrant, imagines that he has all the answers and regards any doubt or question as a personal attack, and responds accordingly... with terror and/or violence.

Abusers... they often believe that they love their victim, and tyrants may love their subjects, but by not being aware of their own imperfection and the consequences of their actions, they damage and even destroy. The good dominant and other leaders try to nurture, and try to avoid needless damage.

A message then to all dominants, take some time to look at yourself, and at your submissive(s), and see whether what you say and do is good for both of you, inspiring your sub to which to please you happily, or whether it simply terrorizes your sub(s) into cowering and obeying.
6/8/2006 11:54:57 AM
This is based partly on a recent conversation, with some additional and more recent thoughts.

Because my profile and journals explain that girls who want an intimate relationship with me need to ask for it, the potential problem came up that many girls feel strongly about avoiding appearing "forward", and that submissives can see forwardness as unsubmissive behavior.

Certainly among many vanilla people (but not all), forwardness in ladies is not much appreciated, and in fact may be condemned as "slutty". I see no reason for that to be a concern for submissives and particularly slaves. If the dominant wants the sub to express her desires or make requests, then it is, in that context, very definitely submissive to obey his wishes. And if the dominant actually wants forwardness, is it not the submissive's duty to behave accordingly, regardless of her previous habits?

What is or isn't inappropriate behavior in a sub or slave is primarily up to the dominant. Styles of dominance can range from not permitting a slave to move from a full obeisance position without orders, to expecting a slave (at least after being trained) to know what to do under normal circumstances and take the initiative to fulfill the dominant's desires with a minimum of orders. Many dominants, but particular those more like the latter style, like to know the thoughts and desires of the slave, and therefore want to be told. This does not mean that the slave's desires will necessarily be granted, of course. That being so, knowledge of the sub's desires increases the dominant's power over the sub, thus it's definitely submissive to confess desires, if that is what the dominant wants.

Beyond simply expressing desires, what about making requests? Asking for something from a dominant is not inherently unsubmissive or "forward". Actually it's not hard to make almost any request unmistakeably submissive by being suitably polite. A foolproof way is to begin with the words "I beg...". For example, if a sub asks, "I beg you to do with me as you please," there is nothing remotely unsubmissive about it, and it's not forward either, because she is not actually asking for anything, but is simply making her consent and availability clear. She could also start requests with "if it pleases you", which nicely and clearly submits the sub's will to the dom/me's.

If a sub feels strongly uncomfortable about seeming or being forward, of course, there are more subtle ways in which she can signal her desires. These signals can be arranged in advance, so that there is ambiguity or misunderstanding, yet the subtlety can help a, shall we say, "shy" submissive to be more comfortable with making the request or signalling desires. Let us suppose a girl has decided that she wants to be owned by a certain person, but is mortified at the thought of outwardly asking to be collared. One clear way of expressing the desire more subtly is to silently hand a collar to him or her, preferably in a suitable position. Even more subtly, presuming they are in a private place, she could simply leave the collar in view, which shows what she wants or consents to, without asking directly at all.

Best wishes to all,
~Demspotis
6/4/2006 10:36:21 AM
I suspect that - as has sometimes happened in the past - not all of my messages (in either direction) are getting through the system here. I'm not sure about it, though...

In any case, I feel like expanding on my previous journal entry; and some of what I say may cover some holes in communication from lost mails. One of the things I hoped for when I joined this site many moons ago was that I might find friends that I had lost touch with. The friend I mentioned last time is my first success here in that particular hope, which is one reason that I'm particularly happy about it. Another, the one I already mentioned, is that it was a very welcome thing to come back to after a few months when I wasn't able to come to the site. 

When we were in school together, we weren't as close as I would have liked, but we got along, and hung out in school, and at least a little bit outside. There are a lot of people that I went to school with that I mostly forgot, but this girl is one of those that I regretted losing touch with, and kept in mind from time to time over the years. 

It's not my way to call someone a friend unless I mean it, and care about them; and even if I lose touch with them, I don't forget them. And I'm always happy to find them again. 

Of course, all this is even better if the friend in question is an attractive woman, and a submissive attractive woman is better yet. I'm still talking on the platonic level here, mind you. :) I very much value my platonic friendships with all kinds of people. A distinct advantage to platonic friendships in this "community" is that we can share many concerns that others are not equipped to understand.

But with compatible friends, there also can be  the potential for more intimate kinds of fun and relationships. Since I'm currently unattached, friends can safely assume that I'm open to discussing such potentials. :)

6/1/2006 3:16:26 PM
Until yesterday, I'd been away from the site for a few months because of some technical problems, but as soon as I logged in on coming back I saw an old friend, a cute, petite girl no less,  from my high school years had signed up on the site about a month ago, so Collarme has enabled us to reconnect. Thanks, Collarme! That's a great welcome-back gift. :)
2/11/2006 7:46:03 PM
I was thinking today about some of the ways that even basic terms and concepts in BDSM are sometimes understood very differently by different people, including "authoritative" sources. I'll talk about two examples that come to mind.

"Daddy" (or "Daddy Dom") - To many, this term implies "age play", role-playing in which the submissive partner takes on the role of a younger person, usually either an adolescent or a child. To many others, it simply means a nurturing style of dominance, whether or not any pretense of age is there. (I generally prefer to use this style, though am by no means bound to it.)

Next, in regard to safe-words (agreed upon verbal signals that the submissive can use to let the dominant know that something is wrong, and she needs him to stop whatever it is that they are doing), I have seen contradictory assertions about the word "mercy". Some sources say that it is the most popular safe-word, but others say that many people like to role-play begging for mercy, so that it is not a good safe-word. The latter kind of sources tend to suggest using safe-words that are completely out-of-context for a scene. That way, the submissive or bottom can act out begging for mercy, etc., without restraint, but if their limits are reached, they will have a safe-word to use that will stand out from the scene. My own conclusion? It is up to the participants to decide what suits them for a safe-word, and the only thing that really matters is that it is clearly understood as such, and is respected if used.

In a different matter of language, I'm continually surprised to see people make a particular mistake: they refer to dominants as "dominates". Here's the truth: in this language, "dominant" is the noun or adjective indicating someone who is dominating. The verb is "to dominate". Grammatically, the kind of word that ends in -ant is a "present participle". The word "dominant" and that ending both come to English from Latin. English also has its own present participle ending, which is "-ing". So, dominant = dominating. There is a participle ending -ate, too, but it is the PAST tense, and is also used passively. This word is NOT used much in English, but the past participle form of "to dominate" is "dominate", and that means the same as "dominated", so it refers to the SUBMISSIVE. Though they are spelled alike, they should be pronounced differently. The verb is "to dom-in-ate" with stress on the first syllable, and a smaller stress on the last. The past/passive participle sounds more like "dom-in-it" with stress only on the first syllable. 

To summarize, the nouns (and adjectives) dominant (Latin dominans) and dominate (Latin dominatus/-a ) are a pair, and each means respectively dominating and dominated, or master and submissive. 

If any girl of mine makes the mistake of calling me her "dominate", she will have to learn the hard way what it means to be, and who is, the dominate. :)   
12/24/2005 11:59:23 AM

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT FOR  GIRLS, FROM THE NORTH POLE CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT

As usual, Santa will continue rewarding good behavior with presents. However, due to the rising fuel costs this winter, Santa has issued an Executive Order mandating that naughty subs, slaves, switches and maybe even dommes, shall be given spankings instead of the traditional lumps of coal.

Because his belt, though wide and supple, is not magical, he hereby deputizes Doms and Masters as his Helpers to deliver these Holiday Spankings to naughty girls, according to the procedures to be set out below.

These rules apply to all regardless of creed. Girls may collect their Holiday Discipline at any time throughout the Holiday season. After that time, there shall be a fine of an automatic 10-percent addition to the number of spanks.

Girls who have their own Doms or Masters shall go to them for their Holiday Discipline. Girls who do not shall approach a trustworthy local Dom or Master as a Helper to fulfill Santa's Executive Order.

The standard procedure shall be as follows:

-The girl shall remove her clothing as a symbol of her penitence, openness and honesty.

-She shall sit on the Helper's lap and confess her naughtiness, in summary or in detail as the situation may warrant.

-She shall then politely ask, or else beg, for suitable punishment, so that Santa will forgive her.

-The Helper will ask her what punishment she feels that she deserves. She must request at least the minimum standard discipline, as detailed below, and may request a more severe level of spanking, as well as optional additional disciplines. She must docilely and gracefully submit to the punishment. (Becoming uncooperative shall result in additional punishment, up to a complete repeat of the original.)

-She shall thank the Helper, and he shall in turn give her Santa's forgiveness and assure her that she is now a Good Girl again, and admonish her to try very hard to stay that way.

- The standard minimum spanking shall comprise at least 12 spanks, to symbolize the traditional 12-day festival. In the case of Jewish girls, the minimum 12 spanks shall instead symbolize the 8-days of Chanukah, plus the four Books of Maccabees. In the case of only minor naughtiness, the spanks may be delivered with the hand, but the standard for any significant naughtiness shall be the use of a belt, to symbolize Santa's belt. If there is no belt available, other implements may substitute, including straps, paddles, canes, crops (quirts), rulers, etc. If no implement is available for a spanking that warrants an implement, a hand-spanking with a doubled number of strokes shall be given. The maximum number of spanks for the Holiday Spanking shall not exceed 144 for the naughtiest, except by special request of the naughty girl. Within these limits, and the necessity to be just fair as the official representative of Santa, the number of strokes and the implement (if any) used is at the discretion of Santa's Helper. Spankings shall be received in Over-the-Knee position, and applied to the buttocks, and optionally a few strokes to the upper thighs.
 
-Additional optional disciplines may be requested by the girl, but shall not be imposed by Santa's Helper without such a request. If in his judgement, such would be beneficial for her, he may try to hint and gently persuade her to make such a request, but if she does not give her willing request and consent, he must not impose anything beyond the spanking. Here is a partial selection of possible additional disciplines: cornertime, speech restriction, clothing restriction, plugging (or other anal discipline), atonement-through-"service", bondage, enema, tickling, use of clamps, being sent to bed without dessert, etc.

-Santa wishes the girls to be freely penitent, so even slave-girls must not be forced or pressured to request additional disciplines that they do not genuinely feel are needed for themselves.

Girls and Helpers may write here with questions or for advice and guidance. Of course, this Helper may be available for appointments for nearby girls. Write with enquiries. 

Happy Holidays from Santa and Mrs. Claus, the North Pole Corrections Department, and the Deputy Helper Team! 

PS - As an old-fashioned man, Santa suggests that it would be beneficial for dommes to take part just like the other girls; and he thinks it would be silly for men to do so. However, Mrs. Claus says that is unfair, and has deputized Dommes and Female Switches to act as her Helpers to punish submissive males appropriately.

PPS- Of course, the writer's legitimacy as one of Santa's Helpers is proven by his small stature and long beard. ;-D

12/4/2005 9:30:04 PM
MAJOR UPDATE - I am now unattached again, and fully available. For the sake of my ex's privacy, I shall remove references to her from this Journal. I would like it be to known that I think well and kindly of her.



10/4/2005 7:09:45 PM
A gentle reminder to those who are or may want to be my girls in some sense: with me, it's important for girls who want something from me to ask for what they want. Dropping hints and waiting for me to ask you is just not going to work very often, so you need to be forward (in a polite way) in expressing your desires. You may or may not get them, of course, but asking gives you a much better chance. :)   
9/16/2005 10:04:59 PM
To (and probably partly for) my amusement, [a former collarme user] entered my screenname in a word association game in the message boards here... in answer to the phrase "sex god". That's very nice to say, but in fact, so far we have only been in contact online; so it's not based on experience. However, being a musician, should I consider "tooting my own horn"?  No, that would be unseemly...  but I will say that I am a Scorpio, and Scorpios usually have at least a bit of sex-deity in them. To me, sex is an art, much like music, but that's not divine, just good humanity. If anyone wants to light incense in front of my picture and pray for orgasms, I can't stop them, but it's not the best way to get that wish fulfilled...     
9/1/2005 10:26:47 PM
A Call for "Amazons"

Yes, I would like to hear from Amazon-like women, in terms of being interested in things like martial arts, archery, etc., and perhaps with a feeling for traditional steppe culture, or else for other traditional cultures (such as Celtic) that had a place for combatant women. Although I'm interested to some extent in talking with (and encouraging) such women with all types of personality and sexuality, I would of course most especially enjoy talking with those who are submissive or slave, and perhaps "switch"-types.

There is an ancient tradition among some peoples for the most intimate honor- and body-guards of high personages to be warrior women, in some cases taken (willingly or not) from the tribes that the Amazon legend is based upon (that is, certain steppe tribes that  were or even still are known to have women among their warriors). There are those today who think this is a custom worthy of reawakening.
 
Any women who find any of this interesting are warmly invited to write to discuss these things, ask questions, etc.  
7/30/2005 12:14:41 PM
I've mentioned before and elsewhere that it's generally necessary for those of my (female) friends who are interested in moving beyond the platonic level to make the first move by telling me of their interest directly, and perhaps even offering themselves, if ready.

However, it has occurred to me that "brats" are a special case. By "brat" I mean that kind of sub that likes to provoke discipline with misbehavior or insolence, either to test limits or because she likes being punished, usually.

Anyway, because "brats" like to provoke, if a girl has identified herself as one, then if she thereafter acts to provoke attention, then it may be equivalent to an invitation to take her in hand. It's still better, however, to speak directly about your interest. 
 
5/28/2005 9:35:33 PM
Over the last few days, I was thinking back over the people I have known in my life, and came to a surprising realization. You see, being quite short for my ethnic group (though normal enough for some), I have both been mostly attracted to very petite girls, and have also assumed that only they would be attracted by me. BUT... what I realized is that actually a lot of girls who have been considerably taller than myself have showed definite signs of interest, and it just never (or almost never) registered in my mind at the time. Now, I regret that my obliviousness very likely hurt the feelings of those girls, many of whom were friends. Although... none of them had the sense to throw themselves at my feet, so how was I to know? ;-) Actually, most of my girls have been quite aggresssive in their submissiveness, so that is the way to get my attention. In any case, now that I become aware of the wider-than-realized range of girls who might be interested in me, I will pay more attention to girls of all heights, and will give a chance to those who are taller than me. (And if by any chance, any of those old friends should read this, please know I was oblivious through my own assumptions, and it did not mean that you were unattractive nor that I disliked you in any way.)
5/20/2005 6:20:05 PM
I have experience doing things the "Gorean" way, and understand it very well from having read most of the books. (Reading them is very important in order to gain a full understanding of what it is and means.)

On the other hand, I do not identify myself with the sub-culture; instead I believe in the preservation and maintenance of real, traditional, cultures, many of which recognize in some way the place of dominance and submission in life and sexuality.

Even so, the generalized Gorean way of slave training is a good, practical system, so it is a good way to do it, and probably any Gorean-trained girl would feel at home under my discipline, because it is applicable to our real-world traditional cultures as much as it is to the fictional and fictionalized transplanted cultures seen in the Gor series. 

5/18/2005 10:52:52 PM
Polyamory?

   Perhaps I could be called a moderate on the issue. Some people sincerely believe that it is possible only to  love one significant other at a time, but others, including me, have the capacity to genuinely love more than one.

   On the other hand, when in a committed relationship with non-polyamorous women, I have felt strongly that it was important to remain "faithful". Actually, back in my school days, I was in a very strong LTR relationship of that sort, but several girls in the school were interested in me, and repeatedly asked me if I was still with "that girl". But one girl actually asked me directly if I would consider cheating on my girl with her, and I felt shocked that someone would ask that question. After all, why would anyone want to be with someone who would say "yes" to such a proposition? Not much security in the resulting relationship!

  I can readily accept either a mono-amorous or a poly-amorous relationship. There are surely advantages to both options. As always, there should be communication and honesty, in either case.  
5/16/2005 10:39:14 PM
Out-of-context Bible verse for the day:
I Thessalonians 4:10: "And, in fact, you are doing it to all of the brothers in all of Macedonia. But we exhort you, brothers, to go on doing it in fuller measure."

Comment: I found this verse quite by chance while looking something up. Ironically enough, the full passage from which it comes is talking about love, but it is brotherly love (philadelphia) rather than sexual love (eros). A section just previous, in the same chapter, warns the brothers (ie Christians) against fornication (sex with someone other than a spouse). But, that verse by itself, because of slang idiom, invokes an image of fornication on a grand scale indeed. :)  

Well, I never!
3/21/2005 3:38:26 PM
I'm pleased with the new friends I've made so far, and hope for many more. :)

As my profile says, I'm currently only interested in getting involved with people who are friends first, so I'd like to hear from submissive and slave girls who would like a dominant friend. Out of them, I will find some who are right and interested for a closer relationships, and perhaps I will find?one special one.?

Friendship means platonic, but my?sub female friends?can ask me?for discipline, training,?or "play" or other?intimate attentions as well as the more usual things?that friends do for one another. This doesn't mean that I "expect" my friends to, just that they can if they?are so inclined, if they are in need. I take friendship seriously, and expect there to be trust and caring?among friends. ?
3/17/2005 9:12:20 PM
After a few days on this site, I'm interested and delighted to say that the profiles I've read impress me with the quality of people here. Granted that I haven't yet had the chance to read but a small percentage of the profiles on the site, but I haven't yet seen even one that wasn't a good profile, expressive of the person's wants and needs and tolerances, and personality. Even if the trend doesn't last, it's still a good sign, and a good testament to all of you. ?

marcia555
 
 Age: 21
 Richardson, Texas